MOFFITT CANCER CENTER Cell Therapy Facility

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Advertisements

Radiopharmaceutical Production
Develop an Information Strategy Plan
ISO in Histopathology Louise O’Callaghan MSc FAMLS
Regulatory Challenges in the Cell Preparation Facility Adrian Gee Center for Cell & Gene Therapy Regulatory Challenges in the Cell Preparation Facility.
COBIT - II.
OHT 10.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 The testing process Determining the test methodology phase Planning.
Components of software quality assurance system overview
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
1 Purchasing and Procurement Processes Module Four Revision Date: 2/06/2015.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
Module 1, Part 1: Introduction and The VMP Slide 1 of 22 © WHO – EDM Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practices.
Basel Accord IITRANSITIONSERVICES Business Integration Support FCM Management Limited Paris New York Toronto.
Bodil Mose Pedersen, DHI Status for implementering af ”Quality Manual”
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Revenue Cycle Management Medical Technology Acquisition and Assessment Team Members: Joseph Dixon, Michael Morotti, Mari Pirie-St. Pierre, David Robbins.
MethodGXP The Solution for the Confusion.
ATMC 10 - Kuwait 29th Nov - 1st Dec AABB Accreditation Salwa Hindawi President of Saudi Society of Transfusion Medicine Medical Director of Blood.
SQA Architecture Software Quality By: MSMZ.
Module 2.1 Finance and Administration Cabinet Organizational Changes and Agency Impact March
Occupational Health and Safety
Information Systems Security Computer System Life Cycle Security.
OHT 25.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 The quality assurance organizational framework Top management’s quality.
February 9, 2012  Partner with the community  Provide an effective educational experience  Prepare every student to find success in our complex society.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Gathering Network Requirements Designing and Supporting Computer Networks – Chapter.
1 Outsourcing and OffShoring January 2004 Sandy Senti.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Internal Sales Overview Obtaining Approval to Conduct Internal Sales.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP): Part I – Which Entities/Offices are Involved ? J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
Multitude of source of errors - various style of source of errors will affect the SQA components * The environment in which software development & maintenance.
Patricia Alafaireet  Lecture 2 – Implementation and go-live strategies Data conversion Communication Planning Downtime.
Capacity Building for the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety by the German Development Co-operation: German Federal Ministry for Economic.
Patricia Alafaireet Patricia E. Alafaireet, PhD Director of Applied Health Informatics University of Missouri-School of Medicine Department of Health.
Hospital Accreditation Documentation Process & Standard Requirements
Tania von Hospenthal – Clinical Services Manager British Association of Dermatologists.
OHT 10.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 The testing process Determining the test methodology phase Planning.
Components of software quality assurance system overview
Managing Complexity Through Innovation
Object Arena overview Object Arena is a premier provider of outsourced Information Technology (IT) services supporting Several Fortune 500 companies on.
(5.1)Development of IMS to fit the organization (step wise)
Ensuring Successful Technology Transfer for Clinical Manufacture
Components of software quality assurance system overview
Grant Administration and Procurement
BANKING INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Information Systems Selection
Senior Staff Meeting November 12, 2008
Business Continuity Plan Training
CCNET Managed Services
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Description of Revision
New Mexico Department of Health Immunization Program
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF –NM (Process Reengineering & Optimization of O&M Functions for New Mexico) Phase II.
Enterprise Cybersecurity Upgrade Initiation Department of Information Technology Maria Sanchez, Acting State CIO November 13, 2018.
World Health Organization
1 Stadium Company Network. The Stadium Company Project Is a sports facility management company that manages a stadium. Stadium Company needs to upgrade.
Competencies in Health Information Systems
Performance Management Training
Fertilizer Industry Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Program
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Computer System Validation
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Central New York HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COALITION
Presentation transcript:

MOFFITT CANCER CENTER Cell Therapy Facility EXPERIENCE IMPLEMENTING A QUALITY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE SYSTEM November 13, 2017 ASQ Tampa/St Petersburg Section

OUTLINE Background Our need Vision Project plan Milestones Future

Moffitt Cancer Center (30 years) MISSION: To contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer VISION: To transform cancer care through service, science and partnership Only NCI Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in Florida

Moffitt Cancer Center Research Institute Hospital Clinic

Cell Therapy Facility

Cell Therapy Facility

Cell Therapy Facility Cellular therapy (CT) is the transplantation of human cells to replace or repair damaged tissue and/or cells. Some of the cells that may be used include hematopoietic (blood-forming) progenitor cells (HPC), skeletal muscle stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, lymphocytes, dendritic cells, and pancreatic islet cells.

