Status of 44 ARCS tested TOB modules, June 24, 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 Faulty Channel Sources (TOB) Fault Sources (excluding cable breaks and CMN)  Hybrid-0.004%
Advertisements

Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – July 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen Dave.
Slide 1X-Calibration Common Testing Issues-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, June 3, 2003 X-Calibration Common Testing Issues: Grounding, Environmental.
May 13, FNAL Hybrid Thermal Test Status  Hybrid Thermal Test Procedure  Test Results Eva Medel FNAL CMS Group June 22, 2004.
1 Hybrid & Module Testing Status Week of 6/6-6/10.
Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 13 October 2003 Sam Burke Lance Simms.
Slide 1Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 20, 2004 Module Testing at UCSB: Simulated Production Derek Barge On behalf.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.
Identifying anomalous strips David Stuart, Noah Rubinstein University of California, Santa Barbara June 18,
Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 13 October 2003 Sam Burke Lance Simms.
Tracker Week, CERN, Oct Oct 2003Tracker Week - Module ProductionSalvatore Costa - Catania Executive summary from Bonding WG Meeting 21 Oct.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
Preparation for TS3 Mariana Rihl. Known issues Implications on light leaks on all modules – Visible on current feedback of bias – Confirmed by study performed.
UCSB Hybrid Bonding & Testing
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
US Module Production Status
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
Executive summary from Bonding WG Meeting 21 Oct 2003
UCSB Testing 3 Stereo Modules Tested 1 SS6 Module Tested
Hamburg Bonding Report
Results from module testing
A. Kaminskiy, CMS Tracker week , Apr 2004
Unexpected Failures of Modules on Rods
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
US Module Production Quality
Vienna Module Production
Module Failures on RODs
Module Failures on RODs
FNAL Module Testing Status
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
Module production in Italy
Noise in TOB modules and sensor quality
Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested
FNAL Module Testing Status
UCSB Qualification Module Grading
Hybrid Status/Deliveries
First UCSB TEC Module (Pictures)
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Module Testing at UCSB: Simulated Production 11-04
FNAL Hybrid Testing Status
Anthony Affolder UC Santa Barbara
Noise in TOB modules and sensor quality
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Is Increased Bias Current and CMN Correlated?
Isolated Bad-CAC Strip at UCSB
TOB Module Production Overview and Plan
FNAL module testing summary
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Module Failures on Rods
Module Testing Status Week of 3/14-3/18.
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
FNAL Hybrid Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Equipment Status ARCS equipment status DAQ equipment status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
FNAL Bonding Since our last report we have built and bonded an additional 10 TOB 4-chip modules 3 RMT pitch adapters 7 Planar pitch adapters By adjusting.
FNAL Hybrid Testing Status
FNAL Hybrid Testing Status
FNAL Hybrid Testing Status
Presentation transcript:

Status of 44 ARCS tested TOB modules, June 24, 2004 Anatoly Ronzhin, Fermilab

7613-7656 modules ARC tested. 44 modules (7613-7656) – tested. 7613-7632 - 4 chips. 7633-7656 - 6 chips. All modules PASSED with grade A. Only 2 “new bad” channels in addition to “known” detected for 7613-7632, and 7 “new bad” - for 7633-7656. “Known” are “wire bond to skip” in db.

7613-7632

7633-7656

Unexpected glitches. Initial VPSP = 40 set made a mess – the set provided us with a lot of BAD channels which were really GOOD ones. First time it was noticed on June 15, 04 (first production day) and reported the same day on our internal meeting (SiDet, kitchen). VPSP=36 was installed on June 17.

VPSP=40, 7628

VPSP=40, 7644

VPSP=40, 7647

Even worse Even worse that VPSP=40 distorted shape of noise plot due to wrong pedestal setting. As result we wasted about 1 day by filling out wrong data in travels, looking for modules damage, trying to distinguish “bad” and “false bad” channels, etc. Both UCSB and CERN use set VPSP=36 for ARC test, why we used VPSP=40 ? We need more fast reaction to fix such a kind of noticed “glitches” (like VPSP, “raw data”…) in our future modules production.

VPSP=40, 7629

VPSP=36, 7629

VPSP=40, 7633

VPSP=36, 7633

VPSP=40, 7636

VPSP=36, 7636

VPSP=40, 7648

VPSP=36, 7648

Another unexpected glitch. FE-hybrid cables (extension) damage – as result - a lost of some contacts and wrong data taken. 4 damaged cables in sum – again loss of time – to realize it, take data with not damaged cables, etc. Looks like cables damage is due to wrong procedure of cable’s connectors disengagement. Tool introduced to make it safe.

FE-hybrid cable damage, 7650.

Fork for cables disconnection

The rest of glitches. 7619 - was not initialized, bended wires between APV2 and PCB, fixed. 7635 – HV, crowbar blown, w/o crowbar passed with grade A. 7642 – HV, broken conductor fixed. 7653 – PH eliminated (#109 pulled out). Main loss of time now (about 3-5 min) during ARCS test is to convert root file into plots.

Summary of ARCS test All 44 produced modules (7613-7632, 4 chips), (7633-7656, 6 chips) passed ARCS test with grade A. The mean value of “bad” channels for 7613-7632 – 2, for 7633-7656 – 3. Main waste of time (about 30%) was due to VPSP = 40 initial set and damaged FE-hybrid extension cables. No CMN and pill off of aluminum on strips (“scratches”) noticed this time. All bad channels identified and mostly due to skipped bonding. Only one PH detected.