Bonds and Certificates of Obligation in 2019

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Law Offices of Wayne D. Gerhold One Gateway Center, 18 th Floor Pittsburgh, PA (412)
Advertisements

PUBLIC FINANCE FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 92 nd County Judge and Commissioners Annual Conference September 30, 2014 Lubbock, Texas Presented By: Tom Pollan, Partner.
SCHOOL BONDS UNDERSTANIDNG YOUR LOCAL DEBT. TALKING POINTS  Who all is involved?  Understanding how forecasting works  Typical timeline  Other key.
 Pay-as-you-go (cash) or Pay-as you-use (debt)?  Which approach is feasible given project costs, fund balances, debt burden, tax rates?  How will decision.
KINGWOOD UDGET PRESENTATION TOWNSHIP OF KINGWOOD 2012 BUDGET PRESENTATION.
Debt Administration Troy University PA6650- Governmental Budgeting Chapter 15.
Ashland School District No. 5 Presentation on General Obligation Bonds October 5, 2005.
Marketable Securities
92 ND ANNUAL COUNTY JUDGES & COMMISSIONERS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS STATE CONFERENCE-LUBBOCK, TEXAS 9/29/14-10/2/14 Funding County Roads.
Public Finance 201 for Illinois School Districts Illinois Association of School Business Officials Annual Meeting—St. Charles, Illinois May 17,
Real Estate Taxes and Other Liens LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Define the term lien and give examples of the following types of liens: voluntary, involuntary,
June 11, 2015 Updates on Measure P & Measure M Bond Programs.
Issuing Bonds – The Process and the Role of the Registered Municipal Advisor 2013 Michigan Community College Business Officers Association July 25, 2013.
Business Law Chapter 14: Negotiable Instruments, Securities and Secured Transactions.
Govt. Reporting - 1 GOVERNMENTAL REPORTING City Council Budgetary Hearing.
Robert W. Doty American Governmental Financial Services Sacramento Public Finance for Utilities.
1 Riverwood Community Governance Forum March 7, 2011 Cal Teague Riverwood C.D.D. District Manager.
1 Community Facilities District & Redevelopment Overview January 19, 2008.
Legal Framework Analysis for Municipal Financing Brad Johnson President Resource Mobilization Advisors
Financing with Bonds 2007 IASBO ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Regulation of Securities, Corporate Governance, and.
Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission Arbitrage Compliance for Bonds February 3, 2011.
Legal Requirements for School Bonds C.A.S.H. Local Workshop Planning for 2016 Local Bond Success September 22, 2015 and September 29, 2015 Presented by:
Selling Your Bond After Passage Lyn Gruber – Koppel & Gruber Public Finance.
Financial Management – Winter 2005 – 1 February to 3 March The accounting environment The rules of financial accounting:
BOARD MEMBER’S GUIDE TO CAPITAL FACILITY PLANNING OPTIONS FOR A SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
Chapter 15 Investing in Bonds 15-1
Legal Issues Impacting Nonprofit Properties Financed with LIHTCs
© National Core Accounting Publications
The CPA Profession Chapter 2.
Production tax.
Chapter 16: State and Local Government Section 3: Local Government & Citizen Participation (pgs )
ND League of Cities Sept. 17, 2016
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Discussion Topics Election Results Capital Facilities Financing
Fund Accounting Overview
Choosing the Legal Form of Organization
Investing Opportunities
School District Bonds and Citizens' Oversight Committees
Expenditure Limitation/Home Rule Option
Stockholders’ Equity: Paid-In Capital
UNITED ADVISORY PARTNERS.
Texas Military Preparedness Commission
Prepare Tax Documentation for Individuals
Presented by: Deborah Early Icenogle Seaver Pogue, P.C.
Texas Military Preparedness Commission
WGFOA Spring Conference Egg Harbor, WI April 20, 2017
Multifamily Partnership Opportunities Annual Conference of the
Pettus Independent School District
Hot Topics in Single Family Lending Annual Conference of the
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Bonds and Certificates of Obligation: Funding Options for Roads
NAST Webinar SEC Proposed Amendments to Rule 15c2-12 May 5, 2017
Texas Community College District Financing Options and Process
Funding Water Quality Mandates
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
MODULE 8 Financial Statements Lecturer: Peter Moreira, MBA, CGA.
Stockholders’ Equity: Paid-In Capital
Kentucky County Treasurer’s
HFC Public-Private Partnership Basics
Section , Texas Local Government Code (HB 1378)
Jennifer Hassemer | Assistant Commissioner for Debt Management
State Board of Finance Bonding Overview
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Effective Budgeting in County Government
Precincts and Polling Places
FinaNcial LEAdership LISD February 21, 2019
Public School Finance 101 Greg Cartwright, Chief Financial Officer Allen Independent School District 7:45 – 7:55 Tim Carroll (embedded slides)
POST-ISSUANCE COMPLIANCE
Accounting for Construction Projects
Presentation transcript:

Bonds and Certificates of Obligation in 2019 Public Finance for Texas Counties Bonds and Certificates of Obligation in 2019 4.001 Bonds and Certificates of Obligation V.G. Young Institute of County Government School for County Commissioners Courts Tuesday, February 19, 2019 4:15 – 5:05 p.m. Presented By: David Méndez, Partner Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 3711 South Mopac Expressway Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746 P: 512-472-8021 F: 512-320-5638 © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 2016 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Public Finance for Texas Counties OBJECTIVES Overview of the Key Issues Related to Bonds and Certificates of Obligation Describe the Major Structure and Function of Bonds and Certificates of Obligation Outline the Major Components of Using These Legal Sources of Money Legal Framework and Statutory Guidance for Bonds and Certificates of Obligation © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 2016 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

The Key Issues Related to Bonds and Certificates of Obligation © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Bonds are debt instruments of the county Texas has jealously guarded the ability of counties to issue debt supported by an ad valorem tax pledge. Bonds are debt instruments of the county Issued pursuant to authority under Art. III Section 52 (GO) or Art. III Section 9 (Road Bonds) of the Constitution These provisions, and laws enacted pursuant to these provisions, reserve to voters to power to authorize debt. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Voter Approval of Debt Texas Legislature has created mechanisms for this under the Texas Government Code and Local Government Code Generally requires election/voter approval or alternative Require Attorney General review and approval © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Bond Elections Since a major element of bonds is the election requirement, it is important to note that there are strict laws which limit when elections can be held as well as a County’s ability to advocate for or against a bond measure once it is on the ballot. Later in the presentation, we will review in more detail the various types of debt obligations and election requirements that are authorized under the constitution and how they work. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Debt Service Debt service (principal and interest on the bonds)is paid from a specific interest & sinking fund (I&S) levy Each year, the county, along with its M&O levy must establish an I&S tax rate that will fund the debt service reserve I&S tax rate is not factored into the rollback rate for M&O Most bonds supported by unlimited tax pledge © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Federal Legal Implications Federal tax law recognizes the sovereign nature of state and local governments and allows interest on state and local government bonds (municipal bonds) to be eligible for tax exempt treatment Federal securities regulations likewise recognize the special nature of municipal bonds and treat them under special rules © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

IRS Regulations and Arbitrage The interest on a county’s bonds may be eligible for tax exempt treatment if the bonds are issued for governmental purposes, the money is utilized for these projects with reasonable diligence, and the county does not merely invest the bond proceeds to try to engage in arbitrage. Tax exempt bonds means the county can pay lower interest rates to bond holders. Lower interest rates mean lower tax burdens on the County’s taxpayers. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

SEC Disclosure Obligations The County must be transparent to investors in the use of bond proceeds and in the County’s financial condition as it pertains to its pledge(s) to pay the debt service These continuing disclosure obligations persist for the life of the bonds County officials can face serious sanctions if the County violates these rules © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Compliance with Federal Requirements is a Major Aspect of the County’s Bond Program These IRS and SEC regulations are complicated, strictly enforced, and have harsh penalties Bond Counsel and the Financial Advisor are the County’s team to insure compliance We will discuss these responsibilities in more detail later in the presentation © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

The Major Structure and Function of Bonds and Certificates of Obligation

Basic Structure of GO Bonds GO Bond authority generally provides for a pledge of ad valorem tax revenues to support payment of the debt service © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

General Structure of GO Bonds Art III Section 52 of the constitution allows counties to levy taxes up to eighty cents per one hundred dollars ($0.80/$100) of which the Attorney General allows for up to forty cents ($0.40) toward debt service Requires 2% reserve to be established These are generally referred to as unlimited tax bonds © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

General Structure of GO Bonds Government Code Chapter 1251 establishes basic parameters including a maximum maturity of 40 years © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (“G.O. Bonds”) Election: Yes Pledge: Ad Valorem Tax Typical Use: Major capital projects where the commissioners court believes that it is important to have the voters approve the project Max Term: 40 Years (Typically 15-20) Requirements: Posting/Publication, etc. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Basic Structure of Certificates of Obligation COs for certain county projects, jails, courthouses, bridges can be supported by a pledge of ad valorem taxes. COs for other county public works must be supported by a combination pledge of ad valorem taxes and other county revenues. Texas Local Government Code Chapter 271 © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Basic Structure of COs Traditionally, these other county revenue sources have been quite limited  For example, library, solid waste facilities, fees and charges for various county services.  Usually, in combination tax and rev COs, the other revenue pledge is limited to a nominal amount COs don’t require election but require notice  Qualified voters may petition (5%) to require the county to call an election on whether to issue the COs.  If such an election fails, the county cannot sell COs for that same purpose for 3 years (unless for exceptional catastrophic items) © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION (“C.O.s”) Election: 5% of Voters May Petition Pledge: Ad Valorem Tax, Revenue, or Combination Typical Use: Capital projects where an election not viewed as necessary Max Term: 40 Years (Typically 15-20) Requirements: Posting/Publication, etc. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Basic Structure of Road Bonds Legislative enhancements allow for different types of such bonds for different types of county public works (Government Code) Article VIII Section 9 of the Constitution allows for limited tax bonds to be issued by counties for flood and road projects. These are typically referred to as limited tax road bonds. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Road Bond Structure Road bonds require election, AG approval, and are marketed and issued in other respects like the GO bonds but may command higher interest rates as the bond holders view the limited nature of the pledge as a detractor from their value. Require creation of a district © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

UNLIMITED TAX ROAD DISTRICT BONDS (“Road District Bonds”) Election: Yes (Within Defined District) Pledge: Ad Valorem Tax Typical Use: Roads, bridges and similar improvements in a specific defined district Max Term: 40 Years (But Typically Shorter) Requirements: District Creation, Posting/Publication, etc. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

ANTICIPATION NOTES (“Tax Notes”) Election: No Pledge: Ad Valorem Tax, Revenue, or Combination Typical Use: Construction of a public work; purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, machinery, buildings, lands, and rights-of-way; professional services such as engineers, architects, attorneys and financial advisors; operating expenses; or to fund issuer’s cumulative cash flow deficit Max Term: 7 Years (1 Year for Cash Flow Deficit) Requirements: Auditor’s recommendation (or Chief Budget Officer) © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

TIME WARRANTS Election: Subject to Voter Petition Pledge: Ad Valorem Tax Typical Use: Older Method of Finance Authorized under Chapter 262 of the Texas Local Government Code Max Term: 40 years Requirements: Time Warrants are Subject to Publication Requirements & Non-Negotiable © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS Election: No Pledge: Ad Valorem Tax, Revenue, or Both Typical Use: For Personal Property Only Max Term: 25 Years Requirements: None © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BONDS (“PID BONDS”) Election: No (Landowner Petitions In) Pledge: Special Assessment Typical Use: Roads, utilities and related subdivision infrastructure in a specific subdivision Max Term: 40 Years (But Typically Shorter) Requirements: District Creation, Posting/Publication, etc. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

REVENUE BONDS Election: No Pledge: County Revenues from Public Utility (solid waste, library, etc.) Typical Use: Rarely available to counties used more by cities and utility districts Max Term: 40 Years (Typically 15-20) Requirements: Coverage © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

REFUNDING BONDS Election: No Pledge: Ad Valorem Tax Typical Use: Refinance certain other outstanding County Bonds Max Term: 40 Years (Typically 15-20) Requirements: Track the underlying bond © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

The Major Components of Using These Legal Sources of Money

Overview of Major Components for GO Bonds Election generally required to obtain voter approval If approved by the voters the authority should be utilized within 10 years To exercise the voted authority, the Commissioners Court must authorize issuance of the bonds in one or more series To issue a series of bonds the Commissioners must sell the obligations to a purchaser through either a private placement, a negotiated sale, or a competitive sale Each approach has distinct complex technical requirements Any sale requires submission to and approval by the Attorney General of Texas and registration with the Comptroller of Public Accounts. The sale must be in compliance with SEC and IRS regulations © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

When and How Ordered Order includes: Measure Size Scope Election Details © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Counties are Restricted as to When They Can Call a Bond Election Uniform election dates first Tuesday after first Monday in November each year. Uniform election dates in May of odd numbered years. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Special Information Goes into an Order Calling a Bond Election and Where These Notices are Posted and Published Texas Government Code Chapter 1251 specifies some notice requirements for County GO bond elections. The rest of these type of requirements tie into the Texas Election Code The Public Finance Division of the Attorney General’s Office has special rules on how a notice is posted or published and in what kind of newspaper it must be published © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Language of Document Ordering an Election Election Code Section 3.009 the proposition language that will appear on the ballot; the purpose for which the debt obligations are to be authorized; the principal amount of the debt obligations to be authorized; that taxes sufficient to pay the annual principal of and interest on the debt obligations may be imposed; © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

GO Bonds If measure is approved, Commissioners may then sell bonds in one or more series The bonds can be sold by the county competitively, through a negotiated sale, or privately placed To issue obligations through competitive sale and negotiated sale Texas Counties have traditionally utilized a financial advisor © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

GO Bonds These public sales typically are to an underwriter and require the County to make an offering statement that describes the bonds and the financial condition of the County  To obtain the best pricing, the County will typically seek ratings from a rating company  The FA, underwriter and Bond Counsel work with the County to assure that representations made to obtain ratings and pursuant to the offering documents are accurate © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

GO Bonds SEC Rule 15c2-12 requires certain continuing disclosure obligations of financial and other data County bonds are generally for governmental purposes Interest on the bonds is eligible for tax exempt treatment  County gets a lower interest rate on the bonds  Extensive regulation of the tax exempt bond market County must comply  © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

IRS Requirements Most county bonds are issued as tax exempt obligations The county is required to provide the purchaser with assurances that the bonds are being utilized and will always be utilized for a purpose and in accordance with procedures that will keep the bonds eligible for tax exempt treatment throughout their life The county will provide a tax certificate that lays out these promises © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

IRS Requirements The basic promises are: To use the bond proceeds for a qualifying governmental project or purpose within the scope of the authority granted by the voters To utilize the proceeds quickly to complete the project without unreasonable delay To insure that the bond proceeds or any funds used for debts service are invested at rates which do not allow the county to make more money from those investments that it is paying bond holders for debt service. The county must avoid engaging in arbitrage. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Public Finance for Texas Counties Team Members County’s Bond Counsel The county’s lawyer in the transaction will prepare the financing documents Provides the “Bond Opinion” which opines that the obligations were properly issued and if issued on a tax exempt basis, that the obligations are not subject to federal insurance taxation Must know local government law, federal tax law and securities law An Attorney-Client relationship must exist between the county and the county’s bond counsel The county has the right to select its own bond counsel HOW ARE THE PROFESSIONALS PAID? Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel work on a contingent basis They are only paid if the bonds are issued and proceeds are delivered to the county Architects and other professionals generally do not work on a contingent basis They expect to be paid even if the bond issue does not pass © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 2016 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Team Members County’s Financial Advisor The professional who will guide the county through the economic side of the issuance process The professional who will structure the form of the financing and recommend the type of issue to be used – G.O. Bonds, CO’s, Anticipation Notes, etc. The professional who will conduct the competitive sale or negotiated sale or arrange for a private placement © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Legal Framework and Statutory Guidance for Bonds and Certificates of Obligation

Basic Federal Structure In Texas, we must look to the state and federal constitutions and statutes as well as our state regulatory system for a full understanding of the county’s bond issuance authority The federal constitution recognizes the states’ sovereign power to govern and provide for the state’s citizens © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Basic Federal Regulatory Oversight The federal statutes concerning the Treasury and the Securities and Exchange Commission provide for tax treatment and the offering documents that the county uses to sell bonds to the public © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Basic Texas Legal Structure for Bonds The state constitution grants debt issuance power to political subdivisions, including Counties. The Texas Government Code, Local Government Code, Transportation Code, Tax Code and other statutes provide specific authority for the particular types of bonds issued by these entities including Counties. © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Texas Regulatory Structure The Attorney General must approve all debt issued by a county The debt obligations must be registered with the Comptroller of Public Accounts In some instances, the Comptroller must preclear a special bond election for a County The Texas Ethics Commission regulates conduct of officials in bond elections © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Bond Election Resources for County Officials These various legal authorities are discussed and explained in the Texas Public Finance Handbook which we publish through the Texas Association of Counties As bond counsel for the county, we work with the commissioners court to guide you through these technical principles along with your financial advisor http://www.bickerstaff.com/wp-content/uploads/2017- Public-Finance-Final.pdf http://www.bickerstaff.com/publications/ © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Bonds and Certificates of Obligation in 2019 Public Finance for Texas Counties Bonds and Certificates of Obligation in 2019 4.001 Bonds and Certificates of Obligation V.G. Young Institute of County Government School for County Commissioners Courts Tuesday, February 19, 2019 4:15 – 5:05 p.m. Presented By: David Méndez, Partner Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 3711 South Mopac Expressway Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746 P: 512-472-8021 F: 512-320-5638 © 2019 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 2016 Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP