Volume 57, Pages S32-S37 (April 2000) Role of patient factors in therapy resistance to antiproteinuric intervention in nondiabetic and diabetic nephropathy Hendrik Bos, Steen Andersen, Peter Rossing, Dick de Zeeuw, Hans-Henrik Parving, Paul E. de Jong, Gerjan Navis Kidney International Volume 57, Pages S32-S37 (April 2000) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07506.x Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Individual antiproteinuric efficacy. In diabetic patients (IDDM), efficacy is presented as percentage change in albuminuria. In nondiabetic patients (NDRD), efficacy is presented as percent change in proteinuria. Symbols are: (•), ACE inhibitor vs. AT1 receptor blockade in IDDM; (▴), ACE inhibitor vs. AT1 receptor blockade in NDRD; (▪), ACE inhibitor vs. NSAID combined with alpha-methyldopa in NDRD. Kidney International 2000 57, S32-S37DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07506.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Individual antihypertensive efficacy presented as percentage change in diabetic patients (IDDM; •) and in nondiabetic renal disease (NDRD; ▴, ACE inhibitor vs. AT1 receptor blockade; ▪, ACE inhibitor vs. NSAID combined with alpha-methyldopa). Kidney International 2000 57, S32-S37DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07506.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Individual antiproteinuric responses to the two different doses of ACE inhibitor (A) and AT1 receptor blockade (B) for diabetic (IDDM, •) and nondiabetic patients (▪). The continuous line represents the line of identity. Kidney International 2000 57, S32-S37DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07506.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions