Color Variation: o Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
consulting engineers and scientists
Advertisements

Edward (Ned) Field USGS, Pasadena plus Tom Jordan, Nitin Gupta, Vipin Gupta, Phil Maechling, Allin Cornell, Ken Campbell, Sid Hellman, & Steve Rock OpenSHA.
Information Technology Thrust B.F. Spencer, Jr., UIUC S.J. Dyke, WUSTL.
TBI Committee Members Y. Bozorgnia C.B. Crouse J.P. Stewart
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps - Inputs and Status Choi Yoon Seok Jennifer S. Haase Robert L. Nowack Purdue University.
Further Development of Site Response in NGA Models PEER Lifelines Program NGA-West2 Project Topic #8 Working Group Meeting Kickoff MeetingApril 20, 2010.
Precipitation.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Skopje, Oct 2012 Radmila Salic, MSc. 1 st Project Workshop and Kick-Off Meeting Improvements in the Harmonized Seismic Hazard Maps for the Western.
Need for an accurate Reno velocity model to understand amplification in the Reno Basin Aasha Pancha.
19 th Advanced Summer School in Regional Science Overview of advanced techniques in ArcGIS data manipulation.
1 High Performance Computing at SCEC Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center University of Southern California.
Introduction This project deals with conversion of Vector based Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) data into Raster based PMP data using different interpolation.
J. Louie 4/15/04 Louie, J. N. Scott, J. B. Rasmussen, T. Thelen, W. A. Pancha, A. Clark, M. Park, H. Lopez, C. T. hazsurv Shallow Shear-Velocity.
NGA-East: National Seismic Hazard Mapping Perspective Mark Petersen USGS Golden, CO.
Brian Chiou NGA Workshop July 19, 2004 NGA Dataset.
Further Development of Site Response in NGA Models PEER Lifelines Program NGA-West2 Project Topic #8 Working Group Meeting Meeting #2October 26, 2010.
Probability of snow amount exceeding 12” over the 24h-period “12z, Dec. 26 to 12z, Dec. 27, 2010” Initiated from 03z, Dec. 24, 2010 Initiated from 03z,
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Evolution of Map Interpolation for Weather Related Information Kriging Or Inverse Distance Interpolation Colored Dots Prism Interpolation.
Time-dependent seismic hazard maps for the New Madrid seismic zone and Charleston, South Carolina areas James Hebden Seth Stein Department of Earth and.
Need for NGA-East: EPRI CEUS Ground Motion Report, Summary and Issues Norm Abrahamson Mar 7, 2008.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744
Turkey Earthquake Risk Model Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters World Bank Washington, DC, June 2-3, 2003 Dennis E. Kuzak Senior Vice President,
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Areal Estimation techniques Two types of technique: 1. Direct weighted averages 2. Surface fitting methods DIRECT WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHODS use the equation:
ANALYSIS OF ESTIMATED RAINFALL DATA USING SPATIAL INTERPOLATION. Preethi Raj GEOG 5650 (Environmental Applications of GIS)
Software Team: Chris Navarro Shawn Hampton
FEMA/ EARTH SCIENCE ASPECTS OF HAZUS Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group URS Corporation Oakland, CA.
Application of SASHA for the Icelandic case Vera D’Amico 1, Dario Albarello 2, Ragnar Sigbjörnsson 3, Rajesh Rupakhety 3 1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica.
Earthquake hazard isn’t a physical thing we measure. It's something mapmakers define and then use computer programs to predict. To decide how much to believe.
Next Generation Attenuation Models for Central & Eastern US (NGA-East) Stakeholder Workshop: Introduction March 7, 2008 Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER.
Dongkyun Kim and Francisco Olivera Zachry Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University American Society Civil Engineers Environmental and Water.
CyberShake Study 2.3 Technical Readiness Review. Study re-versioning SCEC software uses year.month versioning Suggest renaming this study to 13.4.
Spatial Interpolation III
Fig. 1. A wiring diagram for the SCEC computational pathways of earthquake system science (left) and large-scale calculations exemplifying each of the.
Probabilistic Ground Motions for Scoggins Dam, Oregon Chris Wood Seismotectonics & Geophysics Group Technical Service Center July 2012.
SCEC Community Modeling Environment (SCEC/CME): SCEC TeraShake Platform: Dynamic Rupture and Wave Propagation Simulations Seismological Society of America.
Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E.
Figure modified from Campbell and Bozorgnia 0.2 ln units = 22% change Arrow: possible choice for 90% Confidence Interval for Median for CA events M ≥
Ran TAO Missing Spatial Data. Examples Places cannot be reached E.g. Mountainous area Sample points E.g. Air pollution Damage of data E.g.
OpenGL Graphics Textures. Quiz You didn't see that coming!
Interpolation and evaluation of probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) patterns using different methods by: tarun gill.
INCORPORATION OF EARTHQUAKE SOURCE, PROPAGATION PATH AND SITE UNCERTAINTIES INTO ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL Bob Darragh Nick Gregor Walt Silva.
Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake Progress Update 3 November 2014 through 4 May 2015 UGMS May 2015 Meeting Philip Maechling SCEC IT Architect.
Process for 2007 Maps CA Oct 2006 PacNW Mar 2006 InterMtn West June 2006 CEUS May 2006 National User-Needs Workshop DEC 2006 CA Draft maps (Project 07)
UCERF3 Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) 14 Full-3D tomographic model CVM-S4.26 of S. California 2 CyberShake 14.2 seismic hazard.
Funded by the NSF OCI program grants OCI and OCI Mats Rynge, Gideon Juve, Karan Vahi, Gaurang Mehta, Ewa Deelman Information Sciences Institute,
What does it take to produce a good quality and reliable wind resource assessment? What do financiers want? Phil Napier-Moore, Session Moderator Breakout.
CyberShake and NGA MCER Results Scott Callaghan UGMS Meeting November 3, 2014.
Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Cascadia Subduction Zone Megathrust Earthquakes Based on a Stochastic Finite-Fault Model Nick Gregor 1, Walter.
Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake Progress Update November 3, 2014 – 4 May 2015 UGMS May 2015 Meeting Philip Maechling SCEC IT Architect.
WEEK 1 E. FACHE, A. GANGOTRA, K. MAHFOUD, A. MARTYSZUNIS, I. MIRALLES, G. ROSAT, S. SCHROERS, A. TILLOY 19. February 2016.
Forecasting Earthquake Ground Motions Using Large-Scale Numerical Simulations Philip J. Maechling Information Technology Architect Southern California.
Color Variation: o Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration:
SCEC UGMS Committee Meeting
Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center
Results for p = 0.1 Graphs at different values of Call Arrival Rate for Call Blocking Probability (in %) System Utilization (Efficiency) (in %) Average.
AN UPDATED SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR EGYPT
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
Hire Toyota Innova in Delhi for Outstation Tour
A B Figure S1 Frequency allele of interest
GIS: Six functional capabilities
Fix Garmin GPS Map Update Error

