SOLUTION METHODOLOGY SYMPTOMS COMPARISON PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Advertisements

A Decision Support System for Improving Railway Line Capacity G Raghuram VV Rao Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
A Topological Interpretation for Mass Transit Network Connectivity July 8, 2006 Chulmin Jun, Seungjae Lee, Hyeyoung Kim & Seungil Lee The University of.
Abstract The SEPTA Regional Rail system serves as an important network for the Philadelphia region, moving many commuters during the peak hours on suburb-to-city.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Page 49 ppPage 80 ecp #84980 Page 50 Page 81 ecp # Page 52 Top Page 82 ecp # Page 52 pp #3 Page 82 ecp # Page 54 pp Page 82 ecp #
Lecture 5 Bus Rapid Transit, ridership estimation procedures and headway requirements Dr. Muhammad Adnan.
Personal Rapid Transit Fort Carson Community Sustainability.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Assessing the Effectiveness of MBTA Commuter Rail using GIS Silvia Petrova – Kristopher Kuzera IDCE 388 GIS & Local Planning Final Project - Spring 2004.
Transportation Policies Why is public transit in Zurich the way it is today? 1970s- Vehicular traffic and congestion ruled Proposal for Underground.
Quadratic Programming Model for Optimizing Demand-responsive Transit Timetables Huimin Niu Professor and Dean of Traffic and Transportation School Lanzhou.
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.
An Analysis of Intra Airport Transport From A User’s Perspective Allison Davis December 5, 2002.
Recent Evidence on Mass Transit Demand Ian Savage Northwestern University.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
Utah’s Collaborative Approach to Transportation and Community Michael A. Allegra, President/CEO Utah Transit Authority October 9, 2014.
Quality Customer Service Approaches Scott Wisner Customer Service Manager.
Asst. Prof. Dr. Mongkut Piantanakulchai
Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Texas Transportation Works Summit Presenter: Maurice Pearl, Citibus, General Manager.
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
Metro an urban connection. Background information A metro or rapid transit is an underground train which transports passengers. It is undoubtedly the.
RURAL TRANSIT PLANNING Shilpa Panicker – ADOT Jorge Luna – MAG Deron Lozano – Valley Metro Scott Miller – HDR Engineering.
Joint Development of Land Use and Light Rail Stations The Case of Tel Aviv Regional Science Association International -The Israeli Section Daniel Shefer,
SkyTran Overview Overview NASA Research Park Moffett Field, California TM.
Commuting time for every employed: combining traffic sensors and many other data sources for population statistics Pasi Piela EFGS Krakow.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
IT Applications for Decision Making. Operations Research Initiated in England during the world war II Make scientifically based decisions regarding the.
PENNSYLVANIA STATION “One entered the city like a god; one scuttles in now like a rat,”
Uniform Problem A subway train on the Red Line arrives every 8 minutes during rush hour. We are interested in the length of time a commuter must wait.
Po-Lung Chen (Dont block me) d091: Urban Transport System 2010/03/26 (1) d091: Urban Transport System Po-Lung Chen Team Dont Block Me, National Taiwan.
Future Value of Investments
Metrô Rio & SuperVia March Location BRASIL Rio de Janeiro Rio Rio de Janeiro Metropolitan Region - Population: 11,6 million - Counties: %
User orientation at the railway station A dual perspective approach 20 May 2015.
IIT Bombay Data Structures and Algorithms Prof. Ajit A. Diwan Prof. Ganesh Ramakrishnan Prof. Deepak B. Phatak Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Dr. K RAMAMURTHY Divisional Controller Mysore City Transport Division Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation.
Lines in Service UnderConstructionLines Under Construction Lines LinesUnderProject Lines Under Project.
TRANSPORT LIBERALISATION TENDENCY
Alternative ways to address growth
Use of Journey Levels for Hierarchical Transit Assignment
Master Plan Personal Rapid Transit Analysis for Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport by Peter Muller, P.E. President, PRT.
Geometric Probability
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
Public Conference December
RAILWAY INDUSTRY TRAIN PLANNING LEVEL 2 TRAINING
Southern California Transportation Outlook to the year 2040
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System: Nablus Case study
Train scheduling based on speed profiles
Karen Tsang Bureau of Transport Statistics Department of Transport
1888 Press Release - OurBus is Your Bus – the 21st-Century Way to Work Commute
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Passenger Train Classification
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
? The slope tells us the speed Run into a jungle Stop for 5 sec Walk backwards The slope tells us the speed.
Multi-objective Analysis For Passengers’ Routing Using Car/Bicycle
Project description & goals
RAILWAY RESTRUCTURING EXPERIENCES
Visit to VLTC Amsterdam
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
How to Describe & Recognize Motion
Acceleration and Kinematics
Conclusions Working Group Rail Transport Statistics 9 – 10 November 2011 Ruxandra Roman Enescu.
VR in brief Annual net turnover EUR 1,139.9 million Personnel 14,400
SATC 2017 Influence Factors for Passenger Train Use
Comparative Visualization
How Can Modular Vehicles Bring Flexible Capacity to Transit Systems
Presentation transcript:

SOLUTION METHODOLOGY SYMPTOMS COMPARISON PERFORMANCE MEASURES İZBAN A.Ş SOLUTION METHODOLOGY In collaboration with İZBAN we have generated and scheduled five alternative policies Section A (System Time)*(Number of Passengers) Average SystemTime per Passenger = A Joint Venture Total Number of Passengers System Time Number of Passengers began activities in 2010 700 employees the most crowded commuter system in Turkey 100,000 + passengers daily total line length is 79 km System Time*Number of Passengers Headways during different time intervals Time Interval Headway for section A section B 05:30 – 08:55 20 min 10 min 09:07 – 16:33 24 min 12 min 16:43 – 19:55 20:08 – 22:20 22:44 – 00:00 CURRENT SITUATION SYMPTOMS Section B The line is planned to be extended so a new train schedule should be generated including section C Service rate is supposed to be increased ( decreasing headways) COMPARISON Time Interval Headway for section A Headway for section B Headway for section C 05:30 – 08:55 20 min 6 min 09:07 – 16:33 24 min 8 min 16:43 – 19:55 20:08 – 22:20 22:44 – 00:00 Policies Average Travel Time per Passenger (A) Average Waiting Time per Passenger (B) Average System Time per Passenger (A+B) Improvement Rate of Avg. System Time Improvement Rate of Avg. Waiting Time Alternative Policy 3 30.68 2.53 33.22 3.3% 30.3% Alternative Policy 2 2.63 33.31 3% 27.7% Alternative Policy 3.1 2.81 33.49 2.4% 22.7% Current Policy 3.64 34.32 0% Alternative Policy 3.2 3.97 34.66 - 0.9% - 9.1% Alternative Policy 1 4.15 34.83 - 1.4% - 13.9% PERFORMANCE MEASURES The number of trains used for different policies Total travel time (system time) for a passenger travels between terminuses Improvement in Average Waiting time = 30.3% Improvement in Average System time = 3.3% LITERATURE REVIEW PLANNING FACTORS Section C Wang, Y., De Schutter, B., and Van den Boom T., Origin-Destination Depended Train Scheduling Problem with Stop-Skipping for Urban Rail Transit Systems, Proceedings of the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. C.A. Brebbia, N. Tomii, P. Tzieropoulos, J.M. Mera, Computers in Railways XIV- Railway Engineering Design and Optimization, WIT Press, 2014. The line is shared with T.C.D.D.( National Railways) Alsancak station has a complex structure Safety Rules