Quality Assurance & Accreditation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Executive Director of the Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA)
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Building Internal Quality Assurance System Andy Gibbs Beirut 2013.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
1 Dr. M. Feroze Ahmed Dr. M. Feroze Ahmed Ph.D., FBAS, FIE, MASCE Vice-Chancellor, Stamford University Bangladesh
Local Education and Training Boards Adam C Wardle Managing Director, Yorkshire and the Humber Local Education and Training Board.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
Irish Universities Quality Board Internal Quality Assurance at Universities: The Irish perspective Dr Padraig Walsh Chief Executive Irish Universities.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Window-1: [ Self-Assessment Exercise
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Quality Assurance Programme Higher Education Commission, Islamabad (Prof. Dr. Riaz Hussain Qureshi)
Professor Dolina Dowling
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
OBE Briefing.
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
DIMENSIONS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND CHALLENGES OF FUTURE.
Paper Presented at the Standing Conference for African National and University Libraries in East, Central and Southern Africa (SCANUL – ECS), 1st and 2nd.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
Accreditation in the higher education
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Colin N. Peiris Quality Assurance Specialist.
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
Dr. Salwa B. El-Magoli 16/1/2007Dr.Salwa B. El-magoli Cairo: 16/1/2007 Quality Assurance and Accreditation (The Egyptian Experience) Dr. Salwa B. El-Magoli.
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs) Professor Dr Mesbahuddin Ahmed Head of Quality Assurance Unit UGC, Bangladesh.
Professor Sanjoy Kumar Adhikary Quality Assurance specialist QA Unit, UGC 28 July,
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines on Quality Assurance in Higher Education Peter Williams President, ENQA.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Report on The Training Program on Professional Development Program on Quality Assurance in Higher Education from 18 to 29 November 2015 at AIT extension,
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
1 Quality Assurance in Higher Education: The Way Forward Garwe Evelyn Deputy CEO Zimbabwe Council for Higher Education.
QA Unit, UGC 7 October, It is not the strongest of the species that survive nor the most intelligent but the one most responsive to change -Charles.
Introduction to IQAC Khawza I Ahmed, Director IQAC.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
Outline of Quality assurance and accreditation
Establishment of Institutional Quality Assurance Cell at SUB
Principles of Good Governance
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Quality Assurance in Higher Education
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
African Quality Rating Mechanism (AQRM)
Human Resource Development Council for South Africa (HRDCSA)
Lincolnshire Community and Voluntary Service
IQAC The Enabling Framework for QA at the University Level
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
Accrediting Engineering Degrees: Practice and Challenges
Reflection on OAC Manual Quality Audit- Learning By Sharing
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs)
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Africa (ASG-QA: PART B: EQA and PART C: QAAs) Presented at: CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS.
Introduction to the training
Self-Assessment Exercise
Institutional Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) at north south university
Development of Internal Quality Assurance and its Challenges in Taiwan Higher Education from University and Students’ Perspectives Angela Yung Chi Hou.
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Stakeholders & Members
Erasmus+(Mongolian team) 16-17/Oct/2018
Quality Enhancement Cell
Shasta CCD Board Retreat CEO Search, Accreditation & Student Success
Presentation transcript:

Quality Assurance & Accreditation Dr. Md. Mozahar Ali Professor, GTI, BAU, Mymensingh mail: mozahar55@yahoo.co.uk Cell No.:88-01711391190

Quality in Higher Education What is Quality? As a part of the quality debate in higher education, the concept of quality is highly disputed. Moreover it is often used by stakeholders in order to legitimate their specific vision or interests. "Quality .... you know what it is, yet you don't know what it is. ... If no one knows what it is then for all practical purposes it doesn't exist at all. But for all practical purposes it does exist". "You can't define it, but you know it when you see it." G.D. Doherty. Developing Quality Systems in Education

Five Approaches in Considering Quality Quality as exceptional (highest standards) Quality as confronting to standards Quality as fitness for purpose Quality as effectiveness in achieving institutional goals Quality as meeting customers' stated or implied needs. (Green, D. 1994 What is quality in higher education? OUP)

Meaning of Quality: Who Defines? The meaning given to quality is not only a matter of underlying conception. It is also very much a matter of who defines it and in what interest. Is it the academics themselves, students, government and its agencies, professional bodies or employers?

Meaning of Quality: Who Defines? Academics will define quality in higher education by emphasizing the quality of research work done by a colleague or an institution. Undergraduate students will focus on the quality of the teaching, their learning experience and the environment. Professional bodies tend to focus on professional standards and skills related to the professions that students are trained for. Hence, QA must balance the different interests of the stakeholders.

Quality Assurance Quality Assurance (QA) may be defined as a process of establishing stakeholder confidence that provision (input, process and outcomes) fulfills expectations or measures up to minimum requirements. At the institutional level, QA is defined as the part of overall management function that determines and implements the quality policy (intentions and directions of the organization).

Quality Assurance ….. QA relates to a continuous process of evaluating (assessing, monitoring, guaranteeing, maintaining and improving) the quality of higher education system, institutions or programmes. As a regulatory mechanism, quality assurance focuses on both accountability and improvement, providing information and judgment (not ranking) through an agreed and consistent process and well- established criteria.

Objectives of Quality Assurance Universities are Public Institutions Higher education is a “Public Good” Is of crucial importance to the: Health Wealth Well-being of society and Economy of the country Is a key factor in promoting and safeguarding public confidence in the country’s Higher Education

Some Statements on QA QA is not a science, but common sense Instruments are important, but the right attitude is much more important QA is the responsibility of everybody QA should be part of the overall policy and management

HE is the engine that drives the economy - a priority public issue for governments. - a strategic, human resource investment To fuel the engine need to get the public Support - Establish Goals and PI’s - Report on Progress

Public and Government are concern with HE standards quality employability skills of graduates HE is expensive. Increased demands for accountability

Accreditation Council (QAACB) (QAU) Quality Assurance Unit Ministry of Education Accreditation Council (QAACB) U G C (QAU) Quality Assurance Unit University IQAC Academic Units (Program/Degree) SA Committee

Internal Quality Assurance (IQA) IQA refers to each institution's or program’s policies and mechanisms for ensuring that it is fulfilling its own purposes as well as the standards that apply to higher education in general or to the profession or discipline in particular. IQAC: Institutional Quality Assurance Cell is internal quality assurance body of university

Institutional QA Cell (IQAC) Director Additional Director (2) Office Staff 50% funding from HEQEP & rest from UGC Initially project; continue as permanent organ

Quality Assurance Committee (QAC) 1. Vice Chancellor of the university (Chair) 2. Pro-Vice Chancellor (Pro-VC academic if two Pro-VCs) 3. One member of the Board of Trustee ( for private universities) 4. Director of Finance and Accounts 5. Director of IQAC 6. All Deans 7. Director(s) of all institutes of the university (not under Dean) 8. Two senior academics/personnel appointed by the Syndicate nominated by the Vice-Chancellor 9. Registrar of the University

External Quality Assurance EQA refers to the actions of an external body, which may be a QAA or another body different from the institution, which assesses its operation or that of its programs in order to determine whether it is meeting the standards that have been agreed on. QAACB: Quality Assurance & Accreditation Council of Bangladesh (yet to be formed) E

Main Features of Accreditation Council (a) Composition and different committees General council- Chairperson and 32 members appointed by the president of the country. Executive Council- Chairman and 8 members Executive Committee- Supported by the full- time /regular paid up officials. Program committee- Chairperson and 6-8 members (one for each broad discipline). Peer review team- Convener and 5 members for institutional accreditation Convener and 3 members for program accreditation

(b) Main functions of the accreditation council Program Accreditation Institutional Accreditation Note: Accreditation is voluntary for both institutions and programs.

Accreditation Accreditation is the process by which a government or private body evaluates the quality of a higher education institution as a whole or a specific educational program in order to formally recognize it as having met certain predetermined minimal criteria or standards. The result of this process is usually the awarding of a status (a yes/no decision) of recognition, and sometimes of a license to operate within a time- limited validity.

Objectives of Accreditation Accreditation is a process of external quality review Assure that graduates of an accredited program are adequately prepared Stimulate the improvement of the program Encourage new and innovative approaches to education and its assessment Identify accredited programs to the public

How is accreditation conducted? Five Major Steps: The Institution Self-Survey The Pre-survey Visit The Formal Survey Visit Initial Accreditation Full Accreditation, or Periodic Resurvey (Optional)

Why accreditation? ….. Gives prestige to the university Provides easy access to internationally recognized and reputed universities and organizations through membership and other partnership/ twinning/ consortia arrangement Helps making Internationalization of education Brings global acceptance to a particular program or institutions Strengthens the trust and confidence of the stakeholders Earns the respect and admiration of the academic community Ensures sustainable growth and development of the university Creates a sense of competition and self development spirit in the HEIs

ACCREDITATION PARAMETERS & THEIR WEIGHTAGES (BAETE) Mission, goals are well defined and targeted to achieve the desired objective (100) Financial & physical resources are available at institution and program level and appropriately utilized (100) 3. Human resources: faculty & staff are adequate in number and of quality required for the purpose. (300) 4. Human resources: Students have adequate background and quality to achieve the objective of the program. (300) 5. Teaching-learning processes is effective (450) 6. Supplementary processes (100) 7. Industry-institution interaction (70) 8. Research and development (30) Total Marks: 1450

ACCREDITATION PARAMETERS & THEIR WEIGHTAGES (BAETE) Mission, goals & organization (6.9%) Financial,physical resources,util. (6.9%) Human Resource: Faculty & Staff (20.7%) Human Resource: Students (20.7%) Teaching-learning process (31%) Supplementary process (6.9%) Industry-Institution interaction (4.8%) Research & Development (2.1%)

Users of Accreditation Government Students Parents Employers Funding organizations Higher Education Institutions