CyberShake Study 17.3 Science Readiness Review
Air Quality Assessment and Management
Color Variation: o Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration:
CyberShake Study 14.2 Science Readiness Review
9. Spatial Interpolation
Presentation transcript:

Color Variation: o IML @ Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration: o POE @ Fixed Intensity Measure Level & Duration: Base Map (s): o Abrahamson and Silva (2008): o Boore and Atkinson (2008): o Campbell and Bozorgnia (2008): o Chiou and Youngs (2008): o None PSHA Period: o 2 Seconds o 3 Seconds o 5 Seconds o 10 Seconds Overlays: o CyberShake Sites o Vs30 Map o Basin Depth Map Select Duration: 1 yr 10000 yrs 50 yrs Interpolation Method: o OpenSHA o IDW o Kriging Select POE: 0% 100% 2%

Color Variation: o IML @ Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration: o POE @ Fixed Intensity Measure Level & Duration: Base Map (s): o Abrahamson and Silva (2008): o Boore and Atkinson (2008): o Campbell and Bozorgnia (2008): o Chiou and Youngs (2008): o None PSHA Period: o 2 Seconds o 3 Seconds o 5 Seconds o 10 Seconds Overlays: o CyberShake Sites o Vs30 Map o Basin Depth Map Select Duration: 1 yr 10000 yrs 50 yrs Interpolation Method: o OpenSHA o IDW o Kriging Select POE: 0% 100% 2%

Color Variation: o IML @ Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration: o POE @ Fixed Intensity Measure Level & Duration: Base Map (s): o Abrahamson and Silva (2008): o Boore and Atkinson (2008): o Campbell and Bozorgnia (2008): o Chiou and Youngs (2008): o None PSHA Period: o 2 Seconds o 3 Seconds o 5 Seconds o 10 Seconds Overlays: o CyberShake Sites o Vs30 Map o Basin Depth Map Select Duration: 1 yr 10000 yrs 50 yrs Interpolation Method: o OpenSHA o IDW o Kriging Select POE: 0% 100% 2%

Select Duration: 1 yr 10000 yrs 50 yrs Select POE: 0% 100% 2% Color Variation: o IML @ Fixed Probability of Exceedance & Duration: o POE @ Fixed Intensity Measure Level & Duration: Base Map (s): o Abrahamson and Silva (2008): o Boore and Atkinson (2008): o Campbell and Bozorgnia (2008): o Chiou and Youngs (2008): o None PSHA Period: o 2 Seconds o 3 Seconds o 5 Seconds o 10 Seconds Overlays: o CyberShake Sites o Vs30 Map o Basin Depth Map Select Duration: 1 yr 10000 yrs 50 yrs Interpolation Method: o OpenSHA o IDW o Kriging Select POE: 0% 100% 2%