Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Sustained Interactions between T Cell Receptors and Antigens Promote the Differentiation of CD4+ Memory T Cells  Chulwoo Kim, Theodore Wilson, Kael F.
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Dissolving Microneedle Delivery of Nanoparticle-Encapsulated Antigen Elicits Efficient Cross-Priming and Th1 Immune Responses by Murine Langerhans Cells 
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2018)
Interleukin-35 Limits Anti-Tumor Immunity
Timothy E. O’Sullivan, Lexus R. Johnson, Helen H. Kang, Joseph C. Sun 
Inflammatory Monocytes Activate Memory CD8+ T and Innate NK Lymphocytes Independent of Cognate Antigen during Microbial Pathogen Invasion  Saïdi M'Homa.
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Protective Capacity of Memory CD8+ T Cells Is Dictated by Antigen Exposure History and Nature of the Infection  Jeffrey C. Nolz, John T. Harty  Immunity 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Controls the Formation and Maintenance of Gut-Resident Memory T Cells by Regulating Migration and Retention  Nu.
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Dynamics of Blood-Borne CD8 Memory T Cell Migration In Vivo
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
CD301b+ Dermal Dendritic Cells Drive T Helper 2 Cell-Mediated Immunity
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
T Cells with Low Avidity for a Tissue-Restricted Antigen Routinely Evade Central and Peripheral Tolerance and Cause Autoimmunity  Dietmar Zehn, Michael.
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Lisa P. Daley-Bauer, Grace M. Wynn, Edward S. Mocarski  Immunity 
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Matthew A. Williams, Eugene V. Ravkov, Michael J. Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
CD44 Regulates Survival and Memory Development in Th1 Cells
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Hypoxic Ag-specific CD8+ T cells are less functional and less proliferative. Hypoxic Ag-specific CD8+ T cells are less functional and less proliferative.
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 374-388 (August 2016) The Tumor Microenvironment Represses T Cell Mitochondrial Biogenesis to Drive Intratumoral T Cell Metabolic Insufficiency and Dysfunction  Nicole E. Scharping, Ashley V. Menk, Rebecca S. Moreci, Ryan D. Whetstone, Rebekah E. Dadey, Simon C. Watkins, Robert L. Ferris, Greg M. Delgoffe  Immunity  Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 374-388 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2016 45, 374-388DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells Display Suppressed Mitochondrial Function and Mass (A) Representative flow cytogram of nondraining (ndLN), draining (dLN) lymph node, or tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) preparations from C57BL/6 mice inoculated with B16 melanoma cells 12 days prior, gated on CD8 or CD4 as indicated. (B) Tabulated flow cytometric data from CD8+ T cells isolated from mice bearing the indicated tumor types. Each circle represents an individual animal. (C) Transmission electron microscopy of activated or tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. (D) MitoTracker FM staining of CD8+ T cells from peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) or TIL of HNSCC patients. (E) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) trace (left) and metabolic analysis panels (middle, right) from CD8+ T cells isolated from the indicated sites from B16-bearing animals. T cells activated 24 hr with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (Teff) are included as a control. Spare respiratory capacity (SRC) is calculated as the difference between initial, basal OCR values, and the maximal OCR values achieved after FCCP uncoupling. Data represent the mean or are representative of 3–5 independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by unpaired t test. Error bars indicate SEM. See also Figure S1. Immunity 2016 45, 374-388DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Loss of Mitochondrial Function and Mass Is Not Simply a Phenotype of Robust Activation In Vivo (A) Representative flow cytogram and tabulated results of 2NBDG uptake and MitoTracker FM measurements of OT-I T cells injected into B16OVA-bearing or VVOVA-infected, or uninfected congenically mismatched hosts for 6 days. Plots are gated on CD8+ T cells and the congenic allele marker (Thy1). (B) Seahorse measurements (OCR, SRC, and ECAR) from cells in (A). (C) ATP measurements from purified donor cells from (A). (D) Flow cytogram of glucose uptake and mitochondrial mass of OT-I (Thy1.1+) T cells adoptively transferred into B16OVA bearing mice for 6 days, isolated from either LN or tumor, then transferred into VVOVA-infected mice for 6 days. Flow cytogram depicts splenic CD8+Thy1.1+ cells. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by unpaired t test. Results represent four (A–C) or three (D) experiments. Circles represent individual animals. UI = uninfected VOVA = VVOVA-infected (1 × 106 PFU IP), spl = spleen. Error bars indicate SEM. See also Figure S2. Immunity 2016 45, 374-388DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 T Cell Mitochondrial Dysfunction Is Induced upon Entry into the Tumor Microenvironment (A) Representative flow cytogram and tabulated data of LN and TIL of naive, CellTrace Violet (CTV)-labeled, OT-I (Thy1.1+) CD8+ T cells transferred into B16OVA-bearing mice (5–7 mm tumors), or the spleens of the same progenitor cells transferred into B6 mice infected with 1 × 106 PFU VVOVA for 72 hr. Cells were stained with MitoTracker Deep Red FM. (B) As in (A), but with the mitochondrial membrane potential dye TMRE. (C) As in (A), but with the cellular ROS indicator DCFDA. (D) As in (A), but cells were permeabilized and stained intracellularly for LC3B. (E) Representative data from experiments as in (A), but some mice received mitophagy inhibitor m-divi-1. Results represent the mean of three or four independent experiments, with n = 7–9 mice per group. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA. Error bars indicate SEM. See also Figure S3. Immunity 2016 45, 374-388DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Intratumoral T Cells Is Progressive and Correlates with Coinhibitory Molecule Expression in Mouse and Human Tumors (A) Representative flow cytogram of CD8+ T cells isolated from day 14 B16-bearing C57/BL6 mice. (B) Flow cytogram showing mitochondrial mass and glucose competency of CD8+ T cell subsets. (C and D) Tabulated data from (B). (E) ATP measurements from CD8+ T cells sorted directly ex vivo from tumors based on the indicated expression. Results are compared to LN CD8+CD44hi cells (Teff). (F) Cytogram of coinhibitory molecules and (G) mitochondria/glucose status of CD8+ cells from PBL or TIL from HNSCC patients. Data represent the mean or are representative of 3–5 independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by unpaired t test. Error bars indicate SEM. See also Figure S4. Immunity 2016 45, 374-388DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PD-1 Blockade Does Not Rescue Metabolic Dysfunction in Intratumoral T Cells (A) Representative flow cytogram of CD8+ T cells from LN and TIL preparations in B16-bearing mice receiving thrice-weekly injections of 200 μg anti-PD1 or its isotype control. (B) Tabulated results from (A) as well as MC38-bearing mice. Each dot represents a mouse in this experiment. (C) Percentage of mice experiencing tumor regression in several experiments conducted as in (B). (D) Flow cytogram and tabulated values of MitoTracker FM staining during cell division of OT-I T cells transferred into established B16OVA tumors under the cover of anti-PD1 or its isotype control. Data are representative of five (A and B) or represent the mean of three (C and D) independent experiments. Error bars indicate SEM. See also Figure S5. Immunity 2016 45, 374-388DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Intratumoral T Cell Mitochondrial Biogenesis Is Repressed by Chronic Akt-Mediated Repression of PGC1α (A) Flow cytogram (left) and tabulated data (right) of PGC1α intracellular staining in CD8+ T cells isolated from nondraining or draining LNs or TIL preparations from B16 or MC38 bearing mice. Shaded histogram indicates isotype control. (B) Flow cytogram of PGC1α expression in CTV-labeled, naive OT-I T cells adoptively transferred into B16OVA bearing mice for 72 hr. Tabulation for multiple experiments is to the right. (C) Flow cytogram of cytokine production of congenically mismitached WT OT-I T cells transferred into B16OVA-bearing or VVOVA-infected mice for 96 hr, then restimulated with SIINFEKL peptide. (D) Representative and tabulated phospho-Akt (S473) and phospho-Foxo1(T24)/3a(T32) staining of the indicated cell populations in mice bearing 14-day B16 tumors. MFI is reported. (E) Representative flow cytogram and tabulated data indicating PGC1α staining in pAkt low or high cells. (F) MFI of pAkt staining in naive OT-I T cells, or OT-I T cells transferred for 3 or 6 days into a B16OVA-bearing or VVOVA infected mouse. (G) PGC1α levels and (H) mitochondrial mass of CD8+ T cells from LN and TIL of 14-day B16-bearing mice treated for 60 hr with Akt inhibitor VIII or its vehicle. Results are representative of five (A, B, and D), three (C, E, G, and H), or two (F) independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by unpaired t test (A, F, G, and H) or paired t test (D, E, G, and H). ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA. Error bars indicate SEM. See also Figure S6. Immunity 2016 45, 374-388DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Bolstering Mitochondrial Biogenesis Improves Intratumoral T Cell Function (A) Metabolic analysis of OT-I T cells retrovirally transduced with an empty mCherry vector (EV) or one encoding PGC1α. MitoTracker FM staining at various time points post transduction is indicated. OCR, SRC, and ECAR values are from day 5–7 post transduction. (B) Representative flow cytogram of LN- and TIL-resident OT-I T cells transduced as in (A) and transferred into B16OVA bearing C57/BL6 mice. Proportion of the transferred cells in LN and TIL and tabulated MitoTracker FM staining is reported. (C) Flow cytogram depicting cytokine synthesis in OT-I T cells transferred as in (B) and restimulated directly ex vivo with cognate peptide. Results are tabulated to the right. (D) Tumor growth plot of B16OVA bearing mice treated therapeutically upon detection of palpable tumors on day 7 with 250,000 (< 4mm2) or 500,000 (> 4mm2) of PGC1α or control-expressing cells. (E) Survival plot from e. n = 15–17 mice per group. Results represent six (A and B), four (C), or three (D and E) independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by unpaired t test (A–C), two-way ANOVA with repeated-measures (D), or log-rank test (E). Error bars indicate SEM. See also Figure S7. Immunity 2016 45, 374-388DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions