Matthew Gray* and David Stanton**

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The West Central Women’s Resource Centre H.O.M.E.S Program Presents Rewarding Work.
Advertisements

Confronting the Challenges: A Partnership Approach Peter Shields and Kieran Molloy Co-chairs of Supported Employment Solutions (SES)
Welfare Reform From Poverty to Financial Inclusion 17 th October 2012.
Conditional Cash Transfers in South Africa. Social Security in South Africa: Cash Transfers All grants are means tested (targeted) – All social grants.
Introduction to STINMOD and Microsimulation Modelling in Australia Ben Phillips: Principal Research Fellow, NATSEM, 21 Feb 2015.
Assistance for families: An assessment of Australian family policies from an international perspective Peter Whiteford, Social Policy Research Centre,
Benefit Service Veronica Dewsbury. Introduction The Benefits Service administers the following: Housing Benefit Council Tax Benefit Discretionary Housing.
1 Moving from a dynamic cohort microsimulation model to a dynamic population microsimulation model Moving from a dynamic cohort microsimulation model to.
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs Sweden Swedish family policy Ministry of Health and Social Affairs Social Insurance Division Unit for Family Policy.
AUSTRALIAN DEVELOPMENTS IN WELFARE TO WORK Budget
The social safety net for children and families Jane Waldfogel.
Welfare Reforms Ursula Barrington. Welfare reforms On 16 February 2011 the Welfare Reform Bill was introduced to Parliament. The Bill legislates for the.
Social Policy : Trends in spending, recipiency and policy focus Seminar presentation: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 11 October, 2007, Seoul,
Universal Credit and Other Welfare Reforms – a Local Authority Perspective John Wright 21 November
Income support in a time of low unemployment Peter Davidson, Senior Policy Officer ACOSS Economic and social outlook conference, University of Melbourne.
Income support and other assistance for sole parents in New Zealand A comparative summary with other OECD countries MAPP555, 13 September 2012.
Geographic Inequality in Social Provision and Redistribution Sarah K. Bruch - University of Iowa INEQUALITY ACROSS THE US STATES Inequality Workshop The.
Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Ryan Woolsey, Fiscal and Policy Analyst CSDA/CWDA Policy Symposium March 4, 2015.
TANF Recipients Living with a Disability: Policy Framework, Prevalence and Service Strategies Presentation to the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities.
Lesson 10 - Learning Intentions (After this lesson pupils should be able to): Describe the ways by which recent Governments have tried to reduce wealth.
Welfare Reform and Lone Parents Employment in the UK Paul Gregg and Susan Harkness.
Government Anti- Poverty Programs/Poverty In CANADA ECONOMICS 12 JANUARY 21, 2015.
Delivering the Family Poverty Strategy through the Family Poverty Commissioning Framework August 2012.
ILLINOIS KIDS COUNT SYMPOSIUM March 5, Introduction The most visible signs of recession don’t reveal full impact on children Children are hidden.
Observatório Pedagógico MOVING THE GOALPOSTS NOT ONCE BUT TWICE: MINIMUM INCOME BENEFIT IN PORTUGAL Carlos Farinha Rodrigues ISEG / University of Lisbon.
Promoting Work Supports: Background, Issues, Opportunities June 17, 2005 Mark Greenberg Director of Policy Center for Law and Social Policy th.
Introduction The following chapter will review: –Overview –Model assumptions –The Cost Proposal & Evaluation –Payments methodology –Financial Incentives/Disincentives.
North West Youth Employment Convention Wednesday, 23 November 2011 Nick Page.
Chapter 17: Domestic Policy Part II (pp ).
Universal Credit Presentation 1 st September 2015.
PPA786: Urban Policy Class 17: The New World of Welfare Policy.
Shaping Bradford’s delivery of the Childcare Free Entitlement - 30 hours Early Childhood Services.
Fighting child poverty across the OECD: is work the answer?
The Promise and Pitfalls of the ‘Investment’ Approach to Welfare Presentation to “Investing in Australia’s Future”, Peter Whiteford, Crawford School of.
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS
The Australian Priority Investment Approach
Seminar presentation:
Congress Considers Major Medicaid Changes
Social Welfare Policymaking
Class 17: The New World of Welfare Policy
The Canadian Retirement Income System – a Society Perspective
Overview of Income Redistribution Programs
Social Policy : Trends in spending, recipiency and policy focus
High earning replacement in case of parental leave in Estonia
“FEEDBACK PRESENTATION ON THE ASSESSMENT MATRIX FINDINGS
Welfare Programs GOVT 2306, Module 12.
Welfare Programs May 2, 2017.
The impact of budget cuts on social care services for older people
Pension Challenges and Pension Reforms in OECD Countries
Overview of Welfare Reform and UC Rollout
What will this Government mean for NGO’s ?
Social Policy : Trends in spending, recipiency and policy focus
Haksoon Ahn, PhD Associate Professor
Evaluating Three Models for Compensating Family Caregivers
Policies extending social security coverage
Social Welfare Policymaking
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING Amsterdam, June 2016
Haksoon Ahn, PhD Associate Professor
Economics: Principles in Action
Politics and Practicalities of Basic Income in Australia and Canada
Changing employment relations & reforms of social security systems
Government Policies and Individual Welfare
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING,NICOSIA
Domestic Policy Domestic Policy.
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR
Welfare Conditionality IN New Zealand
Federal Budget.
FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION – Budget Analysis Unit
Estimating net impacts of the European Social Fund in England
Federal Budget 2019 ARCO ADVISORY.
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Australian Social Security System and Welfare Conditionality Matthew Gray* and David Stanton** * ANU Centre for Social Research & Methods ** Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU Presentation to International Symposium on Welfare Conditionality University of York 30 January 2010

