Analysis of E-MBS Zone Specific Pilot ( )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modified pilot patterns for 8 data streams IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1724 Date Submitted:
Advertisements

Frame structure supporting the WirelessMAN-OFDMA frames IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0475r1 Date.
1 UL Pilot Evaluation Results Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1098r1 Date Submitted: Source: Jiacheng Huaning.
Discussion of Control Channel Power Control Design IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/2846 Date Submitted:
8Tx Dedicated Pilot Pattern Simulation Results IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0805 Date Submitted:
8Tx Pilot Pattern Performance for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0544 Date Submitted:
Uplink OLPC Modification: Replacement of SIR_DL by SINR_DL for Easy Measurement IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
1 MIMO Supports for IEEE m Broadcast Channel IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1416r1 Date.
1 Pilot Pattern for 8-Stream Transmission Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1138 Date Submitted: Source: Debdeep Chatterjee, Jong-kae (JK) Fwu,
Evaluation of DL subchannelization IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0347 Date Submitted:
Title: Evaluation of DL MIMO Schemes: OL SU Spatial Multiplexing with 2-D MMSE channel estimation Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1043r2 Date Submitted:
Performance Evaluation of Pilots for MIMO Mode 5 (CDR) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-09_2253 Date.
Resource granularity for unicast and E-MBS FDM multiplexing IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0405r1.
1 Comparison of DL Pilot Patterns IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/798r1 Date Submitted:
Proposed Text on Section Miniband Permutation of m Amendment Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0623 Date Submitted: Source:
Results on Downlink Pilot Structures IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/762 Date Submitted:
1 Proposal of the UL Pilot Pattern IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08_977 Date Submitted:
UL Pilot Simulation Results Comparison Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08_1204 Date Submitted: Source: tian qu hong yun.
1 Modifications on Subband (SB) Partitioning Equations ( and ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
DL Pilot Comparison Results Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/649 Date Submitted: Source: Jiacheng Huaning
Evaluation on Subcarrier Permutation Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0318 Date Submitted: Source: HanGyu Cho, Seunghyun Kang, Sunam Kim, Jin.
Uplink 6x6 Pilot Pattern Comparison Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1036r2 Date Submitted: Source: Chih-Yuan Lin
E-MBS Zone Specific Pilot Patterns for MBSFN
Analysis of E-MBS Specific Pilot Pattern ( )
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
[A Reliable Multicast Service in m]
Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_2238 Date Submitted:
MM RG Report Document Number: IEEE C802.16n-11/0083 Date Submitted:
Uplink Pilot Structure for IEEE802.16m
Discussion of Explicit vs. Implicit PC-A-MAP IE Assignment (15.2.3)
Proposed Tailed Biting Convolutional Codes for SFBCH
Emergency Service – NS/EP Vs E-911 for IEEE m
Frame structure supporting multiple CP sizes
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
Evaluation and Proposed Text on UL Tile Permutation
Simulation Results for 8 Tx Antenna Pilots
Proposed text on section subband partitioning of 802
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
HO DG Meeting Minutes Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0752
Comment on Relay Frame Structure
Modulation and Coding set design for IEEE m system
Proposed Change to 8-stream Pilot Patterns (Section )
Proposed PHY Structure for the IEEE m Bandwidth Request Channel
802.16m Downlink Interlaced Pilots Link Level Simulation Results
Project Planning Committee Opening Report
UL Control Ad-hoc group discussion summary
[Modification of CL-MIMO Codebooks]
SPID transmission order in IEEE m UL HARQ
MCS signaling for reducing MAP overhead
Investigation on One- and Two-Stream BCH MIMO Schemes
UL Fast Feedback and HARQ Feedback Channel Structure
QPSK Mapping Rule for Constellation Rearrangement
ARQ for IEEE m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0512
Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-07/304r1 Date Submitted: Source:
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
Investigation on one and two stream BCH MIMO Schemes
IEEE m MIMO RG recommendations for SDD text
Session # Maintenance Task Group Opening and Agenda
Resource Shifting in Persistent Scheduling
Harmonized text proposal to SDD on UL HARQ Feedback Channel
Proposed PHY Structure for the IEEE m HARQ Feedback Channel
IETF 16ng Working Group Update
Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_2238r2 Date Submitted:
Network Coding Retransmission Design with Common Feedback Channel
Maximum number of hops for centralized scheduling mode
Zhu dengkui,Jerry Chow UL HARQ Feedback Channel Performance Comparisons of tile Format Options Document Number: C80216m-09_0158.
PHY Structure for UL Fast Feedback Channel in m Systems
UL Pilot Evaluation Results
HARQ Feedback Joint Coding
ARQ protocol in m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9)
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of E-MBS Zone Specific Pilot (15.3.5.4.3) IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_2380 Date Submitted: 2009-11-06 Source: DongCheol Kim, Jinsoo Choi, HanGyu Cho, Wookbong Lee, Jin Sam Kwak {DongCheol.Kim, emptylie}@lge.com LG Electronics Re: Comment on P802.16m/D2 for recirculation of #30a Purpose: To discuss and adopt in TGm Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>. Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat >. 1

