Mark A Wall, Bruce A Posner, Stephen R Sprang  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
The open conformation of a Pseudomonas lipase
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D Bound to the Human Receptor HveA
Tsan Xiao, Par Towb, Steven A. Wasserman, Stephen R. Sprang  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Modular Recognition of RNA by a Human Pumilio-Homology Domain
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Mark Ultsch, Nathalie A Lokker, Paul J Godowski, Abraham M de Vos 
Phosducin induces a structural change in transducin βγ
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Structure of Cry2Aa Suggests an Unexpected Receptor Binding Epitope
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Structural Basis of Core Promoter Recognition in a Primitive Eukaryote
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Structural basis of activity and subunit recognition in G protein heterotrimers  Mark A Wall, Bruce A Posner, Stephen R Sprang  Structure  Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages S1-S3 (September 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00117-8

Figure 1 The Gαβγ heterotrimer and C terminus of Gγ2. All three subunits are shown as they are bound in the heterotrimer. Gβ1 and Gγ2 are colored in yellow and green, respectively, Giα1 is shown in light gray (helical domain) or dark gray (ras-like domain) and the switch I, II and III regions are colored red. (a) The Gαβγ heterodimer; Trp99 from Gβ1 is visible. (b) The seven sheets of the β propeller of Gβ1 are labeled 1–7 and the strands of each sheet are labeled A–D, progressing from the innermost to the outermost strand. The first WD40 repeat begins with strand 7D and continues through strands 1A, 1B and 1C. The remaining six WD repeats continue in this pattern. (c) Residues 46–61 of Gγ2 bound to the groove in Gβ1 formed by the AB loop of blade 7 and the AB and CD loops of blade 6. (The figures were created using MOLSCRIPT [59] and rendered using POV-Ray [60].) Structure 1998 6, S1-S3DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00117-8)

Figure 2 Conservation of subunit interfaces. Subunit interfaces are depicted in ‘open book’ arrangement showing the sidechains of residues at the contact surfaces. (a) The Giα1–Gβ1 interface; (b) the Gβ1–Gγ2 interface. In each panel, the upper subunit is rotated 180° about the axis of rotation, shown as a white line, and translated upwards from the lower subunit. All residues at the interfaces are colored and labeled. Nonconserved residues are colored blue, highly conserved residues (sequence differences between isoforms are few and conservative) are green, and invariant residues are magenta. Atoms are shown in standard colors. (The figure was created using MOLSCRIPT [59] and rendered using Raster 3D [61,62].) Structure 1998 6, S1-S3DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00117-8)

Figure 3 Amino acid sequence alignments. Amino acid sequence alignments are shown for (a) Gα subunits, (b) Gβ subunits and (c) Gγ subunits. Individual residues at binding interfaces are highlighted and colored according to their conservation as in Figure 2. Secondary structure assignments for each subunit are color-coded as in Figure 1. Residues in Giα1 or Gγ2 that contact Gβ1 are marked with yellow dots. Residues in Gβ1 that contact the switch regions of Giα1 are marked with red dots; residues that contact other regions of Giα1 are marked with gray dots. Residues in Gβ1 that contact Gγ2 are marked with green dots. The alignments also show positions at which the chemical consensus is conserved. Residue chemical consensus groupings are: a = (Asp/Glu), b = (His/Lys/Arg), f = (Ala/Gly/Ile/Val/Leu), m = (Asn/Gln), o = (Phe/Trp/Tyr), h = (Ser/Thr), i = (Pro) and s = (Met). The group label is shown when all aligned residues are in the same consensus group. SWISS-PROT accession numbers are: αi1, P10824; αt, P04695; αo, P09471; αs, P04895; αq, P21279; αz, P19086; β1, P04901; β2, P11016; β3, P16520; β4, P29387; β5, P54314; γ1 (bov.), P02698; γ1 (hum.), Q08447; γ2(6), P16874; γ3, P29798; γ4, P50150; γ5, P30670; γ7, P30671; γ8, P50154; γ9, P43426; γ10, P50151; γ11, P50152; and γ12, Q28024. Structure 1998 6, S1-S3DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00117-8)

Figure 4 Subunit flexibility and membrane orientation. Each subunit is modeled as a combination of secondary structure and solvent-accessible surface above a plane which represents the cell membrane according to Lambright et al. [19], Lichtarge et al. [63] and Onrust et al. [64]. The three subunits are separated, but correctly positioned as they would bind each other if translated horizontally. The solid surfaces correspond to all parts of each subunit that are identical in conformation in different structures. Ribbon and tube representations, respectively, depict α helices and loops of each subunit that adopt different conformations in different structures. Structures contributing to the α subunit are the Giα1β1γ2 heterotrimer (red), Giα1·GTPγS (yellow) and Giα1·GDP (blue). Structures contributing to the Gβ and Gγ subunits are the Giα1β1γ2 heterotrimer (red), Gtαβ1γ1 heterotrimer (blue) and the Gβ1γ1 heterodimer (yellow). The view in the lower panel is rotated 180° around the vertical axis from that above. GDP is rendered as a CPK model. In the lower panel, the β6–α5 GDP-binding loop (Ala324–Ala329, implicated in nucleotide exchange) and α5 (the C-terminal portion of which is implicated in receptor binding) are shown as a green tube and ribbon. Root mean square differences from Giα1β1γ2 positions for corresponding Giα1 Cα atoms in the ras and helical domains, respectively, are 1.7 and 1.5 å (Giα1·GTPγS·Mg2+), 1.8 and 1.4 å (Giα1·GDP·AIF4−·Mg2+), 1.3 and 0.9 å (Giα1·GDP·Pi) and 0.7 and 0.9 å (Giα1·GDP switch II disordered). Surfaces were created with the program GRASP [57] and interhelical angles were calculated using MOLMOL [56]. (The figure was created using MOLSCRIPT [59] and rendered using Raster3D [61,62].) Structure 1998 6, S1-S3DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00117-8)

Figure 5 Stereoviews illustrating βγ selectivity. (a) The subunit interface between Gβ1 and helix 2 of Gγ2. Backbone ribbons are colored olive; sidechain carbon atoms from Gβ1 residues are colored green and those from Gγ2 are in white. Nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur atoms are colored blue, red and yellow, respectively. (b) The same interface between Gγ1 and a model of Gβ2. The coloring scheme is the same as that in (a) except for the residues in Gβ2 and Gγ1 that differ from their counterparts in Gβ1 and Gγ2, respectively; such residues are colored purple in Gβ2 and light blue in Gγ1. The amino acid sequences of Gβ2 and Gβ3 are identical in the regions shown. Orange dotted lines indicate distances between pairs of atoms that are shorter than the sum of their van der Waals radii. These represent steric conflicts that cannot be resolved by χ angle rotations. (The figure was created using MOLSCRIPT [59] and rendered using Raster3D [61,62].) Structure 1998 6, S1-S3DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00117-8)

Figure 6 Stereoview of the heterotrimer nucleotide binding site. Carbon atoms of the Giα1 subunit of the Gi heterotrimer are colored cyan and those for GDP are in yellow. Nitrogen and oxygen atoms are colored blue and red, respectively. Hydrogen bonds present in both the structures of monomeric Giα1 · GDP [38] and the Giα1 heterotrimer are represented as green dots; those interactions present only in the Giα1 heterotrimer are shown as orange dots (see text for details). (The figure was created using MOLSCRIPT [59] and rendered using POV-Ray [60].) Structure 1998 6, S1-S3DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00117-8)

Figure 7 Effect of the G203AGiα1 mutation on conformation and activation. Heterotrimers containing Giα1 and G203AGiα1 have been superimposed and GTPγS has been modeled into the active site. Nitrogen and oxygen atoms are colored blue and red, respectively. Wild-type Giα1 is colored cyan and G203AGiα1 is colored green; strands β2 and β3 and helix α2 are shown in gray. The Gβ1 subunits that correspond to the wild-type and G203AGiα1 structures are colored yellow and purple, respectively. As can be seen from the superposition, the only conformational shifts arising from the mutation occur in switch I and at the N terminus of switch II. A network of polar contacts (dotted lines), involving Thr182, Gln204 and Ser206 from Giα1 and Asn119 and Tyr145 from Gβ1, (see text) is shown for residues in Giα1(G203A)β1γ2. This figure was created using MOLSCRIPT [59] and rendered using POV-Ray [60]. Structure 1998 6, S1-S3DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00117-8)