The Role of the Amygdala in Signaling Prospective Outcome of Choice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perceived Speed of Colored Stimuli
Advertisements

Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Gijsbert Stoet, Lawrence H Snyder  Neuron 
Signal, Noise, and Variation in Neural and Sensory-Motor Latency
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Neural Mechanisms of Hierarchical Planning in a Virtual Subway Network
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Learning to Simulate Others' Decisions
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Nils Kolling, Marco Wittmann, Matthew F.S. Rushworth  Neuron 
Oded Klavir, Rotem Genud-Gabai, Rony Paz  Neuron 
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (September 1999)
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
Activity in Posterior Parietal Cortex Is Correlated with the Relative Subjective Desirability of Action  Michael C. Dorris, Paul W. Glimcher  Neuron 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (January 2017)
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Talia Konkle, Aude Oliva  Neuron  Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Dynamic Coding for Cognitive Control in Prefrontal Cortex
Reward Circuitry Activation by Noxious Thermal Stimuli
Between Thoughts and Actions: Motivationally Salient Cues Invigorate Mental Action in the Human Brain  Avi Mendelsohn, Alex Pine, Daniela Schiller  Neuron 
A Neurocomputational Model of Altruistic Choice and Its Implications
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Represents a Cognitive Map of State Space
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
Jeremy B. Wilmer, Ken Nakayama  Neuron 
Kyoko Yoshida, Nobuhito Saito, Atsushi Iriki, Masaki Isoda 
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Caleb E. Strait, Tommy C. Blanchard, Benjamin Y. Hayden  Neuron 
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Uri Hasson, Orit Furman, Dav Clark, Yadin Dudai, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Masayuki Matsumoto, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Sharon C. Furtak, Omar J. Ahmed, Rebecca D. Burwell  Neuron 
Subliminal Instrumental Conditioning Demonstrated in the Human Brain
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Human Consensus Decision-Making
Broca's Area and the Hierarchical Organization of Human Behavior
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Peter H. Rudebeck, Andrew R. Mitz, Ravi V. Chacko, Elisabeth A. Murray 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Learning to Simulate Others' Decisions
Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell
Manuela Piazza, Philippe Pinel, Denis Le Bihan, Stanislas Dehaene 
Short-Term Memory for Figure-Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex
John T. Serences, Geoffrey M. Boynton  Neuron 
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Gijsbert Stoet, Lawrence H Snyder  Neuron 
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Social Information Signaling by Neurons in Primate Striatum
The Neural Circuitry of a Broken Promise
Taosheng Liu, Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco  Neuron 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex
Presentation transcript:

The Role of the Amygdala in Signaling Prospective Outcome of Choice Itamar Kahn, Yehezkel Yeshurun, Pia Rotshtein, Itzhak Fried, Dafna Ben-Bashat, Talma Hendler  Neuron  Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 983-994 (March 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00626-8

Figure 1 Game Course Diagram indicating the temporal sequence of steps as driven by the interaction between the player and the opponent during one round in the game. The steps were divided by visually and aurally presented commands shown in gray rectangles (see Experimental Procedures for detailed description of game progress and additional information for a game demo). A representative round is depicted, where the master chip is horizontally positioned on the game board (glass-like rectangle). At the beginning of a round, the command “Choose” directs the player to mentally choose a chip from the chips assigned to him (depicted on the bottom of the board). After the command “Ready,” the player is required to move the cursor to mark his chosen chip. Following the command “Go,” the player is required to actually pick it and waits for the opponent's response. Having observed the subject making his choice, the opponent can ask the subject to expose the chosen chip or not to expose the chip and continue to the next turn. Accordingly, three intervals of interest were characterized during a round: “decision-making” (A), “expectancy-to-outcome” (C), and “response-to-outcome” (D). The interval from the onset of the instruction “Go” until the player's last motor action of pick, is marked in gray (B). The “expectancy-to-outcome” interval is divided into two possible events depending on the player's choice: nonmatch (red) or match (blue). Subsequently, the “response-to-outcome” interval is divided into four outcomes, depending on the two possible responses of the opponent: expose the chosen chip (filled arrows) or continue to the next turn (dotted arrows). The actual gain or loss in each round is depicted as the number of chips subtracted or added to the chips assigned initially to the player (E). The relative gain or loss is calculated as the difference between the gain or loss of the actual outcome and the alternative outcome (see Experimental Procedures for details) (F). Note that the magnitude of actual outcome is greater when opponent response with a show than a no-show, while the magnitude of counterfactual comparison (relative gain or loss) is greater when the player makes a nonmatch choice then a match choice. Neuron 2002 33, 983-994DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00626-8)

Figure 2 Behavioral Analysis of the Game (A) Players' choices (gray) and opponent's responses (black) as a function of time. Nonmatch choice index (number of nonmatch choices divided by the number of nonmatch and match choices) and show outcome index (number of show outcomes divided by the number of show and no-show outcomes) are plotted for each minute of the game taken from all games for all the subjects. (B) Players' choices as a function of asset position (see Experimental Procedures). The mean nonmatch choice index is plotted for each one of the different asset positions. (C) Histogram of the distribution of game steps as a function of asset position. Each histogram shows the average proportion of events occurring at different times during the game for each asset position. High asset position is shown in black, medium in gray, and low in light gray. The error bars are standard error of the mean (SEM). Neuron 2002 33, 983-994DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00626-8)

Figure 3 Amygdala Activation during the “Expectancy-to-Outcome” Interval The graphs depict the averaged activation obtained from the amygdala region of interest bilaterally from all subjects. (A) Percent signal change is shown as a function of time for nonmatch (red) and match (blue) choices. The onset of the interval is set by the player's pick of a chosen chip and ended by the opponent response (either “Show” or “Choose”). Dark gray area represents the average duration of this interval while light gray represents the maximal duration. (B) Averaged percent signal change obtained during expectancy interval for match (blue) and nonmatch (red) events sorted by asset position in the game (i.e., low, medium, and high; see Experimental Procedures for details). The error bars are standard error of the mean (SEM). Neuron 2002 33, 983-994DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00626-8)

Figure 4 Parametric Maps for Nonmatch Choice Related Voxels during the “Expectancy-to-Outcome” Interval Parametric maps of preferentially activated voxels following nonmatch choices and before outcome is known, overlaid on anatomical coronal sections. Three representative subjects' maps are shown in addition to a group average (n = 12). Significant activation within the predefined amygdala region is marked in yellow. Neuron 2002 33, 983-994DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00626-8)

Figure 5 Amygdala Activation during the “Response-to-Outcome” Interval Average activation obtained from the amygdala region of interest bilaterally for all subjects. (A) Averaged activation for the 7.5 s after either the “Show” outcome (filled) or “Choose” (dotted) as a function of subject choice (nonmatch in red and match in blue). (B) Time course of the amygdala region activation during the “response-to-outcome” interval following a show outcome, and (C) no-show (“Choose”) outcome. The error bars are standard error of the mean (SEM). Neuron 2002 33, 983-994DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00626-8)

Figure 6 Parametric Maps for Show Outcome Related Voxels during the “Response-to-Outcome” Interval Parametric maps of voxels preferentially activated following a show outcome are overlaid on coronal sections. Three representative subjects' maps are shown in addition to a group average (n = 12). Significant activation within the predefined amygdala region is marked in yellow. Neuron 2002 33, 983-994DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00626-8)