Recovering Hardware Injection Waveforms with Maximum Entropy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
Advertisements

LIGO- G Z August 19, 2004August 2004 LSC Meeting 1 Towards an Astrophysics-Based Burst ETG Tuning Keith Thorne Penn State University Relativity.
Wed. 17th Sept Hamburg LOFAR Workshop.  Extract a cosmological signal from a datacube, the three axes of which are x and y positions, and frequency.
| October 12, 2011 A Multiple Signal Classification Method for Directional Gravitational-wave Burst Search Junwei.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
Neutron Star Formation and the Supernova Engine Bounce Masses Mass at Explosion Fallback.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
February 20, 2006Dissertation Defense 1 Adventures in LIGO Data Analysis Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Zwerger Muller SN waveforms The 78 ZM waveforms differ in initial angular momentum they have (A parameter),
Coherent network searches for gravitational-wave bursts Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
LIGO-G Z 18 March 2004Penn State University1 GravEn Simulation Engine Amber L. Stuver
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
LIGO- G Z August 19, 2004Penn State University 1 Extracting Signals via Blind Deconvolution Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
The RIDGE pipeline as a method to search for gravitational waves associated with magnetar bursts LIGO-G Z Jason Lee, Tiffany Summerscales (Andrews.
Improving the sensitivity of searches for an association between Gamma Ray Bursts and Gravitational Waves Soumya D. Mohanty The University of Texas at.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Analysis of Optimal and Suboptimal Discrete-Time Digital Communications Receivers Clemson University SURE Program 2005 Justin Ingersoll, Prof. Michael.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
S.Klimenko, August 2005, LSC, G Z Constraint likelihood analysis with a network of GW detectors S.Klimenko University of Florida, in collaboration.
S.Klimenko, July 14, 2007, Amaldi7,Sydney, G Z Detection and reconstruction of burst signals with networks of gravitational wave detectors S.Klimenko,
LIGO- G Z Beyond the PSD: Discovering hidden nonlinearity Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.
July 11, 2006Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Probing the covariance matrix Kenneth M. Hanson T-16, Nuclear Physics; Theoretical Division Los.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO- G Z August 17, 2005August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 1 Recovering Hardware Injection Waveforms with Maximum Entropy Tiffany Summerscales.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
Coherent network analysis technique for discriminating GW bursts from instrumental noise Patrick Sutton (CIT) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji,
The 9th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (December 15-18, 2004, Annecy, France) Results of the search for burst gravitational waves with the TAMA300.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
LIGO- G Z August 15, 2006 August 2006 LSC meeting1 LSC Proposal Andrews University Gravitational Wave Group Tiffany Summerscales.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
Adam Blake, June 9 th Results Quick Review Look at Some Data In Depth Look at One Anomalous Event Conclusion.
A Comparison of Burst Gravitational Wave Detection Algorithms for LIGO Amber L. Stuver Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
Oct. 30, 2002Source Simulation & Data Analysis1 Gravitational-Wave Observations of Galactic Populations of Compact Binaries M. Benacquista Montana State.
LIGO-G Z TFClusters Tuning for the LIGO-TAMA Search Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 1 Extracting Supernova Information from a LIGO Detection Tiffany Summerscales Penn State.
LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug A Coherent Network Burst Analysis Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini,
LIGO- G Z 11/13/2003LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 BlockNormal Performance Studies John McNabb & Keith Thorne, for the Penn State University.
G08XXXX-00-Z S. Chatterji, Cascina, Italy, 2008 November 261 Gravitational-wave data analysis and supernovae Shourov K. Chatterji INFN Sezione di Roma.
January 12, 2006Sources & Simulations 1 LIGO Supernova Astronomy with Maximum Entropy Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.
Searching the LIGO data for coincidences with Gamma Ray Bursts Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan for the LSC-Virgo Burst Analysis Working Group LSC-Virgo Meeting July 23, 2007 Eyes Wide Open: Searching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
S3 Spinning Binary Black Hole Search: Status Report
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
SN Classification Study
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Analysis of LIGO S2 data for GWs from isolated pulsars
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
Searching for gravitational wave bursts with the new global detector network 2007 May 3 Searching for gravitational wave bursts with the new global detector.
Neutrino astronomy Measuring the Sun’s Core
L(h) = || X – A*h ||2 + hT *Ω*h
Gravitational SIGNATURE of Core-Collapse Supernovae
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA
J. Ellis, F. Jenet, & M. McLaughlin
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Upper limits on gravitational wave bursts
Presentation transcript:

Recovering Hardware Injection Waveforms with Maximum Entropy Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session

Previous Work Using Maximum Entropy Study investigating recovery of core-collapse supernova waveforms with maximum entropy presented previously (see G050090-00-Z) Recovered Ott et al. waveform from simulated data Recovered waveform contained info on core bounce type and progenitor mass, angular momentum magnitude and angular momentum distribution Simulated data created with realistic detector response but same response function used to simulate data and recover waveform Simulated data created with white noise scaled to appropriate amplitudes August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session

August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session Remaining Questions Do we really know the instrument responses well enough to reconstruct signals using maximum entropy? Maximum entropy assumes perfect knowledge of response function. Can maximum entropy handle actual, very non-white, instrument noise? Recovery of hardware injection waveforms would answer these questions. August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session

Review of Maximum Entropy Maximum entropy attempts to find a signal h that minimizes the function Where ensures close fit with observed data. R = detector response, d = data, N = noise covariance S is a regularizer, equivalent to Shannon information entropy, that ensures smoothness and prevents overfitting Alpha is a Lagrange parameter that balances the two terms. August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session

Hardware Injection Overview Attempted recovery of two hardware injections during S4 (795574893, 795574933) Present in all 3 LIGO IFOs Zwerger-Muller waveform A3B3G1 Weakest and strongest of daily ZM injections (hrss = 0.5e-21, 8.0e-21) Recovery of both waveforms successful NOTE: H1, H2 injections have sign opposite original waveform August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session

August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session Waveform Recovery August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session

Progenitor Parameter Estimation Plot shows cross correlation between recovered waveform and waveforms that differ by A A = degree of initial differential rotation A = distance at which rotation drops to half that at center Recovered waveform has most in common with waveform of same A as injected signal August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session

Progenitor Parameter Estimation Plot shows cross correlation between recovered waveform and waveforms that differ by beta beta = ratio of rotational energy to gravitational potential energy Recovered waveform has most in common with waveform of same beta as injected signal August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session

August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session Conclusions Hardware injection waveforms can be recovered via maximum entropy. Recovery good enough to retain source information carried by the wave. Maximum entropy method is capable of handling realistic data, noise. Current estimation of IFO responses is very good and completely sufficient for maximum entropy August 17, 2005 August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session