CHER-LOB: Preoperative chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, lapatinib or both in HER2 positive operable breast cancer. Preliminary safety report with focus on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Xeloda X-panding options in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer
Advertisements

516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Van Cutsem E et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract LBA4509. (Oral Presentation)
Efficacy results from the ToGA trial: a phase III study of trastuzumab added to standard chemotherapy in first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor.
Should clinicians routinely recommend trastuzumab (Herceptin) as part of the adjuvant therapy for all patients with Her2 positive early breast cancer?
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
Assistant Professor of Medicine Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Abstract Introduction  What is a Herceptin (Trastuzumab) ?  Herceptin (Trastuzumab) is an monoclonal antibody,it is an example of targeted therapy an.
Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Genoa – Italy
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Terapia Neoadiuvante Revisione delle evidenze scientifiche
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Lapatinib versus Trastuzumab in Combination with Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Analysis of the GEPARQUINTO.
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Baselga J et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S3-3.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
PHASE II RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE VERSUS TRASTUZUMAB PLUS DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 – POSITIVE.
Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer Slideset on: Piccart-Gebhart M, Procter M, Leyland- Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 KRISTINE: Neoadjuvant T-DM1 + Pertuzumab vs Chemotherapy With Trastuzumab.
EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Università di Napoli Federico II
Zoneddy Dayao, Rachel Rabinovitch, Stephen H. Dyar,
Slamon D et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 62.
Neoadjuvant Palbociclib + Anastrozole in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
ABRAMYO Phase I-II study of weekly nab paclitaxel in combination with liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin in patients with HER2 negative MBC Alessandra.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
TRAIN-2 (BOOG ): Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ± Anthracyclines With Dual HER2 Blockade in HER2+ EBC CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
Chicago 2008: Post - ASCO Analysis: Metastatic Breast Cancer
BIBF 1120 (Nintedanib) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer:
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Reeder CB et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster)
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Blackwell KL et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 61
ASCO 2002 Advances in the Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Tab. 1 – Characteristics of patients
Swain SM et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Fabio Puglisi
European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer(ECTO): Improved freedom from progression from adding paclitaxel(T) to doxorubicin(A) followed by CMF.
Cardiac Toxicity on NSABP B-31
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Dr T P E Wells 13 July 2018 Breast SSG Bath
Participating groups:
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Jones SE et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5082.
A Report from ECCO 14 Oral Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Untch M et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
CASI CLINICI: trattamento dei tumori HER2 positivi T1a,b N0 terapia sequenziale vs concomitante Federico Piacentini MD Department of Oncology, Hematology.
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Presentation transcript:

CHER-LOB: Preoperative chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, lapatinib or both in HER2 positive operable breast cancer. Preliminary safety report with focus on cardiac tolerability. Valentina Guarneri1, Antonio Frassoldati1, Katia Cagossi2 , Alberto Bottini3, Luigi Cavanna4, Andrea Michelotti5, Gordana Jovic1, Federico Piacentini1, Cristina Oliva6, PierFranco Conte1 1From the 1Department of Oncology and Hematology, Modena University Hospital, Italy and from The Divisions of Medical Oncology of: 2Ramazzini Hospital, Carpi; 3Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona; 4Hospital of Piacenza, 5S. Chiara University Hospital, Pisa, Italy; 6Oncology Medicine Development Center, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, UK INTRODUCTION RESULTS Chemotherapy plus trastuzumab represents the standard treatment for HER2+ breast cancer patients In the preoperative setting, the combination of trastuzumab with sequential chemotherapy including taxane and anthracycline resulted in an impressive rate of pathologic complete responses (pCR). However, intrinsic or acquired resistance to trastuzumab has been reported in both early and advanced breast cancer Lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of the TK activity of EGFR and erbB2, can induce a more effective blockade of the proliferative stimulation The combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib is under development because of the potential additive effect of a combined blockade of the outer and inner part of the HER2 receptor, with promising safety and activity data On these premises, we have designed a phase II randomized trial to evaluate activity and safety of chemotherapy plus lapatinib, trastuzumab, or both as preoperative therapy for HER2positive operable breast cancer. TOXICITY STATUS OF THE TRIAL 19 pts have been randomized: 6 in arm A, 6 in arm B, and 7 in arm C Number of evaluable paclitaxel doses: 135 Number of evaluable FEC cycles: 34 Mean duration of treatment Arm A: 20.2 (range 3-26) weeks Arm B: 18.5 (range 11-26) weeks Arm C: 20.3 (range 6-26) weeks PRELIMINARY CARDIAC EVALUATION Hematological toxicity per cycle (G2) Weekly paclitaxel FEC G2 G3 G4 Leukopenia 1.5% 0.75% - 48.2% 3.7% Neutropenia 44.4% 25.9% 14.8% Anemia 2.25% Thrombocytopenia Febrile neutropenia Evaluable pts Mean LVEF (range) Baseline 14 62% (54-74%) After 12 weeks 8 61% (58-71%) After 24 weeks 7 61% (60-63%) No episodes of CHF No decline in mean LVEF No patient experienced a significant LVEF decline (>15%) No patient had a LVEF value below the LLN at any point PATIENTS AND METHODS Overall patient and tumor characteristics Median age, yrs (range) 47 (27;66) Postmenopausal status: Yes No 36% 64% Mean T mammographic size, cm (range) 3.85 (2;9) Clinical stage: IIA IIB IIIA 21.5% 57% Recommended surgery w/o PS: Mastectomy Breast Conserving 69% 31% Histology: Ductal Lobular Other 77% 15% 8% Histologic Grade: G1 G2 G3 NA ER and/or PgR + ER and PgR - 71% 29% Non-hematological toxicity per cycle Weekly paclitaxel FEC G1 G2 G3 Nausea 6.6% 2.2% - 14.7% Vomiting 3.7% 1.5% 5.9% 2.9% Mucositis/stomatitis 5.2% 8.8% Diarrhoea 16.3% 7.4% Skin toxicity (rash) 11.1% 14% 26.5% Nail changes 11.7% Neuropathy sensory Hepatotoxicity: GT Tachycardia 0.7% Pulmonary (dyspnea) Hypersensitivity reaction STUDY PLAN ENDPOINTS Primary % of pCR in the breast and axillary nodes Secondary % of clinical objective responses (CR+ PR measured by USG) in the breast % of conservative surgery safety profile time to treatment failure from start of primary therapy inhibition of intermediate and final biomarkers of the proliferative and the apoptotic pathways induced by the treatment correlation between tumor gene expression at diagnosis and pathological response R A N D O M I Z T Lapatinib 1000 mg/daily Lapatinib 1500 mg/daily C E B P S Y U G * TXL 80 mg/m2 Trastuzumab 2 mg/kg *Surgery within 2 weeks after the last trastuzumab/lapatinib dose 5 FU 600 mg/m2 Epi 75 mg/m2 CTX 600 mg/m2 EGFR, HER2 pTEN, pAKT, pMAPK TUNEL Test, Ki 67 Gene expression  Arm A Arm B Arm C LVEF % Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks SAMPLE SIZE The sample size has been estimated by using the two-stage Simon’s design Assuming a 50% increase in the pCR rate for the CT+T+L arm vs CT+T or CT+L, in the first stage 52 patients will be enrolled; in case we observe 4 pCR in CT+T and CT+L arms each and 8 pCR in CT+T+L arm, additional 68 patients will be enrolled, for a total of 120 patients CONCLUSIONS Lapatinib compliance Permanent lapatinib discontinuation Lapatinib dose reduction Temporary lapatinib interruption 9 Mean duration of lapatinib interruption, dd (range) 7.6 (1;14) Reasons for lapatinib interruption: Skin toxicity (G2) Dyspnea (G1) Diarrhoea (G3) Increase of GT (G3) Nausea/Vomiting (G3) Neutropenia (G4) Fever 2 1 This is the first report of the combination of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, trastuzumab and lapatinib as primary systemic therapy for HER2+ operable breast cancer Hematological and non-hematological toxicities are mild and manageable Taking into account the potential for cardiac toxicity of these agents, a careful monitoring of cardiac safety is planned These very preliminary data are encouraging on the safety of these combinations Study accrual is ongoing KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA Histologically confirmed infiltrating primary BC of >2.0 cm in largest clinical diameter HER2 positive tumor (either IHC 3+ or FISH+) Availability of tumor tissue for biological and molecular examination Age >18, < 65 years ECOG PS 0-1 Normal organ and marrow function LVEF within the institutional range of normal Adequate contraception (women of child-bearing potential) Ability to swallow and retain oral medication Written informed consent CARDIAC EVALUATION Only those patients with normal LVEF (as measured by echocardiography or MUGA scan) are eligible for the study After baseline, LVEF measurement is repeated after 12 weeks (prior to start FEC), and at the end of treatment More frequent LVEF evaluations should be performed when clinically indicated A >15% absolute decrease from baseline in LVEF (asymptomatic or symptomatic), that is below the lower limit of normal is considered a SAE PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS Modena, Italy (Coordinating Center PI PF Conte ) Carpi (MO), Italy (PI K Cagossi) Piacenza, Italy (PI L Cavanna) Cremona, Italy (PI A Bottini) Reggio Emilia, Italy (PI C Boni) Pisa, Italy (PI A Michelotti) Forlì, Italy (PI D Amadori) Rimini, Italy (PI A Ravaioli) Parma, Italy (PI A Ardizzoni) Perugia, Italy (PI LCrinò) Candiolo, Italy (PI M Aglietta) Varese, Italy (PI G Giardina) Ancona, Italy (PI S Cascinu) Treviglio, Italy (PI S Barni) Pavia, Italy (PI M Danova) Berlin, Germany (PI M Untch) Newcastle, UK (PI M Verril) Warsaw, Poland (PI C. Szczylik) Supported by GlaxoSmithKline