Expectations/ importance of network self-assessment from MA view

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management
Advertisements

POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.
Methodologies for Assessing Social and Economic Performance in JESSICA Operations Gianni Carbonaro EIB - JESSICA and Investment Funds JESSICA Networking.
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
Cyprus Project Management Society
CLLD Anna Parizán Rural Development Desk Officer Ministry of Rural Development 28. May 2014.
1 Implementation of the measures of priority Axis 4 Ministry of Agriculture Latvia 05/11/2009.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region - flagship project “Sustainable rural development” Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department.
Innovation in the Rural Development Networks Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot.
Project “Ex-ante evaluation of programming documents and strengthening evaluation capacity for EU funds post-accession” (EUROPAID/130401/D/SER/HR) Project.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European Union Funds.
18 March th meeting of the Evaluation Expert Committie 1 Thematic Working Group „Ex post Evaluation Guidelines” State of play Jela Tvrdonova.
Ex-ante evaluation for RDPs 4 th International Evaluation Conference Budapest, 26th September 2013 Zélie Peppiette, DG AGRI Rural Development.
The LEADER approach to integrated rural development in the EU UNDP International Conference, Kosice, 5 October 2009 Jean-Michel COURADES AGRI G1 - Consistency.
Plans for the next programming period ESF implementation in Poland
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 Structural Funds Evaluation A VIEW FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Anna Burylo, DG Regional Policy, Evaluation.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
UNDP Latvia strategy to support absorption of EU funds Janis AIZSALNIEKS, Project Coordinator UNDP Latvia CAPACITY BUILDING TO ABSORB EU FUNDS LOCAL GOVERNANCE,
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
1 Performance elements in budget and reporting process - Norway 5TH ANNUAL MEETING OF OECD SENIOR BUDGET OFFICIALS NETWORK ON PERFORMANCE&RESULTS – 28.
– C OMMUNITY - LED LOCAL DEVELOPMENT Ministry of Agriculture of Latvia.
ENCHASE “ENHANCING ALBANIAN SYSTEM OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: APPLICATION OF THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME BASED METHODOLOGY ”
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Monitoring indicators.
Monitoring and (self) assessment of Estonian NSU Meeri Klooren and Konstantin Mihhejev Estonian NSU
Swedish Rural Network Self assessment Nordic Baltic Rural Network meeting
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Action Plan and the Two-year NRN Operational Plans.
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes DG AGRI, October 2005.
Agriculture and Rural Development SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management Petr Lapka DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit "Consistency.
Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.
Evaluation of NRNs Hannes WIMMER, Team Leader Andreas RESCH, Evaluation Advisor Nordic-Baltic Rural Network meeting, 6-8 December 2015, Pułtusk.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Polish National Rural Network Bureau of Technical Assistance Responsible for: -Technical Assistance in Programs of Rural Development for period.
1 The Italian “National Rural Network” Workshop on Successful Work of Managing Authorities Budapest – 15th April 2008 Riccardo Passero
Core Indicators during Latvia Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European Union Funds Strategy Department, Ministry of Finance DG.
ENRD Contact Point Support for NRN self-assessment Activities to date & next steps Edina Ocsko, ENRD CP Nordic-Baltic Network Meeting Warsaw, 7 December.
Information by the Managing Authority on evaluations of EU funds in 2009 Monitoring Committee meeting 25 March 2009.
NRN Evaluation in Baltic countries: Outcomes of a survey Vincenzo Angrisani, Good Practice Manager Nordic Baltic Networking.
Session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand.
Climate change risk management instruments in agriculture Proposal for the Lithuanian case study (WP4)
Thematic Working Group no. 3 Guidelines Evaluation of LEADER/CLLD
Public Procurement Agency - Bulgaria
NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE STATE AUDIT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
Introductory Presentation by David Hegarty David Hegarty Phone:
Annual Review Meeting OP for Cohesion Policy Funds Specific Thematic Focus 2 - Review the status and state of play of Smart specialization.
Lithuanian Standards for Evaluation of EU Structural Funds
The NRN evaluation process in Poland
Estonian NRN self-assessment
Audit & Risk Management
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance
Common Monitoring and Evaluation System for Rural Development
Mainstreaming sustainability into the future EU budget
Policy and Budget Monitoring and Evaluation
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
1.- THE PROJECT. NATURA 2000 NETWORK IN SPAIN
The role of internal and external evaluation in an autonomous system
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
Danish Case Study presentation
Kateřina Fialková, Director,
Reading Paper discussion – Week 4
The current EMFF performance: assessment of shared management measures
ESF evaluation partnership
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Leverage effect of PAFs : experience from CAP integration
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

Expectations/ importance of network self-assessment from MA view Nordic-Baltic NRN meeting, Jelgava 13.09.2016

Who does what in Latvia? National Rural Network Ministry of Agriculture Managing Authority for EAFRD Ltd. “Latvian Rural Advisory and Training Centre” National Rural Network Annual agreement on operation of NRN and implementation of the action plan

Responsibility of the MA According to EU regulations MA is responsible for managing and implementation of RDP in an efficient, effective and correct way in accordance with the principle of sound financial management aimed at minimising the risk of financial damage to the EU 1305/2013 Art.66; 1306/2013 Art.58

Routine work Questionnaires, surveys of relevant stakeholders (interests, needs) to set the scope for the next years plans Agreement on Annual Work Plan (activities, financing, output indicators) Implementation of Annual Work Plan Reporting obligations to the Managing Authority Summary and conclusions of the work done so far, achieved indicators… …. and starting all over again ….

Ongoing evaluation 2007-2013 Ex-ante Mid-term Ex-post + thematic evaluations during the programming period 2014-2020 Ex-ante gap Ex-post + thematic evaluations during the programming period

Added value I ongoing process vs. post factum a tool for reporting obligations  suggestions for modifications helps to define possible weaknesses / shortcomings Gives time and opportunity to improve the performance  reallocation of financing / review of the target indicators and activities / methods used etc.

Added value II Best value for money  the most advantageous combination of cost, quality and sustainability to meet stakeholder requirements Helps Managing Authority to fulfill the obligations  implementation of RDP in an efficient, effective and correct way

Thank you! Karina Afremovica Ministry of Agriculture (Managing Authority) +371 67027673 Karina.Afremovica@zm.gov.lv