“Show Me” Standards (page 49)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process

Advertisements

Poster & Project Presentations The Robert Gordon University

By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez

Title of Presentation Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, Author 4 Abstract Introduction This is my abstract. This is my abstract. This is my abstract. This.

University of Delaware Problem-Based Learning: Getting Started Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Hal White.

Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) ` Established in 1958, a non-profit organization, dedicated to: \development of biological sciences curricula.

Research Proposal Development of research question

ESP/EMI Teacher Collaboration

R ound R ock I ndependent S chool D istrict Policy EFA Instructional Materials: Selection Criteria Reading Assignments Challenges Guiding Principles.

VCE ESL An Introduction to the Yr12 Course ESL vs English There are only very subtle differences between the courses Final ATAR scores are on par.

Understanding Close Reading Agenda Understanding the Unit: I. Introductory Analogy II. Questioning the Text  Topic, Information and Ideas INTRODUCTION.

Learning Targets for Intentional, Purposeful, and Focused Learning.

Planning & Writing Laboratory Reports A Brief Review of the Scientific Method.

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE

AP Stats Final Project.

Critical Lenses An Introduction. Why we use lenses  Readers interpret texts in different ways, because our experiences shape how we see everything around.

Introduction to Science as an Inquiry-Based Process North Carolina State University ©2004 Labwrite Project.

Writing Workshop Week 2 ISP Joanna Luper. Thesis  What is a Thesis…. A document submitted in support of candidature for an academic degree or professional.

DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.

Research Writing and Citing. What is plagiarism? Using another author’s words without quotation and citation Using and citing another author’s words without.

Retrieved from Writing a Paragraph

Change and Continuity Over Time Essay. Change and Continuity  Show both in essay.  You will usually see more change than continuity.  Examine all aspects.

IR 202 Research Methods This course aims to introduce students what is social research, what are the different types of research and the research process.

An introduction to CRITICAL LITERACY Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice School of Politics and International Relations The University of.

Title Authors Introduction Text, text, text, text, text, text Background Information Text, text, text, text, text, text Observations Text, text, text,

The Process of Conducting Research. What is a theory? a set of general principles that explains the how and why of phenomena. Theories are not directly.

SE 521 Dr. Lola Taylor Unit one. INTRODUCTION This week's seminar will focus on getting acquainted and understanding the expectations for the course.

Example of Science Fair Report This example will show what each student needs to have in the report and in what order. There will be explanations at the.

Science Fair Log Book Student’s Name Teacher Name.

Smart Reading Strategies Webinar Presentation. How to use this recording Watch Do activities Webinar slides & further resources:

Sample paper in APA style Sample paper in APA style.

The Nature of Science An Introduction to the Scientific Method Section 1.2.

Classical Studies Meeting the literacy and language demands of the curriculum level and NCEA.

Understanding Close Reading Agenda Approaching the Text INTRODUCTION TO THE UNIT.

Report writing in English In a professional context.

Writing a Critical Summary of an Article or Paper

The Scholarly Journal Article

“As a reading professional, there is nothing more exhilarating than witnessing a young child read for the first time, and there is nothing more disheartening.

Intro to Close Reading English II

Introduction Intro Problem Materials Hypothesis Procedure Results

Reading Effective Reading.

Teaching of Reading and how to help your child

Preparing for a Science Fair

Creating an Active Learning environment

Literature Response Papers

Self-Critical Writing:

Socratic Seminar This PowerPoint is meant to be used with either teachers or students schoolwide to assist in implementing Socratic Seminar. It is written.

Identifying Inquiry and Stating the Problem

Authors and Institutions Can Go Here

Scientific Inquiry.

A BRIDGE TO UNDERSTANDING

Insert Your Poster Title Here

Name of Lab Author.

Writing Lab Reports.

Presenter’s Name (if case)

Inquiry-Minded Schools

An Introduction to the Scientific Method

September 1, 2013 Word Generation 1 P# 5-6

Title Cover Page You can add slides to print your title in larger text if needed but remove after. This page is for teacher and should not be on the board!

Title Introduction: Discussion & Conclusion: Methods & Results:

Objective Summary I can determine the theme of a text

Title Goes Here Title Goes Here Title Goes Here Title Goes Here

<Add authors and affiliation>

Understanding Scholarly Journal Articles

Scientific Method Chapter 2 Southern Methodist University PSYC

Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016

Insert Title Here Insert Name(s) Here Table or Figure Abstract Method

Conclusion & Discussion Research purposes/ Research hypothesis

Analyzing Theme.

MEDIA MANIPULATION.

Presentation transcript:

“Show Me” Standards (page 49) Yitzhak Ersoff

“Show Me” Text - First: Find each section. Page Abstract Introduction Method Procedure Results Discussion Conclusion References Notes

Problems or Questions??? Title “Show Me”???? 4 sections: 1 : 2 and 3 in 4 4 Phrases: Standards Teacher Professionalism Political Control US State Curriculum Policy

Problems or Questions??? Title “Show Me”???? 4 sections: 1 : 2 and 3 in 4 4 Phrases: Standards Teacher Professionalism Political Control US State Curriculum Policy

Next, using the abstract only . . . What is the purpose of this study? Analyze process of writing standards Section: entire article What is the authors’ hypothesis? How standards are written explains the results. Section: Beginning and end

Next, using the abstract only . . . What is the method? Examine intentions and interactions during writing process Section: Method

Next, using the abstract only . . . What were the findings? Teachers: Professionalism & constructivism Politicians: Different views from teachers Control Four conflicts

Next, using the abstract only . . . How did the authors interpret the results? Conflicts made standards: Mix of content and process Bland and value-neutral Not specific Same results in other societies Section: Discussion

Next, using the abstract only . . . What is the author’s conclusion? None in the abstract None in the text

OK, what do we need to know? Introduction (49-55) What are standards, what are the issues? Method (55-58) Who? What? (see subheadings) Results/Findings (58-66) What happened (important) Discussion (66-72) Author analysis (important)

The Conflicts Who? EWG – Teacher committee COP – Politicians Public – Parents, business people, etc.

Conflict 1: Process vs. Content Professional Educators & Business People Constructivist – want processes (problem solving, critical thinking, etc.) Politicians Non-professional – want content (What students will know) Think processes are vague (What does it mean???) Issues What should we teach? Is there a difference?

Conflict 2: Who Reads It? (Language: Professional or Public?) Educators Want professional language Politicians Want simple language (for everyone) Issues Should educators use simple language? Do parents need to understand? Does it really mean the same thing? (see 61-62)

Conflict 3: “Red Flag” Words Politicians Remove words that cause political problems. See 63-64 Issues Must everyone be happy? (not offended?) What about right and wrong?

Conflict 4: General or Specific? Process standards are general “apply information and ideas to different contexts” Content standards are specific “the major elements of geography (location, place, region, . . .) Issues How specific should standards be? Who should decide? (state level, local level, or teacher level)

Finally, Inside the Schools . . . Inquiry-Minded Schools (page 79)

Missouri - The “Show Me” State.