BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XXIII Public Communication Case studies Version 1.0, November 2015 This material was prepared by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Advertisements

Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/2 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
LEGAL FRAMEWORK & REGULATORY SYSTEM f or introduction of NPP into Vietnam Le Chi Dung (VARANS, Vietnam) Vienna, December 2008.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” RADIATION PROTECTION SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part II.
,Yalta,17-th Symposium of AER1 IMPACT OF CHANGED FUEL PERFORMANCES ON SAFETY BARRIER EFFECTIVENESS AT NORMAL OPERATION OF NPP WITH VVER A.V.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.10 Documents to be Submitted to the Regulatory Body.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” STAFFING AND TRAINING
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Information Dissemination.
Current Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure and Human Resources Development in the Republic of Belarus TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Version 1.0, November 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XXIII Public Communication Case studies This material was prepared by the IAEA and.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
Version 1.0, May 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIII Maintenance programme Case Studies This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded.
Version 1.0, May 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module X Operational safety including operational feedback Case studies This material was prepared.
Version 1.0, May 2015 SHORT COURSE BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module V Safety classification of structures, systems and components This material.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
Version 1.0, May 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XX Regulatory control Case Study This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded by.
Fire Safety & Disaster Planning
New Hanover County Schools Managing Crisis Events
Director, Environmental Assessment & Control Directorate
Flood Management Constitution Ministry of Energy
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XI Operational limits and conditions Case studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module V Safety classification of structures, systems and components Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module IX Siting considerations and Environmental Impact Assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015.
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIV Surveillance Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded.
NHLBI Perspective Yves Rosenberg, M.D, M.P.H.
GMP Inspection Process
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module III Basic principles of nuclear safety Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 14
leaks thru rupture sticks open closed
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
NRC Event Number – Event Date
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 14
Director, Environmental Assessment & Control Directorate
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Summary of the Earthquake and Situation of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
Lock Down Quick Guide BHS SY18-19
Training and Tutoring Approaches in the Field of Radiation Safety
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 14
Emergency Preparedness
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VII Probabilistic Safety Assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, July 2015 This material was prepared.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities
Current Radiation Protection Legislation in Slovakia
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module X Operational safety including operational feedback Case studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XX Regulatory control Case Study Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and.
Mikael Olsson Control Engineer
RESPONSIBILITIES and FUNCTIONS of the REGULATORY BODY
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XXIII Public Communication Case studies Version 1.0, November 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded by the European Union. 

Case study No. 1 Draft a public information programme for a small research reactor. Basic assumptions: Reactor type: TRIGA Mark II (see the following slides for description); Audience: general public; Media: leaflet, tour of the reactor. Be careful to communicate in plain language.

Case study No. 1 Reactor TRIGA Mk II is small pool-type research reactor (250 kW). Core is at the bottom of the pool under six meters of deionised water and consists of approximately fifty fuel rods. Rods are stainless steel tubes with the mixture of uranium and zirconium hydride inside. Water in the pool is constantly circulated through filter, mixed-bed demineraliser, and heat‑exchanger, which is cooled with water pumped from the well and discharged to a river. Reactor building is normal industrial hall with ventilation exhaust over filters. Discharged water and air are being constantly monitored for radionuclides.

Case study No. 1 Reactor building is a part of a research facility, which is surrounded with crop fields. The nearest village is some 400 m away. Maximum annual dose at the fence of the facility (~100m from the reactor building) is less than 1µSv. Dose at the fence is consequence of 41Ar emissions.

Case study No. 2 Write a press release about an incident in a NPP according to the following description: Event: Unidentified leakage from the primary circuit in excess of Technical Specifications limit; Event date: 2010-06-04; Event time: 09:44:00 UTC; Event place: XY; Reactor type: PWR.

Case study No. 2 Event abstract: The XY NPP was safely shut down this evening at 8:10 p.m. (local time), after a primary circuit leak was detected at 3:07 p.m. on 4 June 2010. The leak of about 3 m3/h exceeded the limit of the plant Technical specifications and required the plant shutdown. The event was classified as an unusual event. There was no demand on the safety systems. The loss of coolant was controlled by the charging flow. There was no need for off-site protective measures since there were no releases to the environment. The shut down was performed in a controlled way following the general operating procedures. During the initial examination with staff entering the containment it was discovered that the leak was near the reactor coolant pump. The exact location of the leak is still under examination and will be known in a short time. In order to repair the leakage, the plant needs to be brought into a cold shutdown mode, which means that the repair will probably take a few days.

Case study No. 3 Draft a communication program of the regulatory body of a nuclear power newcomer country. Assumptions: Country Abelia is planning to construct its first NPP. A regulatory body has been established according to IAEA Safety standards. The regulatory body plans to communicate with all stakeholders its role, functions, objectives, values, vision etc.

Case study No. 3 Suggestions how to conduct this exercise: Participants are split into 3-4 groups and each group: discusses and develops a common understanding about the role, functions, objectives, values, vision of Nuclear Safety Regulatory Body; prepares a presentation to present their view for discussion purpose on these 5 items and a key message which should be conveyed by the RB to the public at this early stage of the NPP programme; develops a communication plan in order to communicate and interact with interested parties about the licensing process, safety requirements and regulatory oversight as recommended by the action 45 of IAEA Safety Guide SSG-16; presents their plan (in front of other groups) and the rationales which underlie it.

Case study No. 4 Public meeting Assumptions: Public meeting is organized at local level, including journalists, to better inform the people about the project to construct a nuclear power plant nearby and the licensing process under implementation to possibly issue a combined license for design and construction.

Case study No. 4 Suggestions how to conduct this exercise: Participants are split into 3-4 groups (possibly same groups as for case study 3). Groups prepare themselves as the regulatory body members to participate in and interact with the public during the meeting. This includes: determine the role of each group member to ensure good interaction and discussion with the audience; prepare a short presentation to be delivered at the beginning of the meeting to introduce the issue to the audience; get prepared to play a role of a public member (retired nuclear engineer, pregnant woman, journalist, green, farmer…). Participate in the public meeting, either as regulatory body members or a public member. After public meetings (one for each group), a debriefing of the exercise is conducted.

Case study no. 5: Example of a press release about the ALERT in a NPP Suggestions how to conduct this exercise: Groups of 2-3 participants should be handed out description of the event. The groups should study the description and prepare the initial press release and the final press release after the termination of the event. Possible examples of the press releases are provided.

Event description Four Containment monitors indicate sudden increase of radiation levels in excess of 0.06 Gy/h which warrants the initiation of the abnormal operation procedure (AOP). It is established that the pressurizer level is decreasing. The makeup water system can not maintain the pressurizer level. The control room operator manually initiates the SI signal (safety injection), which automatically trips the reactor. There is no release into the environment. According to the procedure and the measured radiation levels the event was declared as ALERT. This initial information was immediately passed to the regulatory authority and local authorities.

Task for trainee The Public Information Officer (PIO) of the plant is immediately informed about the event and the declaration of the ALERT. He should prepare the Press Release for the general public, local media and national media. Task for the trainee: draft a Press Release according to the description of the event.

Possible solution of the task: Press release about the ALERT DATE RELEASED: TIME RELEASED: RELEASED BY: Increased radioactivity level was detected inside the primary containment of the XY Nuclear Power Plant. There has been no release into the environment, but the possibility cannot be completely excluded. As result an ALERT has been declared. An ALERT means there is a minor problem at the plant. For further clarification you may call 1-355-729-0000, which is manned at all times. Stay tuned to local radio or TV station and carefully follow instructions. Information is also available at the XY Nuclear Power Plant web site at www.country.xyplant.

Reaction of the regulatory body, local authority, media and general population Regulatory body despatched its resident inspector to the plant site within 30 minutes after the notification. Local authorities sent two representatives to the plant site. National media representatives appeared at the plant site 1 hour after the first press release with demands for more details and possible development of the situation. Several concerned members of the public were calling the local authorities and plant public information officer.

Activities in the plant after the ALERT declaration After investigation by the plant personnel following the plant abnormal operating procedures identified the probable leak source in the part of the Chemical and Volume Control System. It was established that is possible to isolate the leak from outside without entering the containment. The leak was successfully stopped. Regulatory authorities, local authorities and the media were notified about the resolution of the abnormal event. The ALERT was declared to be over.

Task for trainee The Public Information Officer (PIO) of the plant is immediately informed about resolution of the event and the termination of the ALERT. He should prepare the Press Release for the general public, local media, national media and website. Task for the trainee: draft a Press Release about the termination of the ALERT.

Possible solution of the task: Press release about the ALERT termination DATE RELEASED: TIME RELEASED: RELEASED BY: The incident at the XY Nuclear Power Plant is now over, ALERT is terminated and there is no need for further concern. Any further information will be provided by means of normal news media and our website. The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission.