Protein Evolution by “Codon Shuffling”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Biology of Amyloid: Structure, Function, and Regulation
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2004)
Glen S. Cho, Jack W. Szostak  Chemistry & Biology 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
The crystal structure of bovine bile salt activated lipase: insights into the bile salt activation mechanism  Xiaoqiang Wang, Chi-sun Wang, Jordan Tang,
Modeling Zymogen Protein C
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Yael T. Aminetzach, John R. Srouji, Chung Yin Kong, Hopi E. Hoekstra 
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Functional Dissection of sRNA Translational Regulators by Nonhomologous Random Recombination and In Vivo Selection  Jane M. Liu, Joshua A. Bittker, Maria.
The C. elegans SYS-1 Protein Is a Bona Fide β-Catenin
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the TAO2 Kinase Domain
Qiong A. Liu, Michael O. Hengartner  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Synthetic Biology Select
The 1.5 Å Crystal Structure of a Prokaryote Serpin
Markerless Mutations in the Myxothiazol Biosynthetic Gene Cluster
ICAT Inhibits β-Catenin Binding to Tcf/Lef-Family Transcription Factors and the General Coactivator p300 Using Independent Structural Modules  Danette.
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Structural Basis for Specificity in the Poxvirus Topoisomerase
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages R661-R662 (July 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Non-homology knowledge-based prediction of the papain prosegment folding pattern: a description of plausible folding and activation mechanisms  Alberta.
Membrane Thickness Cue for Cold Sensing in a Bacterium
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
E.Radzio Andzelm, J Lew, S Taylor  Structure 
Maple Syrup Urine Disease: Identification and Carrier-Frequency Determination of a Novel Founder Mutation in the Ashkenazi Jewish Population  Lisa Edelmann,
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Crystal structure of diisopropylfluorophosphatase from Loligo vulgaris
Mark S. Dunstan, Debraj GuhaThakurta, David. E. Draper, Graeme L. Conn 
Directed evolution of D-2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate aldolase to new variants for the efficient synthesis of D- and L-sugars  Sun Fong, Timothy D.
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Caroline M. Groft, Stephen K. Burley  Molecular Cell 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Andrey V Kajava, Gilbert Vassart, Shoshana J Wodak  Structure 
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Protein Evolution by “Codon Shuffling” Sidharth Chopra, Anand Ranganathan  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 917-926 (October 2003) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.09.007

Figure 1 Primary Sequence Analyses of Obtained Mutant β-Lactamases (A) Primary sequence of wild-type and mutant β-lactamases. For the proteins other than TEM-1, the regions in red depict the evolved sequences, while those in black represent the wild-type sequence. The catalytic serine (S45) and lysine (K48) residues are shown in bold. The conserved Tyr residue (boxed) in the mutant sequences is a result of the SnaBI dicodon insertion site design. %MR, percentage mutagenic rate, defined as the percentage of primary sequence that is different from the wild-type TEM-1; GRAVY, grand average of hydropathicity [17]. (B) A register of the number and type of dicodons found in the mutant β-lactamases. The numbers for the second generation mutants BlaSC7-9 do not include the first generation dicodon numbers. (C) Profiling of mutant lactamases according to the amino acid attribute patterning developed by Hecht and coworkers. Polar amino acids, namely S, T, Y, W, Q, N, C, H, R, K, D, and E, are depicted as open circles while nonpolar amino acids, namely, G, A, I, V, L, P, F, and M, are shown as filled circles. The dicodon sequences are in red. The sequences are numbered according to (B). As a reference, sequence no. 7 shows the patterning of an insoluble protein that contains β sheet repeats and forms amyloid structures. This sequence was designed by Hecht and coworkers to test their hypothesis of obtaining amyloid type structures when alternating polar-nonpolar repeats (shown boxed) are used [24]. Chemistry & Biology 2003 10, 917-926DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.09.007)

Figure 2 Hypothetical Representation of the Primary Sequence of Evolved Mutants (A) Ribbon drawing of the 3D X-ray crystal structure of the 263 amino acid long TEM-1 β-lactamase at 1.8 Å resolution [32]. The N- and C termini are pointed in squares. The position of the active site serine residue is depicted with a white circle. (B) Representation of the 57 amino acid long inactive scaffold BlaSC2, the corresponding gene of which was used for dicodon insertion experiment. (C) The 115 residues long active mutant lactamase BlaSC3. The dicodon incorporate amino acid sequence is shown linked to the inactive BlaSC2 scaffold. The primary sequence of this protein is 79% different from that of its TEM-1 parent. (D) The 91 residues long active second generation mutant lactamase BlaSC7. The ribbon that is flanked on both sides by the dicodon incorporate amino acid sequence is the TEM-1 active site “left-over” region and contains the active site serine residue. The primary sequence of this protein is 94% different from that of its TEM-1 parent. The figures were drawn using the Viewerlite and POV-Ray computer programs. Chemistry & Biology 2003 10, 917-926DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.09.007)

Figure 3 Primary Sequence Analysis of Evolved β-Lactamases Using the SAPS Program Comparison of the two representative first and second generation evolved mutants (BlaSC3 and BlaSC7, respectively) with the wild-type TEM-1 enzyme is shown. The y axis represents the percentage amino acids of the total number of amino acids in the proteins. Hydrophobic: defined in SAPS (Statistical Analysis of Protein Sequences) [33] as the L, V, I, F, M set; polar: S, T, C; acidic: D, E; basic: K, R; small: A, G; net charge: DE − KR; α helix and β sheet propensity: % total of amino acids values defined in the modified version of the Chou-Fasman scale (see reference 4 in the Supplemental Data available at http://www.chembiol.com/cgi/content/full/10/10/917/DC1) that have a tendency to partake in the formation of α helices or β sheets; % mutational rate: defined as the percentage of primary sequence that is different from the wild-type TEM-1. Chemistry & Biology 2003 10, 917-926DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.09.007)

Figure 4 Western Blot Analysis of Purified β-Lactamase Proteins with Anti-His Mab Lane 1: BioRad prestained MW marker, comprised of 113, 92, 52.9, 35.4, 30 and 21.5 kDa; lane 2: Signal-less TEM-1 (cytoplasmic, predicted MW of 30.52 kDa); lane 3: mature TEM-1 (periplasmic, predicted MW of 30.24 kDa); lane 4: Signal-less BlaSC3 (cytoplasmic, predicted MW of 14.51 kDa); lane 5: mature BlaSC3 (periplasmic, predicted MW of 14.24 kDa); lane 6: MBP-BlaSC3 fusion (cytoplasmic, predicted MW of 58.21 kDa). Chemistry & Biology 2003 10, 917-926DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.09.007)