Arguments, arguments, and more arguments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Responding Critically to Texts
The Science of Good Reasons
Philosophy 2803 – Health Ethics Andrew Latus. Introduction Ethics Study of right and wrong/good and bad A Branch of Philosophy Central Question = “How.
Logic. What is logic? Logic (from the Ancient Greek: λογική, logike) is the use and study of valid reasoning. The study of logic features most prominently.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
UNIT 3 PHILOSOPHY SAC 2 CRITICAL COMPARISON Pointers for essay structure.
Phil 148 Chapter 3A. Violating Conversational Rules Often, violating a conversational rule draws attention to a specific use of language for a specific.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY SCIENCE AND INTERPRETATION.
Part One: Assessing the Inference, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Writing Skills.
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Part 4 Reading Critically
Academic Language and Tone
Extent to which Challenges to Religious Experience are Valid, including CF Davis
The ontological argument
Arguments and Conclusions
FALSE PREMISE.
The Narrative Essay It’s more than a story..
Identifying/ Reconstructing Arguments
Critical Thinking Lecture 1 What is Critical Thinking?
Analyzing causes and effects Chp.31
Philosophy Essay Writing
Philosophy : Thinkers, Theories and Questions Chapter 2
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Overview Philosophy & logic.
Today’s Outline Discussion of Exercise VI on page 39.
What is rhetoric?.
An In-Depth Look at the Synthesis Essay Question
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
The Narrative Essay It’s more than a story..
Truth Tables Hurley
Truth Trees.
An In-Depth Look at the Synthesis Essay Question
Making Sense of Arguments
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3a Evaluating an argument
An In-Depth Look at the Synthesis Essay Question
Introduction to Logic Lecture 1 What is Critical Reasoning?
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2)
II. Analyzing Arguments
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1b What is Philosophy? (part 2)
How to Write an Argument
Philosophy and Logic Section 4.3
Formalizing arguments
An In-Depth Look at the Synthesis Essay Question
Philosophical Methods
Induction and deduction
Assess the strengths of the cosmological argument. (12 marks)
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Validity.
Somethings are fairly straightfoward
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Validity and Soundness, Again
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Starting out with formal logic
The conditional and the bi-conditional
Presentation transcript:

Arguments, arguments, and more arguments Arguments, arguments, and more arguments!: A primer on philosophical method Kareem Khalifa What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Philosophy is critical thinking Critical thinking is recognizing, analyzing, and criticizing arguments Recognizing arguments: identifying premises and conclusions Analyzing arguments: stating how the premises make the conclusion likely Criticizing arguments: identifying potentially false premises or weak connections between premise and conclusion What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Recognizing arguments All arguments have premises and conclusions Find the conclusion first; that’s the main point of any argument Conclusion-indicators: thus, therefore, hence, so, then, it follows that Premise-indicators: since, because, due to, it follows from What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Are these arguments? String theory says that all aspects of our universe -- the particles that make up matter and the forces that act on those particles -- consist of tiny strings of energy. A theory is scientific only if it is empirically testable. String theory is not empirically testable. So string theory is not a scientific theory. What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Analyzing arguments How do the premises support the conclusion? Premises must make a conclusion more plausible, probable, likely Different ways to do this, but look for important logical operators, e.g., or, but, only, if…then, necessarily, possibly, all, some, etc. What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Analyze this! If a theory is scientific then it is empirically testable. String theory is not empirically testable. So string theory is not a scientific theory. What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Analyze this! If a theory is scientific then it is empirically testable. String theory is not empirically testable. So string theory is not a scientific theory. If p then q. It is not the case that q. So it is not the case that p. What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Criticizing arguments Two ways: 1) Find a false premise 2) Show that the conclusion does not follow from premise, i.e., there are cases when premises are true and conclusion is false. What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Criticize this! A theory is scientific only if it is empirically testable. String theory is not empirically testable. So string theory is not a scientific theory. What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Criticize this! A theory is scientific only if it is empirically testable. String theory is not empirically testable. So string theory is not a scientific theory. Criticism: String theory may be empirically testable. We may not currently know of any empirical tests for string theory, but this doesn’t mean that no such tests exist. What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Applications in Reading Understanding non-fiction just is reconstructing the author’s argument When you’re stumped: recognize and analyze Entertain different interpretations—which provides the most convincing argument? What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Applications in Writing Make sure you have an argument Use premise-indicators, conclusion-indicators, and logical operators to make the structure of your argument clear Make sure you have only an argument Avoid fluff and extraneous language Avoid digressions and tangents—Ask yourself how each sentence is necessary for your argument We will spend time discussing good writing strategies What this class is all about 4/8/2019

Critical thinking matters You may forget what Descartes said, but don’t forget about critical thinking An effective way of avoiding deceptive (though frequently persuasive) rhetoric Important in nearly every facet of life What this class is all about 4/8/2019