Evaluated pilot patterns ITRI Samsung Intel LG 1 -Modified* LG 2 ZTE 1 ZTE 2 * LG1 was a little modified. The performance between the original and modified shows a very similar trend and the modified version has a more simple design structure in the implementation point of view.

Simulation Conditions Parameter Values Channel Bandwidth 10MHz Over-sampling Factor 28/25 FFT Size 1024 Cyclic Prefix (CP) ratio 1/8 Resource Unit RU (18x6) Permutation Tone-pair Logical DRU Data Size 4PRU Channel Code 16e CTC MCS QPSK 1/2, 3/4; 16QAM 3/4; 64QAM 1/2 Channel decoding Max-log-Map, max 8 iteration Channel condition ISD1500m and ISD5Km, 3km/h and 120km/h Channel estimation method 2D-MMSE, Window size = 3PRU The number of antennas 2Tx, 2Rx MIMO schemes Rate-1 SFBC@ISD1500&ISD5000 Rate-2 SM@ISD1500 only MIMO Receiver MRC (SFBC ), Soft-MMSE (SM) Scenarios Noise limited Pilot boosting No boosting, 5dB boosting Performance matrix BLER Vs SNR and SE Vs SNR

ISD 1.5km, SFBC, Speed 3kmph, QPSK1/2

ISD 1.5km, SFBC, Speed 120kmph, QPSK1/2

ISD 1.5km, SFBC, Speed 3kmph, 16QAM3/4

ISD 1.5km, SFBC, Speed 120kmph, 16QAM3/4

ISD 1.5km, SFBC, Speed 3kmph, 64QAM1/2

ISD 1.5km, SFBC, Speed 120kmph, 64QAM1/2

ISD 1.5km, SM, Speed 3kmph, QPSK1/2

ISD 1.5km, SM, Speed 120kmph, QPSK1/2

ISD 1.5km, SM, Speed 3kmph, 16QAM3/4

ISD 1.5km, SM, Speed 120kmph, 16QAM3/4

ISD 1.5km, SM, Speed 3kmph, 64QAM1/2

ISD 1.5km, SM, Speed 120kmph, 64QAM1/2

ISD 5km, SFBC, Speed 3kmph, QPSK1/2

ISD 5km, SFBC, Speed 120kmph, QPSK1/2

ISD 1.5km, SFBC, Speed 120kmph, 16QAM3/4 (w 5dB boosting for cross-check)

ISD 1.5km, SFBC, Speed 120kmph, 64QAM1/2 (w 5dB boosting for cross-check)

Summary LG2 shows best performance if we assume the operating point as 1% FER. If we assume a different operating point (e.g. lower than 1% FER), LG1 and ITRI can be a good candidate in overall environment. In some region, it is shown that ZTE1 or 2 is a best candidate.

<Figure xxx –E-MBS zone specific pilot pattern> Proposed text Modify the description in line 43 of page 312 of P802.16m/D2 as following ----------------------------------------------------------- Text start ---------------------------------------------------------------- The structures of the E-MBS zone specific pilot pattern are shown in FFS Figure xxx. ------------------------------------------------------------ Text end ----------------------------------------------------------------- <Figure xxx –E-MBS zone specific pilot pattern>