Pipeline Planning and Construction: Environmental Considerations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Regulatory Program.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP Implications of Current Wetlands Policy and Management.
Coal Mining Activities Mark A. Taylor Huntington District Corps of Engineers.
401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
The Why, What, and How Presented to:2009 Statewide Land Trust Conference Presented by:J. Grant Barber PBS&J Tyler, Texas Mitigation Banking:
Department of Army Permitting Process: Dredging
Utah Watershed Coordinating Council Conservation Planning Workshop Navigating the Corps’ Permitting Process July 20, 2011 Jason Gipson Chief, Utah/Nevada.
Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1251(a) The objective of this chapter is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s.
1 Clean Water Act Jurisdiction & SWANCC October 2002.
US Army Corps of Engineers One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program.
Agricultural Irrigation and the Corps Regulatory Program
Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration Bill Dewey, Taylor Shellfish Company Shelton, Washington
1 Wetland: Types Marsh Swamp Bog Floodplain/Bottomland Playa Prairie Pothole Vernal Pool Wet Meadow.
Waters of the United States Defining the scope of waters protected under the Clean Water Act ASA Board Meeting July 8, 2014.
Wetlands and Waterways Permits Patti Caswell Statewide Wetlands/Permits Program Coordinator Geo-Environmental, ODOT.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.
St. Paul District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch program: an overview. Presented by Rebecca Gruber, Corps Regulatory Biologist, Waukesha.
Environmental Consultants BMI Environmental Services, LLC AN OVERVIEW OF THE WETLANDS REGULATORY PROCESS AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPOSED OCEAN SPRINGS HIGH.
CE 515 Railroad Engineering
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
Protecting Wetlands Expanding the Clean Water Act Environme1tal Politics & Policy 1.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Coordinating U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permits with Species Conservation Plans November 16,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Regulatory Program Glen Justis Chief, Policy & Administration Regulatory Division Alaska District 2010 Building.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) Guidelines Field Exercise
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Wetland Creation Why and How Char Ison and Caleb Asbury.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Clean Water Act Section 404 How it affects your airport during project implementation.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans020-1 Unit 20 Regulation of Wetlands Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Section 10, Rivers and Harbors Acts of 1890 and 1899.
The Corps and Environmental Regulation Presented by Clarissa J Cook.
Inland Waterways: The National Perspective Amy Larson Executive Director National Waterways Conference, Inc PNWA Annual Meeting.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers REGULATORY PROGRAM WILMINGTON DISTRICT March 13, 2008.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Carrie Bond Project Manager ODOT Liaison Portland, Oregon April 21, 2015 Understanding the Corps Permitting.
Overview of the 401 WQC Process. Main Topics Relationship between Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401 State permitting processes Specifics of Kentucky’s.
Wetlands and Waterways Permits Ken Franklin Statewide Permits Program Coordinator Geo-Environmental, ODOT.
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District Regulatory Branch Allen Edris (412)
Alternative Sediment Remediation Authorities to CERCLA: Elizabeth River Demonstration Robert Engler Moffatt & Nichol),
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lisa Mangione Regulatory Division Los Angeles District January 14, 2016 USACE Regulatory Program Emergency.
Department of Army Permitting Process: Dredging
State of Alaska Assumption of Section 404 program Michelle Bonnet Hale, Director, Division of Water Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Steven.
CWA.
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Samantha Tepper ODOT 404 Permit Coordinator
For Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity
Barriers and Challenges to Developing Renewable Energy Projects
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP
Coal Mining Activities
THE INCREASING NECESSITY
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Overview of the Reissuance of 401 Water Quality General Certifications
Coal Mining Activities
May 7, 2018 Milton Boyd, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers*
Environmental Law Fall 2018
Army Corps permitting of shellfish culture, harvest and restoration
Water Management in the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry
Waters of the U.S. Updates and Changes
An Introduction to the Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

Pipeline Planning and Construction: Environmental Considerations by Peter D. McKone, CWB (Weaver Consultants Group) and Caleb Watkins (Summit Midstream) Jeff

Outline Regulatory Background Permitting Issues

Waters of the U.S.

Corps Regulatory Program Protect navigation: Sections 9 and 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Restore and maintain the physical, chemical and biological integrity of the nation's waters: Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Protect marine resources associated with ocean disposal of dredged material: Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 Source: USACE Fort Worth District and Rapanos guidance

Legal Background USACE administers the regulatory aspects of dredge and fill activities. EPA maintains ultimate responsibility for oversight of the USACE’s program. Section 401 requires water quality certification from states. Section 404 addresses permitting discharge of dredge and fill material.

Types of Permits Individual Permits General Permits Standard Letters of Permission General Permits Regional Programmatic Nationwide

Nationwide Permits 52 Nationwide Permits Focus on environmental protection while providing timely and simplified authorizations for work in aquatic environments Are valid for 5 years from date of issuance (effective 3/2017 to 3/2022) Regional conditions Some statewide Some district specific

Nationwide Permits (cont.) Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) required in many cases Potential to impact cultural resources Potential to impact threatened or endangered species Presence of wetlands/special aquatic sites Resource agency coordination required in some cases If project meets scope & conditions of NWP & does not involve or exceed PCN triggers and/or thresholds, project may be completed w/o a written authorization NOTE: If PCN required but not submitted & work initiated, activity is unauthorized

NWP 12 Utility Line Activities Construction, maintenance, repair, and removal of utility lines and associated facilities Impacts limited to < 0.5 acres Utility Lines No change in pre-construction contours Sidecasting limited to < 3 months Top 6-12” of trench should be backfilled with topsoil from the trench Cannot drain waters of the U.S.

NWP 12 (cont.) PCN Mechanized land clearing in a forested wetland for the utility line ROW Section 10 permit is required Utility line in WOUS, excluding overhead lines, exceeds 500 feet Utility line is placed within a jurisdictional area (i.e., WOUS), and it runs parallel to a stream bed that is within that jurisdictional area Losses of >0.10 acres of WOUS Permanent access roads are constructed above-grade in WOUS for a distance of >500 feet Permanent access roads are constructed with impervious materials Note: Temporary losses of WOUS will no longer trigger a PCN requirement on their own

Waters of the U.S. All waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide All interstate waters, including interstate wetlands All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds

Sample USGS Topographic Maps – Marion County, Texas Perennial River Submerged wooded marsh or swamp

Sample USGS Topographic Maps – Marion County, Texas Perennial stream

Sample USGS Topographic Maps – Marion County, Texas Intermittent Stream

Common JD Problems Inconsistent data Wetland delineation only (no streams) Stream delineation only (no wetlands) Unclear maps and exhibits Incorrect coordinates Wrong form; missing data; incomplete form Wrong or no stream classification No photographs; incorrectly labeled photographs

Problems (cont.) No delineation of waters of the U.S. conducted Incorrect delineations Incorrect determination on permitting options Pipelines Roads Small projects Didn’t take into account threatened and endangered species or migratory birds Didn’t take into account cultural resources

Questions Peter D. McKone, CWB Weaver Consultants Group pmckone@wcgrp.com Caleb Watkins Summit Midstream cwatkins@summitmidstream.com