Experiments We wish to conduct an experiment to see the effect of alcohol (explanatory variable) on reaction time (response variable).

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 25: Paired Samples and Blocks. Paired Data Paired data arise in a number of ways. Compare subjects with themselves before and after treatment.
Advertisements

Other Analysis of Variance Designs Chapter 15. Chapter Topics Basic Experimental Design Concepts  Defining Experimental Design  Controlling Nuisance.
The Independent- Samples t Test Chapter 11. Independent Samples t-Test >Used to compare two means in a between-groups design (i.e., each participant is.
Design of Experiments and Analysis of Variance
Comparing Means: Independent-samples t-test Lesson 14 Population APopulation B Sample 1Sample 2 OR.
Chapter 3 Analysis of Variance
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition
Lecture 24: Thurs. Dec. 4 Extra sum of squares F-tests (10.3) R-squared statistic (10.4.1) Residual plots (11.2) Influential observations (11.3,
8. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE 8.1 Elements of a Designed Experiment
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 20 – April 3, 2008.
Go to Table of ContentTable of Content Analysis of Variance: Randomized Blocks Farrokh Alemi Ph.D. Kashif Haqqi M.D.
Chapter 7 For Explaining Psychological Statistics, 4th ed. by B. Cohen 1 Chapter 7: The t Test for Two Independent Sample Means To conduct a t test for.
The Paired-Samples t Test Chapter 10. Paired-Samples t Test >Two sample means and a within-groups design >The major difference in the paired- samples.
+ Chapter 9 Summary. + Section 9.1 Significance Tests: The Basics After this section, you should be able to… STATE correct hypotheses for a significance.
1 Chapter 13 Analysis of Variance. 2 Chapter Outline  An introduction to experimental design and analysis of variance  Analysis of Variance and the.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 10-1 Chapter 10 Analysis of Variance Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.1 Categorical Response: Comparing Two Proportions.
Sec 8.5 Test for a Variance or a Standard Deviation Bluman, Chapter 81.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 10-1 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition Chapter.
Lecture 8 Estimation and Hypothesis Testing for Two Population Parameters.
Chapter 10 Section 5 Chi-squared Test for a Variance or Standard Deviation.
1 Chapter 23 Inferences About Means. 2 Inference for Who? Young adults. What? Heart rate (beats per minute). When? Where? In a physiology lab. How? Take.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Dependent-Samples t-Test
Paired Samples and Blocks
Chapter 10 Two-Sample Tests and One-Way ANOVA.
Chapter 10 Two Sample Tests
Paired Samples and Blocks
Lecture Nine - Twelve Tests of Significance.
Chapter 25: Paired t-Test
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Factorial Experiments
ANOVA Econ201 HSTS212.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
Applied Business Statistics, 7th ed. by Ken Black
Comparing Three or More Means
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10 Two-Sample Tests and One-Way ANOVA.
Inferences on Two Samples Summary
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
Comparing Two Means: Paired Data
Section 12.2: Tests about a Population Proportion
Chapter 12: Comparing Independent Means
The Randomized Complete Block Design
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Inference Confidence Interval for p.
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
CHAPTER 12 Inference for Proportions
CHAPTER 12 Inference for Proportions
Comparing Two Means: Paired Data
What are their purposes? What kinds?
More on Testing 500 randomly selected U.S. adults were asked the question: “Would you be willing to pay much higher taxes in order to protect the environment?”
Chapter 24 Comparing Two Means.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Correlation A measure of the strength of the linear association between two numerical variables.
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
Inference for Who? Students at I.S.U. What? Time (minutes).
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10 – Part II Analysis of Variance
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

Experiments We wish to conduct an experiment to see the effect of alcohol (explanatory variable) on reaction time (response variable).

Factors and Treatments The manipulated factor will be the amount of alcohol consumed. There will be two treatments No alcohol (Control group – drink grape punch) Alcohol (Treatment group – drink grape punch spiked with grain alcohol)

Experimental Design The twelve participants will be split, at random, into two groups of 6. Each participant will drink two 8 ounce glasses of grape punch in half an hour. Reaction time of each participant will be measured after drinking the punch.

Experimental Design Control of outside variables. Each participant drinks grape punch. Each participant has reaction time measured in the same way.

Experimental Design Randomization Replication Participants are randomly assigned to treatment groups. Replication There are 6 participants in each treatment group.

Natural Variation Participants will vary in terms of their natural reaction time. Randomization spreads this variation evenly across the treatment groups.

Data 1. Control Group 2. Treatment Group

Analysis of Results The data gathered from this experiment can be analyzed using the methods presented in Chapter 24 (Lectures 33 and 34). Two independent samples.

Natural Variation We cannot control the natural variation in reaction time, i.e. make each participant have the same reaction time to begin with. We can account for this natural variation by introducing a blocking variable.

Block Design Have each participant serve as a block. Each participant will experience both treatments (no alcohol, alcohol) in a random order.

Block Design There is no variation in the natural reaction time within a block (it is the same person within a block). Therefore we can better assess the effect of alcohol on each person’s reaction time.

Data With this block design we will get a pair of observations (reaction time after grape punch and reaction time after grape punch with alcohol) for each participant.

Two Independent Samples Two separate sets of individuals. One value of the response variable for each individual.

Paired Samples One set of individuals. Two values of the response variable (a pair of values) for each individual.

Know the Difference It is important to know the difference between data arising from two independent samples and data arising from paired samples.

Example Alcohol and Reaction Time Experiment run as a block design with participants as blocks. A pair of reaction times (seconds) for each participant.

Participant No Alcohol Alcohol Difference Alc – No Alc 1 6.7 7.4 0.7 2 7.0 0.0 3 7.7 4 7.3 7.5 0.2 5 7.2 –0.2 6 7.6 7 6.2 1.2 8 6.4 1.1 9 6.6 0.6 10 –0.3 11 12 6.5 0.9

Summary of Differences

Conditions & Assumptions Randomization Condition Paired data Nearly Normal Condition The differences could have come from a population whose distribution is a normal model.

Difference

Confidence Interval for

Table T df 1 2 3 4 11 2.201 Confidence Levels 80% 90% 95% 98% 99%

Confidence Interval for

Interpretation We are 95% confident that the population mean difference in reaction time is between 0.102 and 0.748 seconds. On average, a person’s reaction time increases from 0.102 to 0.748 seconds after drinking this amount of alcohol.

Test of Hypothesis for Step 1: Null and Alternative Hypotheses. Step 2: Check Conditions See earlier slides.

Test of Hypothesis for Step 3: Test Statistic and P-value

Test of Hypothesis for Step 4: Use the P-value to make a decision. Because the P-value is small, reject the null hypothesis.

Test of Hypothesis for Step 5: State a conclusion within the context of the problem. The population mean difference in reaction time, with and without alcohol, is not zero.

Comment This agrees with the confidence interval. Zero was not in the confidence interval and so zero is not a plausible value for the population mean difference.

JMP Data in two columns Create a new column of differences Reaction time with no alcohol. Reaction time with alcohol. Create a new column of differences Cols – Formula

JMP Analysis – Distribution JMP Starter – Basic Differences Matched Pairs

Analysis - Distribution

Matched Pairs