Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e4 (September 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Jakub K. Famulski, Gordon K. Chan  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Efficient Mitosis in Human Cells Lacking Poleward Microtubule Flux
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 18, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Hoi Tang Ma, Randy Y.C. Poon  Cell Reports 
Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Katja Wassmann, Théodora Niault, Bernard Maro  Current Biology 
Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1  Stephanie A. Miller, Michael L. Johnson, P. Todd.
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
The Role of NEDD1 Phosphorylation by Aurora A in Chromosomal Microtubule Nucleation and Spindle Function  Roser Pinyol, Jacopo Scrofani, Isabelle Vernos 
Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages e6 (February 2019)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Distinct Roles of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex in the Detection of and Response to Errors in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment  Julian Haase, Mary.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Intra-spindle Microtubule Assembly Regulates Clustering of Microtubule-Organizing Centers during Early Mouse Development  Sadanori Watanabe, Go Shioi,
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Vincent Vanoosthuyse, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Mad2 and Mad3 Cooperate to Arrest Budding Yeast in Mitosis
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
RECQL4 is a MAP with a spindle function.
Centriole Reduplication during Prolonged Interphase Requires Procentriole Maturation Governed by Plk1  Jadranka Lončarek, Polla Hergert, Alexey Khodjakov 
Hoi Tang Ma, Randy Y.C. Poon  Cell Reports 
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e6 (December 2017)
A kinase‐dependent role for Haspin in antagonizing Wapl and protecting mitotic centromere cohesion AThe lysates from asynchronous Haspin‐KO cells stably.
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages 2685-2696.e4 (September 2018) Loss of Kif18A Results in Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Activation at Microtubule- Attached Kinetochores  Louise M.E. Janssen, Tessa V. Averink, Vincent A. Blomen, Thijn R. Brummelkamp, René H. Medema, Jonne A. Raaijmakers  Current Biology  Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages 2685-2696.e4 (September 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.026 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2018 28, 2685-2696.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.026) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Identification of Essential Genes Reveals KIF18A and ASTRIN as Synthetic Viable Interactors with SAC Deficiency (A) Representative plots of individual insertional mutagenesis screens in HAP1 WT, ΔMad1, and ΔMad2 cells. Each dot represents a single gene, and the number of integrations per gene is plotted on the x axis. On the y axis, the relative amount of sense integrations over the total amount of integrations is plotted. The synthetic viable hits KIF18A and ASTRIN are highlighted in red. (B) The average ratio of sense gene trap integrations over the total amount of integrations is plotted for both KIF18A and ASTRIN. The data are extracted from 4 individual WT, 2 individual ΔMad1, and 2 individual ΔMad2 insertional mutagenesis screens. Error bars represent SD of two independent experiments. (C) Colony formation assay of HAP1 WT and ΔMad2 cells treated with non-targeting siRNA (siNT) or siKif18A for 5 days, stained with crystal violet and quantified with Fiji. See also Figures S1 and S4. Current Biology 2018 28, 2685-2696.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.026) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Depletion of Kif18A Leads to a Prolonged Mitotic Arrest and Subsequent Cell Death (A) Mitotic timing and cell fate of individual cells followed by live-cell imaging of 3 independent experiments (n = ∼90 cells per condition). Each dot represents an individual cell. Cell fate was determined by either anaphase progression (NEB-Ana), start of NEB followed by interphase without anaphase (slippage), or DNA hypercondensation and fragmentation (cell death). Bars represent average time spent in mitosis. (B) Representative live-cell microscopy images of WT HAP1 cells treated with siNT or siKif18A for 48 hr. After siKif18A treatment, chromosome oscillations become visible (indicated with black arrow). One example is shown where cells progress into anaphase after a prolonged mitosis without segregation errors (t = 105), and one example is shown where prolonged mitosis results in cell death, indicated by DNA fragmentation at t = 295. The scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) Quantification of chromosome segregation errors in WT HAP1 cells treated with siNT or siKif18A for 48 hr, ΔMad2, and two different ΔMad2ΔKif18A clones: cA1 and cB1. Segregation errors were scored during live-cell imaging and consist of anaphase bridges and lagging chromosomes. Error bars represent SD of 3 independent experiments (n = ∼90 per condition). An unpaired Student’s t test showed no significant difference between WT HAP1 cells and WT HAP1 cells treated with siKif18A or a difference between ΔMad2 and the ΔMad2ΔKif18A clones A1/B1. (D) Western blot analysis confirmed the successful generation of Kif18A and Mad2 double-knockout (ΔMad2ΔKif18A) generation in HAP1 cells. Cell lysates were immunoblotted for Kif18A, Mad2, and α-tubulin. (E) Doubling time as determined with a Lionheart microscope (1 independent experiment with samples plated in triplicate). An unpaired Student’s t test showed a significant difference between WT and ΔMad2 cells (∗p < 0.05). No significant difference in doubling time between ΔMad2 and the ΔMad2ΔKif18A clones A1/B1 was observed. See also Figures S1–S4 and Videos S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5. Current Biology 2018 28, 2685-2696.