Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, New York NROW XIX – 7 November 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 4 Sep 2011 Tornado in Eastern New York: An Example for Updating Tornado Warning Strategies Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, NY NROW XIII 2-3 November.
Advertisements

Identifying key features to predict significant severe weather outbreaks in the northeastern U.S. Neil A. Stuart NOAA/NWS Albany NY NROW XIII 3 November.
WSR-88D Signatures Associated with One Inch Hail in the Southern Plains Dennis E. Cavanaugh Jessica A. Schultz National Weather Service Weather Forecast.
Anomalous Velocity Signatures in Low Level Super Resolution Data.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Severe Weather Radar Features. Weak Echo Region (WER) Region of low radar reflectivities on inflow side of storm o Near the surface High reflectivities.
Correlations Between Observed Snowfall and NAM Forecast Parameters : Part 2 – Thermodynamic Considerations Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS Binghamton,
Northeast Convective Flash Floods: Helping Forecasters Stay Ahead of Rising Water Joe Villani - National Weather Service, Albany, NY Derek Mallia - University.
Thunderstorm Forecasting in NYC Christina Speciale, Rutgers University Dr. Steven Decker, Rutgers University Brandon Hertell, Consolidated Edison.
Mike Evans NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY Barry Lambert NOAA/NWS State College, Pa.
A Case Study of the August 25, 2007 Severe Weather Event in Eastern New York and Western New England Brian J. Frugis NWS WFO Albany, New York.
Preparing for a “Change” in Severe Hail Warning Criteria in 2010 Brian J. Frugis NWS WFO Albany, NY NROW XI November 4-5, 2009.
The Father’s Day 2002 Severe Weather Outbreak across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS WFO at Albany.
The August 9, 2001 Lake Breeze Severe Weather Event Across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS WFO at Albany.
6/26/2015 RUC Convective Parameters and Upscale Events in Southern Ontario Mike Leduc Environment Canada.
An Examination of the Tropical System – Induced Flooding in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania in 2004.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
A Storm-Scale Analysis of the 16 June 2008 Significant Severe Weather Event across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS at Albany.
The 4 August 2004 Central Pennsylvania Severe Weather Event – Environmental and Topographical Influences on Storm Structure Evolution Joe Villani NOAA/NWS,
Forecasting Convection An overview of how radar can help in the forecast process. Presentation to MSC radar course, March 24, 2010 By James Cummine, Lead.
Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS.
Severe Weather Operations. Severe Weather Staffing (Positions in orange are minimum needed) Severe Weather Coordinator – oversees the operations of the.
Reanalysis of Southern New England Tornadoes To Improve Warning Verification Daniel Brook, Lyndon State College* Joseph DelliCarpini, NOAA/NWS Taunton,
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office – Taunton, MA (BOX)
SYNOPTIC METEOROLOGY LABORATORY The Dallas and Fort Worth Storms of May 5, 1995 Storms of May 5, 1995 BY: Brent Crisp, Phil Grigsby, Thomas Jones, Devon.
The Inland Extent of Lake- Effect Snow (LES) Bands Joe Villani NOAA/NWS Albany, NY Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY Jason Krekeler State.
TOP CWA Golf Ball Size Hail Study Bill Gargan WFO TOP, KS.
Chad Entremont Daniel Lamb NWS Jackson, MS
Northeast Convective Flash Floods: Helping Forecasters Stay Ahead of Rising Water Joe Villani - National Weather Service, Albany, NY Derek Mallia - University.
Updated Radar-Based Techniques for Tornado Warning Guidance in the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis & Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS Albany, New York.
Analyzing the Roles of Low-Level Forcing and Instability in Significant Severe Weather Outbreaks in the Eastern United States Neil A. Stuart NOAA/NWS Albany.
WFO Huntsville, Alabama A Review of the North Alabama Violent Tornado Outbreak February 6, 2008 Brian Carcione & David Nadler NWS Huntsville, Alabama.
Curious Precipitation Curtains within the Inflow Region of a Supercell Thunderstorm: A Status Report Rodger A. Brown NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory,
An Examination of “Parallel” and “Transition” Severe Weather/Flash Flood Events Kyle J. Pallozzi and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental.
BP-31 Updated Radar-Based Techniques for Tornado Warning Guidance in the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis and Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/National.
Tornado Warning Skill as a Function of Environment National Weather Service Sub-Regional Workshop Binghamton, New York September 23, 2015 Yvette Richardson.
A Review of the March 28, 2007 Tornado Event Teresa Keck NWS North Platte, Nebraska Courtesy of Mike Hollingshead.
The July 19, 2015 “Non Severe” Event in Southern New England What Happened? NROW XVI – November, 2015 Frank Nocera NOAA/NWS Taunton MA.
A Case Study of Two Left-Moving Mesoanticyclonic Supercells on 24 April 2006 Chris Bowman National Weather Service – Wichita, KS.
A Rare Severe Weather and Tornado Event in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania: July 8, 2014 Presented by Mike Evans 1.
*Special Webinar* Severe Storms Likely This Afternoon through Early Wednesday Tuesday February 23, 2016 Please MUTE Your Lines! *6 to Mute #6 to Unmute.
Twenty-Three Foot Waves on Lake Michigan! Examining Storm Events on the Lake Mike Bardou and Kevin Birk Courtesy Mike Bardou.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Mobile - Pensacola Special Briefing Tropical Storm Lee Special Briefing Tropical Storm Lee 1030 AM CDT.
Warning system Alerts people when a storm is coming WSR-88D: World wide service radar that report storms with hail 1 inch or larger in diameter Lightning.
WSR - 88D Characteristics of Significant Tornadoes in New York and New England Lance Franck University of Massachusetts Hayden Frank NOAA/NWS/Weather.
The 22 May 2014 Duanesburg, NY, Tornadic Supercell
Severe Thunderstorm Wind Damage Criteria – Is it time for a change?
Thunderstorms Spring 2016 Kyle Imhoff.
Paper Review Jennie Bukowski ATS APR-2017
AOS 100: Weather and Climate
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Mobile / Pensacola
Pamela Eck, Brian Tang, and Lance Bosart University at Albany, SUNY
The November 26, 2014 banded snowfall case in southern NY
Zdr/Kdp Behavior in Potentially Tornadic Storms
Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. and Christopher Gitro
CAE Tornado Cases Hunter Coleman Anthony Petrolito Michael Cammarata
Hiding under a freeway overpass will protect me from a tornado.
Northeast Regional Operational Workshop XVII 3 November 2016
Bow Echo Workshop March 2017
An Investigation of the 26 July 2006 Downburst near Spearville, Kansas
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
Zdr/Kdp Behavior in Potentially Tornadic Storms
VERIFICATION – DAY CLD: 6.5/10.
Genesis and Morphology of the Alberta Dryline
Outline Large-scale / meso-scale pattern Precipitation type forecasts
William Flamholtz, Brian Tang, and Lance Bosart
Improving Tornado Detection and
Differences Between High Shear / Low CAPE Environments in the Northeast US Favoring Straight-Line Damaging Winds vs Tornadoes Michael E. Main, Ross A.
Brian J. Frugis and Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS Albany, New York
Using WSR-88D Reflectivity for the Prediction of Cloud-to-ground Lightning: A Central North Carolina Study A collaborative research project between NCSU.
Presentation transcript:

Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, New York NROW XIX – 7 November 2018 Using Specific Differential Phase to Predict Significant Severe Thunderstorm Wind Damage across the Northeastern United States Brian J. Frugis NOAA/NWS Albany, New York NROW XIX – 7 November 2018

Motivation Determining severe vs. significant severe thunderstorms can be difficult for a warning meteorologist. This has been a challenge for NWS Albany (ALY) forecasters on several occasions during the summers of 2016 & 2017. Several significant thunderstorms were either missed or under warned. Impact-based warnings requires the warning forecaster to have specific knowledge of wind speeds & damage potential for warning text/graphics. New technology and warning techniques being investigated in research need to be implemented into operations.

What is a Significant Severe Thunderstorm? SPC considers thunderstorms that produce wind gust of 65 kts (75 MPH), hail two inches in diameter or greater, and/or an EF2+ tornado to be significant For the purpose of this study, will also consider thunderstorms that produce injuries or deaths to be significant as well

Significant Severe Thunderstorm Climatology for Northeast* *For the purpose of this study, Northeast is considered New England, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, northeastern Maryland & Central and Eastern Pennsylvania

Significant Severe Wind vs. Tornadoes There were 261 significant severe wind reports in the Northeast between 2012 and 2017 and only 138 tornadic events of any strength (EF0+) reported in that same time.

WFO Albany: Percentage of Significant Events 2012 to 2017 Out of the 1423 severe wind reports received to WFO Albany between 2012 and 2017, only 46 (about 3%) were considered significant

Radar Limitations Always Need to Be Kept in Mind Images from NOAA/NWS Warning Decision Training Division (WDTD) Radar & Applications Course (RAC, formerly DLOC)

Beam Blockage from KENX Catskill Mountains south of KENX cause considerable beam blockage. This is an issue for storms that develop over the high terrain and then track eastward into the mid-Hudson Valley, as it may underestimate strength of storms headed towards populated areas around Kingston and Poughkeepsie.

Good Rule of Thumb from Warning Decision Training Division (WDTD) Radar and Applications Course (RAC), Topic 2, Lesson 7 “Radar Sampling Issues”

Radar Analysis of Significant Severe Thunderstorms Radar data from the Albany KENX WSR-88D was examined for the 46 thunderstorms that produced significant wind damage across the Albany WFO CWA from 2012 to 2017. Several radar-based parameters, such as storm type, radial velocity and Specific Differential Phase (KDP), were collected at the time of and just prior to the time of the damage report via GR2Analyst software.

Radial Velocity Analysis

Specific Differential Phase (KDP) Out of the 46 storms analyzed, 30 of them showed an elevated KDP column suspended aloft for several scans before the wind damage occurred. This KDP column collapsed towards the surface at the time of the wind damage report as a result of a wet microburst. Within the 30 times this was noted, 22 of those events were associated with supercell thunderstorms. The highest KDP value within the suspended column aloft averaged to be 7.6 deg/km within these thunderstorms & the median value was 7.0 deg/km.

Max KDP Height Over Time Typical Radar Volume Scan Lasts 4 to 6 minutes

Typical Radar Volume Scan Lasts 4 to 6 minutes Max KDP Value Over Time Typical Radar Volume Scan Lasts 4 to 6 minutes

Example of Lowering KDP Core 3 July 2014 over southern Herkimer County, New York Type of storm: Supercell Max KDP Value: 8.8 deg/km Significant damage occurred at 2014Z in hamlet of Jordanville. Elevated KDP core was seen at least 12 minutes before significant damage occurred

Descending KDP Column During a Squall Line Event KENX KDP Cross-section 13 Aug 2016 2214Z KENX KDP Cross-section 13 Aug 2016 2220Z KENX KDP Cross-section 13 Aug 2016 2226Z Cross-section of KDP from KENX show the elevated KDP column falling down to the surface on 13 August 2016 thanks to a strong microburst within a severe squall line. Significant damage occurred at 2225Z at the Pine Lake Campground in the town of Caroga in Fulton County, New York. The max value of the KDP within the elevated column was around 5.6 deg/km.

KDP vs. Z A comparison of vertical cross-sections of KDP and Z from 30 June 2017 at 2016Z near Ravena, NY. This storm would go on to produce significant damage in South Schodack, NY at 2028Z. The elevated KDP core was around 8 deg/km around 10,000 ft. The KDP core aloft is easier to pick out for a warning forecaster compared to the broad area of 50+ dBZ within the Z cross-section.

Use During Warning Process While a warning forecaster is interrogating other base data products, they can look for building columns of KDP within a thunderstorm. If values appear to remain elevated and reach critical values (around 6 deg/km based off this study), a warning decision forecaster can anticipate an increased chance for significant damage when this column collapses towards the surface. While base velocity can have its flaws based on beam angle and direction, KDP columns can help alleviate this limitation. Still, inherent issues with beam width and terrain blockage will cause issues when evaluating KDP as well. In addition, storms that contain large hail may not always show KDP columns, as KDP is not plotted when associated with low values of correlation coefficient (<0.90).

Other Considerations & Future Work The depth of the mixing layer was measured to see if high cores of KDP above this layer were able to still make it to the surface Mixing layer depth varied considerably from 1000 ft to 9000 ft Having a small mixed layer did not prevent high KDP cores from making it down to the surface Low level lapse rates within the mixed layer were typically rather steep Average values were 10°/km (basically dry adiabatic) Null cases will need to be examined to see how often high KDP cores don’t make it down to the surface and why that may be the case

Summary Significant severe thunderstorms do occur over the Northeastern United States, with significant wind damage being the highest threat. Determining if a severe thunderstorm will produce significant damage can be difficult at times for warning forecasters to pick out based on radial (pure) velocity alone. Knowing how strong a thunderstorm will be is valuable information for impact-based warnings. Radar limitations (beam blockage, larger angles, distance from RDA) can all have an impact on the quality of radar data and need to be kept in mind during warning decisions.

Summary Watching for collapsing KDP columns may be helpful during the warning process, especially within supercells with elevated KDP values of greater than 6.5 to 7 deg/km. This feature has been seen mostly in supercells, but also has some potential in squall line cases as well. Additional cases, including null cases, will need to be examined over the next few years to fully learn the utility of these items.

Questions? Brian.Frugis@noaa.gov