Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis Neelam Potdar, Tarek Gelbaya, Luciano G. Nardo Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 561-571 (December 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005 Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Selection process of the studies for the systematic review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012 25, 561-571DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005) Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Forest plot for clinical pregnancy rate in the endometrial injury (hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy) and control groups. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012 25, 561-571DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005) Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Forest plot for clinical pregnancy rate in the randomized and non-randomized studies for endometrial injury and control groups. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012 25, 561-571DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005) Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Forest plot for live birth rate in the endometrial injury (hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy) and control groups. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012 25, 561-571DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005) Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 5 Forest plot for live birth rate in the randomized and non-randomized studies for endometrial injury and control groups. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012 25, 561-571DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005) Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions