Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN UTERINE SARCOMA (UTS): REVIEW OF 12 CLINICAL TRIALS FROM EORTC INVOLVING ADVANCED UTS COMPARED TO OTHER SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA (STS)
Advertisements

Surgery v Radiation in Prostate Cancer Prasanna Sooriakumaran MD PhD & Peter Wiklund MD PhD.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
Tang G et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S4-9.
Outcome of Primary Tumor in Patients With Synchronous Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Receiving Combination Chemotherapy Without Surgery As Initial Treatment.
ARTERIAL THROMBOEMBOLIC EVENTS IN A POOLED ANALYSIS OF 5 RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIALS OF BEVACIZUMAB WITH CHEMOTHERAPY JR Skillings Genentech, Inc, South.
Mizutomo Azuma 1, Dongyun Yang 2, Marinella Carpanu 3, Ellen Hollywood 3, Michael Lue-Yat 3, Wu Zhang 1, Kathleen D. Danenberg 4, Peter V. Danenberg 5,
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
Outcome of chemotherapy in synovial sarcoma (sys) patients (pts): review of 15 clinical trials from EORTCc involving advanced sys compared to other Soft.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
THE EFFECT OF AGE ON OUTCOME OF SYNOVIAL SARCOMA PATIENTS A DUTCH POPULATION BASED STUDY Myrella Vlenterie, SEJ Kaal, VKY Ho, R Vlenterie, WTA van der.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Sex-specific trends in lung cancer incidence and survival : a population study of cases 호흡기 내과 R3 조주희 Thorax 2011;66: Camilla M T Sagerup,
Dr. Marco Matos JOURNAL CLUB GCUH 4/07/14.
Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre 1 Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada;
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Correlation of tumor mutation burden and chemotherapy outcomes
Age and its Impact on Outcomes with Intraabdominal Infections
Prognostic significance of tumor subtypes in male breast cancer:
Aspirin Associated With Reduced Mortality in Patients With CRC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Prognostic Factors for First-line Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of the.
Copyright © 2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Presented By Michael Lee at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
SD Walter MD1, T Mahten MD2, JW Harbour MD1,3
Compassionate People World Class Care
Figure 1. (A) Forest plot of common odds ratios (adjusted for ECOG PS) for best overall response by a priori subgroups in patients with KRAS wild-type.
MCW Regional Cancer Therapy Program
Prognosis of younger patients in non-small cell lung cancer
Clinical outcome after SVR: Veterans Affairs
EMT inducing transcription factor SIP1: a predictive biomarker of colorectal cancer survival and recurrence? A Patel, R Sreekumar, R Bhome, KA Moutasim,
CLINICAL AND BUDGET IMPACT OF USING A MOLECULAR TEST TO DETECT KRAS MUTATIONS IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN THE UNITED STATES Cheng I1, Hertz.
Laparoscopic vs Open Colonic Surgery: Long Term Survival
Introduction. TREATMENT BASED ON TUMOR SIDEDNESS IN mCRC: THE EVIDENCE AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION.
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
Challenges in RAS Wild-Type mCRC
New ESMO Guidance on Tumor Sidedness in mCRC
Clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer patients among KRAS wild type, p.G13D and other mutations: Results from a multicenter, cross-sectional.
A Paradigm Shift From One-Size-Fits-All to Tailor-Made Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Benefits of switching postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years adjuvant tamoxifen: Combined results.
Introduction. TREATMENT BASED ON TUMOR SIDEDNESS IN mCRC: THE EVIDENCE AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION.
Axel Grothey Professor of Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester
Colorectal Cancer: Current “Standard” Uses for Molecular Testing
Genetic variants of kinases suppressors of Ras (KSR)in KRAS-BRAF
MJ O’Connell for the ACCENT Collaborative Group
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
Primary side of origin affects the outcome of mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab independently of BRAF status and mucinous.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Ali Shamseddine,MD,FRCP
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
GOCS GRUPO ONCOLÓGICO COOPERATIVO DEL SUR
NAACCR/IACR Combined Annual Conference 2019
Oral Presentation, NAACCR/IACR
Trends in survival from metastatic lung cancer in California,
Figure S1. A. B. Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier curve of progression-free survival by treatment group in soluble heregulin (HRG)-high population (A) and soluble.
Colorectal cancer survival disparities in California
Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients Key Issues
Molecular heterogeneity drives secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in mCRC. Molecular heterogeneity drives secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival in patients receiving panitumumab→VEGFi (PEAK and PRIME) versus bevacizumab→EGFRi (PEAK and 181) in the (A) RAS.
Presentation transcript:

Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery Association of Primary Tumor Site with Mortality in Patients Receiving Bevacizumab and Cetuximab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Mayada Aljehani, DrPH Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery

Introduction/ Background 4/8/2019 OUTLINE Conclusions Limitations Discussion Results Methods Introduction/ Background

4/8/2019 BACKGROUND Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths in U.S. About 20% of CRCs are stage IV at diagnosis (mCRC), predicting poor survival Treatment of mCRC includes systemic chemotherapy (SC) that recently is sometimes accompanied by targeted biologic therapy Biologic therapies anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies such as bevacizumab and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab are increasingly used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) Recent investigations have shown that primary tumor location as right or left impacts response to biologic therapy and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer Current NCCN recommendations do not differentiate between right and left mCRC Sources: Tejpar, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):194-201.

TARGETED BIOLOGIC THERAPY FOR mCRC The two most frequently used targeted biologic therapies for mCRC are two monoclonal antibodies Bevacizumab Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor Cetuximab Epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibitor

ANATOMIC SUBSITE (Location) Right colon Left colon ~45% ~55%

4/8/2019 BACKGROUND Recent clinical trial showed better survival for left-sided mCRC treated with SC + biologic therapy, relative to right-sided malignancies These findings have been challenged because of the highly select characteristics of patients in clinical trials that limit generalizability of findings Biologic therapies anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies such as bevacizumab and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab are increasingly used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) Recent investigations have shown that primary tumor location as right or left impacts response to biologic therapy and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer Current NCCN recommendations do not differentiate between right and left mCRC Sources: Tejpar, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):194-201.

4/8/2019 BACKGROUND Survival benefits from biologic therapy for mCRC influenced by tumor location (right vs. left) remains uncertain Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment recommendations for mCRC are incomplete Biologic therapies anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies such as bevacizumab and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab are increasingly used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) Recent investigations have shown that primary tumor location as right or left impacts response to biologic therapy and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer Current NCCN recommendations do not differentiate between right and left mCRC

4/8/2019 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of primary tumor location on mortality in a diverse population-based dataset among patients with mCRC receiving systemic chemotherapy and bevacizumab or cetuximab Our objective was to evaluate the impact of primary tumor location on mortality in a diverse population-based dataset among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving systemic chemotherapy and either bevacizumab or cetuximab

4/8/2019 METHODS Retrospective review of statewide California Cancer Registry data Between 2004-2014 Stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma Patients ages 40-85 that received systemic chemotherapy (SC) alone or SC and bevacizumab or cetuximab Single primary tumor classifiable as right (appendix to transverse colon) or left (splenic flexure to rectum) We performed a retrospective review of statewide California cancer registry data between 2004-2014 among patients with Stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma. We included patients ages 40-85 that received systemic chemotherapy alone or systemic chemotherapy and either cetuximab or bevacizumab who also had a single primary tumor classifiable as right (defined as appendix to transverse colon) or left (defined as splenic flexure to rectum) Bevacizumab and cetuximab were selected as they are the most common monoclonal antibodies used in treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

OUTCOMES & COVARIATES Overall Survival: Time from date of diagnosis to death or to last date of study follow-up (December 31, 2014) Covariates: Adjusted for age, year of diagnosis, and SES as well as signet ring and mucinous histologies

STATISTICAL ANALYSES Univariable: Counts & percentages χ2 tests Median follow-up & survival: Kaplan-Meier Log-rank tests Multivariable: Propensity score weighting Cox regression Purposeful variable selection

STATISTICAL ANALYSES Subgroup Analyses: KRAS status wild-type patients diagnosed 2010-2014 Proportionality Assumption: Log-log plot Schoenfield’s residual correlation Significance level: Two sided α=0.05 (95%CI)

4/8/2019

DISCUSSION Survival differences for mCRC by location and biologic therapy type, like previous clinical trials, validating our findings and adding generalizability The importance of considering tumor location in decisions about mCRC treatment Right-sided mCRC is associated with poorer survival regardless of the biologic therapy type

LIMITATIONS Lack of genetic data (including MSI, BRAF, NRAS) Absence of information on tumor recurrence Unknown metastatic target tissues that define different survivals Does not utilize distinctions in types of chemotherapy used

CONCLUSIONS KRAS wild-type right-sided mCRC treated with cetuximab had poorer survival KRAS wild-type left-sided mCRC had better survival with cetuximab Further investigations are needed to understand the biologic differences that impact outcomes between right and left colon cancer

THANK YOU!