Do the Side Effects of BRAF Inhibitors Mimic RASopathies?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation 1 Phase III Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial (BRIM3) Comparing BRAF Inhibitor.
Advertisements

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as initial therapy for non- small cell lung cancer: Focus on epidermal growth factor receptor.
Functional role of Pak1/Erk signaling in Rac-related diseases Daniela Araiza-Olivera, Jennifer Rhodes, and Jonathan Chernoff FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER, 333.
Advances in Molecular Biology of Lung Disease
Targeted therapy in melanoma
MAPK pathway inhibitors.
Christian Posch, Brian D
Detection and Monitoring of the BRAF Mutation in Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA in BRAF-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma  Nicolas Guibert,
Phosphoproteomic Analyses of NRAS(G12) and NRAS(Q61) Mutant Melanocytes Reveal Increased CK2α Kinase Levels in NRAS(Q61) Mutant Cells  Christian Posch,
Genetic Profiling of BRAF Inhibitor–Induced Keratoacanthomas Reveals No Induction of MAP Kinase Pathway Expression  Rajan P. Kulkarni, Seema Plaisier,
Latest Advances in Chemotherapeutic, Targeted, and Immune Approaches in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma  Darshil J. Shah, MD, MPH, Roxana S. Dronca,
P90RSK Blockade Inhibits Dual BRAF and MEK Inhibitor-Resistant Melanoma by Targeting Protein Synthesis  Nicholas Theodosakis, Goran Micevic, Casey G.
Young H. Lim, Jonathan M. Fisher, Marcus W. Bosenberg, Keith A
Jack L. Arbiser, Michael Y. Bonner 
Oncogenic B-Raf mutations
Charles H. Adelmann, Kimberly A. Truong, Roger J
Braf-MUTATION POSITIVE melanoma: a case conference
Targeted Therapies in Melanoma: Translational Research at Its Finest
Pedram Gerami, Amy S. Paller  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Activity Goals. Activity Goals Program Overview.
On the TRAIL to Overcome BRAF-Inhibitor Resistance
Andrzej T. Slominski, MD, PhD  Mayo Clinic Proceedings 
Schematic view of Trk receptors signalling, showing the three major pathways involved in cell differentiation and survival. Schematic view of Trk receptors.
A genome-based strategy uncovers frequent BRAF mutations in melanoma
William E. Lowry, Aimee Flores, Andrew C. White 
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nonoverlapping Clinical and Mutational Patterns in Melanomas from the Female Genital Tract and Atypical Genital Nevi  Oriol Yélamos, Emily A. Merkel,
XL888 Limits Vemurafenib-Induced Proliferative Skin Events by Suppressing Paradoxical MAPK Activation  Manali Phadke, Geoffrey T. Gibney, Carolyn J. Rich,
Maria Rosaria Mollo, Dario Antonini, Luisa Cirillo, Caterina Missero 
Pablo Uribe, Leonardo Andrade, Sergio Gonzalez 
Ha Linh Vu, Sheera Rosenbaum, Claudia Capparelli, Timothy J
Keratinocyte Apoptosis in Epidermal Development and Disease
Opioids and neovascularization; pro or anti?
Kavitha Gowrishankar, Stephanie Snoyman, Gulietta M. Pupo, Therese M
TIGIT-CD155 Interactions in Melanoma: A Novel Co-Inhibitory Pathway with Potential for Clinical Intervention  Karsten Mahnke, Alexander H. Enk  Journal.
Melanoma: New Insights and New Therapies
Kyu-Seon Oh, Steffen Emmert, Deborah Tamura, John J
RASopathy Gene Mutations in Melanoma
Keiran S.M. Smalley  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
BRAF Alterations as Therapeutic Targets in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Searching for the Chokehold of NRAS Mutant Melanoma
Mutational Analysis of BRAF Inhibitor–Associated Squamoproliferative Lesions  Britt Clynick, Tania Tabone, Kathryn Fuller, Wendy Erber, Katie Meehan, Michael.
Joanne E. Sordillo, Peter Kraft, Ann Chen Wu, Maryam M. Asgari 
The BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib Enhances UV-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis in Beta HPV38 E6 and E7 Transgenic Mice  Daniele Viarisio, Karin Müller-Decker,
Novel Mutations Involving NF-κB and B-Cell Signaling Pathways in Primary Cutaneous Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Leg-Type and Comparison with Sézary Syndrome 
Heather C. Etchevers  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Global Patterns of Methylation in Sézary Syndrome Provide Insight into the Role of Epigenetics in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma  Sean Whittaker  Journal of.
The RAF Inhibitor Paradox Revisited
Yao Zhan, Michael S. Dahabieh, Arjuna Rajakumar, Monica C
Scott A. Elman, James H. Ware, Alice B. Gottlieb, Joseph F. Merola 
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Geraldine O’Sullivan Coyne, Therese S. Woodring, Chyi-Chia R
Cis-Urocanic Acid Enhances Prostaglandin E2 Release and Apoptotic Cell Death via Reactive Oxygen Species in Human Keratinocytes  Kazuyo Kaneko, Susan.