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.026) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 DOX-Inducible MAD2 Expression Induces Lethality in ΔKIF18AΔMAD2 Cells (A) Western blot analysis confirmed the doxycycline (DOX)-inducible GFP and Mad2 expression in WT, ΔMad2, ΔMad2ΔKif18A_A1, and ΔMad2ΔKif18A_B1 cells. Cell lysates were immunoblotted for GFP and Mad2. s.e. indicates short exposure; l.e. indicates long exposure. (B) Mitotic timing of nocodazole-treated WT HAP1 and ΔMad2ΔKif18A cells, treated with or without DOX to induce Mad2 expression (n = ∼15 cells per condition in 1 independent experiment). (C) Mitotic timing and cell fate of individual cells treated with or without DOX (8 hr prior to live-cell imaging) to induce Mad2 expression (n = ∼30 cells per condition in one independent experiment). Each dot represents an individual cell. (D) Quantification of segregation errors of cells shown in (C). (E) Percentage of GFP (and thus Mad2) expressing cells over time, determined by FACS over a period of 7 days. Current Biology 2018 28, 2685-2696.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.026) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mad1-Positive Kinetochores of Kif18A-Depleted Cells Display Decreased Tension (A) Representative images of the quantification of the number of Mad-positive kinetochores in ΔMad2ΔKif18A_A1 cells. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Quantification of immunofluorescent staining of Mad1 at kinetochores in WT HAP1 cells treated with siNT (48 hr), Eg5 inhibitor STLC (10 μM; 4 hr), nocodazole (50 nm; 4 hr), siKif18A (48 hr), and ΔMad2ΔKif18A_A1/B1 cells. All conditions were pre-treated for 1 hr with MG132 before fixation to arrest cells in mitosis. Error bars represent SD of 4 independent experiments (n = ∼15 cells and 100 kinetochores per condition). (C) Measurements of inter-kinetochore (KT) distance of WT HAP1 cells treated with siNT (48 hr), Eg5 inhibitor STLC (10 μM; 4 hr), nocodazole (50 nM; 4 hr), siKif18A (48 hr), and ΔMad2ΔKif18A_A1. Measurements between Crest pairs were separated in Mad1-positive and Mad1-negative kinetochores. Error bars represent SD of minimally 15 kinetochore pairs per condition. p values were determined by unpaired Student’s t test comparing all experimental conditions against WT + siNT. ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. (D) Measurements of intra-KT distance of WT HAP1 cells treated with siNT (48 hr), Eg5 inhibitor STLC (10 μM; 4 hr), nocodazole (50 nM; 4 hr), ΔMad2ΔKif18A_A1, and ΔMad2ΔKif18A_B1. Distance measurements between Hec1 and CENPC were separated in Bubr1-positive and Bubr1-negative kinetochores. Error bars represent SD of minimally 15 kinetochore pairs per condition. p values were determined by unpaired Student’s t test comparing against WT + siNT. ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. (E) Representative images of immunofluorescent staining of astrin, Mad1, and Crest in WT HAP1 cells treated with siNT or siKif18A for 48 hr. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (F) Quantification of astrin levels on Mad1-positive and Mad1-negative kinetochores in WT HAP1 cells. Error bars represent SD of 15 kinetochore pairs in 1 experiment. (G) Quantification of astrin levels on Mad1-positive and Mad1-negative kinetochores in ΔMad2ΔKif18A cells. Error bars represent SD of 15 kinetochore pairs in 1 experiment. Current Biology 2018 28, 2685-2696.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.026) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Kif18A Loss Results in Recruitment of Mad1 in the Presence of Microtubule Connections (A) Representative immunofluorescent images of WT HAP1, WT HAP1 nocodazole-treated (50 nM; 4 hr), and ΔMad2ΔKif18A_A1 cells, stained for tubulin, Mad1, and Crest. The scale bars represent 5 μm in main figure and 0.8 μm in inlay. (B) Quantification of the amount of k-Mt attachments in Mad1-positive kinetochores of WT HAP1 cells treated with Eg5-inhibitor STLC (10 μM; 4 hr), nocodazole (50 nM; 4 hr), siKif18A (48 hr), and ΔMad2ΔKif18A_A1 cells. All conditions were pre-treated with MG132 for 1 hr, after which cells were calcium treated and fixed before staining the cells for microtubules (α-tubulin), SAC activity (Mad1), and centromeres (Crest). Error bars represent SD of 3 independent experiments (n = 20 cells and 120 kinetochores per condition). p values were determined by paired t test, comparing Kif18A-depleted cells against WT HAP1 cells treated with Eg5 inhibitor STLC. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (C) Graphs showing measurements of k-fiber thickness and intensity (n = 5 cells and ∼25 kinetochores per condition) in WT HAP1 cells treated with Eg5 inhibitor STLC (10 μM; 4 hr), nocodazole (50 nm; 4 hr), siKif18A (48 hr), and ΔMad2ΔKif18A_A1 cells, all treated for 1 hr with MG132 before fixation. See also Figures S1, S3, and S4. Current Biology 2018 28, 2685-2696.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.026) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Loss of Kif18A Results in SAC Activation at Microtubule-Attached Kinetochores Schematic overview of hypothetical model of Kif18A loss. In WT cells, Kif18A is recruited to the plus ends of microtubules when chromosomes are properly aligned at the metaphase plate, leading to a reduction of chromosome oscillations, stabilization of k-Mt attachments, and the generation of tension, which silences the SAC and promotes anaphase onset. Upon loss of Kif18A, the oscillatory movements of chromosomes are no longer reduced and tension defects are found at the checkpoint signaling kinetochores. Thus, the tension defect is able to activate or maintain the SAC, leading to a mitotic arrest and subsequent cell death without destabilizing the k-Mt attachment. Current Biology 2018 28, 2685-2696.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.026) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions