Interoperability in Our Community January 23, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
| Implications for Health Information Exchange – MetroChicago January 2011.
Advertisements

Information Collaborative
Cheryl M. Stephens Executive Director Community Health Information Collaborative July 17, 2006 Community Health Information Collaborative and the Northeast.
Connecting Healthcare Stakeholders Through HIT and Health Information Exchange The Inland Northwest Health Services Story Thomas Fritz, CEO.
SENDING SUMMARY OF CARE RECORDS AT TRANSITIONS OF CARE REGIONAL COORDINATION & DIRECTORY DEVELOPMENT 6/6/14 UW MEDICINE.
Interoperability Kevin Schmidt Director, Clinical Network.
Direct Implementation Perspective 0 Mark Bamberg, Vice President Research & Development MEDfx.
National Health Policy Forum William Winkenwerder, Jr., M.D. Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) January 28, 2004.
A San Diego Health Information Exchange San Diego Health Care Association April 26 th, 2012 Jami Young, MPA San Diego Beacon Project Manager.
Project Update : Claims/Clinical Linkage Project MHDO Board of Directors June 6, 2013.
Cracking the Code on Nationwide Interoperability DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily.
Massachusetts: Transforming the Healthcare Economy John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
July 3, 2015 New HIE Capabilities Enable Breakthroughs In Connected And Coordinated Care Delivery. January 8, 2015 Charissa Fotinos.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Georgia Department of Community Health Georgia Health Information Exchange Network HomeTown Health Event September 25, 2012.
Inter-institutional Data Sharing, Standards and Legal Arthur Davidson, MD, MSPH Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Washington, DC June 9, 2005.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
ONC HIT Policy Committee Interoperability and HIE Workgroup Panel 3: State/Federal Perspectives August 22, 2014 Jennifer Fritz, MPH Deputy Director Office.
Ron Sconyers Rural Healthcare Solutions, LLC.  F oundation  L everage  E ngage  X exute.
1 Community Betterment through HIE Public and Private Health Data Integration in a State-wide HIE: The Nebraska Story Chris Henkenius © Bass & Associates,
HIE Implementation in Michigan for Improved Health As approved by the Michigan Health Information Technology Commission on March 4, 2009.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual.
Kentucky Health Information Exchange (KHIE). Kentucky e-Health Historical Overview March 8, 2005 –Legislation (Senate Bill 2) to create a secure interoperable.
1 Get Ready to RHIO Health Information Exchanges and Emergency Preparedness Jeff Odell, Senior Vice President MedVirginia x227
0 Presentation to: Health IT HIPPA Workshop Presented by: Stacey Harris, Director of Health IT Innovation September 26, 2014 Division of Health Information.
Beyond the EMR – Exchanging Health Information Outside of Your Organization John W. Loonsk, MD, FACMI Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Hurdles and Solutions for the Interoperable EHR John W, Loonsk, MD FACMI Chief Medical Officer CGI.
Presented by: Craig A. Mathews, Executive Director AHRQ Annual Grantee Meeting – October 27, 2007 Transforming Quality Through Health Information Technology.
Final Project – Health Information Exchange: Technology, Challenges & Opportunities Group 3 Gary Brown, Michelle Burke, Kazi Russell MMI 402 Fall 2013.
One Health Information Exchange’s experience in responding to the changing landscape Funding: AHRQ Contract ; State of Tennessee; Vanderbilt.
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 15 Overview / Introduction to the EHR.
West Virginia Information Technology Summit November 4, 2009.
What is the patient’s experience today?
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Kansas Health Information Network, Inc. How the Kansas Medical Society is building a provider-led platform to support interoperability and enable practices.
BENEFITS OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH INFORMATION. Health IT Video from HealthIT.gov (Please wait for the video to load and click on the arrow to play)
KHIN KANSAS HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK Georgia Executive Briefing Provider Led Health Information Exchange.
Enabling Healthcare Transformation through Information Technology Delaware Valley HIMSS September 23, 2010 Better Communication for Better Healthcare The.
Who’s in Your Neighborhood? The Patient-Centered Medical Community David C. Willis, MD Medical Director Greater Ocala Health Information Trust, Inc.
Pennsylvania Health Information Exchange NJHIMSS - DVHIMSS Enabling Healthcare Transformation Through Information Technology September, 2010.
Building a Public Health Informatics Division. OSDH Public Health Informatics Division Identify the needs Develop the proposal Establish division Reality.
California Successes Engagement & Collaboration –Regional HIEs functioning and expanding for 25 years –25 organizations using Epic’s HIE solutions, many.
How are Southeast Pennsylvania hospitals meeting the Meaningful Use requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs? June 2016 How are.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Background On the Rochester RHIO October 2014
Health Information Exchange with Michigan Medicine and Epic
Creating Care-Connected communities
Care Coordination and Interoperable Health IT Systems
Electronic Medical and Dental Record Integration Options
CRISP Update January 2017.
Rural Health Summit June 11, 2010.
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
HIE Landscape in California
Managing Clinical Information: EHR Terms and Architecture
Regional Health Information Exchange: Getting There
Electronic Health Information Systems
Electronic Health Record Update
HIMSS National Conference New Orleans Convention Center
WISHIN Overview 2018 Safety-Net Summit November 2, 2018
Executive Summary: eHealth Exchange Hub
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
President and Chief Executive Officer
Interoperability Sales and Business Development
Presentation transcript:

Interoperability in Our Community January 23, 2018 Laura Fitzmaurice MD, CMIO, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics Mike Dittemore RN, BS, eMBA, Executive Director, Lewis And Clark Information Exchange (LACIE)

Interoperability Definition 2 Interoperability Definition In healthcare, interoperability is the ability of different information technology systems and software applications to communicate, exchange data, and use the information that has been exchanged. Data exchange schema and standards should permit data to be shared across clinician, lab, hospital, pharmacy, and patient regardless of the application or application vendor. HIMSS Board, April 5, 2013

Interoperability “Facilitators” 3 Public Health Information Exchanges National Health Information Organizations Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOS) Community Based Health Information Organizations EMR Vendor Based Exchanges Private Health Information Exchanges Health Information Service Providers (HISP)

National HIEs 4 eHealth Exchange – 501(c)(3) supported by The Sequoia Project Formally known as Healtheway Formally known as National Health Information Network (NHIN) Formally known as Nationwide Health Information Network (NwHIN) In 2012, eHealth Exchange transitioned from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT to a private sector initiative The eHealth Exchange is a network of exchange partners who securely share clinical information over the Internet across the U.S. By leveraging a common set of standards, legal agreement and governance, eHealth Exchange participants are able to securely share health information with each other, without additional customization and one-off legal agreements

National HIEs, cont. 5 eHealth Exchange is currently the only way to connect to Federal Agencies such as the VA, DoD, and Social Security Administration Connecting to eHealth Exchange does not automatically guarantee that other eHealth Exchange members will allow a connection to them eHealth Exchange uses strictly federated connections: no patient ADT information is sent to a central location to assist with patient matching Carequality is an initiative of The Sequoia Project; operational in July 2016 Participants commit to connecting to other organizations that have a Use Case recommended by the Advisory Council and approved by the Steering Committee A significant number of organizations that participate in the eHealth Exchange initiative also participate in the Carequality Interoperability Framework Participation in Carequality is not required to participate in the eHealth Exchange

National HIEs, cont. 6 CommonWell Health Alliance is a not-for-profit trade association dedicated to achieving cross-vendor interoperability that assures provider access to health data regardless of where care occurs CommonWell members believe that provider access to this data must be built into health IT at a reasonable cost for use by a broad range of health care providers and the people they serve CommonWell and Carequality have announced they will work together for improved interoperability CommonWell is more focused on interoperability between vendors where The Sequoia Project has an emphasis at the organizational level Local participants with CommonWell through Cerner include Truman Medical Centers, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, and MOSAIC Life Care

RHIO Connectivity in GKC 7 Lewis And Clark Information Exchange (LACIE) connects directly to Tiger Institute and Kansas Health Information Network (KHIN) LACIE connection requested to Missouri Health Connection (MHC) through eHealth Exchange when available Tiger Institute has a verbal commitment from MHC to connect through eHealth Exchange (likely 2018) KHIN connections: LACIE, MHC, Southeast Texas Health Information Exchange, Iowa Health Information Network, Delaware Health Information Network, Colorado RHIO “One Hop Rule”: As a rule it is not permissible to connect to a “primary” HIO and be able to query information from another HIO through the same connection Example: KHIN to LACIE permissible with appropriate executed agreements Example: KHIN to LACIE to Tiger Institute not permissible, a separate direct connection would be required between KHIN and Tiger