The RAS/MAPK Axis Gets Stressed Out
Bryan K. Sun, Andrea Saggini, Kavita Y
Research Techniques Made Simple: Itch Measurement in Clinical Trials
Newly Discovered Olfactory Receptors in Epidermal Keratinocytes Are Associated with Proliferation, Migration, and Re-Epithelialization of Keratinocytes 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Phenotypic Characterization of Nevus and Tumor Patterns in MITF E318K Mutation Carrier Melanoma Patients  Richard A. Sturm, Carly Fox, Phil McClenahan,
Jack L. Arbiser  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Simon Ekman, MD, PhD, Murry W. Wynes, PhD, Fred R. Hirsch, MD, PhD 
Prospective Clinical Trial Registration
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signalling pathway.
Molecular Characterization of Acquired Resistance to the BRAF Inhibitor Dabrafenib in a Patient with BRAF-Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer  Charles M.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway showing mutations identified in pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH). The mitogen-activated.
Mutant BRAF Melanomas—Dependence and Resistance
c-Raf in KRas Mutant Cancers: A Moving Target
Regulation of signaling by wild-type and oncogenic Ras.
Four classes of agents that can be used to treat multiple myeloma.
Presentation transcript:

Do the Side Effects of BRAF Inhibitors Mimic RASopathies? Alicia Sfecci, Alain Dupuy, Monica Dinulescu, Catherine Droitcourt, Henri Adamski, Smail Hadj-Rabia, Sylvie Odent, Marie-Dominique Galibert, Lise Boussemart  Journal of Investigative Dermatology  Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages 805-809 (April 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.12.012 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Clinical similarities between vemurafenib side effects and RASopathic phenotypes. Photographs of a 76-year-old female patient taken before (a, full face) and after 4 months of vemurafenib treatment (b, profile), compared with full-face (h) and profile (i) photographs of a 17-year-old male patient affected by cardiofaciocutaneous (CFC) syndrome with an MAP2K1 D67N germline mutation. Both patients have a partial alopecia affecting the scalp and especially the eyebrows and eyelashes. (c–g) Pictures of the same 76-year-old patient undergoing vemurafenib treatment as compared with pictures of patients with RASopathy (h–n). Note the dark brown monomorphous nevi (c, anterior part of the thighs of the vemurafenib-treated patient; j, anterior part of the trunk of a patient with Noonan syndrome, with a BRAF germline mutation) and the hyperkeratotic follicular papules on the trunk and limbs (d, right part of the trunk of the vemurafenib-treated patient; k, external part of the left arm of a patient with CFC syndrome, with a BRAF germline mutation). Also note the numerous secondary papillomas developed by the vemurafenib-treated patient (e, anterior part of the neck; f, superior part of the back) as compared with verruciform papillomas seen in adults with Costello syndrome harboring an HRAS germline mutation (l, nose and upper lip; m, forehead). Likewise, a similar yellowish hyperkeratosis of areas of pressure of the soles may be seen with the vemurafenib-treated patient (g) and the patient with HRAS mutant Costello syndrome (n). Patients gave their written permission to publish their images. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2017 137, 805-809DOI: (10.1016/j.jid.2016.12.012) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cutaneous side effects reported in large clinical trials of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma. Graph showing the proportion (%) of patients affected by cutaneous side effects under BRAF inhibitors alone (vemurafenib or dabrafenib, dark or light blue, respectively) or in combination with MEK inhibitors (cobimetinib or trametinib, dark or light red, respectively) in large clinical trials (dabrafenib vs. dabrafenib + trametinib: COMBI-D trial, Long et al., 2015; vemurafenib: BRIM3 trial, McArthur et al., 2014; vemurafenib + cobimetinib: BRIM7 trial, Ribas et al., 2014). KA, keratoacanthoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2017 137, 805-809DOI: (10.1016/j.jid.2016.12.012) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Model depicting the mechanism of action of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF V600E versus BRAFwt cells. Model depicting the mechanism of action of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF V600E versus BRAFwt cells. Unlike the expected inhibition of the MAPK pathway in BRAF V600E cells (a), drug binding increases wild-type RAF isoform heterodimer formation and leads to increased ERK phosphorylation in BRAFwt cells (b), as seen in RASopathies (c). In both RASopathic cells and BRAF inhibitor-exposed BRAFwt cells, MEK inhibitors have the potential to block the downstream activation of the MAPK pathway. *, activating mutation; CFC, cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome; CRAF, v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog C; CS, Costello syndrome; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GDP, guanosine diphosphate; GTP, guanosine triphosphate; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NS, Noonan syndrome; P, phosphorylation; RAF, v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene; RAS, rat sarcoma viral oncogene. Bracketed proteins indicate the possible mutant proteins within the MAPK pathway for each syndrome. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2017 137, 805-809DOI: (10.1016/j.jid.2016.12.012) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions