Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages e4 (September 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recurring conformation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 V3 loop Robyn L. Stanfield, Jayant B. Ghiara, Erica O. Saphire, Albert T. Profy,
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Comparison of EM reconstructions and crystal structures of mAbs that bind at the GP1-GP2 interface. Comparison of EM reconstructions and crystal structures.
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2018)
Model Building and Refinement of a Natively Glycosylated HIV-1 Env Protein by High- Resolution Cryoelectron Microscopy  Jeong Hyun Lee, Natalia de Val,
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Crystal Structure at 2.8 Å of an FcRn/Heterodimeric Fc Complex
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Caspase-3 by XIAP
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Conserved Tetramer Junction in the Kinetochore Ndc80 Complex
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Structures of Two Repeats of Spectrin Suggest Models of Flexibility
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Ebolavirus’s Foibles Cell
How a Single T Cell Receptor Recognizes Both Self and Foreign MHC
Crystallographic Identification of Lipid as an Integral Component of the Epitope of HIV Broadly Neutralizing Antibody 4E10  Adriana Irimia, Anita Sarkar,
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
LC8 is structurally variable but conserved in sequence.
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2019)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 2723-2732.e4 (September 2018) Structural Basis of Pan-Ebolavirus Neutralization by an Antibody Targeting the Glycoprotein Fusion Loop  Charles D. Murin, Jessica F. Bruhn, Zachary A. Bornholdt, Jeffrey Copps, Robyn Stanfield, Andrew B. Ward  Cell Reports  Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 2723-2732.e4 (September 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.009 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 24, 2723-2732.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.009) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structure of Unliganded ADI-15878 Fab (A) Crystal structure of ADI-15878 Fab, demonstrating overall topology and complementarity-determining region (CDR) loop arrangement. Three residues shown in the CDRH3, D95, W99, and Y100c were previously identified as critical for ADI-15878 binding to GP (Wec et al., 2017) and are shown as sticks. (B) Residue W99H3 forms a hydrophobic packing interaction with R97H3 in the unliganded state, sequestering W99H3 from solvent exposure. Cell Reports 2018 24, 2723-2732.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.009) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cryo-EM Structure of BDBV GPΔmuc and Key Structural Elements Relevant to the ADI-15878 Epitope (A) Atomic model of BDBV GPΔmuc derived from the cryo-EM map of BDBV GPΔmuc bound to ADI-15878 Fab (4.3 Å), with GP1 (dark blue) and GP2 (brown) highlighted. Two predicted N-linked glycans are modeled in GP1 and two are modeled in GP2. In addition, there is clear density for three disulfides (labeled), along with a large portion of HR2 that extends to residue 625. Dashed lines represent regions that were included in our construct but we did not build in our model. (B) Details of the β17-β18 loop modeled in the BDBV structure (dark blue), demonstrating homology to previously modeled loops in SUDV GP (green; PDB: 3VE0) and EBOV/May GP (yellow; PDB: 5JQ3). This loop interacts with the base of the internal fusion loop (IFL) (orange), which shows homology across Filoviridae, including MARV (purple; PDB: 6BP2), SUDV, and EBOV/May (yellow). See also Figure 3. (C) Comparison of the IFL across known filoviral GP structures. The tip of the IFL is shifted in SUDV and MARV in comparison to unliganded EBOV/May GP as well as BDBV and EBOV/Mak bound to ADI-15878, although SUDV and MARV shift in opposite directions. (D) The β1-β2 loop of BDBV, near the base of the ADI-15878 epitope, is most similar to the structure of SUDV bound to 16F6. The MARV wing anchor, although divergent in sequence, occupies this same space and has structural similarities. (E) Side-by-side comparison of the highest-resolution structures of filoviral GPs solved to date, showing structural similarity among the ebolaviruses and divergence in the marburgviruses. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2018 24, 2723-2732.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.009) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cryo-EM Structures of ADI-15878 Fab Bound to EBOV/Mak GPΔmuc and BDBV GPΔmuc (A) Model of EBOV/Mak GPΔmuc bound to ADI-15878 Fab. Shown are side (left) and top (right) views. We built four glycans in GP1 (cyan) and one in GP2 (yellow) and only the variable (Fv) domain of ADI-15878, with the light chain (LC) in blue and the heavy chain (HC) in magenta. Cylinders represent the HR2 domain, which were not built in this model. (B) Model of BDBV GPΔmuc bound to ADI-15878 Fab. We describe the core GP structure in Figure 2 and only built the ADI-15878 Fv domain, as described in (A). See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Reports 2018 24, 2723-2732.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.009) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Details of the ADI-15878 Epitope in EBOV/Mak GPΔmuc. (A) The ADI-15878 epitope footprint, which spans two GP1/2 protomers, including the β1-β2 loop in GP1A (cyan), HR1 in GP1A (yellow), and the IFL in GP2B (orange). All residues within 4 Å of ADI-15878 in our model are labeled and highlighted. (B) Details of the ADI-15878 epitope at the IFL in GP2B. A loose hydrophobic network is formed between Y100cH3, H100dH3, Y91L3, Y92L3, W32L1, and IFL residues 527–530. The peptide backbone O from Y92L3 is also within hydrogen-bonding distance of the backbone N from L529 and A30 on the IFL. W32L1 inserts itself between F535 and L529 of the IFL. (C) Details of the ADI-15878 epitope at HR1 in GP2A. W99H3 stacks against Q560HR1 at a distance of ∼3.8 Å, similar to the interaction of W531IFL with Q567. Y100cH3 and R97H3 are within hydrogen-bonding distance of Q567 and NAG-563HR1, respectively. Also, NE2 of Q560 is within hydrogen-bonding distance of the main chain O of S30H1. (D) Residues L54H1 and S56H1 are within 4 Å of portions of the β1-β2 loop in GP1A and may mediate contacts. Dashed lines represent regions that we did not build in our model but were included in our construct. See also Figures S2, S3, and S4. Cell Reports 2018 24, 2723-2732.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.009) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of Bound and Unbound ADI-15878 Paratopes (A) Comparison of unliganded (light blue/pink) and GP-bound (dark blue/magenta) ADI-15878 Fv. Upon binding to GP, ADI-15878 opens up at the HC/LC interface, with the greatest shift occurring at CDRH3 (∼4.8 Å shift). There is also a slight change in the position of CDRL3. (B) A main-chain conformational change causes W99H3 to flip downward by ∼120° upon binding to GP, causing an overall shift in the position of the CDRH3, as well as a change in the rotamer of Y100cH3, which subsequently mediates interaction with a portion of the IFL and the LC. (C) The change in CDRH3 conformation upon GP binding shifts the position of R97H3 by 4.7 Å, allowing it to contact the glycan at N563. (D) A slight shift in the CDRL3 upon binding to GP changes the position of W32L1 by ∼40°, allowing for hydrophobic interactions with the IFL. See also Figures S4 and S5. Cell Reports 2018 24, 2723-2732.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.009) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions