Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network, Brussels,14th April 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Advertisements

1 Ex post evaluation of ERDF Objective 1 & 2 ( ) Kai Stryczynski, Evaluation Unit.
Open Days 2007: 2nd EU-China Regional Policy Seminar, 8 October 2007 "Workshop 2: Multi-level governance and partnership in regional policy" Presentation.
1 Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Fund (including former ISPA) Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, February 25 th 2010.
1 Cohesion Policy Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, October 2010 Ex post evaluation of cohesion policy interventions financed.
Monitoring & Evaluation System of Regional RIS3 Panagiotis Koudoumakis Head of Programming and Evaluation Unit Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia.
Policy coordination process in AttractSEE project and Spatial Plan of Republic of Serbia Jelena Miljković, Siniša Trkulja Republic Agency for Spatial Planning,
Bottom up evaluation of strategies Jela Tvrdonova 2011.
Part-financed by the European Union WS 3: Communication Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant seminar, Hamburg, 2-4 April 2008.
Evidence-based policies and indicator systems 2006 Conducting effective research and analysis to support policy delivery. The Green Book: Appraisal and.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
Model Name Transition Project Learning Network Workshop 3 IYF Transition Project.
Managing Authority of EU Funds – Ministry of Finance 1 Methodology of selection of project applications for EU funds including preparation of appraisal.
1 Cohesion Policy Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 21 September 2009 Ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes
Reporting on performance in establishing and operating the Shared Environmental Information System 16 th session of the Working Group on Environmental.
Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.
Regional Policy Ex post Evaluation of the Cohesion Fund and ISPA in period Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy Evalaution network.
MONITORING SYSTEM OF EU STRUCTURAL FUNDS: PHYSICAL INDICATORS International Conference for New Member States February 1-2, 2012, Vilnius (Lithuania) European.
EQUAL Community Initiative Programme for Malta Conference co-financed by the EU: European Social Fund (ESF) Co-financing Rate: 75% EU Funds;
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division The UNECE Gender Database and Website UNECE Statistical Division.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION National evaluation conference Marielle Riché Evaluation unit, DG REGIO Bucharest, 18.
1 Cohesion Fund (including former ISPA) ex post evaluation Jurate Vaznelyte, Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, April 14 th.
FREP Vision: Sustainability through science and stewardship.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division The UNECE Gender Statistics Database and Website UNECE Statistical Division.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Quality Associates of Web services. Development Quality Manager Quality Information Provider Quality Assuror Developer Quality Information aggregation.
UNIT 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring and evaluation is the process of examining progress against institution’s goals or plan.  The term SM &
Strategies Towards Energy Performance In Urban Planning
RISK MANAGEMENT. CONTENTS  DEFINITION  WHAT IS RISK  TYPES OF RISK  RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS  APPROACHES TO RISK MANAGEMENT.
EU Cohesion Policy and its implementation in the Czech Republic Zuzana Kasáková Department of W European Studies Charles University in Prague.
NCSA Project Management Committee Meeting April 4 th, :00 am EEAA Premises 6 th floor.
Planning, Public Policy, & Management (PPPM) Overview  Evaluation approaches –Overview –Approaches for childhood obesity –Discuss pros and cons  Plan.
Timeline PG Planning the Road network - Workflow End purpose: - Status of the road network - EU Whitepaper analyses - Benchmarking analysis - Consequence.
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
The UNECE Gender Database and Website
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY-BUILDING AND EU COHESION POLICY
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Core indicators in the annual reporting exercise 2011
Core Indicators: Annual Reporting Exercise 2011
Ex post evaluation of ERDF and CF: State of play
Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Administrators Leadership and Vision.
E-government Working Group
Core Indicators: Pilot Exercise and AIR in 2010
Evaluation network DG REGIO 14th April 2011
Effect combined IMPACT on achieving outcomes Organizational OUTPUTS
Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 25 February 2010
Monitoring & Reporting 2019
Core Indicators: Definitions and Use
The Monitoring of the implementation of the IPoA
Monitoring & evaluation in
Central Dauphin School District Budget Presentation #7
Gender Equality in the ESF 2007 | 2013
On-going Evaluation in Germany
Monitoring System of the Centro Region’s RIS3 (Portugal)
Demonstrating performance and EU added value John WALSH REGIO Evaluation and European Semester Unit ESI FUNDS ESI FUNDS.
Common Indicators – Annex 1 of Concepts and Recommendations Paper
or Find everything about EU funds in Lithuania!
Reviewing Core Indicators
Expert evaluation network
ESF ex post evaluation State of play
ESF ex post evaluation State of play
Transparent Cohesion Policy. Presenting beneficiaries
Publication of beneficiaries’ list Lithuanian experience
Assessment of 1st FRMPs and 2nd RBMPs
SUPERPOWERS POLICIES EVALUATION BY REGION
find everything about EU funds in Lithuania first !
DG REGIO Evaluation-Related Activities State of play
MIWP Action on « List of priority data sets »
Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 23rd November 2012
Core Indicators: Annual Reporting Exercise 2010
Presentation transcript:

Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network, Brussels,14th April 2011 Monitoring & evaluation after 2013 – Common Indicators and Result Indicators Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network, Brussels,14th April 2011

Common Indicators Objective: provide EU level (aggregated) information on achievements of Cohesion Policy Timing: information should be available at or shortly after finishing projects (actual and contracted values) Simplicity: data from monitoring of implementation or operation Aggregation: “outputs“ as much as possible