K. Ida1,2, R. Sakamoto1,2, M. Yoshinuma1,2, K. Yamasaki3, T

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ion Heating and Velocity Fluctuation Measurements in MST Sanjay Gangadhara, Darren Craig, David Ennis, Gennady Fiskel and the MST team University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Advertisements

Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department
Investigation of Particle Pinch in Toroidal Device Kenji Tanaka 1 1 National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Gifu , Japan 2 nd Asian Pacific.
Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Related Advanced Technologies with participants from China and Korea ( Kyoto University, Uji, Japan, Feb.
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
9th TTF Spain September 11, 2002 B. J. Peterson, NIFS, Japan page 1 Radiative Collapse and Density Limit in the Large Helical Device.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
I. Opening I-1. Welcome address U.Stroth I-2. Logistics M.Ramisch I-3. Opening remarks H.Yamada II. Definition of the goal of CWGM5 II-1. Brief review.
Effects of ICRF conditioning on the first wall in LHD N. Ashikawa, K. Saito, T. Seki, M. Tokitani, Y. Ohtawa 1), M. Nishiura, S. Masuzaki K. Nishimura.
DPP 2006 Reduction of Particle and Heat Transport in HSX with Quasisymmetry J.M. Canik, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, K.M. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, K. Zhai.
1 G.T. Hoang, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Euratom Turbulent Particle Transport in Tore Supra G.T. Hoang, J.F. Artaud, C. Bourdelle, X. Garbet and.
Momentum transport and flow shear suppression of turbulence in tokamaks Michael Barnes University of Oxford Culham Centre for Fusion Energy Michael Barnes.
A.Karpushov, Mission 410, Jaunt 414,  p "H-gas puff experiments on TCV" Réunions scientifiques, 22 novembre 2004  p 414-1: “H-gas puff experiments.
SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T-10 TOKAMAK PLASMAS V. Vershkov, L.G. Eliseev, S.A. Grashin. A.V. Melnikov, D.A.
49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Temperature Measurements and Impurity Radiation in.
Non-diffusive terms of momentum transport as a driving force for spontaneous rotation in toroidal plasmas K.Ida, M.Yoshinuma, LHD experimental group National.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
Measurement of the Plasma Driven Permeation Flux in the Spherical Tokamak QUEST S. K. Sharma 1 H. Zushi 2, I. Takagi 3, Y.Hisano 1, M. Sakamoto 2, Y. Higashizono.
TOTAL Simulation of ITER Plasmas Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya Univ., Chikusa-ku, Nagoya , Japan 1.
Model prediction of impurity retention in ergodic layer and comparison with edge carbon emission in LHD (Impurity retention in the ergodic layer of LHD)
Excitation of ion temperature gradient and trapped electron modes in HL-2A tokamak The 3 th Annual Workshop on Fusion Simulation and Theory, Hefei, March.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Internal Transport Barriers and Improved Confinement in Tokamaks (Three possible.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
RF simulation at ASIPP Bojiang DING Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Workshop on ITER Simulation, Beijing, May 15-19, 2006 ASIPP.
1 Instabilities in the Long Pulse Discharges on the HT-7 X.Gao and HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 1126, Hefei,
Pellet Charge Exchange Measurement in LHD & ITER ITPA Tohoku Univ. Tetsuo Ozaki, P.Goncharov, E.Veschev 1), N.Tamura, K.Sato, D.Kalinina and.
Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD
(National Institute for Fusion Science, Japan)
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
1 Super dense core plasma due to Internal Diffusion Barrier in LHD N. Ohyabu 1), T. Morisaki 1), S. Masuzaki 1), R. Sakamoto 1), M. Kobayashi 1), J. Miyazawa.
Edge and Internal Transport Barrier Formations in CHS S. Okamura, T. Minami, T. Akiyama, T. Oishi 1, A. Fujisawa, K. Ida, H. Iguchi, M. Isobe, S. Kado.
SLM 2/29/2000 WAH 13 Mar NBI Driven Neoclassical Effects W. A. Houlberg ORNL K.C. Shaing, J.D. Callen U. Wis-Madison NSTX Meeting 25 March 2002.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
1Peter de Vries – ITBs and Rotational Shear – 18 February 2010 – Oxford Plasma Theory Group P.C. de Vries JET-EFDA Culham Science Centre Abingdon OX14.
Transport in three-dimensional magnetic field: examples from JT-60U and LHD Katsumi Ida and LHD experiment group and JT-60 group 14th IEA-RFP Workshop.
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
Active Control of MHDinstabilitiy 2002/11/19 S.Ohdachi et.al. Sawtooth-like phenomena in LHD S. Ohdachi, S.Yamamoto, K. Toi, K. Y.Watanabe, S.Sakakibara,
Effect of Helical Magnetic Field Ripples on Energetic Particle Confinement in LHD Plasmas T.Saida, M.Sasao, M.Isobe 1, M.Nishiura 1, S.Murakami 2, K.Matsuoka.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
1 Feature of Energy Transport in NSTX plasma Siye Ding under instruction of Stanley Kaye 05/04/09.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
1 Nuclear Fusion Class : Nuclear Physics K.-U.Choi.
Y. Kishimoto 1,2), K. Miki 1), N. Miyato 2), J.Q.Li 1), J. Anderson 1) 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference IAEA-CN-149-PD2 (Post deadline paper) October.
21st IAEA Fusion Energy Conf. Chengdu, China, Oct.16-21, /17 Gyrokinetic Theory and Simulation of Zonal Flows and Turbulence in Helical Systems T.-H.
1 Peter de Vries – ITPA T meeting Culham – March 2010 P.C. de Vries 1,2, T.W. Versloot 1, A. Salmi 3, M-D. Hua 4, D.H. Howell 2, C. Giroud 2, V. Parail.
Effect of Energetic-Ion/Bulk-Plasma- driven MHD Instabilities on Energetic Ion Loss in the Large Helical Device Kunihiro OGAWA, Mitsutaka ISOBE, Kazuo.
Simulation of Turbulence in FTU M. Romanelli, M De Benedetti, A Thyagaraja* *UKAEA, Culham Sciance Centre, UK Associazione.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
HT-7 ASIPP Investigation on Z eff and impurities behavior with molybdenum limiter in lithium coating experiments on HT-7 tokamak Presented by Y.J.Chen.
Lower Hybrid Wave Coupling and Current Drive Experiments in HT-7 Tokamak Weici Shen Jiafang Shan Handong Xu Min Jiang HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics,
56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:
Member of the Helmholtz Association Meike Clever | Institute of Energy Research – Plasma Physics | Association EURATOM – FZJ Graduiertenkolleg 1203 Dynamics.
3D plasma response to magnetic field structure in the Large Helical Device 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference San Diego 8-13 October, 2012 Y asuhiro Suzuki.
Study on Plasma Startup Scenario of Helical DEMO reactor FFHR-d1
Reduction of Neoclassical Transport and Observation of a Fast Electron Driven Instability with Quasisymmetry in HSX J.M. Canik1, D.L. Brower2, C. Deng2,
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
11th IAEA Technical Meeting on H-mode Physics and Transport Barriers" , September, 2007 Tsukuba International Congress Center "EPOCHAL Tsukuba",
Integrated discharge scenario
Center for Plasma Edge Simulation
Investigation of triggering mechanisms for internal transport barriers in Alcator C-Mod K. Zhurovich C. Fiore, D. Ernst, P. Bonoli, M. Greenwald, A. Hubbard,
Yasuhiro Suzuki for the LHD experiment group
27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, October 2018, Gandhinagar, India
T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
KTM & CWGM 2006 Kyoto University, Kyoto ( Sep., 2006)
[EX / P7-8] 27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – J. Jang, et. al
CHARACTERIZATION OF ISOTOPE EFFECT ON CONFINEMENT
T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group
H. Nakano1,3, S. Murakami5, K. Ida1,3, M. Yoshinuma1,3, S. Ohdachi1,3,
Presentation transcript:

Isotope effect on impurity and bulk ion particle transport in the Large Helical Device K. Ida1,2, R. Sakamoto1,2, M. Yoshinuma1,2, K. Yamasaki3, T. Kobayashi1,2, Y.Fujiwara1, C.Suzuki1, K.Fujii4, J.Chen5, I.Murakami1,2, M.Emoto1, R.Mackenbach6, G.Motojima1, H.Yamada1,2, S.Masuzaki1,2, K. Mukai1,2, K. Nagaoka 1,7, H. Takahashi 1,2 M. Yokoyama 1,2, S. Murakami8, H. Nakano 1,2,N. Tamura 1,2, M. Nunami 1,2, M. Nakata 1,2, R. Seki 1,2, S. Kamio1, T. Oishi1,2, M. Goto1,2, S. Morita1,2, T. Morisaki1,2,M. Osakabe1,2, LHD Experiment Group1 1National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, 509-5292, Japan 2The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Toki, 509-5292, Japan 3Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu Univ., Kasuga, 816-8580, Japan 4Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto 615-8540, Japan 5 School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China 6 Eindhoven University of Technology Merovingersweg 1, 5616 JA Eindhoven, Netherland 7Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan 8Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan 27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference 22nd – 27th October 2018 Mahatma Mandir Conference Centre Ahmedabad, India Acknowledgement to Dr. M.Yoshida (QST) for providing us two spectrometers for the bulk change exchange spectroscopy 2018/10/27 20min

OUTLINE Introduction Isotope effect on impurity transport and heat transport 2-1 Relation between impurity density gradient and heat transport 2-2 Primary and secondary isotope effect 3 Ion particle transport in the isotope mixture plasma 3-1 Isotope density profile measurements 3-2 Isotope mixing and isotope separation 4 Summary

