PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
Advertisements

UQ Teaching and Learning Small and Large Strategic Grants Scheme Second Round Applications 30 October 2007.
PRAC and Integrated Planning October 22, Integrated Planning Model.
STUDENT SUCCESS CENTERS : WORKING BETTER TOGETHER TO ENSURE STUDENT SUCCESS.
Creating Your Competitive Proposal Projects, Grants, Fellowships...
UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
ASP 2013 Student Luncheon Workshop Tips for Preparing Teaching Portfolios for the Teaching Job Search Darlene Smucny, Ph.D. Collegiate Professor & Academic.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program LOI Webinar 9/27/2011 9:30 AM 9/28/2011 2:00 PM.
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
UQ Teaching and Learning Small and Large Strategic Grants Scheme 14 June 2007.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
College of Human Medicine Executive Committee & Department Administrators Group Presentation May 2006.
Teaching and Learning Grants Workshop Teaching and Learning Enhancement at UQ Professor Deborah Terry 8 February 2008.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Strategies for a well thought out and researched proposal GRANT-WRITING 101.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Carrick Grants Scheme Overview of key aspects and application processes Professor Deborah Terry 8 February 2007.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Strengthening Communities Awarded to support the development and implementation of collaborate and innovative community projects that address economic.
Project Design Jennifer Coffey OSEP May 4,
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Educational Master Plan Update Open Forum November 11, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
Student Success: Learning & Engagement DIVISIONAL COUNCILS Fall 2010.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
Undergraduate Experiential Inquiry and Research at Rice.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT DR. SHEMEKA MCCLUNG DIRECTOR ARNITRA HUNTER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
LeadingAge Minnesota Foundation Workforce Solutions Grant Program
Consider Your Audience
Preparing Your Research or Scholarly (ROSA) Application
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Thanks for coming. Introduce 21st Century and team.
CARE Grants 101 Grants and Sponsored Programs Cindy Bell:
Student Research and Creative Activity at SUNY Oneonta
SOL Innovation Committee
Mastery-Based Learning:
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
Arts Education Brings Out the Best in Students
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
FY15-16 Budget Request & Monitoring Training
School of Dentistry Education Research Fund (SDERF)
OLT Information session
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Graduate Assistantship Application
K R Investigator Research Question
Guided Pathways 101.
February 21-22, 2018.
PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,
Title V Initiatives to Promote Student Success: Capstone Seminar and Student Research With Faculty May 31, 2016.
School District No.73 (Kamloops/Thompson)
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Textbook Transformation Grants
For more information and to book a program please visit our website:
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director, FDC) February 19 and 20, 2019

What is the FEID grant? The Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Award program funds instructional improvement projects that lead to increased student success. Priority is given to proposals that support Goal One and Goal Two of the University Strategic Plan Projects shall address course redesign and/or innovative teaching. Examples include: Implementation or expansion of high-impact practices Application of best/promising practices produced from the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Multi/Interdisciplinary collaboration, i.e., Explore Core Study Abroad or Service Learning Implementation of pedagogy for diverse audiences

Breaking Down the FEID Narrative Description of project Innovation Connection to Goal One and/or Goal Two of the University Strategic Plan Outcomes and Assessment Benefits Sustainability Budget and Timeline

Description What pedagogical or practical instructional problem does this project attempt to solve? Provide details about your project’s objectives, methods, and activities intended to try to solve this problem.

Innovation: Course Redesign and/or Innovative Teaching Practices Describe why your project is innovative Some Possibilities include: Implementation or expansion of high-impact practices Application of best/promising practices produced from the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Multi/Interdisciplinary collaboration, i.e., Explore Core Study Abroad or Service Learning Implementation of pedagogy for diverse audiences ………

Connection to Goal One and/or Two of the University Strategic Plan Provide a transformative educational experience and environment for all students. Titan students are immeasurably enriched by immersive experiences and a robust array of services that support their well-being, provide a sense of belonging, and promote academic success. The many benefits from this institutional commitment — enhanced learning, retention, confidence, and affinity for the university — ensure Titan graduates are well prepared to excel in the workforce or in further education.

Connection to Goal One and/or Two of the University Strategic Plan Goal Two: Strengthen opportunities for student completion and graduation. Perhaps nothing is more central to our educational mission than providing equitable access to the opportunities and resources necessary for student success. Degree completion is one metric, albeit a fundamental one, by which student success is measured, and our commitment to supporting students achieve that goal is interlinked with myriad endeavors that promote student success in all its forms.

