Judging Contests 101 Running a Successful 4-H Judging Contest Kevin Kline, PhD University of Illinois.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rubik’s Cube 101 By Andy Camann.
Advertisements

How to be a good teacher? What makes a good teacher?
BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations
Lets Practice! Look at each cow and think about the parts of the Unified Scorecard. Look at each cow and think about the parts of the Unified Scorecard.
A Systems Approach To Training
Scoring Training Guide. Goals of Assessment We must ensure that tests measure what is of value, not just what is easy to test. If we want students to.
Discrete Probability Rosen 5.1.
Commonly Used Cooperative Learning Techniques
To revise the Pierce County Judging Program to shadow Snohomish County 4-H Horse Department. To create a Judging program that is focused on learning rather.
Steps to Developing an Entry Part Two Module V NJ APA Teacher Training – Module V 1.
Beth Morrison Youth participation in judging will provide multiple benefits in addition to the skills learned in the project area.
Youth Quizzing Ministry. What is Bible Quizzing? Helps youth study and learn about the Scriptures through a weekly small group Bible Study.
Building Student Independence 1. Staying connected 2.
Hit the Ground Running: An Introduction to the Accounting Workplace JFK-102B3W18 JFK-103B1W18.
Scoring of Contests Kathy M. Gordon Extension Educator, 4-H & Youth Carroll County “Maryland Cooperative Extension Provides Equal Access Programs”
Youth-Adult Partnerships
Note Taking and Preparation for Oral Reasons Equine Science Spring 2010 Created by: Bryan Egan and Stacie Domer Penn State, 2006.
2014 Mail-in Tournament Month 2: Swine.  Make sure you have a pencil and judging card ready o Don’t forget to include your full name!  You may take.
4-H Livestock Recordbook Jeopardy $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100.
Source: Basic Steps in Horse Judging (V0A ); MSU-ES Horse Judging Activities I-V (Form 819, 820, 821, 822, 823); 4-H Horse Judging Manual (Pub.
Horse Judging Evaluating Halter Horses Presented by: Katherine Whitby.
Giving Oral Reasons In Livestock Judging Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Extension Agent
Source: Basic Steps in Horse Judging (V0A ); MSU-ES Horse Judging Activities I-V (Form 819, 820, 821, 822, 823); 4-H Horse Judging Manual (Pub.
Utah State 4-H Leadermete Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Extension Agent
Source: MSU-ES Horse Judging Activities I-V (Form 819, 820, 821, 822, 823); 4-H Horse Judging Manual (Pub 901) 4-H Horse Judging Contest Horse Judging.
VOCABULARY  Deck or pack  Suit  Hearts  Clubs  Diamonds  Spades  Dealer  Shuffle  Pick up  Rank  Draw  Set  Joker  Jack 
MAKE A MODEL AND CONDUCT A SIMULATION We design a model and simulate solutions to problems where an exact answer can only be estimated and probability.
Claire Sponseller Morrow County 4-H Agent. Evaluating (comparing) an animal against a common standard (ideal) Four steps Information Observation Comparison.
Leadership Leadership Leadership Leadership For Youth Rania Azmi Business Administration Dept., Faculty of Commerce, Alexandria University Professional.
January 18, 2014.
Interpreting Wildlife Habitat from Aerial Photographs (Activity II) A. Aerial Photo Evaluation - 20 Points B. Oral Reasoning - 10 Points.
Creating Questionnaires. Learning outcomes Upon completion, students will be able to: Identify the difference between quantitative and qualitative data.
TODAY’S AGENDA 9/16 FTF (Blocks D & A only) 1. Complete models (5 minutes only!). Students who are finished will use this time to practice their brief.
Referee Clinic. Introduction Rules Regarding the Referee Qualities of a “Good” Referee Art of Refereeing.
AGR 239 Selection and Evaluation of Horses Information Cards: 1)Name 2)Classification 3)Hometown 4)Equine Experience 5)Judging Experience 6)Reasons Experience.
Presentation skills 1 Group work: discussion and presentation on the topic Qualities to Work in a Care Home 1)suppose you are volunteers in a care home.
Working in Teams, Unit 4 Individual Roles and Team Mission Working in Teams/Unit 41 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
TODAY’S AGENDA 9/12 UNIT 1: Thinking Like A Scientist FTF
Speech Contest Judges Training Andy O’Sullivan, DTM, District Chief Judge Vanessa King, DTM, Program Quality Director District 91.
January 17, 2015.
Beth Morrison Youth participation in judging will provide multiple benefits in addition to the skills learned in the project area.
Livestock Evaluation.
Ms. Howard 9 th Lit./Comp WARRING FAMILIES: A CLASSROOM COMPETITION.
APPLYING OFFSIDE When attending training sessions the subject of offside always comes up. The initial reaction may be:” OH NO,DO WE HAVE TO GO OVER THIS.
Strategies for Answering Multiple Choice Questions
Cooperative Learning. Why?  Cooperative learning groups can:  Promote student learning and achievement  Increase students’ retention of knowledge 
GCSE Business Studies Exam help Command Words Unit 3: Building a Business.
Evaluating Statements About Number OperationsProjector Resources Evaluating Statements About Number Operations Projector Resources.
FFA Cattle Judging.
Basic Skills For Group Leaders
Scoring Cards.
Livestock Judging Helpful Hints Beef cattle Swine Sheep.
The 5S numbers game. 1 1.
4-H Horse Judging Contest
5S Numbers Game The purpose of this game is to demonstrate the impact the way our workplace is arranged impacts on how the work is done.
Judging Contests 101 Running a Successful 4-H Judging Contest
Horse Conformation/ Evaluation
The 5S numbers game..
Scoring Judging Placings
UKCAT.
Practice Judging: Halter Practice Judging Halter.
The 5S numbers game..
Parts of a Judging Contest
Having Fun at Project Meetings!
Horse Judging Evaluating Halter Horses Presented by: Katherine Whitby.
Senior High 4-H Consumer Decision-Making Contest
The 5S numbers game..
Horse Judging Evaluating Halter Horses Presented by: Katherine Whitby.
4-H Horse Judging Contest
Delivering Livestock Judging Reasons
Presentation transcript:

