Structural Unity among Viral Origin Binding Proteins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Advertisements

Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Yu Luo, Su-Chen Li, Min-Yuan Chou, Yu-Teh Li, Ming Luo  Structure 
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Unexpected Structural Diversity in DNA Recombination
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Crystal Structure of a SIR2 Homolog–NAD Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Structural Basis for Specificity in the Poxvirus Topoisomerase
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Crystal Structure of E. coli RecE Protein Reveals a Toroidal Tetramer for Processing Double-Stranded DNA Breaks  Jinjin Zhang, Xu Xing, Andrew B. Herr,
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Building a Replisome from Interacting Pieces
Crystal Structure of the Extracellular Domain of a Human FcγRIII
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Structural Unity among Viral Origin Binding Proteins Alison Burgess Hickman, Donald R Ronning, Robert M Kotin, Fred Dyda  Molecular Cell  Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 327-337 (August 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00592-0

Figure 1 The Inverted Terminal Repeat of AAV-5 and Model for Replication (A) The predicted T-shaped structure of the inverted terminal repeat (ITR) is the result of optimized base pairing of palindromic sequences. The stem contains the Rep binding site (RBS) and the terminal resolution site (trs) (Chiorini et al., 1999b). (B) Schematic of proposed model for the initial steps of AAV replication (adapted from Kotin, 1994). In Step 1, template-directed synthesis proceeds from the free 3′ hydroxyl on the bottom strand to copy one end of the AAV genome. In Step 2, Rep cleaves the top strand at the trs, generating a new 3′ hydroxyl group and a phosphotyrosine bond between Rep and the 5′ phosphate at the cleavage site. In Step 3, the other end of the AAV genome is duplicated. Subsequent separation of the two DNA strands requires a helicase activity. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 327-337DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00592-0)

Figure 2 Experimental and Refined Electron Density and the Structure of Rep1–197 (A) Experimental (left) and refined (right) electron density of AAV-5 Rep1–197 in the region of Tyr-153. The electron density is contoured at 1σ, and the final refined structure is overlayed on both panels. The ligands to the tetrahedrally coordinated Zn2+ are Glu-82 (which is behind the plane of the image), His-89, His-91, and Asp-24 which is contributed by an adjacent Rep monomer. (B) Ribbons (Carson, 1991) representation of AAV-5 Rep1–197. The position of the bound zinc ion is shown in silver. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 327-337DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00592-0)

Figure 2 Experimental and Refined Electron Density and the Structure of Rep1–197 (A) Experimental (left) and refined (right) electron density of AAV-5 Rep1–197 in the region of Tyr-153. The electron density is contoured at 1σ, and the final refined structure is overlayed on both panels. The ligands to the tetrahedrally coordinated Zn2+ are Glu-82 (which is behind the plane of the image), His-89, His-91, and Asp-24 which is contributed by an adjacent Rep monomer. (B) Ribbons (Carson, 1991) representation of AAV-5 Rep1–197. The position of the bound zinc ion is shown in silver. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 327-337DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00592-0)

Figure 3 Surface Representations of AAV-5 Rep1–197 (A) Blue and red represent regions of positive and negative surface electrostatic potential, respectively. The protrusion at top left consists of residues 135–144; Lys-135, Lys-137, and Lys-138 are marked. (B) Rep has been rotated forward ∼90° relative to (A), and six nucleotides of ssDNA (adapted from PDB ID 1a9n) modeled into the active site cleft. The model was made by three-dimensional superposition of the spliceosomal U2B″-U2A′ protein-RNA complex (Price et al., 1998) to AAV Rep. The two proteins can be superimposed with an rmsd of 1.8 Å over 44 Cα positions. The RNA 2′-OH groups have been removed. Features of the modeled DNA, shown in stick representation, include binding across the β sheet as seen in RRM complexes (Conte et al., 2000) and curving around helix αD to avoid steric clashes. The position of the active site Tyr-153 is marked. Figures were generated with SPOCK (Christopher, 1998) and MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis, 1991), and rendered with PovRay (http://www.povray.org). Molecular Cell 2002 10, 327-337DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00592-0)

Figure 4 The AAV-5 Fold and Sequence Alignment with Related Viral Proteins (A) Folding topology of AAV-5 Rep1–197. Strands are shown in purple and α helices in yellow. The two His residues of the HUH motif are located on strand β3, in close proximity to two conserved Tyr residues on helix αD. (B) Structure-based sequence alignment of AAV-5 Rep1–197 with SV40 T antigen and BPV E1. The top sequence corresponds to AAV-2, and residues that are identical in AAV-5 are colored green. The numbering is that of AAV-5 Rep. RCR motifs 2 and 3 are highlighted in gray. The purple and yellow boxes indicate β strands and α helices, respectively; the blue box corresponds to the 310 helix. The DNA binding domains of the SV40 T antigen (residues 131–260; Luo et al., 1996) and BPV E1 (residues 159–303; Enemark et al., 2000) were aligned in DALI (Holm and Sander, 1997). Residues in bold letters are those that structurally align with residues in AAV-5 Rep. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 327-337DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00592-0)

Figure 5 Comparison of the Folds of AAV-5 Rep1–197 and the DNA-Binding Domains of BPV E1 and SV40 T Antigen In AAV-5 Rep1–197 (left), the active site residues shown in ball-and-stick are clustered in a cleft on one surface of the central β sheet. In BPV E1 (center) and the SV40 T antigen (right), N-terminal extensions (shown in red) occupy this region instead. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 327-337DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00592-0)

Figure 6 Biochemical Characterization of AAV-5 Rep (A) Binding of Mn2+ to the Rep endonuclease domain measured by isothermal titration calorimetry. Top: Raw data for injection of MnCl2 into Rep1–197 and the point mutant H91A (the data for H91A are offset slightly for clarity). Bottom: Integrated heats of injection for the wild-type data, with the solid line showing the best fit. (B) Cleavage activity of AAV-5 Rep1–489 on partially single-stranded substrates. Reactions were carried out in a volume of 10 μl containing 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mM DTT, 4 mM MnCl2, 0.34 μM protein, and 1 pmol substrate. After incubation for 1 hr at 37°C, reactions were quenched at 90°C for 5 min after addition of 20 μl formamide gel loading buffer. Reaction products were resolved on a 10% polyacrylamide/7 M urea denaturing gel. The minor cleavage product seen with Rep1–489 likely represents cleavage at a suboptimal site. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 327-337DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00592-0)