Outcomes and Assessment Goals/Outcomes are defined Measure(s) Aligned to goals/outcomes Feasible Evaluative

Benefits Proposed project clearly describes the benefits the implementation will have on students, the department, and/or instructional processes

Sustainability Plan for the future Funding (if needed) Sustained implementation Expansion To other sections To other courses

Examples of Past Projects Redesign of Theatre Management Class to Address 21st Century Realities International Cohort Cultural Experience: Japan Developing counseling skills through co-curricular, experiential education, and service learning Including Undergraduate Research in a CAS Senior Seminar Course A Humanity at Work: Alumni Career Webinars for History Majors Design and implementation of a cross-disciplinary Bio-Geo intersession field course

Budget and Timeline Reassigned Time/ Summer Stipend Need for reassignment Any other supports for project (e.g., department, college, grants and stipends) Deliverable dates Operating Expenses & Equipment Need for resources Any other supports for project (e.g., department, college, grants and stipends) Deliverable dates

Money will be transferred to your Department This means: If you are asking for reassigned time- the FDC will budget transfer this money to your dept If you are asking for summer stipend there are new rules on faculty additional pay. OE & E- there are rules on how state funds can be used- money will be transferred to your dept- make sure your dept is in agreement on how you are spending funds- i.e., gift cards can’t be bought with state funds.

How will my project be scored? Criterion Weight Strong (5,4) Weak (3,2) Unacceptable (1,0) Score Problem and objectives 20% Clear statement of problem, and meaningful objectives which address the problem. Problem clearly stated, but some objectives are unclear or inappropriate to the problem. Problem not clearly stated. Objectives unclear or inappropriate to the problem.   Connection to Goal One and/or Two of the University Strategic Plan 10% Proposed project demonstrates a clear connection to Goal 1 and/or Goal 2 of the University Strategic Plan. Proposed project discusses Goal 1 and/or Goal 2 of the University Strategic Plan, but does not demonstrate a clear connection. Proposed project does not discuss Goal 1 and/or Goal 2 of the University Strategic Plan. Clarity of assessment of outcomes/objectives 15% Assessment strategies are clearly aligned and measure project objectives or (expected) outcomes. Assessment strategies do not adequately measure and/or clearly align to project objectives or (expected) outcomes. Assessment strategies do not measure and/or align to project objectives or (expected) outcomes. Plan: Methods and Activities Clear plan which delineates methods and activities that are aligned to the problem and will meet the objectives. Some methods and activities are unclear or the case has not been made that all of the methods and activities will accomplish the objectives. Methods and activities are unclear and/or the methods and activities will not accomplish the objectives. Innovation to include best/promising practices Clearly explains what is new and how it reflects best or promising practices Project clearly incorporates a limited number of new and best or promising practices. Unclear how project incorporates best or promising practices. Benefits Proposed project clearly describes the benefits the implementation will have on students, the department, and/or instructional processes. Benefits described in the proposed project are not clear and/or are not strong. Benefits are unclear or not discussed. Sustainability 5% Clear and detailed indication of how the project will provide sustained benefit once the course release or stipend is exhausted. More resources are likely to be needed to sustain benefit once the course release or stipend is exhausted. Little or no indication of sustained benefit once course release or stipend is exhausted. Cost justification and feasibility of completion (see Budget and Timeline template for further explanation) Clear justification of WTUs/stipend and OEE. Project completion likely given timeline and scope. Project completion questionable given timeline and scope. Or, work completed outside of time-frame requested. Unclear justification of WTUs/stipend or not all of the aspects of the budget are addressed. Automatic calculations occur in this row: Total:

Online Application Process https://afapps.fullerton.edu/FEID/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fFEID%2f http://fdc.fullerton.edu/teaching/grants.php

TIPS Remember that the faculty reviewers reading your narrative might not be from your discipline. Your narrative should be clearly understandable by a faculty member outside your own field. Take the time to review the weblinks throughout the powerpoint. Explore the FDC's teaching pages and scholarship pages for helpful online resources when developing your project concept. Compare your draft proposal to the rubric and revise your draft as necessary to clearly address the criteria.

Questions? Slide Title