中外合作办学中的教育质量问题 Quality Controls Issues on International Joint program 郑通涛 厦门大学 Professor Tongtao Zheng Xiamen University March 13, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW TO EVALUATE A MOBILITY PROJECT Training Unit 11.1 Procedures, tools and roles for the evaluation of a mobility project.
Advertisements

PREPARATORY ACTIVITIES Training Unit 6.1 Preparatory activities before the placement.
Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January ERASMUS MUNDUS PREPARING YOUR APPLICATION.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Joint Degree Programmes: QA across national borders – ideas and strategies Nick Harris Quality Assurance Agency for HE UK.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
Employer Engagement; Curriculum Refinements Carol Costley Institute for Work Based Learning.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
DYNAMIC MODEL DY.MO.VO.TRA. A NEW WAY TO SUPPORT TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONALISM FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF EUROPEAN SCHOOL IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY KEY ACTION.
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Implementing the new Australian Medical Council standards: The focus on Indigenous health Professor Michael Field Chair, Medical School Accreditation Committee,
Minimum Core Skills and embedding. A study by the National Research and Development Centre (NRDC) 2006 discovered that…. Learners on embedded courses.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
WELCOME!. Foreign Language as a tool of internalization of Higher Education.
Quality Assurance in the University of Oulu Preparing for the Audit of QA system in November 2009 E-XCELLENCE Suvi Eriksson Coordinator University.
Management Committee TUNING methodology and tools for curricula design: II part - Questionnaires Fausta Ludovici.
CBU / International Relations Heino Nyyssönen Adjunct Professor University Lecturer, CBU-coordinator
INITIAL AND IN-SERVICE TRAINING OF PRACTITIONERS AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF GUIDANCE IN FINLAND Professor Marjatta Lairio University of Jyväskylä Department.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
STRATEGY OF LIFELONG LEARNING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NIS
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Higher education and professional work José-Ginés Mora Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
1 Joint Programmes Require Joint Forces: the Management Aspect Francesco Girotti International Relations Division, Bologna University JOIMAN project‘s.
Developing trust: Towards Mutual Recognition agreements MERCOSUR – RIACES María José Lemaitre Chile.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Quality in mobility: how to measure and assess it Maria Sticchi Damiani.
The Finnish-Russian Cross-Border University CBU ® Two countries Nine universities Six study fields Liisa Tahvanainen CBU.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Workshop 4: Recognition of non-formal and informal learning Espoo Lauri Savisaari.
Hanne Smidt, Senior Advisor European University Association.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Current issues in internationalization of higher education in Finland Conference in Seinäjoki Dr. Carita Blomqvist Head of Unit Recognition and.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
Student and stakeholder participation in QA of education Kirsi Hiltunen.
Outline of Quality assurance and accreditation
The EQAVET Framework – supporting quality and relevance of VET
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Degree programme development
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
Nationally Coordinated Promotion Languages Promotional Materials
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
IMPLEMENTING THE… NHS KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS FRAMEWORK ‘NHS KSF’
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Recognition of prior learning: report
European higher education in a globalised world
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Othman Haji Simbran Brunei Darussalam National Accreditation Council
Monica Puscas (NUSPSA, Romania)
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
“CareerGuide for Schools”
PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN
Recognition of prior learning: report
Zanzibar Education Development Plan ZEDP II (2017/18 – 2021/22)
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Professional Standards
Quality assurance and curriculum development
CO-OPERATION BETWEEN HEI’S AND LABOUR MARKET , Baku
European Style Pilot Evaluations in Azerbaijan Higher Education Baku 20 June 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Project Leader.
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Professional Standards
European collaboration for knowledge exchange & Innovation
Training on joint doctoral studies
Presentation transcript:

中外合作办学中的教育质量问题 Quality Controls Issues on International Joint program 郑通涛 厦门大学 Professor Tongtao Zheng Xiamen University March 13, 2010

Why Joint program? Enhancing quality of education through joining forces Broadening the study and coverage of the disciplines Combining strengths and learning from the partners Internationalization Joining the overseas education systems and processes Increasing the recognition of the joint degrees

Quality? If you can not measure it, you can not understand it If you can not understand it, you can not improve it

International Joint programs at Xiamen University Foundation program Exchange Students Dual degree program Two campus one degree program Two or more campus one degree program Co-supervision program (postgraduate)

Problems in the programmes Slow response from partner university: 效率低。补考试题提交了等半年都没有回音。 Unable or unwilling to tickle questions during communication 有回音的也不指明改进方案,多次询问都没有答复 Lack of internationalized considerations 教材所配录音太强调某种口音,不能满足学生考试的需要;在训练国外学习技能方面的内容不够丰富,如训练在内容选择和篇幅长度上不足;缺乏学术写作的critical thinking训练,以及presentation以外seminar skills的训练 Content and level integrity problems 一些大学专业课采用MBA教材, 难度较大. 合作方应可以选择专业基础教材。课程名称与教材内容不符。如:课表是‘金融学’,但教材是‘财政学’;课表是‘产品管理’,但教材内容又以物流居多。翻译上的不严谨,造成排课及课程准备上的不便 Course overlapping有的课程内容重复,安排不合理 Progression limit: recognition problem 学生出路窄 Country-specify curriculum and teaching methodology as well as evaluation is the most important factor in a successful international joint programme

WHAT IS QUALITY? Teachers & students satisfaction Fulfilling the set requirements Best possible results with available resources Continuous improvement

Quality in Joint programme Mutual gurantor- quality as a partner Future path gurantor-quality of the consortium Communication integretion-services in destinational languages International experience- mobility Mutiple integretion - courses in a curricula taken from several universities Group recongnition- several universities can award the degree based on the same studies

Quality: Three Aspects Quality of individual institution and their offers More of the cooperation across institutional and national borders The programmes as a whole

Formations of Quality: Joint!!! Jointly developed and recognised by several institutions Students can spend part of their studies at another institutions The study are automatically recognised in full at their home institutions The curriculum are worked out together, including regulations for admission, the examination and teaches at the other institutions Students receive either national degrees from the individual institutions or a degree jointly conferred

Quality Factors Successful program: teamwork, focus on patients, clarity of roles through standards, and synergy between the QC Project and the Project itself Keywords: program evaluation, quality assurance, quality improvement, quality management

Value-added Factors Commitment to quality is essential Competition for market shares is hard Students are quality conscious and demanding

Quality Motivation Visibility in international educational markets Attractiveness to national and international applicants Combining adequate educational resources Incorporating complementary teaching expertise in core areas Expert exchange between partners Research co-operation between the partners

Objectives To provide students with wide range of high quality, internationally attractive and relevant programs on disciplines in a foreign language To promote educational co-operation between China and other countries, the cultural and national equality, language plurality and gender equality

Process of Quality Implementation Formulating the areas of competency in each partner university Formulating the core competences of the consortium Formulating the sub-competences of the consortium Formulating the curriculum for the joint degree programme Joint implementation of the programme Awarding the joint diplomas

Curriculum Structure Compulsory courses, jointly produced Home university compulsory courses Elective courses from partner universities Special courses, given by both sides experts, available for all the students Cross-border Internship in a partner university In cooperation with companies, supervised by two universities Versatile teaching methods; Face-to-face, distance education, seminars, projects

Students expectations SKILLS AND COMPETENCES: Applying their knowledge and understanding in international and multicultural environment Internationalization that advances succeeding in business life Problem solving and decision making in international environment To work in an interdisciplinary and international team and context Appreciation of diversity and multiculturality Understanding of social and ethical responsibilities Concern for quality

Other expectations Services: well arranged, effective and competent teaching versatile teaching methodology good supportive services (ICT, library, language...) well organised guidance and tutoring giving feedback and participating in developing of teaching To have a choice of studies to be aligned with needs of labour markets To get a national or double or joint diploma to apply for their working life or further studies To build up individual international network in their field of expertise

Establishment of Quality System After surveys set up indicators To provide an additional element for existing systems. Makes the quality visible

The Quality Objectives Has to committed to the fulfillment of the goals and values by the quality assurance system with indicators and surveys Has to produce and demonstrate high quality educational products and services that would attract young students to the program Has to demonstrate that the degrees have better employment opportunities than students in general in partner universities The program are internationally recognized and audited.

Main Features of QCS Could be used via internet Offers help and guidance for the partner universities to maintain and develop the joint education and services Provides common uniform procedures and methods for assuring the quality Guarantees equal opportunities for students Makes the quality of programmemes visible Help the auditors’ work

STEP BY STEP Defining Quality Actors The Status of Present QA at the university Quality of universities as partners universities Student satisfaction/Feedback Teacher satisfaction/Feedback Other Stakeholders’ feedback Quality reflection to the objectives, strategies, needs Quality Development Action Plan Documentation Feedback and Availability of Quality Information Internal Quality Audit External Quality Audit

Partner Institutions Survey programme learning outcomes commonly not defined QCS in teaching Not always fully described and in use Commonly not audited and certified by national or international bodies Evaluation of the quality of teaching Some regularly evaluated (internal + national) Some only occasionally evaluated

Feedback about education In most universities regularly collected from employers and other stakeholders Student feedback not always systematically collected Feedback is used as a developing tool and available for the teachers but usually not to the students Participation Students and teachers have an opportunity to participate in work of the universies’ administrative and developing bodies

Educational Processes and Resources Survey Language skills of the teachers have to be active-proficient Teachers are offered an opportunity to participate in pedagogical, language and subject specific training Different teaching methods are used: including distance-education, team working, small-group instruction Personal study plans are always obligatory Students teacher ratio is 20-25: 1

Student Support Dormitories are available for students Health care and library services are always available in destinational language Internet access libraries with course materials in destinational language

CONCLUSIONS A very clear system for Quality Concto is essential Who is responsible and of what What shall be done Regular feedback surveys, self-evaluation template with common quality indicators Documentation and publish Creating new programme by defining the learning outcomes Provides a tool for continuous development Provides clear added-value for each partner demonstrate good quality of education offered concern of quality

CONCLUSIONS To be realized in better market-value of joint international educational products Create highly recognized brand As profound mutual trust and respect in the consortium A high-level QC would also enable the educational choices by students to be aligned with market needs The fundamental principle of the quality assurance of the CBU education is to assure and demonstrate students, employees and the society of good quality of education offered and good quality of the institutions offering that education. The value-added of the CBU quality assurance system is expected to be realized in better market-value of joint international educational products with highly recognized CBU brand but also as profound mutual trust and respect in the consortium. A high-level quality assurance would also enable the educational choices by students to be aligned with market needs.