Judging Contests 101 Running a Successful 4-H Judging Contest Kevin Kline, PhD University of Illinois

Objectives of 4-H Horse Judging Contests Teach life skills –Observation –Organization –Logic –Critical thinking –Decision making Gain knowledge for future vocation/avocation Enjoy competition!

Offer a mini-clinic before the contest to help 4-Hers recognize good/bad qualities of horses

Halter Basics Balanced Horse Unbalanced Horse

Performance Basics High Quality Western Pleasure Horse

Make the contest a learning experience! Simulate real life shows (youth/open) Use horses of show quality Keep breed/type, sex and age together in halter & similar training levels in performance classes Match horses in a class that sort logically –Outstanding top horse, close middle pair, bottom horse –Close top pair, close bottom pair –Clear differences between all 4 horses Let experienced judge choose classes –Dont make officials sort out messy classes

Score the contest correctly Use volunteers trained in scoring –Hormel cards –Computer program –By hand (Its easy!) Use the correct cuts to reflect differences in horse quality and 4-Her performance

What are cuts? Point values assigned to relative quality differences between a pair of horses Assigned to top, middle, bottom pairs of 4-horse classes Points deducted for incorrect placement of pair

One point Cut Horses are extremely similar; no obvious reason why one should be placed over the other; or both horses have numerous faults and none supersedes the others; placing is strictly a matter of personal preference; placing varies among the official judges.

Two Point Cut Horses are very close, but one horse has one or two qualitative or quantitative advantage; the majority of official judges would not switch the pair, but half of the contestants could logically switch the pair.

Three Point Cut Horses of similar quality, but there is some logical placing in favor of one horse; either one horse has several advantages or one has several faults; all official judges would agree on the placing; no more than one third of contestants would be expected to switch the pair.

Four Point Cut Horses are not of similar quality; one horse has several decided advantages based on many points; all experts would quickly see the placing; no guesswork or personal preference required to make placing; no more than 10% of the contestants would be expected to switch the pair.

Five Point Cut Large numbers of extreme differences between the horses; placing is obvious to everyone on first, quick observation; careful study not required for the placing; pair consists of an inferior horse vs. a consistent winner; only very novice, uninformed contestants would switch the pair.

Six Point Cut Horses not even comparable; differences reflective of a champion quality horse or performance vs. a horse or performance that is not of show quality.

12 34 QUIZQUIZ

Official placing & cuts Yearling QH Fillies: 3 – 1 – 4 –

Scoring 4-Her placing cards - examples Official: 3 – 1 – 4 – 2 Cuts: Her placing: 1 – 3 – 2 – 4 Scoring: 50 possible - 4, - 3 = Her placing: 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 Scoring: Did she place 3/1? – yes Did she place 3/4? – no : lose = 6 Did she place 3/2? – yes Did she place 1/4? – no : lose 2 Did she place 1/2? – no : lose = 5 Did she place 4/2? – yes Final class score: 50 possible minus = 37

Scoring 4-Her placing cards – another example Always ask/answer 6 questions re: placing Official: 3 – 1 – 4 – 2 Cuts: Her placing: 2 – 1 – 3 – 4 1.Did she place 3/1 – No : minus 4 2.Did she place 3/4 - yes 3.Did she place 3/2 – No : minus = 9 4.Did she place 1/4 - yes 5.Did she place 1/2 – No : minus = 5 6.Did she place 4/2 – No : minus 3 Final class score: 50 possible minus = 29

Marking/Scoring Question Cards 4-H member circles only one number representing the horse number that is the answer to the question – usually 5 pts each, 10 Qs

Example questions from QH yearling fillies A.Which QH yearling filly had the longest back & shortest hip? #2 B.Which QH yearling filly had the best balance and heaviest muscle? #3 C.Which QH yearling filly had the least feminine head? #4 D.Which QH yearling fillys neck was cleanest blending into the shoulder? #3 E.Which QH yearling filly was palomino in color? #1 F.Which QH yearling filly was lightest muscled and sickle hocked? #2

Volunteers are essential! Horse handlers Group leaders –Help keep order among contestants – no talking! –Collect cards –Ensure safety of contestants Experienced judge or judges committee Clear voiced announcer familiar w/contests Score keepers –Score the placing & question cards –Sort cards into class & team groupings