Some 24-1 DOE’s Responses: Shrinkage (S) Excess Length (L)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 6 The 2k Factorial Design
Advertisements

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Introduction Introduction Confounding Confounding –Confounding/Aliasing –Alias Structure Examples and Exercises Examples.
Chapter 7Design & Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1 Design of Engineering Experiments Blocking & Confounding in the 2 k Text reference, Chapter.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Some Fiber Optics Examples and Exercises* Some DOE’s Some DOE’s Responses: Responses: –Shrinkage (S) –Excess.
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Demonstrating the Effects of Confounding* Response: Conductivity (milliohm/cm), Corrected for Concentration (CC) Response:
1 Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Introduction The special cases of the general factorial design (Chapter 5) k factors and each factor has only.
14-1 Introduction An experiment is a test or series of tests. The design of an experiment plays a major role in the eventual solution of the problem.
Chapter 8 Two-Level Fractional Factorial Designs
CHEN 4860 Unit Operations Lab Design of Experiments (DOE) With excerpts from “Strategy of Experiments” from Experimental Strategies, Inc.
1 14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors 14-1 Introduction 14-2 Factorial Experiments 14-3 Two-Factor Factorial Experiments Statistical analysis.
Bayesian Model Selection in Factorial Designs Seminal work is by Box and Meyer Seminal work is by Box and Meyer Intuitive formulation and analytical approach,
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
Design of Experiments Chapter 21.
CPE 619 2k-p Factorial Design
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
Dr. Gary Blau, Sean HanMonday, Aug 13, 2007 Statistical Design of Experiments SECTION V SCREENING.
Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 14 Sequential Experimentation, Screening Designs, Fold-Over Designs.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments.
1 The General 2 k Factorial Design Section 6-4, pg. 224, Table 6-9, pg. 225 There will be k main effects, and.
14-1 Introduction An experiment is a test or series of tests. The design of an experiment plays a major role in the eventual solution of the problem.
Fractional Factorial Design Full Factorial Disadvantages Full Factorial Disadvantages –Costly (Degrees of freedom wasted on estimating higher order terms)
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs These are 2 k factorial designs with one observation at each corner of the “cube” An unreplicated.
IE341 Midterm. 1. The effects of a 2 x 2 fixed effects factorial design are: A effect = 20 B effect = 10 AB effect = 16 = 35 (a) Write the fitted regression.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs _ Blocking _ Example _ Four Blocks _ Exercise.
Factors Affecting Student Study Allison FoyJustin Messina.
Solutions. 1.The tensile strength of concrete produced by 4 mixer levels is being studied with 4 replications. The data are: Compute the MS due to mixers.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
II.3 Screening Designs in Eight Runs: Other Screening Designs in 8 runs  In addition to 5 factors in 8 runs, Resolution III designs can be used to study.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
1 Prof. Indrajit Mukherjee, School of Management, IIT Bombay High (2 pounds ) Low (1pound) B=60 ( ) Ab=90 ( ) (1)=80 ( ) A=100.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
L. M. LyeDOE Course1 Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments Fractional Factorials Not Based on the Powers of 2 – Irregular Designs.
ETM U k factorials Recall our example from last time … Estimate the effects Determine significant effects Develop regression model Examine.
Designs for Experiments with More Than One Factor When the experimenter is interested in the effect of multiple factors on a response a factorial design.
Engineering Statistics Design of Engineering Experiments.
1 Chapter 8 Two-level Fractional Factorial Designs.
1 Chapter 8 Two-level Fractional Factorial Designs.
Unit IV Finite Word Length Effects
Nominal the best case analysis using Minitab
Chapter 21 More About Tests.
Chapter 1 Multiple Choice
CME Analysis: a New Method for Unraveling Aliased Effects in Two-Level Fractional Factorial Experiments C. F. Jeff Wu (Joint work with Heng Su) School.
Confounding the 2k Factorial Design in Four Blocks
I=ABD=ACE=BCF=BCDE=ACDF=ABEF=DEF
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
Statistical tests for replicated experiments
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James.
II.3 An Example and Analyzing Interactions
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James.
I.2 Examples To Illustrate DOE Concepts (1-4)
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
ENM 310 Design of Experiments and Regression Analysis Chapter 3
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
Response: Conductivity (milliohm/cm), Corrected for Concentration (CC)
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
Graziano and Raulin Research Methods: Chapter 12
14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors CHAPTER OUTLINE
Chapter 14, part C Goodness of Fit..
Presentation transcript:

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Some Fiber Optics Examples and Exercises* Some 24-1 DOE’s Responses: Shrinkage (S) Excess Length (L) Factors: some are trade secrets and others include Time Temperature Fiber Tension Draw Ratio Line Speed Fiber Conditioning * Examples are based on some 24-1 DOE studies done at the Pirelli’s Lexington, SC plant Discuss only a few highlights. Shrinkage is measured by diameter (Target is best). For Excess Length, a target of zero is best.

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Shrinkage Skim

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Shrinkage - Discussion and Interpretation The 24-1 Fractional Factorial Used Here (D=ABC or ABCD=I) is called a Resolution IV Design. This Means That, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE , Factors B and C Affect Shrinkage Without a Significant Interaction. (More About Resolution Later) We Estimate That Setting B Hi Increases Shrinkage .36 over Setting it Lo Setting C Lo Increases the Shrinkage .39 over Setting it Hi Skim

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Shrinkage - Estimated Mean Response (EMR) EMR isn’t any more complex. Our answer will differ from Minitab’s due to rounding error. For B = + and C = -, EMR = .55 + (+1)(.36)/2 + (-1)(-.39)/2 =.55 +.375 = .925

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Excess Length Excess length is both positive and negative.

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Excess Length - Discussion and Interpretation The 24-1 Fractional Factorial Used Here is Again the Resolution IV Design, D=ABC (or ABCD=I). Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factors B, C and D Affect Excess Length But There Appears To Be A Significant Interaction, (AD or BC, or Both). Since B and C signaled but A did not, We Shall ASSUME that the BC interaction is Significant for Interpretation Purposes. A somewhat strong assumption here, since D signaled too, which could suggest AD is large.

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Example Excess Length - Discussion and Interpretation Noise Factors/Control Factors If Factor C was Hard to Control (a Noise Factor), But B was not (a Control Factor), Setting B Hi mitigates the effect of C Similarly, Setting C Hi mitigates the effect of B Ideally, The Excess Length should be 0. Setting B Lo and C Hi Give the Smallest Magnitude of Excess Length with Excess Length at about -.07. In addition, changing D from Lo to Hi increases Excess Length Thus, Set B Lo, and C and D both Hi. The plot could also be a BC+AD plot, or a AD plot (Minitab forces a choice). B low, C high is closest to 0.

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Excess Length - Estimated Mean Response (EMR) For B = - , C = +, D=+: EMR = -.057 + (-1)(-.18)/2 + (+1)(-.09)/2 + (+1)(.07)/2 +(-1)(+1)(.12)/2 = -.057 + .02 = -.037 Don’t overthink need to assign D as well. Do EMR in Minitab

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Completed Signs Tables and Normal Probability Plots are Provided for Two Other 24-1 Experiments (D=ABC or ABCD=I) Involving Shrinkage and Excess Length Analyze These Experiments Calculate the EMR for Shrinkage and Excess Length when A and B are both Lo and C and D are both Hi Another example.

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Shrinkage Skim/skip

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Excess Length Skim/skip

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Shrinkage Solution - Discussion and Interpretation C+ABD is Statistically Significant. Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE , Factor C Affects Shrinkage. There are No Significant Two-way Interactions. We Estimate That Setting C Hi Increases the Shrinkage .206 over Setting it Lo When C = +, EMR = .692 + (+1)(.206)/2 = .692+ .103 = .795 Skim/skip

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Excess Length Solution - Discussion and Interpretation A+BCD, C+ABD and AC+BD are Statistically Significant. Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE , Factors A and C Affect Excess Length. To interpret AC+BD, we will ASSUME that BD is Negligible Since A and C are Significant. Skim/skip

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Exercises Excess Length Solution - Discussion and Interpretation Ideally, Excess Length should be 0. Setting A Lo and C Hi Reduces the Magnitude of Excess Length with Excess Length at about -.04. For A = - and C = +, EMR = .074 + (-1)(.107)/2 + (+1)(-.07)/2 +(-1)(+1)(.045)/2 = .074 - .111 = -.037 Skim/skip