Intersection Conflict Warning Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)
Advertisements

Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
1. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholder Dialogue Session January 17, 2014 Transport Canada John Hnatyshyn Department.
NCHRP 07-21: Asset Management Guidance for Traffic Control Devices, Barriers, and Lighting 2014 ATSIP Annual Meeting Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
Peggi Knight.   An AASHTO program administered by FHWA  Allows interested agencies to partner on studies of mutual interest  Sponsored/led by either.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
“RAC 101” An Introduction to the AASHTO Research Advisory Committee 26 July 2010.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Module 13: Highway-Rail Grade Crossings (HRGC)
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
Transportation Management Center Pooled Fund Study (TMC PFS) Advancing the State of Knowledge for TMC Operations through Cooperative Research and Technology.
ITS to Address Non-Signalized Rural Intersection Safety Ray Starr, Assistant State Traffic Engineer Intelligent Transportation Systems Section Minnesota.
Rural ITS Safety Solutions (RITSS) 2010 ITS America Annual Meeting Houston, TX May 4, ITS America Annual Meeting Houston, TX May 4, 2010 Marthand.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Participating from a Distance Bringing the TRB Annual Meeting Home to the Washington State Department of Transportation Leni Oman Director Office of Research.
E N T E R P R I S E Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions – Intersection Warning Systems ENTERPRISE PROJECT OVERVIEW JUNE 15, 2011.
SCOHTS STRATEGIC PLAN Goal 5 – Workforce Development.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Implementation Overview Research Advisory Committee July 24, 2012.
IntelliDrive SM Strategic Plan 2009 Ted Trepanier SSOM – SCOTE Manchester The IntelliDrive SM logo is a service mark of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Research Committee – June 2008 No meeting this week Next meeting: –January 2009, FHWA TFHRC Research presentations Simulator demonstration –More details.
Association of National Stakeholders in Traffic Safety Education (ANSTSE) Update on National Driver Education Standards and Initiatives
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering September 16-26, 2008.
Aurora and Clear Roads Update MDSS Stakeholder Meeting Falls Church, VA August 10, 2006.
Transportation Engineering and Road Research Alliance Rory L. Rhinesmith, P.E Wisconsin DOT Mid Continent Transportation Research Symposium 08/15/2013.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
AASHTO Research Advisory Committee ~ July 28, 2010 TERRA Transportation Engineering and Road Research Alliance Presented by: André Clover, P. E. Bureau.
National Transportation Operations Coalition (NTOC) Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration NAWG Meeting.
Traffic Control Devices Pooled Fund Study June 2010 Technical Liaisons: Amanda Emo (FHWA) Bryan Katz (SAIC) Co-Chairs: Scott Wainwright (FHWA) Bill Lambert.
INFRASTRUCTURE, OPERATIONS & SAFETY A. George Ostensen FHWA Office of Safety 8 January 2005 White House Conference on Aging Listening Session USDOT- FHWA.
E N T E R P R I S E Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions – Intersection Warning Systems Project Overview December 2011.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
Transportation Research Board Agency Update Barbara Hilger DeLucia August 6, 2002.
The Safety Problem Is Global The Safety Solution Is Local and Personal Business of Saving Lives.
Implementation: Results from the Using Your Regional ITS Architecture Peer Exchange Network Workshop Mac Lister FHWA Resource Center ITS America Annual.
INTERSECTION WARNING SYSTEMS Jon Jackels Mn/DOT ITS Program Engineer Traffic Topics April 7, 2011.
Section 1: Introduction
Brian Cronin Federal Transit Administration ITSA Annual Conference May 4, 2005 Mobility Services for All Americans (MSAA) Foundation Research and Next.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
U.S. DOT Automated Vehicle Policy Activities ITS PCB T3 Webinar The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of.
Melissa Lance Operations Systems Manager July 16, 2015 Connected Vehicle Update National and Virginia Perspective.
Overview of SCOH Strategic Plan AASHTO Subcommittee on Design 2010 Annual Meeting Rick Land, Vice Chair AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Design and Chief.
1 NTOC Talking Operations – Road Weather Management – September 30, 2008 PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ROAD WEATHER MANAGEMENT Roemer Alfelor FHWA Road Weather.
Sharing Data: Issues and Opportunities Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting January 22, 2006 Leni Oman Director of Transportation Research Washington.
Pedestrian Facility Improvement Program
What's in the 2009 MUTCD For Bicyclists?
Transforming the future of public health in Missouri
No meeting this week Next meeting: January 2009, FHWA TFHRC
Multi-state Corridor Pooled Fund Program
Vehicle to Infrastructure Deployment Coalition (V2I DC) & SPaT Challenge Overview January 8, 2017.
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
Using State Pooled Funds to Support TRB Conferences
Implementing the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program
FHWA Bicycle and Pedestrian Program
ROUNDABOUTS Improving Safety and Efficiency
Regional Architecture Development for Intelligent Transportation
National Center for Mobility Management Webinar May 10, 2018
Status Update AASHTO RAC
Results and Status of State Crash Analyses
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Second U.S. Roadway Safety Data Capabilities Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Intersection Conflict Warning Systems E N T E R P R I S E Overview October 2012

Outline ENTERPRISE Program Intersection Conflict Warning Systems Design and Evaluation Guidance Systems Engineering Next Steps E N T E R P R I S E

ENTERPRISE Program What is a transportation pooled fund? Allows federal, state, and local agencies and other organizations to combine resources to support transportation needs Federal, state, regional or local transportation agencies may initiate pooled fund studies Private companies, foundations, and colleges/universities may partner with any or all of the sponsoring agencies to conduct pooled fund projects Approved by FHWA E N T E R P R I S E