Isotope effect on impurity transport and heat transport The effect of He ash on energy confinement besides dilution is important in fusion plasma What is the coupling between impurity transport and heat transport? What is the impact of impurity density gradient to turbulent heat transport? Simulation of heat flux in JET Flat impurity Hollow impurity No impurity peaked impurity Peaked carbon density profile weakens the ITG instabilities J.Q.Dong, Phys. Plasmas 2, (1995) 3412. K.Kim, Phys Plasma 24 (2017) 062302 N.Bonanomi. Nucl. Fusion 58 (2018) 026028 Heat flux Ion density gradient Relation between impurity profile and heat transport is studied in LHD

Steady-state ITB is achieved in Deuterium plasma ITB is transient in Hydrogen plasma, while it becomes steady-state in Deuterium Plasma H- plasma Ti(0) ~ 7 keV Wave form density Carbon impurity density profile is hollow inside ITB region in Hydrogen plasma D- plasma Ti(0) ~ 9 keV Carbon impurity density profile becomes flat or slightly peaked inside ITB region in Deuterium plasma

Isotope effect on heat transport has two steps (primary and secondary) The outward convection of carbon impurity in the ITB region is reduced in the deuterium plasma Lnz < 0 hollow (H)  Lnz ~ flat (D) Primary effect  impurity hole mitigation Deterium Mitigation of impurity hole Stabilization of ITG turbulence Mitigation of impurity hole contributes to the achievement and sustainment of higher ion temperature in deuterium plasma by stabilization of ITG turbulence Secondary effect Reduction of ci neat magnetic axis Ti(D) > Ti(H) : Achievement of higher Ti (0) in D plasma

Ion particle transport in the isotope mixture plasma Ion and electron density profiles are identical through quasi-neutrality in an single isotope plasma. However, in a isotope mixture plasma, individual isotope ion density profiles can differ due to the increase of freedom. Questions are Does the different isotope ions have same transport and radial profile? Is the isotope profile sensitive to method of fueling (recycling, beam, pellet)? What is the impact of recycling isotope ratio on ion particle transport?

Isotope mixing is expected in the ITG dominant plasma in tokamak In the ITG regime, fast isotope mixing is expected (no control of isotope profile) The change of Hydrogen and Deuterium density profile is small even when the source is flipped from D to H, because of Di >> De C.Bourdelle et. al., Nucl. Fusion 58 (2018) 076028 D H D source JET D H H source JET In other turbulence regime, the isotope profile control can be possible by the isotope mixture fueling (eg. H beam, H pellet, D recycling), if Di << De Beam fueling (H) pellet fueling (H) Gas puff and recycling (D) wall Deuterium dominant electron H electron D ?

Isotope ratio inside plasma is measured with bulk charge exchange spectroscopy The charge exchange lines are fitted by 4 Gaussian (12 parameters) of H, D cold components and H, D hot components (12 parameter  5 parameters) Ion temperature and flow velocity of cold component are given by fitting the background spectrum (NBI-off timing) Intensity (NBI-on) – Intensity (NBI-off) The flow velocity of hot component are given the flow velocity of carbon impurity The following 5 parameters are selected as the free parameters to be fitted. 1) amplitudes of hot component 2) amplitude of cold components, 3) ion temperature 4) D/H ratio of the cold components 5) D/H ratio of the hot components  D/H density ratio

H profile can be peaked by the combination of H beam and D recycling Deuterium/Hydrogen recycling comparable Deuterium recycling dominant IDcold/Ihcold =0.8 IDcold/Ihcold =4 Hydrogen density profile is peaked at mid-radius and deuterium density profile becomes hollow Hydrogen density profile is similar to the deuterium density profile

Pellet deposits near the plasma periphery but changes core isotope ratio Hydrogen pellet injection Deuterium pellet injection The electron density profile becomes hollow after the pellet injection and the increase of the density fueled by pellet injection peaks at reff /a99 ~ 0.9. Although the deposition of the pellet is near the plasma periphery, the core density increases after the pellet injection.

Decay time of hydrogen and deuterium density after pellet injection are comparable Decay time of the density injected by pellet  20 ms in H-pellet and 21 ms in D-pellet. in the plasma with D:H ~ 1:1 recycling condition H-density IDcold/Ihcold =0.8 D-density

Density decay after the pellet injection depends on the recycling isotope ratio Deuterium/Hydrogen recycling condition Deuterium-dominant recycling condition IDcold/Ihcold =0.8 IDcold/Ihcold =4 Decay of hydrogen density after the pellet injection is similar or slightly longer than that of deuterium density in the deuterium/Hydrogen recycling condition Decay of hydrogen density is faster than that of deuterium density by a factor of 1.3 in the Deuterium-dominant recycling condition

Summary 1 Isotope effect on transport has two steps in D-plasma in LHD impurity transport  reduce outward convection of impurity (primary effect) Ion heat transport  mitigation of impurity hole contributes longer sustainment of ion-ITB (secondary effect) Isotope separation and exchange are observed in an isotope mixture plasma in LHD Peaked H density and hollow D density profiles are achieved by H beam fueling in the D dominant recycling wall condition (isotope separation) The decay time of the density injected by pellet depends on the isotope ratio of the recycling, because the outward isotope and inward isotope by recycling is not the same (isotope exchange) Particle transport in isotope mixture plasma is sensitive to wall condition