Modifying Gravity to Reduce the

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational constraints on primordial perturbations Antony Lewis CITA, Toronto
Advertisements

Observational constraints and cosmological parameters
Primordial perturbations and precision cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background Antony Lewis CITA, University of Toronto
Constraining Inflation Histories with the CMB & Large Scale Structure Dynamical & Resolution Trajectories for Inflation then & now Dick Bond.
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Cosmic Microwave Background & Primordial Gravitational Waves Jun-Qing Xia Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, IHEP Planck Member CHEP, PKU, April.
Curvature Perturbations from a Non-minimally Coupled Vector Boson Field Mindaugas Karčiauskas work done with Konstantinos Dimopoulos Mindaugas Karčiauskas.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles: Isolating the Evolution of the BAO Peak with Power-law Initial Conditions Chris Orban (OSU Physics) with David Weinberg.
Falsifying Paradigms for Cosmic Acceleration Michael Mortonson Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago January 22, 2009.
Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?
1 Latest Measurements in Cosmology and their Implications Λ. Περιβολαρόπουλος Φυσικό Τμήμα Παν/μιο Κρήτης και Ινστιτούτο Πυρηνικής Φυσικής Κέντρο Ερευνών.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, Karčiauskas, JHEP 07, 119 (2008) Dimopoulos,
The CMB and Neutrinos. We can all measure the CMB T CMB = \ K CMB approx 1% of TV noise! 400 photons/cc at 0.28 eV/cc.
Inflationary Freedom and Cosmological Neutrino Constraints Roland de Putter JPL/Caltech CosKASI 4/16/2014.
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Peter Holrick and Roman Werpachowski.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
Confronting theory with observations workshop, NBIA, Copenhagen, August 18, Analysing the CMB in a model-independent manner Syksy Räsänen University.
1 Edmund Bertschinger MIT Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research Testing Gravity on Large Scales Dekel 1994 Ann.
Cosmology from CMB Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the.
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 1 the standard model Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
The anisotropic inflation and its imprints on the CMB Kyoto University Masaaki WATANABE Ref: MW, Sugumi Kanno, and Jiro Soda [1] 2009, arXiv:
Relic Neutrinos, thermal axions and cosmology in early 2014 Elena Giusarma arXiv: Based on work in collaboration with: E. Di Valentino, M. Lattanzi,
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us.
Constraints on the neutrino mass by future precise CMB polarization and 21cm line observations Yoshihiko Oyama The Graduate University for Advanced Studies.
Probing fundamental physics with CMB B-modes Cora Dvorkin IAS Harvard (Hubble fellow) Status and Future of Inflationary Theory workshop August 2014, KICP.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
Cosmology : Cosmic Microwave Background & Large scale structure & Large scale structure Cosmology : Cosmic Microwave Background & Large scale structure.
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Interpreting Dark Energy JDEM constraints.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity collaborated with Elcio Abdalla.
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
 Acceleration of Universe  Background level  Evolution of expansion: H(a), w(a)  degeneracy: DE & MG  Perturbation level  Evolution of inhomogeneity:
The Pursuit of primordial non-Gaussianity in the galaxy bispectrum and galaxy-galaxy, galaxy CMB weak lensing Donghui Jeong Texas Cosmology Center and.
2010/09/27 Tokyo Univ. f(R) Modified Gravity Cosmological & Solar-System Tests Je-An Gu 顧哲安 臺灣大學梁次震宇宙學與粒子天文物理學研究中心 Leung Center for Cosmology.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Three theoretical issues in physical cosmology I. Nonlinear clustering II. Dark matter III. Dark energy J. Hwang (KNU), H. Noh (KASI)
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
Evolution of perturbations and cosmological constraints in decaying dark matter models with arbitrary decay mass products Shohei Aoyama Nagoya University.
Do consistent modified gravity models mimic General Relativity? S. Appleby, R. Battye. Talk based on arXiv:
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Neutrinos and Large-Scale Structure
Understanding the CMB Neutrino Isocurvature modes S. MUYA KASANDA School of Mathematical Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal Supervisor: Dr K. Moodley.
TBA TBA.
Jan Hamann Rencontres de Moriond (Cosmology) 21st March 2016
Observational Constraints on the Running Vacuum Model
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Mildly Mixed Coupled cosmological models
12th Marcel Grossman Meeting,
Hosted by LBL Cosmology Workshop
Searching for modified growth patterns with tomographic surveys
Olber’s Paradox The universe is expanding! Hubbles Law.
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
Cosmic Microwave Background
Coincidence Problem in Interacting Dark energy model
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Probing the Dark Sector
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
Ignacy Sawicki CEICO, Institute of Physics, Prague
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
“B-mode from space” workshop,
ν Are we close to measuring the neutrino hierarchy? Filipe B. Abdalla
Presentation transcript:

Modifying Gravity to Reduce the 𝐻 0 Tension Meng-Xiang Lin, Marco Raveri, Wayne Hu arXiv: 1810.02333 mxlin@uchicago.edu 2018.10.05 at H0 workshop

Motivation Current H0 tension between CMB and local H0 measurements Modified gravity is tested at late times Study modified gravity at early times

Parameterized Phenomenological MG Background: fixed to LCDM Perturbation: 𝑘 2 Φ=−4𝜋𝐺 𝑎 2 𝜌Δ 𝑘 2 Φ−Ψ =12𝜋𝐺 𝑎 2 𝜌+𝑃 𝜎 GR: 𝑘 2 Ψ=−4𝜋𝐺 𝑎 2 𝜇[𝜌Δ+3 𝜌+𝑃 𝜎] 𝑘 2 Φ−𝛾Ψ =12𝜋𝐺 𝑎 2 𝜇 𝜌+𝑃 𝜎 MG: (Hojjati et al. 2011) 𝜇(𝑎,𝑘): the effective strength of gravity (𝐺→𝜇𝐺) 𝛾 𝑎,𝑘 : difference between the gravitational effects on non-relativistic and relativistic matter

𝜇 ∞ =1.2: the value at beginning of the Universe 𝝁, 𝜸 in this work: Step function of time 𝑎 𝑇 : transition time (z=30) 𝜇 0 =1: the value today

Late time parameters: 𝝁 𝟎 , 𝜸 𝟎

Late time parameters: 𝝁 𝟎 , 𝜸 𝟎

Late time parameters: 𝝁 𝟎 , 𝜸 𝟎 It’s very hard to reduce the tension by only changing the lensing potential (by only modifying gravity at late times)

Early time parameter: 𝝁 ∞ Mention the axis —— 𝜇 ∞ =1.2 - - GR

Early time parameter: 𝝁 ∞ Mention the axis —— 𝜇 ∞ =1.2 - - GR

Early time parameter: 𝝁 ∞ Peak locations in GR 1: phase shift 2: driving effect 10

ΛCDM with CMBTT results: H 0 =67.26±0.99 km/s/Mpc μ ∞ with CMBTT results: H 0 =67.80±1.27 km/s/Mpc

split 𝐻 0 ≈70 km/s/Mpc

split 𝐻 0 ≈70 km/s/Mpc

μ ∞ with CMBtension results: H 0 =69.35±0.80 km/s/Mpc CMBall: CMBTT+CMBlens+CMBpol CMBtension: CMBall+H0+WL ΛCDM with CMBTT results: H 0 =67.26±0.99 km/s/Mpc μ ∞ with CMBTT results: H 0 =67.80±1.27 km/s/Mpc μ ∞ with CMBtension results: H 0 =69.35±0.80 km/s/Mpc μ ∞ >1 at 98% CL

μ ∞ with CMBtension results: H 0 =69.35±0.80 km/s/Mpc CMBtension: CMBall+H0+WL ALL: CMBtension+BAO+SN μ ∞ with CMBtension results: H 0 =69.35±0.80 km/s/Mpc μ ∞ >1 at 98% CL μ ∞ with ALL results: H 0 =68.57±0.50 km/s/Mpc μ ∞ >1 at 95% CL

Summary Ability to reduce H 0 tension: μ 0 + γ 0 YES NO μ ∞ NO? γ ∞ CMB TT CMB TT+ CMB Lensing CMB Lensing+ CMB polarization CMB polarization+ H0+WL H0+WL+ BAO+SN μ 0 + γ 0 YES NO μ ∞ NO? γ ∞

CMB anisotropy source functions in k-space

Shift on BAO peak

TE residual for 𝜇 ∞

Relation between lensing and 𝜎 8 𝑊𝐿 Ω 𝑚 0.5

Impact on lensing potential