Gospel: “Good tidings” “Good report” “Good news” Luke Gospel: “Good tidings” “Good report” “Good news”

Luke Written by…Luke, although he doesn’t name himself. It’s obviously a companion book to Acts. Gentile by birth, physician, traveling companion of Paul Great command of Greek language, rich vocabulary Written probably between 55 – 60 AD, although some say as late as the 70’s or 80’s. Probably written while in Rome. Purpose of book: To affirm Theophilus (and other Christians in the 1st century) in the Gospel of Jesus, which he learned through catechesis Presents the story of Jesus’ life as a journey

Two Different Audiences in Mind Apostles, disciples, crowds, and opponents of Jesus who actually heard and saw Jesus at work in the events Luke records That first audience never really “got it” Group of disciples or catechumens who later receive and hear Luke’s Gospel They know how the story will end Want to learn more

Themes Law Themes: The lost; the mighty brought low; destruction of the temple; repentance; call to prayer Gospel Themes: The found; the humble exalted; God’s presence at the temple; work of the Spirit; promises fulfilled; fellowship meals; call of the Gentiles

Emphasis Universality of God’s plan (Jews and Gentiles) Emphasis on prayer Role of women Concern for poor and sinners Joy at the announcement of the “Good News” Stress on the family circle Repeated use of the title “Son of Man” Emphasis on Holy Spirit (think of Acts)

Organization 3 major parts: 1. Events that occurred in and around Galilee 2. Those that took place in Judea and Perea 3. The final week in Jerusalem Luke focuses more on parables and teachings, than on miracles (or signs).

What’s unique about Luke? He carefully details events surrounding the births of John and Jesus. He writes from Mary’s perspective and perhaps bases his presentation on interviews with Mary. He included events from the early years of ministry in Galilee that are not included elsewhere. Luke focused on the journey towards the Passion in Jerusalem in a different way than the others, including recording several parables that are not found elsewhere. He records unique info about the events following the resurrection and prepares readers for the next part of the story, which he covers in Acts.

And yet…

If one examines the end of Luke and the beginning of Acts, the correlation between the two can be seen. Luke leaves off with the resurrected Lord being raptured into heaven, after commissioning His disciples to preach the message of the kingdom, and commanding them to wait in Jerusalem for the promise of the Father (Luke 24:47-51). The opening to Acts summarizes this ending (1:1-2), and also mentions Jesus' command to wait in Jerusalem for the promise of the Father (1:4); a clear connection to Luke's summary in his gospel. The correlation is perfect. Then Luke reiterates Jesus' resurrection and speaks of certain statements Jesus' made to His disciples, followed by His ascension into heaven (Acts 1:4-11).