Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Westinghouse Owners Group Risk-Informed Repair and Replacement – Implementation of 10 CFR Twelfth International Conference on Nuclear Engineering.
Advertisements

Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
The 2002 Davis Besse Event and Safety Culture Policy at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Stephanie Morrow, Ph.D. Safety Culture Program Manager Office.
ANS RESPONSE TO FUKUSHIMA LESSONS LEARNED Presented to: NESCC November 29, 2012 Washington D.C. Donald J. Spellman, Chair ANS Standards Board American.
1 Generic Safety Issue (GSI) 191 Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Sump Performance Presented by: Donnie Harrison Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Presented.
Cumulative Impacts James Slider November 7, 2013.
Debris Effects in Long-Term Post-LOCA PWR Cooling
SPONSOR of 4R Nutrient Stewardship Program. The Nature Conservancy Teaming with the Florida agriculture industry to increase farmer profitability and.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Managing Risk to Reduce Construction Claims (And Improve Project Success) Presented by Laurie Dennis, PE, CVS-Life, FSAVE.
Purpose of the Standards
1 © 2013 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 David Cliff UK Licensing Manager AP1000 Westinghouse.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
GSI-191 Status and Lessons Learned Presented by: Donnie Harrison Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presented at:
PWR Owners Group Post-Accident Chemical Effects Work NEI Chemistry Meeting, January 26, 2012.
Westinghouse Perspective on New Reactor Sumps
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
普 华 永 道 Phase 1: Project Preparation Phase 1: Project Preparation Phase Overview Phase Overview.
1 Current Issues in Siting Safety Reviews Michelle Hart, Sr. Reactor Engineer Division of Site and Environmental Reviews NRC Regulatory Information Conference.
1 NEI Process Discussion. 2 Topics for Discussion Relationship to NFPA 805 Relationship to Regulatory Guide Technical Process currently in NEI
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20 th, 2015 | New Orleans, LA API RP 1175 Pipeline Leak Detection Program Management – New RP Highlights.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Proposed Fire Risk Meter Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
ECCS Operability Determination Jim Andrachek Fellow Engineer Westinghouse Electric Company.
Option 2b Template Example Phillip Grissom – Southern Nuclear Based on Vogtle (more or less)
Option 2a Template Example Phillip Grissom – Southern Nuclear Based on Farley (more or less)
Closure Option 1 GSI-191 Workshop October 18-19,2012.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC’s Risk-Informed and Performance- Based Approach to Decommissioning DOE Workshop on Risk-Based End States.
SNC Severe Accident Management NEI Workshop 4/5/12 David Gambrell – Director, Severe Accident Management
Response to NRC Information Requests for NTTF Recommendation 9.3 Sue Perkins-Grew Director, Emergency Preparedness NEI.
The Art of delivering before time and within budget
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
Application Outsourcing: Achieving Success & Avoiding Risk
Defense-in-Depth and Mitigative Measures
Delivering Risk Informed Engineering Programs (50.69) The OG Plan
Joe Bellini, Exelon Drew Miller Exelon April 6, 2012
Industry Guidance on Part 21 Evaluation and Reporting
Introduction to OVAL to SACM Info Model Paper
ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar
Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group
Description of Revision
PWROG Comprehensive Closure Plan
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Fix it or Forget it? Dealing with Troubled Projects
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Bypass Testing Paul Leonard.
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Research and Test Reactor Safety: The Regulatory Perspective
BEPU and Safety Margins in Nuclear Reactor Safety
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Project Management Process Groups
Safety Management System Implementation
NRC Update of LLW Emerging Issues
PWR Sump Performance (GSI-191) Industry Workshop
RESOLUTION OF GENERIC SAFETY ISSUE 191
Risk-Informing In-Vessel Effects
Statewide Public Communications Services RFP#
PWR Sump Performance (GSI-191) Workshop
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
Executive Project Kickoff
RESOLUTION OF GENERIC SAFETY ISSUE 191
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Perspective on GSI-191 Closure Introduction of the PWROG GSI-191 Comprehensive Closure Program Jeff Brown Chairman PWROG SEESC

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Introduction PWROG Mission PWROG Perspective on GSI-191 PWROG Program and Objectives In-vessel Deterministic Program Overview Additional Support for Issue Closure Definition of Success Requirements for Success Limitations and Constraints Summary Technical Program Details – WEC / Areva

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Introduction Greetings Thanks to… NEI PWR industry Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group PWROG Mission Overarching mission Support generation of safe and reliable power Effective regulatory interface

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group PWROG Perspective on GSI-191 Outstanding issue – closure required Important that GSI‐191 be resolved in a manner that provides a stable resolution Plants are safe All aspects of ECCS performance have been addressed with the exception of in-vessel effects (fuel) Evolving technical issues and complex phenomena have resulted in extended resolution time and conservative results (15 g/FA)

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group PWROG Perspective on GSI-191 Need for a “holistic” approach based on scientific process for the revised deterministic program Balance needed between closure timeframe and necessary time to complete technically defensible, reasonable limit for in-vessel fiber

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group PWROG Program and Objectives PWROG technical support for the NEI GSI-191 resolution program “Tiger” Team assembled to provide technical guidance for closure program development and execution Industry representatives NSSS Vendors Other advisors and consultants

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group PWROG Program and Objectives Overall Program Objectives Establish range of fiber acceptance limits and applicability criteria for utility assessment toward plant specific goals for closure by deterministic methods Program to improve upon WCAP 16793 Revision 2 results (15 g/FA) applicable to all plants Support risk informed closure methods Assist in closure process

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group PWROG Program and Objectives Program Defined “Concept for Closure” PWROG Projects (“PAs”) PA-SEE-1090 – Deterministic in-vessel fiber test program PA-SEE-1072 – Boric acid precipitation PA-SEE-0872 – General support PA-SEE-1088 – Independent third-party review (I3PR)

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group In-Vessel Deterministic Program Overview (Option 2 “A”) A revised (holistic) approach Lessons learned Little margin available through additional “head loss” testing Significant increase above WCAP 16793 limit of 15 g/FA not expected Actual cooling flow requirements are significantly less than maximum ECCS Timing and precipitation form are key ACRS concerns

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group In-Vessel Deterministic Program Overview Long term core cooling – 10CFR50.46 Establish required flow conditions to ensure long term core cooling LOCA analysis models Integrated system analysis Assess boric acid precipitation (BAP) Build the fiber bed (coupled with BAP) Characterize fibrous debris and by-pass process Establish prototypical chemical precipitation conditions Address appropriate water chemistry for testing

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group In-Vessel Deterministic Program Overview Program considerations Diverse expertise Tiger Team NSSS vendors and research labs Utility experts and consultants Coordination with STPNOC RI effort Screen by-pass testing Water chemistry testing

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group In-Vessel Deterministic Program Overview I3PR Bench-top Testing ECCS / LOCA Analysis PIRT (In-vessel fiber /BAP) Program Test Plan Challenge Board Final Test Plan WCAP

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Additional Support for Issue Closure PWROG support for alternative closure options SECY 12-0093 Option 3 “Designed Mitigation” approach? Additional support for: NEI submittal template development Operability guidance (Option 1 plants) Defense in depth and mitigating strategies

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Definition of Success In-vessel deterministic program Establish range of options for utilities to determine conditions to satisfy LTCC and minimize overall impact on cost and dose Enhance margins for future design changes and or operability evaluations Industry and NRC alignment Development and execution of alternative programs based on industry need

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Requirements for Success “Work”shop Communication Industry NRC Industry (utility) support for PWROG programs Surveys (get them in)

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Limitations and Constraints PWROG in-vessel deterministic program schedule alignment with Option 2A (SECY 12-0093) PWROG budget Post-Fukushima program support

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Summary Stable resolution of GSI-191 needed Revised PWROG program to address in-vessel fiber in support of utility closeout Complex phenomena, but program based on ensuring LTCC – range of options PWROG and Tiger Team to support alternative closure options based on utility needs Alignment between industry (PWROG) and NRC is key to success Communications Industry (utility) support for PWROG programs

Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group Technical Program Details WEC Tim Croyle James Spring Areva Gordon Wissinger