Evaluation of Marine Invertebrate Biodiversity in the East River

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aquarium Biogeography and Succession of Microbial Communities in Aquatic Built Environments Nitrification Results in Coral Pond 1 The nitrite levels in.
Advertisements

Insect DNA Barcoding. Agenda DNA Bug Barcoding at FLCC Finger Lakes Invertebrate Biodiversity Study (FLIBS) Introduction to Biology (for majors), Research.
Introduction to Biodiversity Friday, January 22 nd, 2016.
 Salinity: Salinity is the concentration of dissolved salts in the water and is an important element of a  habitat. Aquatic animals are adapted to living.
Honors Project May 2, 2013 By: Alyssa Rogers Mentor: Dr. Christopher Lane BROWN ALGAL DIVERSITY IN BERMUDA REVEALED USING MOLECULAR TOOLS.
Introduction Biodiversity is important in an ecosystem because it allows the species living in that ecosystem to adapt to changes made in the environment.
Using DNA Barcoding to Identify Freshwater Algae in Two Bodies of Water Lauren Cottral, Shweta Karmakar, Janalyce Torres Islip High School Results We were.
Using DNA Barcode to Identify Endangered Species Manhattan Center for Science and Mathematics 1, Hostos Lincoln Academy of Science 2, American Museum of.
Dragon Fly Larvae Genetic Barcoding References 1.What is DNA barcoding? (2015) Retrieved from barcoding(n.d.).
Unidentified Flora of the Upper Peconic River Authors: Angela Blangiforti, Theresa Blangiforti Sabrina Sauerwald, Edward Spagnuolo Teachers: Robert Bolen,
Plant Biodiversity in the Peconic River Methods ●First, 20 leaf samples from the Peconic River Otis Pike Preserve were collected. All the samples are from.
Genetic Diversity Of Freshwater Snails in The Peconic River Using the DNA Barcoding Method ●Biodiversity refers to the amount of genetic diversity in ecosystems.
Saltwater Algae vs Freshwater Algae
DNA Barcoding of Shinnecock Bay Crabs
Using DNA Barcoding to Identify Biodiversity: A Comparative Study of the Invertebrate Fauna of an Urban Green Roof and the Ground Level Ella Ezratty, Sasha.
The Effect of Vegetated Buffer Zones on Aquatic Biodiversity
What is the Makeup of the Community of Organisms Living on Rock Substrate Near the Post in the Long Beach High School Pond? Matthew Amato, Joseph Carrasco,
School: Manhattan Comprehensive Night and Day High School
Biodiversity of Seaweed on Long Island
Evidence of Two Invasive Aquatic Species in Lake Ronkonkoma
Topic 4.4: Water Pollution
Abstract Tables & Figures Introduction Materials & Methods Results
Environmental Economics
Funded by the Thompson Family Foundation
Biodiversity of Macroinvertebrates at Argyle Lake
Identifying Species In The Peconic River Using DNA Barcoding Method
Species Biodiversity in the Peconic River
Damselfly Biodiversity in the Peconic River
Comparison of Plant Species in Big Egg Marsh in Jamaica Bay, NY
Coding the Surface: Examining the Composition of a Recurring Unknown Culture of Organisms in Van Cortlandt Lake Ryan Conard,1 David Goldberg,1 Zander Harpel,1.
Biodiversity in Oyster Reefs: A DNA Barcoding Approach
Diversity of Damselflies: The Damselflies of Van Cortlandt Park
The extraction of microorganisms in the Great South Bay
FIGURE 2: SAMPLES COLLECTED FIGURE 1: STEPS OF DNA BARCODING
Proportion of Native and Non-native Plants in the
The Biodiversity of Snails in Van Cortlandt Park
DNA Barcoding of Damselfly Nymphs
Biodiversity of Ants: DNA Barcode of Formicidae Collected in Two Different Locations Relative to Pollution Funded by the Thompson Family Foundation Authors:
Assessing oyster reef habitat value through naked goby
Butternut Creek Biomonitoring
Identifying a Novel Species Through DNA Barcoding
Aquatic Plant Life Biodiversity in Long Island’s Rivers
Biodiversity of Ants: DNA Barcode of Formicidae Collected in Two Different Locations Relative to Pollution Authors: Tenzin Ghongwatsang1, Diana Flores1,
Terrestrial Species of the Peconic River
Are Those Beetles Eating Our Trees?
Invertebrate Biodiversity in the East River
Ants Effect on Soil Composition
Funded by the Thompson Family Foundation
Assessment of Invertebrate Biodiversity in the Gowanus Canal
Topic 4.4: Water Pollution
Results Abstract Introduction Discussion Materials & Methods
Funded by the Thompson Family Foundation
Tables & Figures Abstract Introduction Discussion Materials & Methods
Authors: Lauren Aslami3 and Sabrina Li3
Assessment of Invertebrate Biodiversity in the Bronx River
Identification of New Invasive Species in the Peconic River
The Biodiversity of Water Mites in Freshwater Ecosystems
Can Coral Species Be Identified Using DNA Barcoding
Jenna Marcotte1, Emily Picchiello1, John Halloran1
Alexi Flores, Olivia Reid, Ethan Young, Adriana Zarcone
Biodiversity in the Forge River
Amphipod Diversity in Two Bay Estuaries in Mattituck:
Testing Marine Copepod Diversity Throughout the Connetquot River
Biodiversity in the Peconic and Forge River
Biodiversity in Aquatic Ecosystems
Biodiversity of Long Island Macroinvertebrate In the Connetquot River
Abstract Materials & Methods Results Acknowledgements References
Identification of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates in a Pond on Long Island
. . Using DNA Barcoding To Measure The Biodiversity in Ants in Residential Areas And Park Areas Authors: Emily Augulis1, Paige Dreher1, Sarah Hussain1.
Figure 5: Sequence Results Table 1: Water Quality Tests
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Marine Invertebrate Biodiversity in the East River Funded by the Thompson Family Foundation Amara Faison & Shenika Francois; Mentor: Sabrina Miller Academy For Young Writers Results Out of the 22 samples collected, all 22 were sent out for sequencing. However, only 20 samples were sequenced due to the quality of the DNA. Of the 20 samples that were sequenced, only 16 had a high percent similarity to DNA sequences in the BLAST database, which is necessary to confidently determine the identity of the species. Nine different invertebrate species were found in the East River. The second data table indicates the water quality test results for the East River. Tables & Figures Discussion According to our research, the present-day species richness of the East River is 9 species. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conducted a study of shallow water benthic invertebrate biodiversity in the fall of 2015.[3] Their study indicates that the species richness for the East River near our sampling location was 12.5. This indicates that the biodiversity in NYC waterways had decreased. The pH level of the water was 8, which is close to the ideal pH of 7.4. There was a nitrate concentration of at least 2 ppm, a phosphate concentration of at least 2 ppm and the dissolved oxygen concentration of at least 4 ppm. The high concentration of nitrates and phosphates can cause eutrophication and decreased oxygen content in the water. Dissolved oxygen concentrations below 4 ppm are inadequate to support aquatic animal life. These water quality indicators may help explain the reduced invertebrate biodiversity levels uncovered by our research. Hopefully, efforts to restore water quality and biodiversity such as the Billion Oyster Project will reverse these trends. References [1] [2] Billion Oyster Project, Curriculum and Community Enterprise for Restoration Science. Oyster Restoration Station Field Science Manual, New York Harbor Foundation, 2016.    [3] Sandy Hook(2015). Shallow water benthic mapping: Westside Manhattan and Brooklyn waterfront.http://www.harborestuary.org/pdf/HabitatPages/ShorelinesShallows/NYSDEC-BenthicMappingReport-102815.pdf Acknowledgements We’d like to give a big thanks to Alison Cucco from the Harlem DNA Lab for helping collect the invertebrate samples and to Nicolle Martinez from the Lower Eastside Ecology center for helping with the water quality testing. Abstract During this project we evaluated the change in marine invertebrate biodiversity of the East River over time. We compared our results to a 2015 study of biodiversity conducted by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation. Our results indicate a decline in the species richness from 12.5 species in 2015 to 9 species in 2017 in the East River just south of the Williamsburg Bridge. This means that there is still a long way to go in restoring the NY Harbor to its former levels of biodiversity when native oysters were in abundance. Introduction For many years, the waterways in New York City have been polluted from raw sewage. When rainfall in New York City is too heavy, the sewage pipes cannot handle the large influx of water. This causes the sewage to overflow and run off into the East River, increasing the concentration of nitrates and phosphates and making it more likely for eutrophication to occur.[1] Because of this pollution, keystone species such as oysters are being killed, which as a result can cause waterways to become less filtered and habitats for other marine life be less abundant. It is a known fact that have oysters effectively become extinct in New York Harbor due to pollution and overharvesting.[2] An unfortunate ramification of such activity is the decrease of biodiversity in NYC waterways. This sustained source of pollution has lowered the water quality of the East River and decreased the biodiversity of species present there. However, there are currently several programs that are actively working to improve water quality and marine biodiversity in the NY Harbor. One such program is the Billion Oyster Project, a citizen science project founded in 2015 with a goal of “[restoring] a sustainable oyster population and [fostering] awareness, affinity, and understanding of the Harbor by engaging New Yorkers directly in the work of restoring one billion oysters.” [2] Our research aim is to evaluate the current state of water quality and marine invertebrate biodiversity to see if such programs have made a significant impact on our waterways. Materials & Methods The samples were collected from oyster restoration stations, which are cages placed near the surface of the water containing oyster and other sessile organisms. When the cage is pulled up,  invertebrate specimens were picked from the surface or inside the cage. The specimens were stored in small glass vials containing 95% ethanol to prevent DNA degradation. Each vial containing a specimen was labeled with the sample number and photographed. The DNA is extracted from the specimen using a silica-based DNA purification protocol. Then the DNA is amplified by PCR. We used CO1 primers to amplify the cytochrome C oxidase gene because it is an evolutionarily conserved sequence, which is useful for barcoding. We use the CO1 primers because this amplifies this gene. But for some samples the CO1 primers didn't work, so we used diverse metazoan invertebrate (DMI) primers instead. After that, we electrophoresed a small portion (5 μl) of our DNA samples on a 2% agarose gel. If there is a band present, this means that the DNA extraction and PCR were successful. We sent all successfully extracted and amplified DNA samples to GeneWiz for DNA sequencing. Table 1. Species ID of collected invertebrate specimens from East River in fall 2017. Sample IDx Species Name Common Name % DNA Sequence Similarity KXR-001 Dyspanopeus sayi Mud Crab 99.8% KXR-002 Ectopleura crocea Tubular Hydroid 99% KXR-003 N/A KXR-004 Ectopleura larynx Ringed tubularia Low quality KXR-005 KXR-006 Crepidula Common slipper shell 99.7% KXR-007 Eirene pyramids No common name (type of cnidarian) KXR-008 KXR-009 Halichondria panicea Breadcrumb sponge 99.2% KXR-010 Botrylloides violaceus Colonial tunicate 99.1% KXR-012 KXR-013 KXR-014 Mud crab 100% KXR-015 Tubular hydroid 98.8% KXR-016 95.5% KXR-017 Haliclona cf. 92.3% KXR-018 Halichondria panacea Lumpy pink sponge 95.3% KXR-019 Haliclona fascigera sponge KXR-020 KXR-021 Lumpy Pink Sponge KXR-022 98.9% Figure 1. Location where invertebrate specimens were collected from the East River in 2017. Table 2. Water Quality of the East River in 2017. Water Quality Metric Values Nitrates 2ppm Phosphates Dissolved oxygen 4ppm pH 8 Salinity 38 ppt Figure 2. Location where invertebrate specimens were collected from the East River in 2015 NYSDEC study. Species richness at BNY 14-01 was 12 and at BNY 14-02 was 13.