Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-Service Teacher Goal Setting Agreement University of Cincinnati Teacher Preparation Programs.
Advertisements

Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Susan Malone Mercer University.  “The unit has taken effective steps to eliminate bias in assessments and is working to establish the fairness, accuracy,
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
Consistency of Assessment
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
 Field Experience Evaluations PSU Special Educator Programs Confidence... thrives on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Standard 2: Partnership for Practice Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
Teacher Work Sample. Lectures Objectives: 1.Define the teacher work sample. 2.Integrate lesson plans with a practice Teacher Work Sample in terms of the.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Presenters: Drs. Thomas Koballa, Jr. & Tracy Linderholm
Data Conventions and Analysis: Focus on the CAEP Self-Study
What it means for New Teachers
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
EVALUATING EPP-CREATED ASSESSMENTS
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Polices, procedures & protocols
Partnership for Practice
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Standards- based grading for parents- grades k-2
Technology Assessment Training
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Learning Prompt- How do you think tonight’s readings connect to the next steps in our assessment process?
The Developing Independence Phase
Student Assessment and Evaluation
WVU CPASS University Supervisor Training
Welcome to the School of Education
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
EDA: Educator Disposition Assessment
Local Option Plan for Analysis of Student Work (ASW)
*Note to facilitator—prior to conducting this learning session, it is strongly advised that you have watched and scripted the video less and thoroughly.
Unit 7 – Making Informed Career Choices
Demonstration Teaching
Resident Educator Program
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Cooperating Teacher Training
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
Student Assessment and Evaluation
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Training Chapter for the Advanced Field Experience Form (Pre-CPAST
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
TAPTM System Overview Teacher Excellence Student Achievement
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP* Collaboration *Valid and Reliable Instruments for Educator Preparation Programs

Learning Objectives In this chapter, you will: Learn the CPAST Form: Sections, Row Structure, Levels of Performance, Formatting, Scoring, and Resources Learn the purpose of the Three-Way Conference Learn the timing of the Three-Way Conference Learn how to prepare for the Three-Way Conference Examine examples of interactions that may occur during the Conference

CPAST Form Sections: Pedagogy & Dispositions 13 rows 4 subsections Dispositions 8 rows 3 subsections CPAST rows are aligned to OSTP, CAEP, & InTASC Standards

CPAST Form: Row Structure There are four levels of performance Each row receives a whole number score

CPAST Form Levels of Performance: Does Not Meet Expectations & Emerging NOTE: At the mid-term evaluation, most student teachers will earn a “0” or “1” in some areas.

What if the midterm consensus score is ‘0’ or ‘1’ on a row? A consensus score of a “1 or 0” alerts the team that the student teacher: •Needs to focus on that specific area; and •Needs support and resources from the university supervisor and cooperating teacher. The cooperating teacher and university supervisor are obligated to support the student teacher. Support Example Suggesting resources Readings, articles Reflection questions Post conference questions related to the area for improvement Providing opportunities For the student teacher to demonstrate competence Co-teaching To model and support

CPAST Form Levels of Performance: Meets Expectations “Meets Expectations” indicates a student teacher is proficient at a given skill and has demonstrated he or she is able to independently use that skill in a P-12 classroom at the level expected of an entry level teacher. EXAMPLE: To earn this score on Row J, a student teacher needs to: -demonstrate a pattern of using data to design instruction and assessment; AND -demonstrate evidence of the use of contemporary tools for collecting and organizing that data

CPAST Form Levels of Performance: Exceeds Expectations Exceeds Expectations = ROCK STAR!! This level represents performance beyond what is expected for a beginning teacher Student teachers will earn few, if any, “Exceeds Expectations” (similar to OTES) Midterm: Extraordinary occurrence Final: Few, if any, “Exceeds Expectations” Are there exceptions? For some dispositions (e.g., punctuality and meets deadlines), candidates may have a score of a “3” at both midterm and final.

CPAST Form Scoring: Special Notes A score of “not applicable” is not an option for any row Raters are strongly discouraged from lowering scores at the midterm conference or inflating scores at the final conference simply to show growth Although a student teacher will likely show growth in some areas assessed by the form, it is expected a student teacher will earn consistent scores in some rows at the midterm and final

CPAST Formatting: AND/OR, Lists A student teacher must provide evidence for ALL descriptors in a level of performance in order to earn the column rating. This short video explains the use of enumerated lists in the CPAST Form’s Rows. https://youtu.be/YDkqfZtONos If a student teacher consistently communicates accurate directions for activities to learners AND sequences learning experiences appropriately, But does not communicate accurate learning targets - he or she should not earn a 2 on this row.

CPAST Resources: “Look Fors” Document The Look Fors document is intended to assist the student teacher, cooperating teacher and university supervisor in determining a score and provide suggestions for possible sources of evidence, as well as further elaboration of the characteristics for each level of performance. WHY is it used? The ‘Look Fors’ document is intended to: reduce confusion; and promote inter-rater reliability of the form (i.e., all users are using the form to evaluate student teachers the same way).

What is the Three-Way Conference? The meeting Includes the university supervisor, the cooperating teacher (mentor), and the student teacher (intern). Ensures the perspectives of each member of the team are taken into consideration when evaluating the student teacher using the CPAST Form. Occurs twice: Formative Mid-term and Summative Final The Three-Way Conference

When does the Three-Way Conference occur? The CPAST Form is intended to: Accurately reflect the ST performance at the middle and the end of the student teaching experience. Provide formative feedback to the student teacher. The CPAST Form is used: At any time during the student teaching experience, but it may be particularly useful in preparing for the midterm and final Three-Way Conferences. The second Three-Way Conference Serves as the summative assessment for the student teaching experience Takes place in the in the final week of the student teaching experience Helps the ST identify areas of strength and opportunities for growth in his/her future teaching career The first Three-Way Conference Provides an opportunity for self and formative assessment Takes place midway through the student teaching experience Helps the student teacher (ST) identify areas of strength and opportunities for growth in the remaining time in the placement Review expectations at the beginning of the semester

How should each participant prepare for the conference? Each team member involved in the evaluation process should bring: a suggested score evidence to support his/her score In addition to self-assessing his/her progress the Student Teacher should: complete the “Goals” section of the CPAST Form refine his/her goals after discussing them with the US and CT at the Three-Way Conference

Let’s look at what conversations may look like in two mock Three-Way Conferences. Situation Website Link Example #1: A team member indicating s/he has not had an opportunity to observe the student teacher demonstrating evidence for a specific skill https://youtu.be/A39KGYMjYlQ Example #2: The ST indicating s/he has not had the opportunity to demonstrate a particular skill https://youtu.be/VMJT738RMyw

This is the end of the training chapter This is the end of the training chapter. Thank you for taking the time to review the content. If you have any questions, please consult a University Supervisor or your program contact for more details. We wish you a successful semester!