Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AS9102 First Article Inspection Report
Advertisements

Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
Global Supplier Quality Manual PPAP Requirements
PPAP Requirements Training
First Article Inspection Report
SUBSAFE Approved for Public Release
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
QLF Contract Quality Clauses Working Group QUALITY LEADERSHIP FORUM CONTRACT QUALITY CLAUSES WORKING GROUP Ken Crane MSFC September 24, 2002.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
COMP8130 and 4130Adrian Marshall 8130 and 4130 Test Design & Documentation Adrian Marshall.
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
TS16949 requirements Subjects –Audit planning –Recertification audit requirements –Auditing Remote supporting functions.
First Article Inspection 9102 Carl ZimmermanSept,2013.
David Warne Independent Manufacturing Consultant.
First Article Inspection
1 Inspection and Testing Approved for Public Release.
1 RPS Critical Planning Preparation & Delivery of Critical Parts Goodrich Aerostructures Group.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Supplier Overview of Johnson & Johnson MD&D Supplier Quality Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Receiving Inspection Process for Components and Finished.
Applied Materials Confidential Authorized Labels for Information: Applied Materials Confidential. Applied Materials Confidential Restricted/Modifier Applied.
From Research Prototype to Production
1 International Aerospace Standard for for First Article Inspection(FAI) First Article Inspection(FAI) Dick Pocock VP, Quality Assurance Honeywell Engines.
©2011 AAI Corporation Overview of AAI Supplier First Article Inspection (FAI) expectations See your Supplier Quality Engineer with questions.
Instructions for Completing the P rint A ttribute R esults Form Last revised 3 January 2005.
What Documentation Needs to be Submitted With an Approval Application?
06/27/100 Internationally Harmonized Aerospace Standards for First Article Inspection AS9102, EN 9102, SJAC 9102 Philippe Removille SNECMA Moteurs 5.
1 Internationally Harmonized Aerospace Standards for First Article Inspection AS9102, EN 9102, SJAC 9102 AS9102, EN 9102, SJAC 9102 Dick Pocock VP, Quality.
Validation | Slide 1 of 27 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.
Air Products Solutions for EN th of November 2014 Air Products Internal Use Only Name of speaker.
06/27/100 Internationally Harmonized Aerospace Standards for First Article Inspection AS9102, EN 9102, SJAC 9102 Chetan Date, Ph.D., P.E. Director of Design.
Webinar FSSC audit report 7th september 2015
Company Confidential 1 IAQG 9100:2009 Revision Overview Buddy Cressionnie Lockheed Martin Americas 9100 Team Lead Prepared by IAQG 9100 Team Rev: 1 Dated:
Supplier Quality Improvement
How the NCSX Project Does Business
19-Feb-16 “"Dana Confidential Information - Those having access to this work may not copy it, use it or disclose the information contained within this.
Thanks for giving me an opportunity to share with you our process for controlling media and other supplies. Disclaimer: We are not yet accredited to ISO.
First Article Inspection Reports (FAIRs) Instructions for Suppliers
Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) / Manufacturing Process Quality Plan (MPQP) - training of suppliers to FMC Technologies, Norway QRL FMC Standard.
SQA01 Supplier Guidance Material: Certificate of Conformance Requirements GKN Aerospace Services – CowesDate:13/5/16.
External Provider Control
Production Part Approval Process
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
World Health Organization
First Article Inspection Reports (FAIRs) Instructions for Suppliers
SQA01 Supplier Guidance Material: Certificate of Conformance Requirements GKN Aerospace Services – Cowes Date: 13/5/16.
Module 6 Corrective Action Request (CAR) Overview
Evaluation of Suppliers of Critical Consumables, Supplies and Services Section February 2016.
ISUAL Product Assurance
Experience in Conformity Assessment of Products and Services  for Russian NPPs and Overseas Nuclear Power Plant New Builds Yury Meltsov Aug
First Article Inspection
Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Training Session
First Article Inspection Report (FAIR) Training
First Article Inspection (Per AS9102)
Aeronautic & Traceability By Alain Pétrement (Société Air France)
Inspection and Testing
First Article Inspection Reports (FAIRs) Instructions for Suppliers
TEAM NAME. TEAM NAME Additive Manufacturing Business Model Workshop Day 2 Outbrief 31 May 2018.
SQA01 Guidance Material: FAI Review
KAMAN AEROSPACE GROUP L. Chodasiewicz - Supplier Quality Assurance.
SQA01 Supplier Guidance Material: Permission to Ship Forms
First Article Inspection
Production Part Approval Process
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
BS EN 10204:2004 Metallic Products – Types of inspection documents
BS EN 10204:2004 Metallic Products – Types of inspection documents
Change Highlights January 2013
First Article Inspection (Per AS9102)
ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE MACHINING Special Process Instruction
Supplier Briefing Pack
Presentation transcript:

Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports

Requirements First Article Inspection Reports are to be recorded in English AS/EN/SJAC9102 Revision A - Aerospace First Article Inspection Requirement Invoked by AS/EN/SJAC9100 Revision B: 8.2.4.2 First Article Inspection: The organization’s system shall provide a process for the inspection, verification, and documentation of a representative item from the first production run of a new part, or following any subsequent change that invalidates the previous first article inspection result. NOTE: See (AS) (EN) (SJAC) 9102 for guidance

Requirements Additional Customer requirements if applicable AS/EN/SJAC9102 Rev A forms are to be completed in accordance with the Appendix A guide of the standard Note: If alternate forms are used, they must contain all “Required” and “Conditionally Required” information and have the same field reference numbers as AS/EN/SJAC9102 Rev A

Application Compliance with AS/EN/SJAC9102 Revision A - Aerospace First Article Inspection Requirement is required of: all sites that maintain a quality management system based on 9100 the approved supply base for these sites sub-tier suppliers of the applicable approved suppliers

Definition FIRST ARTICLE INSPECTION (FAI): A complete, independent, and documented physical and functional inspection process to verify that prescribed production methods have produced an acceptable item as specified by engineering drawings, planning, purchase order, engineering specifications, and/or other applicable design documents. Ref AS9102 Rev A

Purpose Provides objective evidence that: all engineering, design and specification requirements, including process and manufacturing validation, are correctly understood accounted for verified and recorded a consistent documentation requirement for aerospace components 6

When should FAI be performed? Full FAI New part introduction New supplier or new location of manufacture Lapse in production for more than 2 years When required by the customer Partial (Delta) FAI Design change Significant change in the method of manufacture (e.g. Tooling, Processes, Machine, Location, Numerical Control Program, Sequence of Manufacture).

What does it apply to? All product defined by engineering drawings or model based definition issued by the Customer Assemblies All levels of detail parts within assembly including castings and forgings Modified Standard, Electronic or COTS Items Only the modifications

Model Based Definition Model Based Definition (MBD) refers to the design dimensions, geometry and tolerances that make up a dataset which are programmed into a computer aided design (CAD) application. This results in a 3 dimensional solid “model”. When viewed and interrogated, this model represents the underlying dataset, although the characteristics are not posted. If characteristics are not available elsewhere, they must be identified and extracted for an FAI.

Model Based Definition The Sites and their applicable suppliers shall develop and maintain a documented process to extract inspection media and other measurement data from digital product definition (DPD) datasets, including delivery and control of the media. DPD datasets with reduced content, including MBD is sufficient to document: Manufacturing and inspection activity for the product Evidence of configuration control

Model Based Definition The FAI of a MBD derived part will have its own Characteristic values obtained from one or more these sources: A fully dimensioned 2D engineering drawing of the model Engineering Parts List/Notes that contain default tolerances/Configuration Control Sheets Engineering bubbled characteristics

What does it not apply to? Standard Parts If supplier can provide evidence (CofC) that part has been qualified to procurement specification such as MS, NAS etc. Electronic Components If parts being supplied have been manufactured by a supplier listed on Qualified Products List (QPL) for that part Non Custom parts (COTS) Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) Items No FAI required

What is included? Verification of all design characteristics Material and Special Process Certifications Manufacturing Process Verification Nonconformance resolution

Forms The Following Forms comprise a First Article Inspection Report (FAIR) AS9102 A Form 1: Part Number Accountability shall be used to identify the part that is being first article inspected (FAI part) and associated sub-assemblies or detail parts. AS9102 A Form 2: Product Accountability – Raw Material, Specifications and Special Process(s), Functional Testing shall be used if any material, special processes or functional testing are defined as a design requirement. AS9102 A Form 3: Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation shall be used to record an actual measurement or inspection/verification of the FAI part for every design characteristic on the drawing, including notes.

YELLOW or LIGHT GREY fields – MANDATORY information required. AS9102 A Form 1 – Part Number Accountability YELLOW or LIGHT GREY fields – MANDATORY information required. BLUE or DARK GREY fields – CONDITIONALLY REQUIRED. These fields must be completed when information is available. WHITE fields – OPTIONAL information required when available.

Box 1. Part Number of the FAI part. AS9102 A Form 1 – Part Number Accountability Box 1. Part Number of the FAI part. Box 2. Name of the part as shown on the drawing. Box 3. Serial number of the FAI part. Box 4. The Report No. Box 5. The revision of the part being first article inspected. Indicate if there is no revision. Note: The latest revision (Box 7) does not always affect all parts contained on a drawing. Box 6. The drawing number associated with the FAI part. (if different from part number) Box 7. Reference the revision engineering drawing. (if drawing number is different from part number) Box 8. Reference Design, Engineering or Manufacturing changes affecting the FAI part, not reflected by the current part/drawing revision level. 16

Box 9. Reference the internal works order. AS9102 A Form 1 – Part Number Accountability Box 9. Reference the internal works order. Box 10. Name of the organization performing the FAI . Box 11. Reference the supplier vendor code. Box 12. Reference the customer Purchase Order number. Box 13. Check as appropriate. Box 14. Check as appropriate. For Partial FAI provide the baseline drawing number, including issue status and the reason. i.e Change of manufacturing location, Non-Conformance, Process change, Design change etc.

Box 15. Reference all lower level parts or AS9102 A Form 1 – Part Number Accountability Boxes 15, 16, 17 and 18 – this section is only required if the Part Number in Box 1. is an Assembly with lower level parts. Box 15. Reference all lower level parts or next level sub-assembly Part Number. Box 16. Part name as shown on the drawing/ parts list. Box 17. Reference the serial number of the part. Box 18. A reference number that identifies the FAI package.

Box 19. The name and signature of the person who prepared the FAI. AS9102 A Form 1 – Part Number Accountability Box 19. The name and signature of the person who prepared the FAI. Box 20. Date when the FAI was prepared. Box 21. The name of the person who reviewed or approved the FAI package. Box 22. Date when the FAI was reviewed. Box 23. Customer Approval. Box 24. Date of Customer approval.

AS9102 A Form 2 – Product Accountability Boxes 1 - 4 are repeated on all forms for convenience and traceability.

Box 7. Reference any material code specified. AS9102 A Form 2 – Product Accountability Box 5. Enter the name of the material or process i.e. Aluminium Alloy, Cadmium Plate etc. Box 6. Enter the material or process specification number, class and material form i.e. AMS4928 Bar (Include ‘make from’ materials, weld/ braze filler materials, standard catalogue hardware etc). Box 7. Reference any material code specified. Box 8. Reference Special Process Supplier Vendor code. Box 9. Indicate if technical approval is required by the customer. Box 10. Reference Certificate of Conformance number(s) e.g. Special Process, Raw material & Mill certifications, Laboratory Reports etc.

Box 11. Reference the Functional Test procedure AS9102 A Form 2 – Product Accountability Box 11. Reference the Functional Test procedure as stated on the drawing. Box 12. Reference the Functional Test report. Box 13. Comments – As applicable. Box 14. The name of the person who prepared this form. Box 15. Date when this form was completed.

Ballooned Drawings A ballooned drawing is a required element of a FAIR package to support Box 5 of Form 3 Identify 100% of characteristics Balloon and number all dimensions Balloon and number all surface finish callouts Including exclusion and inclusion area callouts Balloon and number all material and hardness callouts Don’t forget the requirements identified in the title boxes at the bottom of the drawings.

Note: In this example not all characteristics ballooned BALLOONED DRAWINGS 1 2 3 4 5 Note 2 6 7 8 Note: In this example not all characteristics ballooned

AS9102 A Form 3 – Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation Boxes 1 - 4 are repeated on all forms for convenience and traceability.

Box 6. Reference the drawing zone (include Sheet No. and Zone). AS9102 A Form 3 – Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation Box 5. Assign a unique number for each design characteristic. These are to be traceable to each drawing requirement. Box 6. Reference the drawing zone (include Sheet No. and Zone). Box 7. Reference any zoned characteristics i.e. Key Characteristics, Safety Critical Characteristic, etc.

Indicate measurements obtained for each design characteristic. AS9102 A Form 3 – Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation Box 9. Indicate measurements obtained for each design characteristic. Multiple characteristics shall be listed as individual values. All drawing notes must be accounted for. Processes that require design verification must have statement of compliance recorded on the form i.e. Certification of Compliance – state ‘Accept’. Laboratory reports or Certificate of test must show specific values for requirements and actual results. Box 10. Record the tool identification number of specially designed tooling used as a media of inspection. Box 8. Indicate the specified requirement for the design characteristic i.e. Dimensional features with minimum and maximum value of tolerance, Drawing notes, Specification requirements etc. Box 11. Record non-conformance document reference number if any design characteristic is found non-conforming. Box 14. Record any addition information required.

Box 12. Name of the person who prepared this form. AS9102 A Form 3 – Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation Box 12. Name of the person who prepared this form. Box 13. Date when this form was completed.

AS9102 A forms can be downloaded at: Forms Link AS9102 A forms can be downloaded at: www.sae.org/aaqg/publications/as9102a-faq.htm

Most Common Reasons for FAI Rejection C of Cs do not accompany the FAI Report Missing FAI Reports or Test Reports for sub-assemblies and/or fabricated detail parts. Variable data requirements from the engineering drawing are not provided with numerical results Missing or wrong information provided Missing special processor full address on AS9102 A Form 2, box 8 Missing tolerances on AS9102 A Form 3, box 8 Standard Catalog Hardware is not listed on AS9102 A Form 2