Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Advertisements

Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Driving Through the California Dashboard
2012 Accountability Determinations
Accountability in Virginia: Revisions to the Standards of Accreditation and Virginia’s Federal Programs Application under ESSA Virginia Department of Education.
Title I Parent/Family Meeting
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
Washington’s ESSA Consolidated Plan Implementation 101
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability & Assistance System
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Kansas Elementary and Secondary Education Act Advisory Council (ESEA)
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Pennsylvania’s ESSA Submitted Plan Review
Ridgefield Public Schools New Jersey School Performance Report
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Understanding the New Maryland School Report Card
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
NYS ESSA ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Starting Community Conversations
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Every Student Succeeds Act
Driving Through the California Dashboard
What To Expect from the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Principal’s Meeting: SCEP Planning Part II
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Phillipsburg Middle School Identification as a School in Need of  Comprehensive Support and Improvement: Starting Community Conversations March.
District and School Accountability System: Recommended Modifications
Old (API State/AYP Federal) to New
Central Middle School August 20, 2019
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System What Identification as a Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) School Means to our Students and Staff

Today’s Presentation Discuss reasons for a new accountability system Review New York’s new accountability system Including the new indicators of school performance Present how our school performed on each of the indicators Discuss Comprehensive Support and Improvement School How we will build on our current school-improvement efforts Today’s Presentation

Why a New Accountability System? The Every Student Succeeds Act or ESSA is the federal law for K-12 education in the United States. States receive funding from the United States Department of Education to help districts and schools improve student outcomes, particularly for groups of students who have historically underperformed compared to state averages. NY receives about $1.6 billion annually in ESSA funding. In the Madison Elementary/Middle School District, ESSA funding supports programs and services that include: Math and Reading Teachers; academic support for students who are struggling; supplies and materials for AIS; supplemental supplies for homeless students; In exchange for funding, states must have an accountability system for measuring school performance and determining which schools need extra support. States have flexibility in developing these accountability systems States can incorporate measures of school success that go beyond test scores Why a New Accountability System?

Accountability Educational Equity Educational equity means all students succeed and thrive in school no matter who they are, where they live, or where they go to school. Accountability is everyone’s responsibility: we should celebrate what we do well and recognize upon what we need to improve, and identify the implications of the choices we make. Being identified for Comprehensive Support & Improvement means we will get extra help to assist us in our improvement efforts.

New York’s New Accountability System The New York State Education Department (NYSED) has established a new set of indicators to measure school performance. More than a thousand people—parents, educators, experts— as well as national experts offered input. Broader than in the past - Much stronger focus on student growth and progress. - More comprehensive look at school performance. New York’s New Accountability System

Multiple Measures of Performance NYSED is using several indicators to determine the performance of elementary and middle schools: Student academic achievement in language arts, math, and science Student growth in language arts and math Academic progress in language arts and math English language proficiency Chronic absenteeism For every school, these measures are applied to all students and specific student subgroups, such as members of racial and ethnic groups, students with disabilities, and English language learners

How Schools Are Measured On Each Indicator For every indicator, a school is given a numeric score: “1” is lowest “4” is highest For every indicator: A score of “1” to “4” is given for all students at a school and A score of “1” to “4” is given for each specific student subgroup at a school for which the school is accountable

The Individual Indicators What Each Indicator Measures and How Our School Performed

Measuring Student Academic Achievement (Composite Performance Index) This indicator measures achievement on state assessments in English language arts (ELA), math, and science. Levels are assigned based on where a school ranks compared to all other schools in the state: Schools receive no credit for students who score at Level 1, partial credit for students who score at Level 2, full credit for students who score at Level 3, and extra credit for students who score at Level 4. The Composite Performance Index is computed two ways: one based on only students who participated in state assessments and one adjusted for students who did not participate. A school can receive an index that ranges from 0 to 250. Madison Elementary/Middle School had a Performance Index of 102.6 out of a possible 250 based on students who participated in the state assessments and 88.2 when adjusted for students who did not participate. Madison Elementary/Middle School received a Level 2 on this indicator, meaning our school performed between the 10% and 50% percentile among all elementary and middle schools in the state. Rank Level 10% or Less 1 10.1 to 50% 2 50.1 to 75% 3 Greater than 75% 4

Measuring Student Growth on State Tests This indicator measures student growth on state assessments in English language arts and math. Indicator applies to grades 4-8. Compares students’ scores this year to scores of students in the same grade with similar scores in prior years. Uses the performance of our school for the last three years, not just last year. The scores for each student in ELA and math are averaged and a Growth Index computed for the school. Levels are assigned as follows: On this indicator, Madison Elementary/Middle School had a Growth Index of 42 and received a Level 1 for the all students group. Measuring Student Growth on State Tests Growth Index Growth Level 45% or less 1 45.1 to 50% 2 50.1 to 54% 3 Greater than 54% 4

This measure combines the Student Achievement and Student Growth indicators Creates a “Combined Composite Performance and Growth” measure by: Adding the Composite Performance Level and the Student Growth Level, giving a number from 2-8. For Madison Elementary/Middle School that would be a Composite Performance Level of 2 and a Student Growth Level of 1, equaling 3. Ranking schools with the same number (for Madison Elementary/Middle School a 3) based on their rank for Composite Performance and for Student Growth. Assigning a percentile rank to the result. On this indicator, our school received a score of 1 for all students, placing the school among the lowest ten percent in the state. Measuring Student Test Achievement (Composite Performance) & Growth on State Tests Combined

Measuring Academic Progress This indicator measures overall student progress on state assessments in English language arts and math, compared to our school’s measures of interim progress (MIP), the State MIP and long-term goals In ELA, Madison Elementary/Middle School had a school MIP of 78.8, the State MIP was 100.7, and the State long-term goal was 117. Madison Elementary/Middle School’s performance was 73. Since we did not meet either MIP, we received Level 1 in ELA. In math, Madison Elementary/Middle School had a school MIP of 76.6, the State MIP was 103.3 and the State long-term goal was 119.4. Madison Elementary/Middle School’s performance was 75.8. Since we did not meet our school MIP, we received Level 1 in math. Madison Elementary/Middle School did not receive a Level 2 for ELA or math our overall Level for Academic Progress was Level 1. Measuring Academic Progress

Measuring English Language Proficiency This indicator measures progress of English language learners (ELL) in meeting their individual targets on the New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT). Each school receives a Success Ratio on this measure based on the percent of students who made progress compared to the probability that a student will make progress. A success ratio of 1.0 means students did exactly as expected in terms of making progress towards English proficiency; greater than 1.0 better than expected; and less than 1.0 less than expected. On this indicator, Madison Elementary/Middle School did not receive a score due to our low number of ELL students. Measuring English Language Proficiency

Measuring Chronic Absenteeism This indicator measures the percentage of students who miss 10% or more of the days they are supposed to attend, compared to our school’s measures of interim progress (MIP) and long-term goals. Madison Elementary/Middle School had a school MIP of 18.6%, the State MIP was 13.3%, and the State long- term goal is 9.2%. Madison Elementary/Middle School’s performance was 17%, meaning 17% of students at Madison Elementary/Middle School were absent for 10% of more days of instruction. Since we met the school MIP, but not the State MIP or long-term goal, Madison Elementary/Middle School received a Level 2. Measuring Chronic Absenteeism

Identification for Comprehensive Support and Improvement An elementary or middle school can be identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement if its Levels of Performance meets one of these five “scenarios” Scenario Composite Performance Growth Combined Composite Performance & Growth ELP Progress Chronic Absenteeism 1 Both Level 1 Level 1 Any Level (None, 1-4) 2 Either Level 1 None Any One of the Two is Level 1 3 4 Level 2 5 Level 3 or 4 Madison Elementary / Middle School Performance was: Scenario Composite Performance Growth Combined Composite Performance & Growth ELP Progress Chronic Absenteeism 2 1 None Madison Elementary/Middle School has been identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement because we met “Scenario 2.”

Comprehensive Support & Improvement What it Means to Our School

Required CSI School Interventions Madison Elementary / Middle School will: Participate in an on-site needs assessment conducted by the New York State Education Department (May 14-16). Review additional data to identify needs to be addressed in the school’s annual improvement plan. Conduct annual surveys of parents, staff, and students. Develop, in consultation with parents, school staff, and for secondary schools, students, an annual School Comprehensive Education Plan (SCEP) and submit to NYSED for approval. Identify a school-wide evidence-based intervention to be included within the annual improvement plan. Take steps to increase parent and student participation in decision-making. Receive Federal School Improvement funds to support our efforts. CSI School

How Schools Can Exit CSI Status To exit CSI status, the school must for two consecutive years be above the levels that would cause it to be identified for CSI status: Madison Elementary/Middle School can exit CSI status if for the 2018-19 and 2019-20 school years: Composite Performance Level and Student Growth Level are both Level 2 or higher, or Both the Composite Performance Index and Student Growth Index are higher than at the time of identification; AND Combined Composite Performance and Growth is Level 2 or higher; AND none of the following is Level 1: Academic Progress; English Language Proficiency; Chronic Absenteeism Madison Elementary/Middle School can also exit CSI status if the school is not on the next list of CSI schools created based on 2020-21 school year results.

Questions?