Overview of Australian Social Security System Most social security benefits are flat-rate entitlements financed from general government revenue. The system consists of a range of benefits designed to provide a minimum level of income support. Each payment has its own eligibility criteria and in some cases “activity requirements”. Also payments are available to assist with the costs of children and assistance with costs of child care Most social security benefits are income or asset tested and subject to residence conditions. Duration of payment receipt is not time limmited. Coverage of the population is broad Social security expenditure in Australia estimated to be 35.3% of total Federal Government Expenditure in 2017-18 (Whiteford, 2017). The system is relatively “efficient” in terms of directing assistance to those in need compared with other OECD economies. But issues remain of effectiveness, adequacy and complexity.

Types of social security payments Divided into payments for: those of retirement age (age pension, war service related payments) those of working age (14 categories of payments –e.g., disability, carers; primary carers of children; unemployed; full-time students) System of additional payments for families with children (same system for in work and out of work families). Supplementary payments to assist with additional costs such as housing, living in a remote area). Subsidy for costs of formal child care (increasingly focused on objective of parental work force participation). Moves have been made to “simplify” the system by grouping together like payments. But this is more superficial than real in effect.

Changes in generosity of the system From the mid-2000s (and earlier) the generosity (on average) of the Australian social security system increased – largely towards age and disability pensioners. Reductions in personal income taxation. Significant real increases in rates of age and disability pensions, but not for other payments. Combined social security and tax changes have increased financial rewards from paid employment. BUT for some groups there have been changes to the social security system which have led to a less generous system – mainly single parents; continued drops in the relative value of unemployment benefit payments. There has been a major push by community groups (under the banner “Raise the Rate”) and some business groups to increase the rate of unemployment benefit (Newstart allowance). There have also been calls for a fundamental and over-arching review of the social security and tax systems. This has not occurred since the Henderson Poverty Inquiry in the 1970’s.

Developments in welfare conditionality Conditionality has always been a part of the social security system in Australia. Australia’s first national legislation to introduce age pensions in 1908 included the requirement that applicants be of “good character” and “deserving of a pension” There is a clear trend towards increasing conditionality. But conditionality (new conditionality?) has developed over the last 25 years with a particular emphasis on attempts to alter pre-existing forms of behaviour. These measures are inherently paternalistic and punitive- more “stick” than “carrot”. This has become a “solution looking for a problem” and has partly reflected technological change and the ability to manage a cashless debit card system that restricts purchases for those “on welfare”. Activity requirements job search, education or part-time employment required by single parents when youngest child reaches the age of 6 (mid-2006; grandfathering ended 2013) Higher activity requirement (hours of work, study/training. Voluntary work) to meet eligibility requirements for receipt of Child Care Subsidy (from 1 July 2018) Other types of conditionality are being increasingly introduced or proposed. Recent suggestions included restricting payments to all teenagers to supposedly curb drinking and gambling. Assumptions: Changes are assessed only on individuals who were already in receipt of the payment (i.e. no new recipients are added even if they become eligible with an increased base payment) Combine individual poverty gap estimates into a single target figure using weights (deriving empirical weights for multiple variables is challenging!) Total expenditure is estimated using the iterative payment levels across the number of recipients based on average allowance levels (i.e. proportion of max payment)

Developments in welfare conditionality Immunisation of children required for receipt of child related payments Income Management / cashless welfare card (selected areas) – being expanded School Enrolment and Attendance Measure (SEAM) (selected areas) – abolished Trial of mandatory drug testing of social security recipients - trial of 5,000 new unemployment benefit recipients in 3 locations over a 2-year period (subject to passage of legislation) Assumptions: Changes are assessed only on individuals who were already in receipt of the payment (i.e. no new recipients are added even if they become eligible with an increased base payment) Combine individual poverty gap estimates into a single target figure using weights (deriving empirical weights for multiple variables is challenging!) Total expenditure is estimated using the iterative payment levels across the number of recipients based on average allowance levels (i.e. proportion of max payment)

Developments in welfare conditionality, cont … Application to Indigenous Australians has been very controversial Trialling (e.g., Income Management, School Enrolment and Attendance Measure) Major independent evaluations of Income Management have raised major concerns with the program. Introduction of the Community Development Programme which applies to job seekers in remote areas of Australia (large majority are Indigenous) Requires up to 25 hours per week of work like activities. Requires greater level activity than other job seekers. Widespread application of penalties for non-compliance. From March 2019, changes will be made including more flexible hours, reduction in number of hours required (20 hours per week), ensuring delivery provided by local Indigenous organisations (aimed to give greater community control). Assumptions: Changes are assessed only on individuals who were already in receipt of the payment (i.e. no new recipients are added even if they become eligible with an increased base payment) Combine individual poverty gap estimates into a single target figure using weights (deriving empirical weights for multiple variables is challenging!) Total expenditure is estimated using the iterative payment levels across the number of recipients based on average allowance levels (i.e. proportion of max payment)