Cell Therapy Facility HPC used for Blood and Marrow transplants treating hematologic malignancies.

Cell Therapy Facility Experimental Cell Therapies using dendritic cells, autologous tumor cells, T Cells to stimulate immune response to cancer cells.

VOLUMES

Increasing Requirements

The Catch-up Game

Making our case Pilot –Potential enterprise expansion

Search for solution Competitor

Modules Purchased Audits Documents Training Risk QEM Internal and External Audits Planning, Resources, Findings, Responses, CAPAs, Reports Documents Training QEM Risk Audits All controlled documents Creation-Collaboration, Organization, Archival, Approval (e-signature) All Training – Competency - Retraining Based on written procedures, extra materials, class scheduling, documentation, reports. Quality Event Monitoring Incident/Deviation/Complaint Reporting, CAPA Equipment Maintenance/Calibration

Modules Purchased - Phases Phase I – Document Control, Training Modules

Modules Purchased - Phases Phase II – Quality Event Management (QEM) Incident Report Deviations Out of Specification CAPA essentials Non-conformance Equipment Maintenance Equipment Calibration Change Control advanced

Project Initiation – Phase I Internal Project Manager from IT and CTF appointed to work with the vendor’s Project Manager. Administrator (champion) from each department were identified. Document Control was identified as the most critical need of the laboratories and implemented concurrently with the training module. Remote installation of the system involved several sessions with a member of the vendor installing team, and the internal IT Project Manager.

Configuration After training, administrators identified the user requirements in a series of meetings with the Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) for each department, reaching consensus for the configuration and customization. Configuration was accomplished through a series of on-site collaborative sessions between a vendor representative, the internal administrators and the internal IT Project Manager.

Validation – Phase I Installation Qualification was performed by the vendor during installation sessions. Validation plan and protocols for IQ and PQ were provided by the vendor and reviewed, revised and approved by the laboratory team prior to execution. The vendor provided a Transfer Operational Qualification (TOQ) covering all aspects of the software. TOQ was extensively reviewed with the internal team through several remote meetings.

Validation – Phase I A risk assessment was performed remotely between the vendor and the internal team, to refine the needs of the PQ and documented in the Risk Management Plan. PQ was performed following the Risk Management Plan and using the most complex processes rather than going through every single case scenario. This strategy saved time and resources while testing all functionality of the software as configured for the laboratories’ needs.

Implementation – Phase I The first phase of implementation of the software went live in August 2015. Validation and implementation of the first phase of the QMSS took 1 dedicated FTE (50% of each department’s administrator) and significant involvement of an IT representative. Documents are continuously created, approved and archived. Time from document revision to approval has been reduced considerably and allows for expedited approval of documents to meet unexpected deadlines, such as accreditation inspections, IND submissions and grant proposals.

Implementation – Phase I Activity Vendor services (hrs.) Internal staff effort (hrs.) Education 56 96 Installation 14 Configuration 84 440 Validation 80 73 Initial End User Training 16 20 Total initial effort 250 643

Status at Go-Live Phase I Document Type Tissue Core (TC) Cellular Therapies (CTF) Policies 47 35 Procedures 132 220 Processes 3 Forms 30 240 Labels 16 Validations 31 Protocols 2 Competency Assessments Templates 13 6 Totals 551

Implementation – Phase II QEM Module – Out of the box Customization available Moffitt Purchased 6 custom forms. Incident Report Deviations Out of Specification CAPA essentials Non-conformance Equipment Maintenance Equipment Calibration Change Control advanced

Implementation – Phase II Agile Style Project Schedule Less configuration activities Less flexibility* More independent learning Remote collaboration Remote Validation *This may be a positive

Implementation – Phase II CTF Implemented Change Control advanced TC Implemented Equipment Maintenance and Calibration All Custom forms validated – Remote sessions Currently Developing Standard Operating Procedures for implementation of custom forms

Lessons learned Critical to the success of this implementation was to have an approved plan in place to manage the financial and human resources. Also critical was the identification of departmental champions who managed the project. These champions should have enough time available to dedicate to the project Involvement of a knowledgeable internal IT Project Manager is essential to the success of the implementation. The vendors of the system provide expertise for validation activities. Investing financial resources to purchase these services allows the internal staff to focus on optimizing the performance of the system. Interactions of the system with other existing software and institutional security measures can complicate the installation and proper functioning of the software.

CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a validated QMSS can be achieved with the investment of human and financial resources. The division of the implementation in phases has been beneficial to the facility as it allowed for a sense of accomplishment at each stage, rapid improvement of current systems and compartmentalization of the validation. It is essential to ensure resources are available for all phases of the project.