Vebjørn Ekroll, Bilge Sayim, Ruth Van der Hallen, Johan Wagemans 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Erman Misirlisoy, Patrick Haggard  Current Biology 
Advertisements

The Dynamic Range of Human Lightness Perception
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Enhanced Muscle Afferent Signals during Motor Learning in Humans
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Kinesthetic information disambiguates visual motion signals
A Unique Advantage for Giant Eyes in Giant Squid
Ryota Kanai, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Frans A.J. Verstraten  Current Biology 
Mental Imagery Changes Multisensory Perception
Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M. Vickery  Current Biology 
There's more to magic than meets the eye
Colin J. Palmer, Colin W.G. Clifford  Current Biology 
John A. Endler, Lorna C. Endler, Natalie R. Doerr  Current Biology 
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Lisa M. Fenk, Andreas Poehlmann, Andrew D. Straw  Current Biology 
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Nicolas Catz, Peter W. Dicke, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
Neurological and Robot-Controlled Induction of an Apparition
Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision
A Scalable Population Code for Time in the Striatum
Perception Matches Selectivity in the Human Anterior Color Center
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Visual Sensitivity Can Scale with Illusory Size Changes
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Feeling numbness for someone else's finger
Peng Zhang, Min Bao, Miyoung Kwon, Sheng He, Stephen A. Engel 
Masaya Hirashima, Daichi Nozaki  Current Biology 
Neural Locus of Color Afterimages
Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality
Humans Have an Expectation That Gaze Is Directed Toward Them
Supervised Calibration Relies on the Multisensory Percept
How Dopamine Enhances an Optimism Bias in Humans
Octopus Movement: Push Right, Go Left
Keith A. May, Li Zhaoping, Paul B. Hibbard  Current Biology 
Claudia Lunghi, Uzay E. Emir, Maria Concetta Morrone, Holly Bridge 
Sung Jun Joo, Geoffrey M. Boynton, Scott O. Murray  Current Biology 
Kevin R. Foster, Thomas Bell  Current Biology 
The Perception and Misperception of Specular Surface Reflectance
Social Information Signaling by Neurons in Primate Striatum
The challenge of measuring long-term positive aftereffects
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (April 2011)
Experience-Driven Plasticity in Binocular Vision
Kazumichi Matsumiya, Satoshi Shioiri  Current Biology 
Manuel Jan Roth, Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner  Current Biology 
A Visual Sense of Number
J. Andrew Pruszynski, Roland S. Johansson, J. Randall Flanagan 
The Geography of Ecological Niche Evolution in Mammals
Vision: Attending the Invisible
Volume 28, Issue 19, Pages e8 (October 2018)
Binaral Rivalry between the Nostrils and in the Cortex
Visual Crowding Is Correlated with Awareness
Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

Illusory Visual Completion of an Object’s Invisible Backside Can Make Your Finger Feel Shorter  Vebjørn Ekroll, Bilge Sayim, Ruth Van der Hallen, Johan Wagemans  Current Biology  Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 1029-1033 (April 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.001 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2016 26, 1029-1033DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A Well-Known Magic Trick and the Shrunken Finger Illusion (A and B) The multiplying balls routine. The magician first holds what seems to be a single ball between his fingers (A). After a quick flick of the wrist, a second ball seems to materialize (B). In reality, the lower “ball” is a hollow semi-spherical shell, from which the real ball is pulled out. Adapted from [1], licensed under CC BY 2.0. (C and D) Schematic illustration of the shrunken finger illusion. When a semi-spherical shell is balanced on the observer’s finger as shown in (C) and viewed from above, the observer often reports perceiving the shell as a complete ball (D), while his or her finger is felt to be unusually short, as if to make space for the illusory volume of the complete ball. Note that this drawing is an exaggerated caricature of the perceptual experience. In particular, the real effect may be smaller than depicted here. In the experiments, only the middle finger was extended, while the other fingers were closed to a fist (see Figure 2). Current Biology 2016 26, 1029-1033DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Illustration of the Experimental Pointing Task (A) In experiment 1, the observers viewed the semi-sphere balancing on their extended middle finger from above and indicated the felt position of their fingertip by pointing with a stick held with the free hand. (B) In order to estimate the deviation of the observers’ pointing from the true position of the fingertip, four points in the image (blue crosses) were manually identified. The distance from the intersection of the two resulting lines (red circle) and the top of the shell was taken as a measure of the illusion. See the Supplemental Experimental Procedures for further details. Current Biology 2016 26, 1029-1033DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Errors Made When Pointing to the Fingertip Increase Linearly with the Diameter of the Semispherical Shell Results from experiment 1. Average errors made by the observers when pointing to the tip of their fingers (red symbols) or to the top of the shell (blue symbols) are plotted against the diameter of the shell. A shell diameter of zero means that observers just pointed to their fingertip without any shell on it, so in this case the task was identical in all four conditions. The black horizontal line represents the true position of the fingertip or top of the shell, and the solid diagonal line indicates the theoretical extent of the illusory finger shortening necessary to “make sufficient space” for the perceptual completion of the shell into a full sphere. The dashed oblique line shows the pointing error necessary to “make space” for a solid half-sphere. The strongly colored data points refer to the conditions in which the observers were asked to wait until they were sure that they experienced the shell as a complete ball before performing the pointing task. The pale data points refer to the conditions in which no such additional instruction was given. Each data point shows the average of 66 settings (22 observers × 3 repeated-measurements). Error bars represent ±1 SEM of the pooled data; where invisible, they are smaller than the symbol size. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 1029-1033DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Shrunken Finger Effect Only Occurs with an Object Supporting Amodal Volume Completion Results from experiment 2. Average pointing deviations relative to the baseline bias (observed when the observers pointed to the directly visible fingertip without any shell) are shown. Negative values indicate a finger-shortening effect. The labels on the x axis refer to the opaque semi-spherical shell, the transparent semi-spherical shell, and the flat disk. The error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 1029-1033DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.001) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions