WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

District Accreditation
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
APS Teacher Evaluation
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Paulding County School District Stakeholder’s Meeting
World’s Largest Educational Community
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Accrediting Commission for Schools Western Association of Schools and Colleges ACS WASC Postsecondary Visiting Committee Final Presentation Accrediting.
Pioneer High School Our Journey: Becoming and Sustaining a Professional Learning Community.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Implementing the ASCA National Model
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
BOLD’S WORLD’S BEST WORK FORCE, MISSION TO SUCCESS.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
FACULTY MEETING October 1, 2008 John F. Kennedy High School.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
School Site Council / WASC Institutional Committee Meeting November 18, 2009 Presented by Martha Rankin.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
School Site Council / WASC Institutional Committee Meeting December 16, 2009 Facilitated by Martha Rankin.
Self Study Focus Areas & LCAP Alignments A. Organization: Vision and Purpose, Governance, Leadership and Staff and Resources LCAP 5a.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Sparta High School Continuous School Improvement Plan.
Principals & Self Study Coordinators. School Improvement Concepts Collaboration Data –Collect –Analyze –Use!!! Questions What? So What? Now What?
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
1 McFarland High School WASC Self-Study 2014 MUSD Board Report January 21, /23/2016.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation
GDOE/ACS WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Hope International School November 14-17, 2016
Welcome to the Your course title here Advisory Committee Meeting
February 21-22, 2018.
Professional Development August 22, 2017
Western Association of Schools and Colleges Presentation
HIDOE/ACS WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
Presentation transcript:

WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service

Focus Groups 05/19/08

WASC (Western Association of Schools and Colleges)

(12 good reasons for accreditation) 1. Certification that the school is a trustworthy institution of learning 2. Validates the integrity of a schools program and student transcripts 3. Fosters improvement of the schools programs & operations to support student learning

(Ideally…) 4. Assures a school community that the schools purposes are appropriate and being accomplished through a viable educational program 5. A way to manage change through regular assessment, planning, implementing, monitoring and reassessment

(Getting to Reality!) 6. Assists school in establishing its priority areas for improvement (Aha! Critical needs!) 7. UC approval of A-G requirements requires WASC accreditation 8. Cal Grants require WASC accreditation 9. California Department of Education requires WASC accreditation.

(Reality could bite!) 10. Colleges & universities require units from accredited institutions 11. Military recruiters require accredited schools 12. Teachers receive credit for years taught at accredited schools

We might as well learn to love the WASC; even the Orkin man couldnt get rid of it!

Structure of the Self-Study Process The Professional Learning Community (PLC) completes its work in three types of groups: 1. Leadership team 2. Home groups ( i.e., Departments) 3. Focus groups

Work of the Self-Study Process Analyze student data & achievement in relation to : Academic standards Expected School-wide Learning Results ( ESLRs- ESHS Eagle Expectations) Quality of the school program based on WASC/CDE (California Department of Education) criteria

Rationale 1. How are the students achieving? Expected school-wide learning results (ESLRs= Eagle Expectations) Academic standards 2. Is the school doing everything possible to support high achievement for all its students?

School Improvement Cycle Perpetual cycle: Assessment Planning Implementing Monitoring Reassessment Annual summary of student progress Annual review of action plan In-depth study every 6 years (the WASC visit!)

Schools Vision: ESHSs Eagle Expectations Eagles Soar with P Perseverance to solve problems R Responsibility, respect, and integrity I Investment in lifelong learning, community service, and global contribution D Dedication to physical and mental well-being E Effective communication, collaboration, and critical thinking for the 21 st Century

ESHS Mission Statement El Segundo High School will provide students with the necessary skills and knowledge to become life-long learners, effective communicators, and socially productive citizens who will be prepared for life in the 21 st century.

Schools Academic Standards California State standards in each curricular area Schools determine the benchmarks for student work that meets these standards provide appropriate instruction use multiple measures of assessment

Five Criteria on how Focus Groups are organized: 1. Organization: Vision and Purpose, governance, Leadership and Staff, and Resources 2. Standards-based Student Learning: Curriculum 3. Standards-based Student Learning: Instruction 4. Standards-based Student Learning: Assessment and Accountability 5. School Culture and Support for Student Personal and Academic Growth

Data Analysis In-depth gathering of data and information to enable a school to take a careful and penetrating look at: 1. the identified Critical Academic Needs 2.the related Expected School-wide Learning Results (ESLRs = Eagle Expectations) 3.the academic standards 4. what is and isnt working

Data Analysis Strategies 1. Examination of student work (3 times per year) 2. Observation of students working (Walk-throughs) 3. Interviewing students about what they are learning (Surveys, etc.) 4. Review of group test data (Annually: Sept.-Oct., etc.) 5. Analysis of feedback from parents, graduates, and community (Surveys)

Expected Outcomes of Self-Study 1. Involvement & collaboration of entire PLC to support student achievement 2. Clarification and measurement of what all students should know, understand, and be able to do through ESLRs and academic standards 3. Gathering and analyzing of data about students and student achievement

Outcomes, continued 4. Assessment of the entire school program and its impact on student learning 5. Alignment of a long-range action plan to the schools areas of need; an accountability system for monitoring the accomplishment of the plan

Discussion & analysis of 2007 STAR & API scores Hispanic-Latino sub-group did not meet state growth target

Data Analysis #1 : Analysis completed 1. School-wide 2. Departments

Data #1: De-briefed Planned for upcoming 10/01/07 in- service: data analysis through departments

Data analysis #2: To document current common assessments and plan future common assessments by department

Data analysis #2: De-brief Planned 11/05/07 in-service to include school-wide data summary and department reports

Designed protocols for 11/05/07 in- service Formed sub-committee to synthesize data analysis by departments

Data synthesis PowerPoint Reviewed action plan and critical academic needs

Reviewed Focus Groups recommendations Emphasis on closing achievement gap

Began process of writing WASC report and collecting additional data

Planned 1/28/08 in-service to review & revise ESLRs to incorporate 21 st century learning skills Review and revision necessary to complete before identifying new critical academic needs

Reviewed & revised Eagle Expectations to incorporate 21 st century learning skills Reduced current ESLRs to essentials

Reviewed student responses to Eagle Expectations contest Responses sent to sub-committee for review

Reviewed, refined, finalized Eagle Expectations

Presented new Eagle Expectations to faculty AVID team reviewed A-G requirements, our data, and importance of rigor for all

Read & suggested revisions for Chapter I (Profile) Reviewed all data to be included or referenced in Chapter I

Planned 4/21 In-service to select critical academic needs based on data and Eagle Expectations Revised Mission Statement Read and revised Chapter III (Progress Report)

Read revised Chapter I Analyzed data for achievement gaps Selected potential critical academic needs and questions to present to Focus Groups

Received revised Chapter I Considered potential critical academic needs and questions Analyzed data Made suggestions for changes

Reviewed Focus Group feedback Revised critical academic needs

1. Increase the percentage of students completing A-G courses

2. Increase the percentages of identified student subgroups participating in advanced level classes

3. Continue to ensure that a consistent standards-based curriculum is implemented that addresses student skill needs in the areas of a. math b. reading comprehension

We will review the data annually and make adjustments in our critical needs as appropriate…

Eagles Soar with Pride!