Monitoring programs in Sweden

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Setting the scene for Session 1 National information systems.
Advertisements

WFD Monitoring Doug Wilson Monitoring Policy Manager.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
How close are we in the Water Framework Directive’s Implementation ? Paul C.M. Frintrop Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste-Water Treatment.
MARTIN M. LARSEN & JESPER H. ANDERSEN PHD QA COORDINATOR & PHD PROJECT MANAGER CHASE VERSION 2.X MARTIN M. L., JESPER H. A. CHASE-ING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.
IPPC Discharges Monitoring Workshop Water Framework Directive Overview (and its implications for Industry) Peter Webster Regional Chemist (EPA Cork)
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Black Sea Basin Directorate – presentation of the scope, responsibilities and project interests Mrs. TANYA.
LVĢMA, 2006 LATVIJAS VIDES, ĢEOLOĢIJAS UN METEOROLOĢIJAS AĢENTŪRA Water data availability Normunds Kadiķis.
Development of WFD compliant Transnational Monitoring Network in the Danube River Basin Dr. Igor Liška ICPDR Secretariat.
Indicators to communicate progress towards good status WG DIS, April 2015.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.
WFD Reporting, Copenhagen, 4th Feb 2010 Schema overview WFD reporting training Copenhagen, 4 February 2010 Jorge Rodriguez-Romero DG Env, European Commission.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Anne Laine North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre FINLAND BOTHNIAN BAY LIFE.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.
National Sampling Programme Carol McCarthy, A/Senior Engineer LAWCO/ Kilkenny County Council Environmental Services Training Group Annual Conference 26.
Monitoring according to the WFD
Agenda item 5: Discussion of next steps
EU Water Framework Directive
Review of guidance number 16, SE Groundwater in drinking water protected areas Lessons learnt from the 1st RBMP period Lotta Lewin Pihlblad & Jenny McCarthy.
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
The design of the monitoring network for lakes and rivers in Finland
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Ecological Quality Assessment in the Water Framework Directive
One-out-all-out and other indicators
Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands
Results of breakout group
EU Water Framework Directive
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
One-out-all-out and other indicators
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Design of monitoring networks for rivers in Austria
Discussion on compliance checking
One-out-all-out and other indicators
Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)
Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements
REFCOND Workshop Uppsala, May 2001
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential
EU Water Framework Directive
EU Water Framework Directive
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
Swedish views on the revision of the WFD reporting sheets for the next reporting cycle Niklas Holmgren Assistant Director Competent Authority of South.
Water Framework Directive implementation: RBMP assessment
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EU Water Framework Directive
Juhani Gustafsson, Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
2018 Freshwater data call Stéphane Isoard
Frequently asked questions Part II: Coordination of monitoring under WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water.
Article 13 RBMP Schema.
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
A general introduction
National Environmental Research Institute
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring programs in Sweden Northern calotte water authority meeting 16 – 18 april 2013

4 types of monitoring according to WFD Surveillance monitoring - Kontrollerande övervakning Operational monitoring - Operativ övervakning Investigative monitoring- Undersökande övervakning Quantitative monitoring - Kvantitativ övervakning Plan for monitoring of water (VM) New national and regional monitoring programs (HaV, länsstyrelserna) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 MP = Monitoring programme reported to EU MP 2006 MP 2006 MP 2012 MP 2016

The first monitoring programme reported in 2007 didn’t make the EU-commission so happy… A number of shortcomings in the Swedish monitoring programmes have been identified. The Commission however considers these shortcomings serious. The monitoring networks are therefore considered incomplete in this first cycle. Few monitoring stations Only about 1% of river water bodies (16 water bodies) and 1.5 % of lake water bodies (13 water bodies) are actually monitored, the results for the other water bodies are modelled. Little monitoring of biology and hydromorphology At the same time the sites that are monitored do not cover all biological quality elements or all supporting quality elements, e.g. there are only 3 sites that cover at least 3 biological quality elements (all except phytoplankton) but all others cover less. Hydromorphological supporting elements are not monitored and not applied to ecological classification at all. What about monitoring of prioritized substances? As regards monitoring of priority substances, it is unclear if all priority substances have been monitored. If not all substances have been monitored it is unclear, which substances are monitored and in which matrix. Monitoring is the base of all other parts of the RBMP’s This is particularly serious since it also has repercussions on literally all other parts of the RBMPs, such as classification, the setting of specific objectives and the identification of measures.

Monitoring program 2012-2015 Bothnian Bay district Present monitoring: lots of activities, lack of coordination, metadata/rawdata of monitoring stations divided on several databases Water authority: produce monitoring programs, no monitoring of our own, we have to use other monitoring Criteria for selecting sites and description of the monitoring programmes 2012-2015 are described in reports BVVD, BHVD, NÖVD, SÖVD, VHVD

Monitoring programmes are based on existing programmes Registered monitoring stations in the database VISS 2012 Reported 2007, 2009 Reported 2012

Monitoring programme 2012 – Groundwater Monitoring of quantitative status Surveillance monitoring of chemical status 44 17 74 7 90 8 113 62 9 7 waters bodies in BB district 44 water bodies in BB district

Monitoring programme 2012 – Groundwater – Operational monitoring Of chemical status 13 0 water bodies in BB district

Monitoring programme 2012 – surface waters – surveillance monitoring Basically all active stations that monitor relevant parameters, were selected 10-50 % of the water bodies in the districts are monitored, less monitoring in north 10 % of the WBs in BB-district is included in the programme reported 2012 Bothnian Bay – monitoring programme 2012

Lakes: Phys-Chem is monitored in a large amount of lakes only 1 time/6 yrs (333 of 376 lakes) Surveillance monitoring of ecological status: Biology Hydromorphlogy Phys-Chem

Lakes: Phys-Chem is monitored in a large amount of lakes only 1 time/6 yrs (333 of 376 lakes) Surveillance monitoring of ecological status: Biology Hydromorphlogy Phys-Chem

Monitoring programme 2012 – surface waters – operational monitoring Stations monitoring relevant parameters for each environmental problem were selected In Bothnian Bay covers the program 197 waters (3% of all water bodies) Monitoring of acidification and eutrophication dominates despite the fact that hydromorphological changes is the most common environmental problem in the district. Operational monitoring of ecological status

Monitoring programme 2012 – Surface water – priority substances and chemical status Covers all stations monitoring in water, biota and sediment About 7% of the water bodies are monitored, more stations at the coast Surveillance monitoring of chemical status Operational monitoring of chemical status Cd, Pb och Ni most common (400 stationer). Hg about 100 stations. Organic compound about 20 stations (only in coastal water) All stations except metals in water 1 times/6 yrs. Not related to where problems with hazardous substances occur.

Improvement since reporting 2009? YES A lot more stations reported Improved reporting regarding information of the programme, e.g. Design of programme Used methods, references Motives for frequencies differing from the overall design