Trent Allison Ops StayTreat 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAVITY LOCK ELECTRONICS Dan Sexton, Sirish Nanda, and Abdurahim Rakhman.
Advertisements

Collimation and tagging instrumentation for the GlueX photon beamline Richard Jones Igor Senderovich, Anne-Marie Carroll University of Connecticut APS/DNP.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Digital RF Stabilization System Based on MicroTCA Technology - Libera LLRF Robert Černe May 2010, RT10, Lisboa
HPS MPS OVERVIEW Dan Sexton & the Safety Systems Group JLAB 1.
Pohang Accelerator Laboratory POSTECH EPICS Collaboration Meeting RICOTTI, Tokai, JAPAN EPICS collaboration meeting 2004 Dec , 2004 RICOTTI,
ESS LLRF System Anders J Johansson.
Y. R. Roblin, Apr 23, 2009 Hall D Fast Feedback System Performance and configuration.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
29/06/2007FOFB at Diamond1 Fast Orbit Feedback (FOFB) at Diamond Guenther Rehm, Head of Diagnostics Group.
Power Supply Controller Architecture
APS BPM and power supply applications on micro-IOCs W. Eric Norum
Beam Instrumentation for Orbit Stability I. Pinayev.
Characterization of Fast Orbit Feedback System Om Singh, APS, ANL NSLS-2 Beam Stability Workshop BNL, April 18-20, 2007.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
Linac Marx Modulator Update Trevor Butler 5/20/2015.
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Tomasz Czarski, Maciej Linczuk, Institute of Electronic Systems, WUT, Warsaw LLRF ATCA.
Ethernet Based Embedded IOC for FEL Control Systems J. Yan, D. Sexton, Al Grippo, W. Moore, and K. Jordan ICALEPCS 2007 October 19, 2007 Knoxville Convention.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
G2p/GEp Beamline Tim Michalski Project Lead. Beamline Overview Slow Raster Tungsten Calorimeter Upside Down Girder (correctors, BCM, superharp) FZ1 Magnet.
G 0 Coordinator Update & “To-Do List” Joe Grames William & Mary, June 5-6, 2006  Hall C Beam Line Tasks  Accelerator Preparation Tasks  Beam Halo 
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Initial Performance Results of the APS P0 (Transverse Bunch-to-Bunch) Feedback System N. DiMonte#, C.-Y. Yao, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing J. Frisch 7/22/15.
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
ESS LLRF and Beam Interaction. ESS RF system From the wall plug to the coupler Controlled over EPICS Connected to the global Machine Protection System.
Present Uses of the Fermilab Digital Signal Receiver VXI Module Brian Chase,Paul Joireman, Philip Varghese RF Embedded Systems (LLRF) Group.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Power Supply Status George Ganetis Power Supply Status ASAC Review October 22-23, 2009.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Run Coordinator Report February 5 to 8 Stepan Stepanyan JLAB 1.
4. Operations and Performance M. Lonza, D. Bulfone, V. Forchi’, G. Gaio, L. Pivetta, Sincrotrone Trieste, Trieste, Italy A Fast Orbit Feedback for the.
LLRF 15 Daresbury Andrew Moss ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Fast Global Orbit Feedback for the Australian Synchrotron Eugene Tan Accelerator and Operations 13/12/20101 ACAS Workshop on Accelerator Feedback Systems.
CLIC Workshop 18 th -22 nd January 2016, CERN 1 Alfonso Benot Morell Manfred Wendt.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control. CW mode of operation (FNAL’s experience). Yu. Pischalnikov W. Schappert FNAL TTC CW SRF Meeting, Cornell University, 12June,
R. Michaels, JLab PREX Mtg, July 2008 Recent Cavity Monitor Tests Credit: John Musson, Anna Boehle, Vince Sulkosky Good position & current for 10 nA to.
RF Control Electronics for Linacs Overview of activities at Electronics Division, BARC RF control electronics for: 1.Super-conducting Heavy Ion Linacs.
Current Status of QBPM Electronics and Magnet Movers D. McCormick, J Nelson, G White SLAC S Boogert Royal Holloway Y. Honda, Y.Inoue KEK.
Microphonics Discussion For LLRF Design Review Tom Powers 13 June 2016 Not for release outside of JLAB There are several MSWord documents located at: M:\asd\asddata\C100Microphonics2016.
RF System for C100 Cryomodule C100 GDR mode – Original/Modified Tuner Phase noise 25.6 deg rms /14 Hz rms Phase noise 7.5 deg rms /4 Hz rms.
ESS LLRF and Beam Interaction
Dither Luminosity feedback versus Fast IP feedback
LLRF Research and Development at STF-KEK
Status of the ASTRID2 facility
Collimation and tagging instrumentation
JLab Accelerator Overview
Overview and System Design for ESS LLRF Systems
ILC LLRF Status Ruben Carcagno, Brian Chase
The ELENA BPM System. Status and Plans.
Experience with High Loaded Q cavity Operation at JLAB
Electronics requirements for special diagnostics for the XFEL
Jefferson Lab Low Level RF Controls
ERL BPM System Mike Billing, Mark Palmer
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
Qweak Coordination Meeting
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Feedback Systems Joe Grames Hall A Parity Meeting Jefferson Lab
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) LLRF Preliminary Design Review LLRF Monitor and Control System September 26, 2005 Ron Akre.
PQB Meeting March 05, 2009.
Fast Orbit Feedback at the SLS
Breakout Session SC5 – Control Systems
Breakout Session SC1/SC2 – Accelerator System
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Red Pitaya with EPICS Andraz Pozar EPICS Collaboration Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Trent Allison Ops StayTreat 2015 Hall D Fast Feedback Trent Allison Ops StayTreat 2015

Hall D FFB Overview Correctors Correctors BPM BPM V H V H X Y X Y Control Algorithm Data from 2 BPMs used to control 2 sets of correctors Locking position at 1 point does not stabilize the trajectory or downstream position, 2 points are needed Element locations are selected based on the optics Main goal is to compensate for 60Hz line motion Beam Motion 60Hz 120Hz 4/4/2019

SL Service Building Zone 20 Vernier Control Chassis Based on Halls A & C FFB BSY Service Building VME Crate Beam Sync n*60Hz Shared Memory EPICS IOC Magnet Trim Rack/ Cards Timing Magnet 4 3 3 BPM RF Mod IF Mod ADC DAC FFB IOC Magnet … (x8) … … Filter 4 3 3 BPM RF Mod IF Mod ADC DAC Magnet Trim Rack/ Cards Magnet A/C Select Magnet FFB Control Algorithm: Lebedev & Dickson circa 1996 Targets 60Hz line motion and harmonics Auto calibration: kick beam, record response and calculate matrix coefficients Feedback to 180Hz plus feedforward to 720Hz Position and energy correction SL Service Building Zone 20 Filter RFCM 1&2 Vernier Control Chassis Filter RFCM 3&4 Filter RFCM 5&6 Filter RFCM 7&8 4/4/2019

Hall D FFB Beam Sync Tagger Service Building Striplines E2 FFB Chassis Correctors BT02 Cal Cell BPM RX BS04V 5C00 Cal Cell BPM RX Altera Cyclone V FPGA/ ARM Cortex-A9 dual-core FFB IOC BS04H 5C02 Cal Cell BPM RX Trim Rack/ Cards 5C00V DACs 5C00H 5C06 Cal Cell BPM RX 5C04V 5C07 Cal Cell BPM RX Fiber RX 5C04H 5C11B Cal Cell BPM RX AD00C Cal Cell BPM RX NL Service Building Zone 26 Cavities* Beam Sync LLRF 1 5C11A Cal Cell BPM RX LLRF 2 AD00 Cal Cell BPM RX Fiber TX Beam Sync LLRF 3 Hall D Fiber to BNC LLRF 4 PC104 EPICS IOC Active Collimator 5H01 VME ADC/ FPGA LLRF 5 LLRF 6 LLRF 7 LLRF 8 * There are only 8 fiber inputs so the Cavity BPMs will replace 2 Striplines 4/4/2019

Hall D FFB Chassis PC104 FPGA/ARM DACs EPICS IOC FFB IOC Fiber I/O IOC RS232/Net Beam Sync Power Filtering LEDs 4/4/2019

Stripline BPMs Used instead of M15 antenna BPMs 26 Striplines IPMBS00 IPMBS01 IPMBS02 IPMBS03 IPMBS04 IPMBE01 IPMBE02 IPMBE03 IPMBE04 IPMBT01 IPMBT02 IPMBT03 IPM5C00 IPM5C01 IPM5C02 IPM5C03 IPM5C04 IPM5C05 IPM5C06 IPM5C07 IPM5C08 IPM5C09 IPM5C10 IPM5C11 IPM5C11B IPMAD00C Used instead of M15 antenna BPMs Easier & more precise manufacturing No hand bending of antennas Better sensitivity 50 ohm devices Position calculated as difference-over-sum Each characterized with Goubau Line BPM Test Stand Y Stepper Ladder Goubau Line BPM X Stepper 4/4/2019

Stripline Bandwidth vs Resolution Current Ramp from 0 to 100nA with 1Hz Bandwidth Error at 7 & 30nA Beam Position (mm) IPM2H00.XPOS IPM2H02.XPOS IPM2H00.YPOS IPM2H02.YPOS 430um 100um Beam Current (nA) 7nA 30nA   100um 430um BW Hz Beam nA 0.1 9 2 1 30 7 60 232 54 120 329 77 180 402 94 240 465 108 300 520 121 100um resolution at 330nA with 120Hz BW 4/4/2019

Cavity BPMs IPM5C11A at shield wall, IPMAD00 at Goniometer Positions go as X/I & Y/I Electromagnetic field excited by beam BCM: TM010 Mode BPM: TM110 Mode Signal disappears at boresight Tuning port for centering at 1497MHz Temperature stabilized Better sensitivity than Striplines Tuners I X Y Probes & Test Ports Foot Blanket w/ Heat Tape 4/4/2019

Active Collimator IPC5H01 in Hall D Alcove Intercepts photon beam Tungsten pin-cushion wedges Current output Difference-over-sum used on inner wedges for FFB (region 1) Works at low beam currents mm 4/4/2019

Hall D FFB Algorithm Correctors up to 1kHz Hall A&C FFB @ 10uA Hall D: 5nA to 500nA SEE: 20um @10uA Striplines: 100um @ 330nA/120Hz BW Use Cavity BPMs & Active Collimator for lower currents Plan A: Hall A&C style feedback and feedforward 1.8ksps data & DACs (due to hardware limitations in A&C) Plan B: High bandwidth feedback (no feedforward) Take advantage of 30ksps fiber data and 1MHz DACs Must have low latency and good signal-to-noise Plan C: 60Hz line-locked feedforward only (last run) Gunk 5C03V Corrector 5C03H Corrector 4/4/2019

1kHz kick on top of 60Hz @ Active Collimator Hardware Testing Hardware was verified using beam Fiber data to FFB Magnet controls Magnet locations mapped correctly Good response at 5.5GeV with headroom for 12GeV 1kHz kick on top of 60Hz @ Active Collimator Active Collimator plot of time domain response to 1kHz FFB magnet kick at BS04V IPM5C07 Stripline Frequency Response BS04H BS04V 5C00H 5C00V 5C04H 5C04V 60Hz 4/4/2019

60Hz Suppression (Plan C) Line-synchronized 60Hz Feedforward suppression algorithm used last 2 days of the run Also engaged slow EPICS position locks to steady the beam 60Hz Suppression OFF 60Hz Line Frequency Wanders ~0.14Hz 60.07 IPM5C07 Stripline Frequency Response Hz 60Hz Suppression ON 59.93 4/4/2019

Hall D FFB To Do Implement Hall A&C FFB algorithm (Plan A) Translate into the new electronics Incorporate Active Collimator Incorporate Cavity BPMs Commission Cavity BPMs (beam time) Finish firmware and software Measure bandwidth & current limitations Commission Active Collimator (beam time) Iterative FFB testing and tweaking (beam time) 4/4/2019

Questions? Hall D Fast Feedback Hall D FFB Team: Trent Allison, Brian Bevins, Keith Cole, John Musson, Todd Satogata & Scott Windham 4/4/2019

Hall D Fast Feedback Backup Slides… 4/4/2019

Bandwidth vs Resolution ~30 nA @ 10 Hz ~30 nA @ 1 Hz 250 um Step Scan Position map improves by tightening bandwidth Improving the signal-to-noise improves performance Filtering down to 1 Hz instead of 10 Hz gives an improvement factor of about 3.2 This square root of bandwidth improvement holds true as long as the noise is Gaussian 4/4/2019

FFB Component Locations Magnets Stripline BPMs Cavity BPMs IPMAd00

FFB Component Locations Stripline BPM Active Collimator