Soil fauna dynamics and soil chemical and physical properties in abandoned pastures and agroforestry systems in the Central Amazon ND04_FEER_02 Ilse L.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soil Organic C, SON and SOP of Sandy Soils As Affected by Intensive Loblolly Pine Management in SE U.S. Deoyani V. Sarkhot.
Advertisements

Chrisoula Karakosta Laboratory of Rangeland Ecology Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Mini Project Course: Restoration Summer School 2009 PhD.
Nitrogen Mineralization Across an Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition Gradient in Southern California Deserts Leela E. Rao 1, David R. Parker 1, Andrzej Bytnerowicz.
Carbon storage in silvopastoral systems Farm Woodland Forum Annual Meeting 13 June 2013 Matthew Upson and Paul Burgess Centre for Environmental Risk and.
Zhengxi Tan *,1,2, Shuguang Liu 2, Carol A. Johnston 1, Thomas R. Loveland 3 Jinxun Liu 4, Rachel Kurtz 3, and Larry Tieszen 3 1 South Dakota State University,
Cover Crops and Biofuels Implications for Soil Characteristics and Plant Development Deanna Boardman October 21, 2009.
Soil and Water Quality with Miscanthus on a Louisiana Coastal Plain Hillside L. Gaston and W. Felicien LSU AgCenter School of Plant, Environmental and.
Methods Field Sites: The study was conducted on a ranch bordered to the west by I-75 and to the north by the Santa Fe River. Three different ecosystems.
Fate and Transport of Dissolved Organic Carbon in Soils from Two Contrasting Watersheds Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division.
“Carbon Isotope Systematics in Soil” -or- “Plant Poo and Microbe Farts” Justin Yeakel, UCSC.
Dynamics of the Northern Hardwood Ecosystem Yuqiong Hu, Jeff Plakke, Sharon Shattuck, Erin Wiley.
Carbon Isotope Systematics in Soil. Soil Pathway Summary Organic matter finds it’s way into soils and decomposes SOM (Soil Organic Matter) is further.
Fuel treatment effects on forest carbon and wildfire Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center,
How does flooding effect soil quality? Reducing Pore Space: Loss of pore space can result in decreased infiltration rate, ultimately exacerbating runoff.
Soil Composition 1/13/12. What determines characteristics of soil? Physical (such as water) Parent material (chemical make-up) Life (biological activity)
CARBON STOCKS IN TROPICAL FORESTS OF MEXICO Víctor J. Jaramillo 1, Angelina Martínez-Yrízar 2, Luz Piedad Romero-Duque 1, J. Boone Kauffman 3 & Felipe.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
The saprotrofic food chain in terrestrial ecosystems : Soil Biota
Adam M. Davis Center for Geospatial Data Analysis Indiana University, Bloomington, IN Studying geological controls on succession in an old field: Progress.
IntroductionIntroduction Land-use change or intensification can influence the dynamics and storage of soil organic matter (SOM) and the extent of carbon.
Lecture 3b Writing Soil Profile Descriptions and Forest Soils.
Stream water chemistry in three meso-scale hydrologic basins in Eastern Amazonian Ricardo de O. Figueiredo 1, Daniel Markewitz 2, Eric A. Davidson 3, Ewerton.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION BY HYBRID POPLARS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Dr. Jon D. Johnson Hybrid Poplar Research Program Washington State University - Puyallup.
Peter Motavalli Dept. of Soil, Environmental and Atmos. Sci. University of Missouri University of Missouri ADAPTING TO CHANGE:
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
A single basin-wide estimate for basic density of wood (0.69) has been employed to map above-ground biomass and carbon stocks across Amazonia (Fearnside.
Introduction: Globally, atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 are rising, and are expected to increase forest productivity and carbon storage. However, forest.
Approach: Samples were obtained from 4 different plots of land, each with a different land-use. The land uses that were examined were a grassland (hayed),
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Nitrogen-use efficiency of a sweetgum forest in elevated CO 2 Richard J. Norby 1 and Colleen M. Iversen 2 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN;
Soil Carbon and Phosphorous Fractions in Ciampitti I.A. 123, F.O. García 1, G. Rubio 2 and L.I. Picone 4 Field Crop Rotations of the Argentine Pampas Ciampitti.
Effects of parent material and land use on soil phosphorus forms in Southern Belgium Renneson 1 M., Dufey 2 J., Bock 1 L. and Colinet 1 G. 1 University.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Pasture degradation, secondary forest regrowth, and mature forest productivity: Do nutrients matter? Eric A. Davidson, The Woods Hole Research Center Adam.
Seasonal Emissions of N 2 O, NO, CO and CO 2 in Brazilian Savannas Subjected to Prescribed Fires Alexandre Pinto, Mercedes Bustamante, Laura Viana, Universidade.
Mixed Oak Ecosystem: Field and Lab Data Integration Deborah Hudleston Catherine Resler Mary Walton Chris Weber.
Greater root carbon storage compared to shoot carbon storage in soil Fig 1 We labeled cereal rye cover crop with 13 CO 2 (left) aboveground biomass was.
Additions crop residues manures composts losses CO 2 (respiration of soil organisms) erosion soil organic matter Figure 3.1. Additions and losses of organic.
Above and Below ground decomposition of leaf litter Sukhpreet Sandhu.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 18: Nitrogen Cycle Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Marco A. Galang, Lawrence A. Morris, and Daniel Markewitz D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, DW Brooks Drive,
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Samuel T. Dunn 1, 2, Andrew G. Bunn 3, John D. Schade 1
Final Evaluation Lab Practicum Take Home Assessment Formal Examination
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Virginia Recycling Association Annual Meeting Organics Session
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Soil Change after Three Decades of Conventional Till, No-Till, and Forest Succession in the Piedmont of Georgia, USA S. Devine1, D. Markewitz1, P. Hendrix2,3,
Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations
Long term Biochar versus Wood Ash Agronomic Field Trial at 6 months
Where has all the leaf litter gone?....
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
Effect of land use systems on soil resources in Northern Thailand
Distribution of soil P fractions in oil palm plantation of
Partial Nutrient Balance at Farm plot level under Different Irrigation Water Management for Tomato production Muluye Gedfew1, Petra Schmitter2, Prossie.
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Impacts of cattle on cotton in a bahiagrass/peanut/cotton rotation
Soils and their Significance
The potential for microbial nutrient cycling processes in urban soils
By: Paul A. Pellissier, Scott V. Ollinger, Lucie C. Lepine
Getting from here to there: protecting and promoting ecosystem services during the conversion of forests to fields in New England Alexandra Contosta1,
Using Soil Moisture and Matric Potential Observations to Identify Subsurface Convergent Flow Pathways Qing Zhu, Henry Lin, and Xiaobo Zhou Dept . Crop.
a IIASA, ESM, Laxenburg, Austria,
Simulated succession under high grazing
6. REFERENCES CITED see Handout
RC Izaurralde – JGCRI With contributions from NJ Rosenberg – JGCRI
Carbon and Nutrient Stocks in Agroforestry Systems and Secondary Forest in the Central Amazon ND04_FEER_04 Karen A. McCaffery*1, Marco A. Rondon* 1, Jorge.
Don O’Connor NBB Sustainability Workshop September 27, 2018
Soil organic carbon (SOC) can significantly influence key soil functional properties and improve soil quality by increasing water holding capacity, reducing.
Presentation transcript:

Soil fauna dynamics and soil chemical and physical properties in abandoned pastures and agroforestry systems in the Central Amazon ND04_FEER_02 Ilse L. Ackerman1, Juliete M. T. Queiroz2, Christienne Kuczak1, Erick C. M. Fernandes1, Marco A. Rondon1, Eleusa Barros3, Elisa Wandelli2, Johannes Lehmann1 *1 Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; *2Centro de Pesquisa Agroflorestal da Amazônia da Embrapa (EMBRAPA-CPAA), AM-10, km 29, Manaus, AM, 69011-970; *3Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Rua Nelson Batista Sales 114, Cj Petro-Aleixo, Manaus, AM. Correspondence: ecf3@cornell.edu 1. INTRODUCTION Earthworms, termites and leaf cutter ants of the macrofauna group that are the more readily accessible and potentially manageable 'ecosystem engineers'. Earthworms and termites not only ingest large amounts of litter and soil, but also actively move around in soil and thereby play a major regulatory role in the dynamics of litter, SOM and soil nutrients. Leaf cutter ants have been shown to decrease deep soil resistance to penetration and in increase deep soil fertility (Moutinho, 1998; Brener & Silva, 1995). Several authors have stressed the need for research on the role of soil macrofauna in restoring land productivity (Urbanek, 1989; Abbott, 1989; Lavelle, 1994). We are measuring the impact of previous land use, mulching, and biomass removals on the dynamics of earthworms, termites and leaf cutter ants and their impacts on C and nutrients in abandoned pastures and 9-year-old agroforestry systems established on abandoned pasture land. Where forest is converted to pasture, the initial increase in dead standing wood appears to be responsible for population explosions of mound-building termites. Paradoxically, while termites have an important role in cycling the dead woody material, their mounds in pastures appear to resist vegetation establishment thereby limiting aboveground biomass accumulation. Figure 2. Aerial view of the experiment site showing Primary forest in the background, 4-year-old agroforestry systems in the center and regenerating forests on abandoned pastures in the lower left hand portion. The entire scene covers approximately 15 hectares. Primary forest Agroforestry I Agroforestry II Agroforestry III Secondary forest on abandoned pasture Figure 3: Contents of C, N and P in termite mounds versus control soil Figure 4: Inorganic phosphorous fractions in earthworm casts and adjacent soils in agroforestry systems and secondary forest on abandoned pastures Figure 1: Photo sequence showing large amounts of woody biomass on soil surface in a recently established pasture that appears to result in the proliferation of termite mounds within 5-8 years after pasture establishment. The mound structures are hard and many remain devoid of vegetative cover for as long as 10-15 years after mounds start forming. 4. RESULTS Macrofauna Groups: Our preliminary data show distinct changes in the soil macrofauna family profiles for secondary forest on abandoned pastures versus four agroforestry systems. The 4-year-old palm based and high input silvopastoral systems favored the proliferation and/or invasion of earthworms. This is most likely a response to the higher and better quality litter inputs in these systems as compared to abandoned pastures (Figure 1 below). We are now sampling the same systems at 9 years and will also characterize the distribution of soil fauna with depth in an attempt to investigate relationships with rooting depth of the vegetation (Figure 2 below). C and nutrients: Our data show that termite mounds have significantly higher C contents as compared to adjacent soil. This is likely to be a function of the higher clay contents in the mounds. Termite mounds may play a role in carbon sequestration, perhaps in part offsetting their negative effect on aboveground C accumulation. N and K contents of mounds are significantly higher than in adjacent soil. While Ca and Mg contents are lower in mounds, the available P content is similar. We are currently sampling more sites to obtain a more robust data set. Phosphorus fractions : There is a significant difference in inorganic P levels for earthworm casts between system type, i.e. ASII and secondary forest and Pi levels in all fractions are significantly greater for earthworm casts than control soil. Most of the Pi, however, appears in the least available NaOH extractable (Fe oxide-bound) fraction. We are currently completing assays for organic P. Plant families and Biomass: Plant biomass is significantly lower on mounds relative to adjacent soil. Plants from the Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Poaceae and Melastomataceae tend to dominate the mound structures (Figure 5). We are continuing to evaluate the extent of mounds, plant distribution and biomass. Figure 5: Plant Families and Biomass on Mounds versus Adjacent Soil 2. OBJECTIVES (1) To quantify their extent and impact on soil C and nutrients in pasture, secondary forest regenerating on abandoned pasture and agroforestry systems established on abandoned pastures. (2) To identify the factors responsible for limiting vegetation growth on termite mounds over time and to identify plant species capable of colonizing termite mound structures (3) To quantify the dynamics of soil macrofauna groups in pastures, abandoned pastures and agroforestry systems on abandoned pastures (4) To assess the impact of macrofauna groups on C and P fractions in the soil. 3. METHODS & MEASUREMENTS Site: The study area consists of sites at the EMBRAPA field station located along highway BR-174 north of Manaus, Amazonas. These include actively grazed pastures, a 7-year secondary forest, and 8-year-old agroforestry systems (Fernandes et al., 2001; McCaffery et al., this session). The following measurements are in progress: 1. Termite mounds and carbon dynamics: Extent of land coverage by termite mounds; Compare the following parameters on and off termite mounds: Above- and belowground plant biomass; Soil carbon content and fractions (POM, ELF); Soil respiration; Microbial biomass and respiration; Termite respiration; 2.1 Biomass limiting physical factors on and off termite mounds : Soil resistance to penetration; Soil bulk density, texture, and moisture; Soil hydrophobicity and water infiltration; Air permeability; 2.2 Biomass limiting chemical factors on and off termite mounds : Soil pH; Macro- and micronutrients, Al3+ 3. Abandoned pasture versus agroforestry system management impacts on the dynamics of soil macrofauna groups 4. Soil macrofauna activity impacts on soil P fractions (modified Hedley extraction). 5. DISCUSSION Data on soil fauna impacts on C, nutrients, plant distribution and productivity is still being collected. We estimate that all sampling will be completed in the next 3 months. The data and observations presented here must be considered as preliminary. Preliminary results show that despite trends of increased contents C, N, and K in termite mound structures both vegetation regeneration and primary productivity appears to be lower on mounds relative to adjacent soils. Methane emission from termite mounds is higher than from surrounding soil (See Rondon et al., this session). Although inorganic P fractions are higher in earthworm casts, most of the Pi is in the least available Fe-oxide-bound fraction. It will be interesting to evaluate the P contributions of the organic fractions since the readily available Pi is ~0.1 mg/kg. We expect the organic P data by March 2001. The Asteraceae and Fabaceae plant families have species with apparently significant potential to colonize mound structures and contribute to increasing primary productivity. Figure 1: Macrofauna Groups in Abandoned Pasture and Agroforestry Systems Figure 2: Macrofauna Groups by Soil Depth in an Abandoned Pasture 6. REFERENCES CITED see Handout