Overview of Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) and Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Chris LeMieux Program Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Advertisements

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Addressing Disproportionality through Technical Assistance: A Case Study of New York Project 405 Team Metropolitan Center for Urban Education New York.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.
Superintendent’s Entry Plan Dr. Lory D. Morrow. Dr. Lory Morrow will begin serving as superintendent of Davidson County Schools on January 1, The.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
DECEMBER 19, 2013 PRESENTATION TO THE TRSD SCHOOL BOARD Timberlane District Action Plans.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
The Statewide System of Support & Regional Roundtables.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
PRINCIPAL READY FALL SOUTHEAST. PRINCIPAL READY: FALL 2015 Welcome Introductions Overview of the Day Service Support Team Overview Service Support.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
1 Stakeholder Engagement State Personnel Development Grantees Directors’ Webinar Beth Moore, Ed.D. June 11, 2015.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Continuous School Improvement & ASSIST ACIP Dr. Melissa Shields, NBCT
AdvancED Accreditation
Teacher-Based Problem-Solving for Groups (TBIT)
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
District Accreditation
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
District and School Planning
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Catoosa County Schools
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
Got Expectations. March 17, 2015 Dr
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
AdvancED/SACS and Strategic Planning Update
Division Liaison Update
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
CCS Consistent & Pervasive Practices Lessons We Are Learning!
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Continuous Improvement/eProve Regional Trainings
District and School Planning
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Parent Discussion Meeting
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region Chris LeMieux
Georgia’s Systems of Continuous Improvement Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Orientation Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
Principal’s Meeting: SCEP Planning Part II
Making Middle Grades Work
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) and Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Chris LeMieux Program Assessment Specialist Metro Region clemieux@doe.k12.ga.us 770-827-6039 Stephanie S. Johnson, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent School and District Effectiveness stjohnson@doe.k12.ga.us 404-651-7277 Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region ansmith@doe.k12.ga.us 229-894-2119 Shawn Keim Program Assessment Specialist North Region skeim@doe.k12.ga.us 704-560-0998

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP)

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) Overview Purpose: To determine areas of focus and support for a district to improve student achievement Goal: Impact student learning by collaborating with a district to improve student achievement

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) Overview Hallmarks: Aligned with 5 systems and 22 structures of GSCI framework. Examines a district’s: -Data -Priority needs -CNA -Root cause analysis -Improvement plan -Improvement goals -Strategic plan -Action steps

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) Overview Hallmarks: Collaborative process between the district and GADOE that outlines target areas, next steps, and support. Examines use of evidence-based interventions and practices Provides detailed information for district on its progress toward full implementation of GSCI

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) Overview Intended Audience: Any district with identified Tier III Comprehensive Support and Improvement schools Any district requesting a review as a Tier I or Tier II intervention, dependent upon GaDOE capacity Process was written so that districts could implement the review independently

Flowchart of the 5 Stages Stage I- Data Analysis This stage collects and analyzes district data. Data reviewed: SLDS CCRPI indicators GMAS Retention Rates College Career Readiness Data Attendance Graduation Rates AdvancED report Surveys of parents, students, staff, school board Superintendent interview Stage II- Determining Priority Data Results of data analysis protocol are prioritized to reflect critical, high priority needs. Stage III- Reviewing and Aligning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Compare identified needs with district identified needs and root causes Flowchart of the 5 Stages Follow up interviews as necessary Requests for additional data as necessary Stage IV- Reviewing and Aligning District Strategic/Improvement Plan(s) Analyze district goals and action steps Done in collaboration with district to have an end product that details how SDE will support district in the implementation of its strategic/ improvement plan(s) Stage V- Determination of Support Collaborative determination of GaDOE support for district goals and action steps

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) Overview Components: Data analysis using new data platform in SLDS Surveys of parents, students, instructional staff, district staff and BOE Interviews with Superintendent and Assistant Superintendents (or district equivalent) Tools and rubrics developed specifically to examine priority needs, root causes, improvement goals and action steps

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) Overview End Result: External perspective on the impact of a district’s processes on student achievement Comprehensive data analysis provided to the district Support for districts in developing and implementing effective improvement plans Plan of support between the CSI district and SDE for district’s improvement work

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) Overview Vetting Process: Every component of the process was vetted by various stakeholders at different stages of the development of the review (superintendents, RESA personnel, GaDOE staff, district staff, principals) Currently being field-tested in various districts of different sizes and needs around the state

Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) Overview Roll Out: Field-testing and revisions continue throughout the fall of 2018 Full implementation and publication of process in January of 2019

Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS)

Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Overview Purpose: To determine the progress of a school’s improvement work as framed within GSCI in order to guide the school’s improvement plan

Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Overview Intended Audience: Any school identified as a Tier III Comprehensive Support and Improvement school Any school requesting a review as a Tier I or II intervention, dependent upon GaDOE capacity Process was written so that schools can implement the review independently

Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Overview Components: Data analysis Surveys of parents, students and instructional staff Interviews with principals, teachers, leadership teams and assistant principals Classroom observations Tools and rubrics developed specifically to examine the impact of a school’s processes that influence student achievement

Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Overview Current Status: GSAPS was revised to align with GSCI in the spring of 2018 GSCI-aligned process has been implemented in 14 schools, with at least 3 more scheduled before the end of the year

Review Processes Overview All guides and tools of the review processes will available on the SDE website soon For any questions, please reach out directly to: Shawn Keim (skeim@doe.k12.ga.us) Chris LeMieux (clemieux@doe.k12.ga.us)

Overview of Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) And Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) January 7, 2019 Chris LeMieux Program Assessment Specialist Metro Region clemieux@doe.k12.ga.us 770-827-6039 Stephanie S. Johnson, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent School and District Effectiveness stjohnson@doe.k12.ga.us 404-651-7277 Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region ansmith@doe.k12.ga.us 229-894-2119 Shawn Keim Program Assessment Specialist North Region skeim@doe.k12.ga.us 704-560-0998