Statistical evaluation of pre-laboratory and laboratory factors that influence DNA recovery from archaeological material  Cristina Gamba, Eva Fernández,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The most efficient STR loci in forensic genetics in population of central Poland R. Jacewicz, M. Jedrzejczyk, J. Berent Forensic Science International:
Advertisements

Collection protocols for the recovery of biological samples
On the effect of shooting distance, ballistic model construction, doping and weapon type on the simultaneous analysis of DNA and RNA from backspatter.
T. Tamura, M. Osawa, Y. Inaoka, S. Tanaka, F. Satoh, T. Nakamura 
A. Verzeletti, V. Cortellini, S. Cisana, S. Pretto, N. Cerri, F
V. Kallupurackal, T. Kausel, A. Sulzer, P. Voegeli, A. Kratzer 
Activity level in the hierarchy of propositions in case of the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson analyzed using Bayesian network 
A. M. López-Parra, E. Fernández, C. Baeza, C. Gamba, M. Tirado, L
E. Fernández, J. E. Ortiz, T. Torres, A. Pérez-Pérez, C. Gamba, M
An evaluation of miniSTR markers for casework applications
PhyloTree Build 17: Growing the human mitochondrial DNA tree
A. Barbaro, P. Cormaci, G. Falcone 
Use of universal reporter primers in multiplex PCR of autosomal loci
Forensic identification of 12 mammals species based on size variation of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene using multiplex PCR assay  M. Črček, K. Drobnič 
An unexpected case in the prehistory of the Iberian Peninsula: Biogeographical origin analysis through mitochondrial DNA  Sara Palomo-Díez, Ángel Esparza-Arroyo,
Probabilistic modelling for DNA mixture analysis
Efficiency of DNA IQ System® in recovering semen DNA from cotton swabs
C. Davies, J. Thomson, F. Kennedy 
The effect of increased cycle numbers using the Quantifiler® Duo DNA Quantification Kit (AB) on the detection of minute amounts of male DNA in mixtures.
The effects of different adhesive tapes and of Hemastix test strips on DNA recovery using magnetic silica beads  Stefan Kutranov, Holly Cullis  Forensic.
DNA typing of trace DNA recovered from different areas of sandals found at a homicide crime scene investigation: A comparative study  Samuel T.G. Ferreira,
DNA transfer by different parts of a hand
Juliana G. Aquino, Juliana Jannuzzi, Elizeu F. Carvalho, Leonor Gusmão 
Establishment of Italian national DNA database and the central laboratory: Some aspects  R. Biondo, F. De Stefano  Forensic Science International: Genetics.
Timothy J. Verdon, R. John Mitchell, Roland A.H. van Oorschot 
Effectiveness of CIFS DNA database in Thailand
U. Ricci, I. Carboni, S. Iozzi, A. Gozzini, F. Torricelli 
Repeated extraction of DNA from FTA cards
Seung-Bum Hong, Yangseop Kim, Jung-Hyun Park 
A custom software solution for forensic mtDNA analysis of MiSeq data
R. Alghafri, S. Alhammadi, K. Amiri 
Population data for SE33 locus in United Arab Emirates Arab population
S. Iyavoo, A. Wolejko, D. Furmanczyk, R. Graham, R. Myers, T. Haizel 
Genetic structure of the population of Beni department (North Bolivia)
Automated extraction of DNA from clothing
Combining DNA evidence for greater match information
J. Hedman, L. Albinsson, L. Norén, R. Ansell 
False homozygosity at D12S391 locus: A case report
A. Verzeletti, V. Cortellini, S. Cisana, S. Pretto, N. Cerri, F
Timothy J. Verdon, Kaye N. Ballantyne, R. John Mitchell, Roland A. H
Efficient DNA extraction from hair shafts
A. M. López-Parra, E. Fernández, C. Baeza, C. Gamba, M. Tirado, L
Evaluating DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for dropin, dropout and stutters  Roberto Puch-Solis  Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement.
Analysis of forensic samples in Banco Nacional de Datos Genéticos
Introducing a latent variable approach for finding populations in a forensic DNA database  Maarten Kruijver  Forensic Science International: Genetics.
Determination of siblings: A special case report from Halle
C.J. Bruijning-van Dongen, K. Slooten, W. Burgers, W. Wiegerinck 
Direct STR typing from bullet casings
N. Scaramozzino, P. Terrenoire, L. Baron 
Testing the behavior of GlobalFiler® PCR amplification kit with degraded and/or inhibited biological samples  V. Bogas, M. Carvalho, F. Corte-Real, M.J.
M. Hara, T. Masuda, A. Takada, T. Miyazaki, H. Suzuki, A. Kido, K
Comparison and optimization of DNA recovery from sperm vs
Semen detection: A retrospective overview from 2010
Application of less primer method to commercial kits
DNA persistance in soft tissues exposed to extreme environments
Eye colour and SNPs in Danes
S. Iyavoo, S. Hadi, W. Goodwin 
Kpop: A Python package for population genetics analysis
DNA recovery from a 44-year old umbilical cord
Monique Wesselink, Irene Kuiper 
Effects of the most common methods for the enhancement of latent fingerprints on DNA extraction from forensic samples  S. Gino, M. Omedei  Forensic Science.
Improved performance for forensic casework: Extraction and isolation updates for the Maxwell® 16 instrument  M. Lindner, P.V. Mandrekar, J. Bessetti,
Genetic data for the locus SE33 in a Southern Italy population with AmpFlSTR NGM SElect™ PCR amplification kit  A. Barbaro, P. Cormaci, A. La Marca  Forensic.
Development of a 24-plex Y chromosomal STR loci typing system
Statistical aspects of familial searching
L. Zha, L.B. Yun, H.B. Luo, J. Yan, Y.P. Hou 
First application of the Investigator DIPplex indels typing kit for the analysis of ancient DNA samples  C. Hollard, F. Mendisco, C. Keyser, E. Crubézy,
Validation of the MiniFiler™ Kit in archaeological samples
Discrepancies between forensic DNA databases
A.M. Ölçen, G. Filoğlu, H. Altunçul, S. Erdem, Ö. Bülbül 
Presentation transcript:

Statistical evaluation of pre-laboratory and laboratory factors that influence DNA recovery from archaeological material  Cristina Gamba, Eva Fernández, Ana María López-Parra, Eduardo Arroyo-Pardo  Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series  Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages e109-e110 (December 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.08.054 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 (a) Amplification efficiency vs archaeological site. (b) Replication efficiency vs extraction method. (c) Extracts inhibition power vs extraction method (N.I.=no inhibition, P.I.=partial inhibition, T.I.=total inhibition). (d) Extracts inhibition power vs the silica-based extraction method. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2011 3, e109-e110DOI: (10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.08.054) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.