ENTERPRISE Program Evaluating New TEchnologies for Road PRogram Initiatives in Safety and Efficiency E N T E R P R I S E

ENTERPRISE Program Goals Facilitate rapid progress in the development and deployment of ITS technologies Accelerate the systematic advancement of selected ITS projects Members carry out ITS projects and activities including fundamental research, technology development, demonstration, standardization and deployment E N T E R P R I S E

ENTERPRISE Program Members Arizona DOT Georgia DOT Idaho Transportation Department Illinois DOT Iowa DOT Kansas DOT Maricopa County, Arizona Michigan DOT* Minnesota DOT Mississippi DOT Oklahoma DOT Texas DOT Virginia DOT Washington State DOT Ministry of Transport Ontario Transport Canada Dutch Ministry of Transport FHWA * Michigan DOT administers program and is a founding member

ENTERPRISE Program Major Milestones 1989 1991 1993 1994 Today Agencies began talking about concept of a group focused on ITS research and development ENTERPRISE TPF-5(231) officially formed Program Management Plan developed; foundation of program and defined annual work plan process First Annual Work Plan developed Completed over 50 projects! E N T E R P R I S E

ENTERPRISE Program Recent projects Warrants for ITS Devices Understanding Utilization of Third Party Travel Data and Information Impacts of Travel Information on the Overall Network Next Era of Traveler Information Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions – Intersection Conflict Warning Systems ICWS Coordination and Systems Engineering E N T E R P R I S E

Intersection Conflict Warning Systems Intersection conflict warning systems (ICWS) are used at stop-controlled intersections to provide drivers – on major or minor roads – with dynamic warning of other vehicles approaching the intersection ENTERING TRAFFIC FLASHING WHEN Major Road Minor Road V1 N V2 CROSS E N T E R P R I S E

Intersection Conflict Warning Systems

Design and Evaluation Guidance Bring together organizations that have developed and deployed ICWS to develop a consistent approach for accelerated, uniform deployment and further evaluation of them, and to recommend preliminary design and evaluation guidance for MUTCD consideration. E N T E R P R I S E

Design and Evaluation Guidance Webinar (June 23, 2011) Shared knowledge and educated each other on systems deployed Identified challenges with future deployments Workshop #1 (July 28-29, 2011) Discussed content of a preliminary design guidance Discussed roadmap for reaching standardization Workshop #2 (September 15-16, 2011) Reviewed preliminary design guidance Developed evaluation framework that may be used in future deployments Discussed plans for future deployment and coordination plans E N T E R P R I S E

Design and Evaluation Guidance Design guidance Four typical layouts based on warning direction and intersection configuration Preliminary illustrations Offer technical insight and recommended practice Conditions, intended driver use, layout, options, notes and references E N T E R P R I S E

Design and Evaluation Guidance Not all systems have been formally evaluated Acknowledged various evaluation approaches Establish a common framework for evaluation Individual and national Based on ITS Evaluation Guidelines Goal Strategy Hypotheses Test plan parameters E N T E R P R I S E

Systems Engineering Why develop a concept of operations or system requirements? ICWS are intelligent transportation systems and FHWA requires systems engineering for ITS Some agencies are unfamiliar with systems engineering Time and budget aren’t always available for adequate systems engineering E N T E R P R I S E Systems Engineering for Intelligent Transportation Systems, January 2007

Systems Engineering Concept of operations and system requirements will offer a starting point for transportation agencies deploying ICWS E N T E R P R I S E

Systems Engineering Concept of operations identifies stakeholders, needs, operational concept and system components Challenge ID Need Continuous alerts can diminish the credibility and value of a dynamic warning for drivers.   5 Drivers and transportation agencies need alerts to be dynamic and not become nearly continuous so as to lose impact. 3.2 Operational Concept – Transportation Agency Perspective 3.2.1 Transportation agencies will not deploy ICWS where traffic volumes cause alerts to be displayed in a nearly continuous manner. (5) Key stakeholders are identified and defined This is the first area I’ll come back to in a moment to review in further detail Needs are defined by the challenges that stakeholders face This is the second area that we’ll review in further detail today System Component Support Required Overall ICWS Determine where ICWS should be installed based on traffic volumes, speeds and intersection design characteristics for maximum safety effectiveness. (3.2.1) (3.2.12) (3.2.14)

Next Steps For ENTERPRISE work... Finalize concept of operations by October 2012 Finalize system requirements by December 2012 Maintain coordination with key standards, industry and transportation organizations E N T E R P R I S E

Next Steps Work beyond ENTERPRISE... Traffic Control Devices TPF-5(065) Human factors research on sign placement and legend Evaluation of Low Cost Safety Improvements TPF-5(099) Nationally oriented safety effectiveness evaluation NCUTCD R/WSTC Task Force Determine what may be needed for ICWS in MUTCD AASHTO SCOTE Resolution to SCOH American Traffic Safety Services Administration Signing Committee collaboration with ENTERPRISE

Next Steps More work beyond ENTERPRISE... NCDOT Safety Effectiveness Evaluation Major and major/minor road ICWS = 25-30% reduction (total crashes) May be even higher reduction for severe injury crashes MnDOT Rural ICWS project Design-build deployment at 20-50 sites

For more information... www.enterprise.prog.org E N T E R P R I S E Jon Jackels, MnDOT ENTERPRISE Project Champion jon.jackels@state.mn.us, 651.234.7377 Bill Legg, WSDOT ENTERPRISE Program Chair leggb@wsdot.wa.gov, 360.705.7994 Ginny Crowson, Athey Creek ENTERPRISE Program Support crowson@acconsultants.org, 651.600.3338 www.enterprise.prog.org