Types of Participant Connections 8 Centralized Bi-directional: All data, that is available for query from a participant, is sent to a centralized data repository. This includes patient demographic data that significantly enhances patient matching through a Master Patient Index (MPI). Participant has ability to query HIO centralized data repository. Federated Bi-directional: No data is sent to the HIO for storage and retrieval by the participant. An edge server is deployed by the participant that contains an up to date copy of the information from the EMR database the participant is willing to share. There is no patient demographic information provided to the exchange making patient matching more of a challenge. Participant has ability to query HIO centralized data repository. Hybrid Bi-directional: Limited data is sent to the HIO, in most cases this is patient demographic data that is used for patient matching. Clinical data remains at the participant’s location, usually on an edge server that can be queried by other HIO participants. Participant has ability to query HIO centralized data repository. View Only Uni-directional: No data is sent to the HIO, participant can only query exchange. Depending on the type of connections other organizations have from which the participant is attempting to view information, the patient matching and return of information can be very low, i.e. view only participants attempting to view information from each other.

RHIO Connection Robustness 9 Connectivity does not ensure data quality or the availability of meaningful data Not all RHIO participants provide information beyond PAMI Problems, Allergies, Medications, Immunizations Patient demographics, lab results, and vital signs are common as well While PAMI information can be helpful, most providers find discharge and clinic encounter summaries, along with radiology and procedure reports, much more impactful Discharge and clinic summaries are not included in Continuity of Care Documents (CCD) and Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (CCDA), which make up a significant portion of the data shared with and between HIO

Community Based HIOs 10 Very difficult for community only centered HIOs to be successful Lack of enough organizations to shoulder the cost of the exchange Political and business decision hurdles Many that were started either merged with HIOs covering a larger geographical area or dissolved Wichita Health Information Exchange (founders Kansas Medical Society and Kansas Hospital Association) merged with KHIN Kansas City based eHealthAlign (formally Kansas City Bi-State Health Information Exchange) ceased operations in September 2011 and seeded technology vendor (ICA) participants to KHIN

EMR Vendor Based Exchange 11 EMR Vendor Based Exchange Cerner Resonance: Allows Cerner EMR instances to connect to one another as well as to HIOs HealtheIntent: Facilitation of connections to obtain data for analytics Population health tool used by Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), Kansas Heart and Stroke Collaborative, and Truman Medical Centers Epic Care Everywhere: Allows Epic EMR users to share information between their organizations as well as connect to other EMRs and HIOs Connection used by The University of Kansas Health System and Saint Luke’s Providence Medical Center, Saint John, Saint Joseph, Saint Mary and Clinics plan to convert to Epic Share Everywhere: focus on patients being able to contribute information from multiple sources Allscripts – dbMotion; CareInMotion; Netsmart CareFabric; Practice Fusion Cloud-Based EHR eClinical Works (eCW) – HUB; Care Coordination Medical Record (CCMR)

12 Private HIE Allows organizations/providers to share information between them that may not be shared in the traditional Public Exchange Enhanced granularity over the type of data shared Participants provide permission for specific information to be shared with organizations such as payers/organizations in pay-for-value agreements, e.g., Clinically Integrated Networks LACIE’s Private Exchange extracts data from the native EMRs database Ability to capture non-discrete data for quality reporting Document retrieval Alerts based on ADT Messages Data movement to desired endpoint in desired format Participants include: Kansas Clinical Improvement Collaborative, MPact Health, Kansas City Metropolitan Physician Association (KCMPA), Meritas, Signature Health, Olathe Health System, Providence Medical Center, Saint John Hospital and Clinics, Truman Medical Center, North Kansas City Hospital, Tri-County Mental Health, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City (Medicare Advantage and CPC+ offerings)

Health Information Service Provider 13 A Health Information Service Provider (HISP) is an organization that manages security and transport for health information exchange among health care entities or individuals using the Direct standard for transport (Direct Messaging) There is no specific legal designation for a HISP, nor are HISPs specifically regulated by Meaningful Use certification rules Several EMR vendors provide HISP services for their customers and other providers/organizations whose EMR does not offer a HISP/Direct Messaging Service Multiple companies outside of EMR vendors also provide HISP services, as do some HIOs

14 Conclusion There are numerous forms of interoperability being utilized in the Greater Kansas City Area, of which not all are fully interoperable Some interoperability solutions are not vendor agnostic Interoperability is impacted as much, if not more, by political and business decisions as technology issues Public HIOs are best suited for sharing of patient medical information between providers that have patient overlap Private HIOs are better suited for Population Health

Questions and Contacts 15 Questions and Contacts Questions? Contact Information Dr. Laura Fitzmaurice, lfitzmaurice@cmh.edu, 816-234-3897 Mike Dittemore, mike.dittemore@lacie-hie.com, 816-214-6894